Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. May 27, 2024; 16(5): 667-670
Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.667
Hepatic pseudotumor: A diagnostic challenge
Arghya Samanta, Moinak Sen Sarma, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, India
ORCID number: Arghya Samanta (0000-0002-1768-0263); Moinak Sen Sarma (0000-0003-2015-4069).
Author contributions: Samanta A performed the literature review and drafted the manuscript; Sen Sarma M performed the literature review and critically reviewed the manuscript; All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Moinak Sen Sarma, MBBS, MD, Adjunct Associate Professor, Doctor, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226014, India. moinaksen@yahoo.com
Received: December 26, 2023
Revised: March 10, 2024
Accepted: April 16, 2024
Published online: May 27, 2024
Processing time: 147 Days and 23.8 Hours

Abstract

Hepatic pseudotumors are rare lesions of unknown origin, characterized by the proliferation of fibrous connective tissue and inflammatory cell infiltrates. They mimic malignant lesions clinically, and radiologically, given their non-specific clinical and imaging features. The pathophysiology of hepatic pseudotumor is incompletely understood and there are no standardized criteria for diagnosis. Pseudotumors have been reported to develop in various organs in the body with the lung and liver being the most common site. Hepatic pseudotumors develop in patients with underlying triggers of liver inflammation and injury, including infections, autoimmune liver diseases, bile duct injury, or surgery. Hepatic pseudotumors respond well to conservative treatment with antibiotics, and steroids and some may regress spontaneously, thus avoiding unnecessary resection. This condition is rewarding to treat. It is important to recognize pseudotumor as a distinct clinical entity and include it in the differential of liver masses with atypical imaging features.

Key Words: Hepatic pseudotumor; Infection; Stroglyloides; Hepatic resection

Core Tip: Hepatic pseudotumors may mimic malignant lesions clinically and radiologically and often result in unnecessary invasive procedures. Both clinicians and pathologists should consider this differential in patients with hepatic mass lesions, especially if the patient has a clinical history of infection or injury of the biliary tree and/or hepatic parenchyma.



INTRODUCTION

The term “pseudotumor” describes a heterogeneous group of benign, non-neoplastic, non-metastasizing masses that can involve many organs[1]. This entity has been described by several names and histologic presentations. In 1954, Umiker and Iverson coined the term “inflammatory pseudotumor” as the clinical and imaging findings of the lesion mimic those of malignant tumors[2]. Pseudotumor is characterized by the presence of myofibroblastic spindle cells, infiltrated plasma cells, and mixed inflammatory cells without atypical mitoses or anaplasia[3,4]. The lesions are known to have extensive variability in histologic features, and no uniform criteria have been recommended for diagnosis and classification[5,6]. The most commonly involved organ is the lung followed by the liver, central nervous system, major salivary glands, kidney, omentum, ovary, larynx, urinary bladder, breast, pancreas, spleen, lymph nodes, skin, soft tissues, orbit etc[7]. In this editorial, we discuss the etiopathogenesis, differentiating radiological and histological features of this unique disease entity and currently available treatment modalities.

ETIOPATHOGENESIS OF HEPATIC PSEUDOTUMOR

An inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver is an uncommon, benign, tumor-like lesion that clinically, radiologically, and histologically mimics a malignant tumor, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, or metastatic tumors[8]. Tang et al[9] found that these lesions were more common in men than women and most common in young adults. The most frequent presenting symptom is abdominal pain, followed by fever[9]. Biliary obstruction or portal hypertension may also be present. The pathogenesis of hepatic pseudotumor is poorly understood but it has been associated with infection, autoimmune liver disease, or recent trauma or surgery of the liver[10-12]. In the majority of cases, these inflammatory pseudotumors are infectious in origin[12]. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Brucella, Strongyloides, Bartonella, syphilis, Candida, and Actinomyces have been reported as causative agents[13,14].

The lesions often appear to develop from a healing abscess or an inflammatory condition resulting from rupture of the bile duct and extravasation of bile into the tissue, which provokes a xanthogranulomatous inflammatory response that heals with scarring.

RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES OF HEPATIC PSEUDOTUMORS

Imaging studies of hepatic pseudotumors have revealed non-specific findings. Abdominal ultrasound shows variable echogenicity. Both hypoechoic, as well as hyperechoic lesions have been reported[7]. Computed tomography angiography of the abdomen shows hypoattenuating hepatic lesions, which show a hypodense peripheral halo with no significant enhancement on contrast images[15]. In contrast, hepatocellular carcinoma shows arterial phase hyperenhancement with rapid washout in the venous phase. On magnetic resonance imaging, hepatic pseudotumors are typically hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, with variable enhancement patterns[16].

HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA

Given the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria for diagnosing inflammatory pseudotumors, it is difficult to obtain clear data from the literature regarding the incidence, anatomic distribution, natural history, and malignant potential of these lesions. Not surprisingly, this difficulty has an impact on the understanding of the natural history of this condition as well as its prognosis and treatment.

No specific biomarker is available for diagnosing pseudotumors. A definitive diagnosis of inflammatory pseudotumor can be made via needle biopsy findings and, occasionally, fine-needle aspiration. It is well recognized that inflammatory pseudotumors have a wide variability in histologic features that may be reflected in different areas of the same lesion. Therefore, adequate sampling in multiple sections is essential for establishing an accurate diagnosis. Histological classification of hepatic pseudotumor has not been well established. Balabaud et al[1] conducted a study of 145 cases of liver pseudotumor and identified 5 histologic subgroups: a plasma cell–rich with discrete or diffuse lymphocytes, mixed inflammatory cell, granulomatous, granulomatous with eosinophils, and a predominantly purulent type. Although 2 of these 145 cases showed focally increased IgG4-positive plasma cells, these did not meet the currently accepted diagnostic criteria as too few plasma cells were observed in the tissue and none of the patients had elevated serum levels of IgG4[17,18]. A liver biopsy is recommended to avoid unnecessary liver resection.

TREATMENT: LESS IS MORE

It is common practice to excise a resectable liver tumor in the absence of a definitive diagnosis. However, if a preoperative diagnosis of pseudotumor can be made, there is no reason to advocate hepatic resection, as rightfully noted by Rosa et al[19]. Antibiotic treatment may be curative in infective cases, and hepatic resection can be avoided, as reported by Gialanella et al[20] and others[21]. Corticosteroids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been successfully used in some cases[15,22-24]. If the patient presents with biliary obstruction, biliary stents may be placed[25]. Occasionally, the pseudotumor spontaneously regresses[20,26].

In this issue, Gialanella et al[20] presented the case of a 45-year-old female with tender hepatomegaly, who was diagnosed with a hepatic pseudotumor with the help of imaging and serology. The lesion resolved completely following treatment with an antihelminthic agent for 2 wk. The case report by Gialanella et al[20] is a good example of the necessity to consider the diagnosis of hepatic pseudotumor if an atypical mass is found in the liver with non-specific clinical and imaging features.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Given its rarity, more data should be collected to better classify pseudotumors and further understand their natural history; specific areas of future research should involve culturing the infectious agents, testing for aberrant expression of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-1 and its gene translocation, and testing for the expression of IgG4-positive plasma cells. Further research is needed to determine which clinical settings warrant increased suspicion for this diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic pseudotumor is a rare, benign space-occupying lesion of the liver with non-specific clinical and radiological features that pose diagnostic challenges. This entity remains a diagnosis of exclusion without any definitive diagnostic criteria. Despite its rarity, pseudotumor should be considered in the diagnosis of focal hepatic space-occupying lesions with atypical/non-specific radiological features, especially in the setting of co-existing inflammatory conditions or infection of the liver. Histopathological diagnosis of these conditions is crucial to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country/Territory of origin: India

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Cabezuelo AS, Spain S-Editor: Gong ZM L-Editor: Webster JR P-Editor: Cai YX

References
1.  Balabaud C, Bioulac-Sage P, Goodman ZD, Makhlouf HR. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: a rare but distinct tumor-like lesion. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012;8:633-634.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  UMIKER WO, IVERSON L. Postinflammatory tumors of the lung; report of four cases simulating xanthoma, fibroma, or plasma cell tumor. J Thorac Surg. 1954;28:55-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 162]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 162]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Milias K, Madhavan KK, Bellamy C, Garden OJ, Parks RW. Inflammatory pseudotumors of the liver: experience of a specialist surgical unit. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1562-1566.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Yang X, Zhu J, Biskup E, Cai F, Li A. Inflammatory pseudotumors of the liver: experience of 114 cases. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:5143-5148.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Park JY, Choi MS, Lim YS, Park JW, Kim SU, Min YW, Gwak GY, Paik YH, Lee JH, Koh KC, Paik SW, Yoo BC. Clinical features, image findings, and prognosis of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: a multicenter experience of 45 cases. Gut Liver. 2014;8:58-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 5.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Gleason BC, Hornick JL. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: where are we now? J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:428-437.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 475]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 466]  [Article Influence: 27.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Patnana M, Sevrukov AB, Elsayes KM, Viswanathan C, Lubner M, Menias CO. Inflammatory pseudotumor: the great mimicker. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198:W217-W227.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 210]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 210]  [Article Influence: 17.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Zhao J, Olino K, Low LE, Qiu S, Stevenson HL. Hepatic Inflammatory Pseudotumor: An Important Differential Diagnosis in Patients With a History of Previous Biliary Procedures. ACG Case Rep J. 2019;6:e00015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Tang L, Lai EC, Cong WM, Li AJ, Fu SY, Pan ZY, Zhou WP, Lau WY, Wu MC. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver: a cohort study. World J Surg. 2010;34:309-313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Zhang Y, Lu H, Ji H, Li Y. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: A case report and literature review. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2015;4:155-158.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Calomeni GD, Ataíde EB, Machado RR, Escanhoela CA, Costa LB, Boin IF. Hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor: A case series. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4:308-311.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Torbenson M, Yasir S, Anders R, Guy CD, Lee HE, Venkatesh SK, Wu TT, Chen ZE. Regenerative hepatic pseudotumor: a new pseudotumor of the liver. Hum Pathol. 2020;99:43-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Gulbas Z, Kebapci M, Pasaoglu O, Vardareli E. Successful ivermectin treatment of hepatic strongyloidiasis presenting with severe eosinophilia. South Med J. 2004;97:907-910.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Koea JB, Broadhurst GW, Rodgers MS, McCall JL. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: demographics, diagnosis, and the case for nonoperative management. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:226-235.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 100]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Yoon KH, Ha HK, Lee JS, Suh JH, Kim MH, Kim PN, Lee MG, Yun KJ, Choi SC, Nah YH, Kim CG, Won JJ, Auh YH. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: CT-histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1999;211:373-379.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 81]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Goldsmith PJ, Loganathan A, Jacob M, Ahmad N, Toogood GJ, Lodge JP, Prasad KR. Inflammatory pseudotumours of the liver: a spectrum of presentation and management options. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:1295-1298.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Umehara H, Okazaki K, Nakamura T, Satoh-Nakamura T, Nakajima A, Kawano M, Mimori T, Chiba T. Current approach to the diagnosis of IgG4-related disease - Combination of comprehensive diagnostic and organ-specific criteria. Mod Rheumatol. 2017;27:381-391.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 137]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 145]  [Article Influence: 20.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Khosroshahi A, Wallace ZS, Crowe JL, Akamizu T, Azumi A, Carruthers MN, Chari ST, Della-Torre E, Frulloni L, Goto H, Hart PA, Kamisawa T, Kawa S, Kawano M, Kim MH, Kodama Y, Kubota K, Lerch MM, Löhr M, Masaki Y, Matsui S, Mimori T, Nakamura S, Nakazawa T, Ohara H, Okazaki K, Ryu JH, Saeki T, Schleinitz N, Shimatsu A, Shimosegawa T, Takahashi H, Takahira M, Tanaka A, Topazian M, Umehara H, Webster GJ, Witzig TE, Yamamoto M, Zhang W, Chiba T, Stone JH; Second International Symposium on IgG4-Related Disease. International Consensus Guidance Statement on the Management and Treatment of IgG4-Related Disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:1688-1699.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 573]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 620]  [Article Influence: 68.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Rosa B, Moutinho-Ribeiro P, Pereira JM, Fonseca D, Lopes J, Amendoeira I, Cotter J. Ghost tumor: an inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012;8:630-633.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Gialanella JP, Steidl T, Korpela K, Grandhi MS, Langan RC, Alexander HR, Hudacko RM, Ecker BL. Hepatic pseudotumor associated with Strongyloides infection: A case report. World J Hepatol. 2023;15:1338-1343.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Bernard M, Marie I, Riachi G, Goria O, Lerebours E, François A, Levesque H, Michel P. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver revealing gynecological Corynebacterium infection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:875-877.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Shibata M, Matsubayashi H, Aramaki T, Uesaka K, Tsutsumi N, Sasaki K, Ono H. A case of IgG4-related hepatic inflammatory pseudotumor replaced by an abscess after steroid treatment. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Hakozaki Y, Katou M, Nakagawa K, Shirahama T, Matsumoto T. Improvement of inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver after nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1121-1122.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Zamir D, Jarchowsky J, Singer C, Abumoch S, Groisman G, Ammar M, Weiner P. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver--a rare entity and a diagnostic challenge. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1538-1540.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 44]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Pokorny CS, Painter DM, Waugh RC, McCaughan GW, Gallagher ND, Tattersall MH. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver causing biliary obstruction. Treatment by biliary stenting with 5-year follow-up. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991;13:338-341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Ntinas A, Kardassis D, Miliaras D, Tsinoglou K, Dimitriades A, Vrochides D. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:196.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]