Non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) can lower the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (identified by a hepatic venous pressure gradient ≥10 mm Hg) with active etiology. Our aim was to examine the effect of NSBBs on first decompensation occurrence in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

Patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinical evidence of CSPH (gastroesophageal varices [GEVs] and/or spontaneous portosystemic collaterals [SPSSs]) after 2 years from etiological treatment. The primary endpoint was first decompensation (occurrence of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy) in patients on NSBBs vs off NSBBs.

The final cohort included 406 patients. Baseline characteristics of patients on NSBBs (n = 187) and off NSBBs (n = 219) were comparable, except for signs of portal hypertension that were more pronounced in the on-NSBBs group. During a mean follow-up of 32 months, 127 (31%) patients decompensated, with ascites being the most common (77%) decompensating event. Decompensation rates were lower in patients on NSBBs (16% vs 44%; P < .0001). The benefit of NSBBs on decompensation was maintained in patients with small GEVs (17% vs 43%; P < .0001), in those with spontaneous portosystemic shunt only (8% vs 43%; P = .003), and in each different etiology, including hepatitis C virus-cured cirrhosis (9% vs 32%; P < .0001). At Cox regression analysis, hemoglobin, Child-Pugh, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium, diabetes at baseline, and previous bacterial infections were independent predictors of decompensation, while NSBBs use had a protective effect (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.49; P < .0001). NSBBs use significantly reduced bacterial infection rates (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.58; P < .0001).

NSBBs decrease the risk of first decompensation in patients with cirrhosis and enduring CSPH after etiological treatment.

This editorial describes the contemporary concepts of prevention and management of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients according to the current guidelines. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding is the most dangerous complication of portal hypertension in LC patients. Risk stratification and determination of an individual approach to the choice of therapeutic measures aimed at their prevention and management has emerged as one of the top concerns in modern hepatology. According to the current guidelines, in the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension, etiological and non-etiological therapies of LC is advisable for the primary preventing gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, whereas its presence serves as an indication for the administration of non-selective β-blockers, among which carvedilol is the drug of choice. Non-selective β-blockers, as well as endoscopic variceal ligation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can be used to prevent recurrence of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Pharmacotherapy with vasoactive drugs (terlipressin, somatostatin, octreotide), endoscopic variceal ligation, endovascular techniques and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are recommended for the treatment of acute gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Objective and accurate risk stratification of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding will allow developing individual strategies for their prevention and management, avoiding the first and further decompensation in LC, which will improve the prognosis and survival of patients suffering from it.

The aim of this study was to analyze blood coagulation, endothelial dysfunction and liver fibrosis in an experimental model of Metabolic Syndrome (MS) induced by chronic administration of a sucrose-rich diet (SRD) and to evaluate the effects of chia seed as a therapeutic strategy. Male Wistar rats were fed with a reference diet (RD) - 6 months - or a SRD - 3 months. Then, the last group was randomly divided into two subgroups. One subgroup continued receiving the SRD for up to 6 months and the other was fed with a SRD where whole chia seed was incorporated as the source of dietary fat for the next 3 months (SRD + CHIA). Results showed that rats fed a SRD for a long period of time develop dyslipidemia, visceral adiposity, insulin resistance, and a hypercoagulable and hypofibrinolytic basal state. Hepatic VCAM-1 (main adhesion molecules involved in endothelial dysfunction) expression was significantly increased. In addition, the SRD group presented hepatic steatosis, a significant increase in interstitial collagen deposition and hydroxyproline content. Liver TGF-β1 (a key cytokine involved in fibrogenesis) levels increased and a negative correlation with PPARα protein mass levels was found. The administration of chia seed for 3 months reversed dyslipidemia, visceral adiposity and insulin resistance. Platelet count, coagulation parameters and plasma fibrinogen levels were normalized. In the liver tissue, VCAM-1 expression, steatosis, interstitial collagen deposition and the hydroxyproline content decreased. TGF-β1 expression was decreased and this was associated with an increase in the PPARα protein levels. The present study showed new aspects in the progression from liver steatosis to fibrosis in dyslipidemic insulin-resistant rats chronically fed a sucrose-rich diet. Chia seed supplementation could be used as a functional food and a potential dietary strategy to prevent or ameliorate disorders related to atherothrombotic cardiovascular events and NASH.

The role of anticoagulants in chronic liver diseases is inconclusive. A meta-analysis was thus undertaken to evaluate treatment-related survival and antifibrotic effects in animal models of chronic liver diseases.

A systematic search of the literature took place (up to November 2020), screening for preclinical studies that evaluated anticoagulant effects in animal models of chronic liver diseases. We assessed the quality of methods and the certainty of evidence. Data on outcomes were extracted and pooled into random-effects models.

Sixteen studies proved eligible, each assessing anticoagulant use in animals with chronic liver diseases. Generally, the pooled evidence demonstrated that the administration of anticoagulants is preventive against fibrogenesis, as indicated by METAVIR fibrosis scores (risk ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.47 to 0.94), portal pressure determinations (mean difference = -1.39, 95% confidence interval: -2.33 to -0.44), inflammatory activity (mean difference = -169.69, 95% confidence interval: -257.64 to -81.74), and indices of hepatic injury, specifically alanine aminotransferase (mean difference = -82.7, 95% confidence interval: -107.36 to -58.04), aspartate aminotransferase (mean difference = -186.12, 95% confidence interval: -254.90 to -117.33), albumin (mean difference = 0.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.16 to 1.01), and total bilirubin (mean difference = -0.96, 95% confidence interval: -1.46 to -0.46), and it had no impact on animal survival (risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.94 to 1.13).

Our assessments indicate that in animal models of chronic liver diseases, anticoagulants may alleviate the degree of fibrosis evaluated by the METAVIR score system, portal pressure, inflammatory activity, and serum indices of hepatocellular injury, without impacting survival. High-quality experimental studies are still required.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent and relevant healthcare issues. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first-choice for anticoagulant treatment of these conditions displaying a better efficacy/safety profile than vitamin-K antagonists, mainly due to significantly reduced risk of major bleeding, especially of intracranial haemorrhage. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in developed countries showing a continuously growing prevalence. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), its evolutive form, will be the leading cause for liver transplantation by 2020. NAFLD is independently associated with an increased risk of abnormalities of cardiac structure and function, including cardiac rhythm disorders (mainly AF). Moreover, data suggest an increased risk of unprovoked VTE associated with NAFLD/NASH. Therefore, a growing number of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) will be candidate for anticoagulant therapy in the near future. Cirrhosis of any etiology is characterized by an unstable thrombosis/bleeding haemostatic balance, making anticoagulant therapy particularly challenging in this condition. Given that patients with significant active liver disease and cirrhosis were excluded from all pivotal randomized controlled trials on DOACs, this comprehensive review aims at critically discussing real-world evidence, including the latest population studies, regarding the use of DOACs in patients with CLD/cirrhosis.

Portal hypertension is defined as increased pressure in the portal venous system. The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. In this setting, there is an increase in intrahepatic resistance leading to an increase in portal pressure. By increasing portal blood flow, splanchnic vasodilation further aggravates portal hypertension. New pathogenic pathways are being established which might result in new therapeutic strategies. The presence of varices at endoscopy and/or other abdominal portosystemic collaterals confirms the diagnosis of portal hypertension. The role of non-invasive and imaging tests in the diagnosis and prognosis of portal hypertension has been clarified. Non-selective beta-blockers decrease both the risk of variceal haemorrhage and hepatic decompensation. Terlipressin, somatostatin or octreotide, in combination with early endoscopic therapy, are recommended for the treatment of acute variceal haemorrhage. Early Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is effective as salvage therapy in acute variceal bleeding in selected patients and prevents rebleeding more effectively than endoscopic and medical therapy resulting in an increased survival.

Portal hypertension (PH) is an increase in the pressure gradient between portal vein and inferior vena cava. Increased resistance occurs at different levels within the portal venous system, followed by increased portal venous inflow. PH is the main driver of cirrhosis decompensation. Varices on endoscopy or portosystemic collaterals on imaging indicate PH. Although its cause is determined mostly via noninvasive tests, the gold standard to measure portal pressure in cirrhosis and determine its severity is hepatic vein catheterization with determination of the hepatic venous pressure gradient. Measuring portal pressure is essential in proof-of-concept studies of portal pressure-lowering drugs.

In the past, patients with liver cirrhosis were thought to be prone to increased bleeding risk. However, those with compensated liver cirrhosis actually have normal coagulative balance, which can become altered when liver function worsens, or infection, bleeding, or acute kidney insufficiency occur. When this happens, it is now recognized that patients with liver cirrhosis are at higher risk of thrombotic rather than haemorrhagic complications. Anticoagulation plays a favourable role both when used therapeutically or prophylactically. Successful anticoagulation is associated with a lower rate of decompensation and with improved survival. To date, treatment has involved the use of low molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists. Preliminary data suggest that novel non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be used safely in patients with liver cirrhosis.

To provide an overview of recent pharmacological treatments for portal hypertension evaluated in early clinical trials, with particular emphasis on the pathophysiological basis of their use.

In patients with compensated cirrhosis, even small decreases in portal pressure (as small as 1 mmHg) are associated with a lower probability of decompensation. In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, portal pressure "response" to non-selective beta-blocker (NSBB) therapy is associated with a lower mortality. When present, significant portal hypertension persists even after elimination of the etiology of cirrhosis and this justifies the continued development of new drugs that target portal hypertension.

Over several decades we have gained great depth in the understanding of portal hypertension, its mechanisms and complications. NSBBs, which act by reducing portal venous inflow (an extrahepatic target), are effective in reducing portal pressure and have been the mainstay of therapy for portal hypertension in the last 35 years -being effective in preventing decompensation and variceal hemorrhage. However, because not all patients will have a sufficient response to NSBB and some may be intolerant to NSBB, alternative drugs or drugs that will augment the effect of NSBB on portal pressure are being tested in pre-clinical and early-clinical trials. Many of these drugs target more than one of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Out of these proposed therapies, statins have emerged as the most promising new pharmacological therapy for the treatment of portal hypertension.