Ekinci O, Baran B, Ormeci AC, Soyer OM, Gokturk S, Evirgen S, Poyanli A, Gulluoglu M, Akyuz F, Karaca C, Demir K, Besisik F, Kaymakoglu S. Current state and clinical outcome in Turkish patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2018; 10(1): 51-61 [PMID: 29399278 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i1.51]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Sabahattin Kaymakoglu, MD, Professor, Department of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Cape, Istanbul 34390, Turkey. sabahattin.kaymakoglu@istanbul.edu.tr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Hepatol. Jan 27, 2018; 10(1): 51-61 Published online Jan 27, 2018. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v10.i1.51
Table 1 Treatment modalities and the stage of the disease in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Treatment modality
Pts within expanded criteria, n (%)
Pts within Milan criteria, n (%)
Total, n
BCLC stage
Survival, n (%)
0-A
B
C
D
Surgical resection
24 (89)
19 (70)
27
18
9
0
0
16 (59)
OLT
47 (84)
41 (73)
56
24
13
7
12
56 (100)
Percutaneous ablation
16 (94)
15 (88)
17
11
1
3
2
10 (59)
TACE
118 (69)
99 (58)
172
81
47
34
10
80 (46)
Yttrium-90
11 (58)
10 (53)
19
7
5
7
0
10 (53)
Sorafenib
3 (19)
2 (13)
16
1
2
10
3
8 (50)
No treatment
88 (37)
61 (26)
238
24
28
54
132
39 (16)
Table 2 Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients
Characteristics
Number of patients (%)
545 (100)
Male, n (%)
449 (82)
Female, n (%)
96 (18)
Age (yr)
Mean ± SD
59.5 ± 10
Median (range)
60 (19-85)
Chronic liver disease, n (%)
532 (97.6)
Chronic viral hepatitis, n (%)
454 (83.3)
HBV (monoinfection)
287 (52.6)
HCV (monoinfection)
120 (22)
Hepatitis D
37 (6.7)
HBV + HCV co-infection
10 (1.8)
Cirrhosis, n (%)
477 (87.5)
Child A
247 (45.3)
Child B
140 (25.7)
Child C
90 (16.5)
Diagnostic method for HCC, n (%)
CT
26 (4.8)
MRI
433 (79.4)
Liver biopsy
86 (15.8)
Treatment, n (%)
No treatment
238 (43.7)
Hepatic resection
27 (5)
OLT
56 (10.3)
TACE
172 (31.5)
Yttrium-90 radioembolization
19 (3.5)
RFA
12 (2.2)
Ethanol/acetic acid ablation
5 (0.9)
Sorafenib
16 (2.9)
Table 3 Univariate logistic regression analyses of possible predictors of extrahepatic metastasis (n = 545)
Univariate
OR
95%CI
P value
Total tumor diameter
≥ 5 cm
3.19
1.18-8.59
0.022
Tumor type
Solitary HCC
Reference
-
-
Multinodular HCC
1.17
0.52-2.66
0.71
Diffuse-infiltrative HCC
1.06
0.13-8.43
0.96
Vascular invasion
1.86
0.53-6.51
0.33
HBV infection
1.76
0.73-4.26
0.21
Number of nodules
1.21
0.92-1.59
0.18
Stage of liver disease
Normal or precirrhotic liver
Reference
-
-
Child-Pugh A
2.29
0.51-10.2
0.28
Child-Pugh B
1.22
0.23-6.47
0.81
Child-Pugh C
1.14
0.19-7.01
0.89
AFP level
> 100 ng/mL
1.30
0.59-2.85
0.52
> 200 ng/mL
1.59
0.72-3.50
0.25
> 400 ng/mL
1.48
0.64-3.39
0.36
> 1000 ng/mL
1.91
0.81-4.52
0.14
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with vascular invasion (n = 545, R2 = 0.15)
Variables
Univariate
Multivariate
OR
95%CI
P value
OR
95%CI
P value
TTD ≥ 5 cm
6.56
2.29-18.79
< 0.001
3.14
1.01-9.77
0.047
Tumor type
Solitary HCC
Reference
-
-
Reference
-
-
Multinodular HCC
2.07
1.01-4.25
0.047
1.54
0.72-3.30
0.270
Diffuse-infiltrative HCC
6.63
2.14-20.51
0.001
2.71
0.82-8.94
0.100
Extrahepatic metastasis
1.86
0.53-6.51
0.330
Etiology of liver disease
Hepatitis C
Reference
-
-
Reference
-
-
Hepatitis B
6.29
1.48-26.76
0.013
5.37
1.23-23.39
0.025
Other (non-viral)
4.52
0.89-22.91
0.069
3.76
0.72-19.74
0.120
Stage of liver disease
Normal or precirrhotic liver
Reference
-
-
Child-Pugh A
0.60
0.24-1.53
0.290
Child-Pugh B
0.53
0.18-1.52
0.240
Child-Pugh C
0.62
0.20-1.94
0.420
AFP level
> 100 ng/mL
3.77
1.79-7.96
< 0.001
> 200 ng/mL
4.18
2.05-8.52
< 0.001
2.95
1.38-6.31
0.005
> 400 ng/mL
2.81
1.43-5.52
0.003
> 1000 ng/mL
3.54
1.78-7.05
< 0.001
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of factors associated with overall survival (n = 545)
Univariate
Multivariate
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Patient related factors
Age
0.99
0.98-1.01
0.360
Gender
0.82
0.60-1.10
0.180
Etiology of liver disease
Hepatitis C
Reference
-
-
Reference
-
-
Hepatitis B
1.28
0.98-1.66
0.074
0.98
0.74-1.30
0.900
Other (non-viral)
1.41
1.002-1.99
0.049
1.12
0.78-1.60
0.540
Stage of liver disease
Normal or precirrhotic liver
Reference
-
-
Reference
-
-
Child-Pugh A
1.52
0.99-2.30
0.051
1.29
0.84-1.99
0.250
Child-Pugh B
3.16
2.04-4.88
< 0.001
1.81
1.13-2.89
0.013
Child-Pugh C
10.46
6.57-16.66
< 0.001
5.35
3.24-8.83
< 0.001
Tumor related factors
Total tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm
3.07
2.40-3.93
< 0.001
1.74
1.30-2.33
< 0.001
Multinodular or diffuse-infiltrative
2.02
1.61-2.53
< 0.001
1.23
0.95-1.59
0.120
Extrahepatic metastasis
2.53
1.63-3.93
< 0.001
2.17
1.37-3.45
0.001
Vascular invasion
3.48
2.42-5.01
< 0.001
2.74
1.84-4.06
< 0.001
AFP level > 200 ng/mL
2.59
2.07-3.23
< 0.001
2.19
1.72-2.80
< 0.001
Treatment modalities vs no treatment
Surgical treatments (OLT, hepatic resection)
0.07
0.04-0.13
< 0.001
0.12
0.06-0.24
< 0.001
TACE
0.24
0.19-0.31
< 0.001
0.38
0.28-0.51
< 0.001
Yttrium-90 adioembolization
0.37
0.19-0.72
0.003
0.36
0.18-0.74
0.005
RFA
0.12
0.04-0.38
< 0.001
0.18
0.05-0.57
0.004
Ethanol/acetic acid ablation
0.60
0.22-1.63
0.318
0.79
0.28-2.22
0.660
Sorafenib
0.51
0.25-1.04
0.063
0.52
0.25-1.10
0.088
Citation: Ekinci O, Baran B, Ormeci AC, Soyer OM, Gokturk S, Evirgen S, Poyanli A, Gulluoglu M, Akyuz F, Karaca C, Demir K, Besisik F, Kaymakoglu S. Current state and clinical outcome in Turkish patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol 2018; 10(1): 51-61