Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2020; 12(1): 21-33
Published online Jan 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i1.21
Published online Jan 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i1.21
Table 1 Clinical characteristics according to objective response - target lesion response
| Variable | NR (n = 44) | RE (n = 141) | Total (n = 185) | P value |
| Gender (male), n (%) | 39 (88.6) | 118 (83.7) | 157 (84.9) | 0.424 |
| Age (yr), mean ± SD | 58.7 ± 9.2 | 57.4 ± 8.1 | 57.7 ± 8.4 | 0.3631 |
| BMI, mean ± SD | 27.2 ± 4.2 | 27 ± 4.8 | 27.1 ± 4.7 | 0.7171 |
| Systemic hypertension, n (%) | 19 (43.2) | 60 (42.6) | 79 (42.7) | 0.941 |
| DM, n (%) | 17 (38.6) | 46 (32.6) | 63 (34.1) | 0.463 |
| DLP, n (%) | 1 (2.3) | 9 (6.4) | 10 (5.4) | 0.4562 |
| Smoker (%) | 12 (27.3) | 28 (19.9) | 40 (21.6) | 0.297 |
| Coagulopathy3, 4, n (%) | 21 (47.7) | 63 (44.7) | 84 (45.4) | 0.723 |
| Thrombocitopenia5, n (%) | 28 (63.6) | 93 (66) | 121 (65.4) | 0.778 |
| CHILD, n (%) | 0.7056 | |||
| A | 19 (45.2) | 72 (52.6) | 91 (50.8) | |
| B | 20 (47.6) | 56 (40.9) | 76 (42.5) | |
| C | 3 (7.1) | 9 (6.6) | 12 (6.7) | |
| MELD, mean ± SD | 12.1 ± 3.5 | 11.9 ± 3.5 | 12 ± 3.5 | 0.6051 |
| Downstaging7 - Milan Criteria, n (%) | 9 (20.5) | 45 (31.9) | 54 (29.2) | 0.144 |
| Multinodular HCC, n (%) | 19 (43.2) | 68 (48.2) | 87 (47) | 0.558 |
Table 2 Pre procedure laboratory characteristics according to objective response - target lesion response (mRECIST)
| Variable | NR (n = 44) | RE (n = 141) | Total (n = 185) | P value |
| Hb (g/dL) | 12.9 ± 2.5 | 12.9 ± 2 | 12.9 ± 2.1 | 0.6671 |
| Ht (%) | 37.1 ± 6.7 | 37.4 ± 5.6 | 37.3 ± 5.9 | 0.8621 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.95 ± 0.81 | 0.92 ± 0.86 | 0.93 ± 0.84 | 0.4591 |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.43 ± 0.53 | 3.34 ± 0.55 | 3.37 ± 0.54 | 0.5751 |
| Alphafetoprotein (UI/mL) | 200.3 ± 463 | 435.1 ± 2307.2 | 379.3 ± 2027.7 | 0.3201 |
| Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.73 ± 0.49 | 0.65 ± 0.41 | 0.67 ± 0.43 | 0.6481 |
| Indirec bilirubina (mg/dL) | 1.43 ± 0.87 | 1.14 ± 0.71 | 1.21 ± 0.76 | 0.0501 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 1.9 ± 1.11 | 1.78 ± 0.89 | 1.81 ± 0.94 | 0.8421 |
| INR | 1.31 ± 0.19 | 1.31 ± 0.21 | 1.31 ± 0.2 | 0.7781 |
| Platelets (x 103/mm3) | 85 ± 42.9 | 91.7 ± 54.8 | 90.1 ± 52.1 | 0.8101 |
| AST (U/L) | 87 ± 68.1 | 84.4 ± 59 | 85.1 ± 61.3 | 0.8421 |
| ALT (U/L) | 71.4 ± 52.4 | 71.5 ± 49.7 | 71.5 ± 50.2 | 0.8251 |
Table 3 Intraoperative information according to objective response - target lesion response (mRECIST)
Table 4 Characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma according to objective response - nodule-based analysis (mRECIST)
| Variable | NR (n = 93) | RE (n = 205) | Total (n = 298) | P value |
| Preoperative | ||||
| HCC diameter (cm) | 2.2 (1; 8.5) | 2.7 (1.1; 8) | 2.5 (1; 8.5) | < 0.0011 |
| Liver segment2, n (%) | 0.9613 | |||
| 1 | 2 (2.2) | 4 (2) | 6 (2) | |
| 2 | 8 (8.6) | 24 (11.7) | 32 (10.7) | |
| 3 | 5 (5.4) | 15 (7.3) | 20 (6.7) | |
| 4 | 10 (10.8) | 18 (8.8) | 28 (9.4) | |
| 5 | 9 (9.7) | 23 (11.2) | 32 (10.7) | |
| 6 | 19 (20.4) | 35 (17.1) | 54 (18.1) | |
| 7 | 23 (24.7) | 46 (22.4) | 69 (23.2) | |
| 8 | 17 (18.3) | 40 (19.5) | 57 (19.1) | |
| Pseudocapsule, n (%) | 47 (50.5) | 149 (72.7) | 196 (65.8) | < 0.001 |
| Intraoperative | ||||
| Chemoembolic dosis (mg) | 11.4 (1.5; 50) | 22.5 (2.4; 100) | 18.23 (1.5; 100) | < 0.0011 |
| Feeding vessels | 0.0411 | |||
| mean ± SD | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | |
| median (min; max) | 1 (1; 3) | 1 (1; 3) | 1 (1; 3) | |
| Selective catheterization@, n (%) | 0.1973 | |||
| Proximal | 3 (3.4) | 9 (5.2) | 12 (4.6) | |
| Segmental | 33 (37.9) | 47 (27.2) | 80 (30.8) | |
| Subsegmental | 51 (58.6) | 117 (67.6) | 168 (64.6) | |
| Hypervascular4, n (%) | 70 (75.3) | 156 (78.8) | 226 (77.7) | 0.502 |
| End-point5, n (%) | 88 (94.6) | 187 (91.2) | 275 (92.3) | 0.308 |
Table 5 Objective response – nodule-based analysis (mRECIST) – responder
| Variable | OR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Inferior | Superior | |||
| Chemoembolic dose (mg) | 1.04 | 1.02 | 1.06 | < 0.001 |
| Pseudocapsule | 2.01 | 1.18 | 3.42 | 0.01 |
Table 6 Characteristics of lesion according to percentage of necrosis - hepatocellular carcinoma treated
| Variable | Description | P value |
| HCC diameter (cm)1 | 0.21 | < 0.001 |
| Chemoembolic dose (mg)1 | 0.31 | < 0.001 |
| Feeding vessel1 | 0.093 | 0.11 |
| Liver segment2 | 0.7093 | |
| 1 | 41.7 ± 49.2 | |
| 2 | 60.9 ± 43.6 | |
| 3 | 64 ± 38.9 | |
| 4 | 53 ± 42.4 | |
| 5 | 47.3 ± 42 | |
| 6 | 50 ± 43.6 | |
| 7 | 56.2 ± 41.3 | |
| 8 | 59.3 ± 43.2 | |
| Pseudocapsule | < 0.0014 | |
| No | 39.2 ± 43.8 | |
| Yes | 63.4 ± 39.2 | |
| Selective catheterization5 | 0.0383 | |
| Proximal | 70.4 ± 43.9 | |
| Segmental | 46.3 ± 41.6 | |
| Subsegmental | 59.1 ± 41.9 | |
| Hypervascular6 | 0.9883 | |
| No | 54.4 ± 43.6 | |
| Yes | 54.3 ± 42.2 | |
| End point7 | 0.1983 | |
| No | 66.1 ± 37.7 | |
| Yes | 54.2 ± 42.6 |
Table 7 Radiological response – % Necrosis – treated hepatocellular carcinoma
| Variable | Coefficient | Standard-error | t value | P value |
| Constant | 27.83 | 4.64 | 6 | < 0.001 |
| Chemoembolic dose (mg) | 0.65 | 0.14 | 4.58 | < 0.001 |
| Pseudocapsule | 18.27 | 5 | 3.66 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Galastri FL, Nasser F, Affonso BB, Valle LGM, Odísio BC, Motta-Leal Filho JM, Salvalaggio PR, Garcia RG, de Almeida MD, Baroni RH, Wolosker N. Imaging response predictors following drug eluting beads chemoembolization in the neoadjuvant liver transplant treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2020; 12(1): 21-33
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v12/i1/21.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v12.i1.21
