Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Hepatol. Jun 27, 2019; 11(6): 542-552
Published online Jun 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i6.542
Published online Jun 27, 2019. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i6.542
Table 1 Characteristics of the included patients
| Variable | Patients |
| n = 1912 | |
| Male gender, n (%) | 1575 (82.4) |
| Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 57(± 7.2) |
| Etiology | |
| Hepatitis C | 1369 (71.6) |
| Hepatitis B | 468 (24.5) |
| Other | 75 (3.9) |
| Albumin (g/L, mean ± SD) | 31.4(± 4.6) |
| Bilirubin [µmol/L, median (IQR)] | 24.5 (13.9-29.1) |
| Platelet count (x 109/L, mean ± SD) | 96 (± 37.4) |
| AFP [µg/L, median (IQR)] | 43 (10-184.3) |
| Tumor size [cm, median (IQR)] | 5.6 (1.8-8.4) |
| Solitary tumor, n (%) | 369 (19.3) |
| PVT | 345 (18) |
| Metastasis | 148 (7.7) |
| ECOG grade 0, n (%) | 1154 (60.4) |
| Treatment | |
| Liver resection | 67 (3.5) |
| Liver transplantation | 43 (2.3) |
| Ablative procedures (PEI, RFA and microwave) | 249 (13.1) |
| TACE | 1036 (54.1) |
| Combined treatment (TACE + ablation) | 8 (0.4) |
| Systemic therapy | 40 (2.1) |
| Conservative | 469 (24.5) |
| Overall survival, months (95%CI) | 17.9 (12.1-13.8) |
| Overall deaths, n (%) | 1219 (63.8) |
Table 2 Multivariable Cox regression anaylysis
| Variable | Hazard ratio (95%CI) | P-value |
| Tumour number | ||
| Solitary | 1 | |
| Multiple | 1.456 (1.236, 1.750) | <0.01 |
| Log10 tumour size (cm) | 3.517 (2.678, 4.567) | <0.001 |
| Baseline log10 AFP | 1.302 (1.208, 1.411) | <0.001 |
| Baseline albumin | 0.993 (0.966, 0.998) | 0.031 |
| Baseline log10 bilirubin | 1.581 (1.139, 2.194) | <0.001 |
| Vascular invasion | ||
| No | 1 | |
| Yes | 1.612 (1.251, 2.045) | 0.001 |
| Aetiology | ||
| Hepatitis C virus | 1 | |
| hepatitis B virus | 1.260 (1.020, 1.407) | <0.05 |
| Others | 0.914 (0.887, 0.991) | 0.043 |
Table 3 Distribution and median survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma according to the studied staging systems
| Staging/grading system | Stage/grade | Percentage of patients | Median survival (mo) | P-value |
| CTP | A | 50.6 | 19 | < 0.001 |
| B | 36.1 | 11 | ||
| C | 13.4 | 3.8 | ||
| BCLC | 0 | 3.6 | 25.4 | < 0.001 |
| A | 27.5 | 19.8 | ||
| B | 26.6 | 16 | ||
| C | 28.9 | 8 | ||
| D | 13.4 | 4 | ||
| TNM | I | 19.5 | 23 | < 0.001 |
| II | 36.6 | 18 | ||
| III | 35.4 | 8 | ||
| IV | 8.5 | 6 | ||
| ALBI | 1 | 12 | 28.6 | < 0.001 |
| 2 | 63.2 | 14 | ||
| 3 | 24.7 | 5.8 | ||
| PALBI | 1 | 10.1 | 34.6 | < 0.001 |
| 2 | 29 | 27.5 | ||
| 3 | 33.9 | 23.9 | ||
| 4 | 27 | 7.5 | ||
| ALBI-based BCLC | 0 | 1.5 | Undefined | < 0.001 |
| A | 5.9 | 30.8 | ||
| B | 67.2 | 14.2 | ||
| C | 2.2 | 11 | ||
| D | 23.2 | 5 | ||
| ALBI-T | 0 | 2.6 | 42 | < 0.001 |
| 1 | 18.1 | 28.9 | ||
| 2 | 30.4 | 17 | ||
| 3 | 31.1 | 8 | ||
| 4 | 16 | 5 | ||
| 5 | 1.8 | 3 | ||
| Modified ALBI-T | 0 | 2.6 | 42 | < 0.001 |
| 1 | 9.1 | 28.9 | ||
| 2 | 18.5 | 20 | ||
| 3 | 27.9 | 14 | ||
| 4 | 25.5 | 8 | ||
| 5 | 14.6 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 1.8 | 3 |
Table 4 AUROC values for all scores at 1 and 3 years in addition to overall survival
| Grade | 1-yr AUROC | 3-yr AUROC | Overall AUROC |
| TNM | 0.639 | 0.626 | 0.620 |
| CTP | 0.672 | 0.649 | 0.643 |
| ALBI | 0.741 | 0.728 | 0.709 |
| Modified ALBI | 0.755 | 0.732 | 0.719 |
| PALBI | 0.753 | 0.741 | 0.734 |
| BCLC | 0.758 | 0.743 | 0.713 |
| ALBI-based BCLC | 0.762 | 0.751 | 0.749 |
| ALBI-T | 0.822 | 0.809 | 0.801 |
| Modified ALBI-T | 0.851 | 0.848 | 0.848 |
- Citation: Elshaarawy O, Alkhatib A, Elhelbawy M, Gomaa A, Allam N, Alsebaey A, Rewisha E, Waked I. Validation of modified albumin-bilirubin-TNM score as a prognostic model to evaluate patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2019; 11(6): 542-552
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v11/i6/542.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i6.542
