BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Rajak S, Shahi A, Yadav A, Medhe P, Sinha RA. Microplastics in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: An emerging threat to liver health. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 111198 [PMID: 41479513 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.111198]
Reader's ID:
01804237
Submitted on:
December 29, 2025, 14:48
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
I read the excellent paper by Rajak et al. The review is organized and precisely addresses the role of microplastics in inducing metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease and its progression. The review raises a growing emergency: the relationship between air pollution and human health. This can be a stimulus for policymakers and international organizations to take concrete action. However, it should be remembered that a proper lifestyle can mitigate the negative impact of microplastics on the liver and human health in general. While waiting for long-term measures, this is information that can yield short-term results. On this issue, it will be my concern to send a letter to the editor. Sincerely, Gianni Testino