Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and incurable disease in humans and animals. To gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis and identify potential treatments, miRNAs will be extracted and analysed from extracellular vesicles (EVs) of equine adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (AdMSCs).

For this purpose we cultivated and pretreated AdMSCs under different conditions: interleukin 1β, shock wave, chondrogenic differentiation, chondrogenic differentiation under hypoxia, or after senescence. After treatment, EVs were harvested from the cell culture supernatants. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to sequence the miRNAs from the EVs.

A total of 89 miRNAs whose expression was significantly altered compared with that of an untreated negative control were identified. On average, 53 miRNAs were upregulated and 6 miRNAs were downregulated. Among others, the miRNAs eca-miR-101, eca-miR-143, eca-miR-145, eca-miR-146a, eca-miR-27a, eca-miR-29b, eca-miR-93, eca-miR-98, and eca-miR-221 were significantly increased after the stimulations, which, as known anti-inflammatory miRNAs, could be candidates for therapeutic use in the treatment of OA.

These results lay the foundation for further research into the significance and efficacy of these miRNAs so that this knowledge can be improved in further experiments and, ideally, translated into therapeutic use.

In our aging society, the degeneration of the musculoskeletal system and adjacent tissues is a growing orthopedic concern. As bones age, they become more fragile, increasing the risk of fractures and injuries. Furthermore, tissues like cartilage accumulate damage, leading to widespread joint issues. Compounding this, the regenerative capacity of these tissues declines with age, exacerbating the consequences of fractures and cartilage deterioration. With rising demand for fracture and cartilage repair, bone-derived stem cells have attracted significant research interest. However, the therapeutic use of stem cells has produced inconsistent results, largely due to ongoing debates and uncertainties regarding the precise identity of the stem cells responsible for musculoskeletal growth, maintenance and repair. This review focuses on the potential to leverage endogenous skeletal stem cells (SSCs)-a well-defined population of stem cells with specific markers, reliable isolation techniques, and functional properties-in bone repair and cartilage regeneration. Understanding SSC behavior in response to injury, including their activation to a functional state, could provide insights into improving treatment outcomes. Techniques like microfracture surgery, which aim to stimulate SSC activity for cartilage repair, are of particular interest. Here, we explore the latest advances in how such interventions may modulate SSC function to enhance bone healing and cartilage regeneration.

Osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease, requires innovative therapies due to the limited ability of cartilage to regenerate. Since mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide a cell source for chondrogenic cells, we hypothesize that chemicals capable of enhancing the chondrogenic potential of MSCs with transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) in vitro may similarly promote chondrogenesis in articular cartilage in vivo.

Chemical compounds that enhance the TGFβ signaling for chondrogenesis were investigated utilizing mesenchymal stem cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. The mechanisms of action underlying the identified compound were explored in vitro, and its therapeutic effects were validated in vivo using a mouse model of exercise-induced osteoarthritis.

Hydroxycitric acid (HCA) emerged as the lead compound. In vitro, HCA effectively enhanced chondrogenesis by inhibiting ATP citrate lyase, inducing citrate and alpha-ketoglutarate (α-KG), while reducing cytosolic acetyl coenzyme A (Ac-CoA). This induction of α-KG promoted collagen prolyl-4-hydroxylase activity, boosting hydroxyproline production and matrix formation. The reduction of Ac-CoA attenuated the inhibitory effect of β-catenin on mitochondrial activity by diminishing its acetylation. In vivo, orally administered HCA accumulated in joint tissues of mice and histological examination demonstrated newly synthesized cartilage tissues in damaged area. Analysis of joint tissue extracts revealed a downregulation of Ac-CoA and an upregulation of citrate and α-KG, accompanied by a systemic increase in an anabolic biomarker.

HCA demonstrates promise as an osteoarthritis therapy by enhancing chondrogenic differentiation. Its ability to modulate crucial metabolic pathways and facilitate cartilage repair suggests potential for clinical translation, addressing a critical need in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Advanced cell therapies emerged as promising candidates for treatment of knee articular diseases, but robust evidence regarding their clinical applicability is still lacking.

To assess the efficacy and safety of advanced mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) therapy for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and chondral lesions.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials conducted in accordance with Cochrane Handbook and reported following PRISMA checklist. GRADE approach was used for assessing the evidence certainty.

25 randomized controlled trials that enrolled 1048 participants were included. Meta-analyses data showed that, compared to viscosupplementation (VS), advanced MSC therapy resulted in a 1.91 lower pain VAS score (95 % CI -3.23 to -0.59; p < 0.00001) for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months. Compared to placebo, the difference was 0.99 lower pain VAS points (95 % CI -1.94 to -0.03; p = 0.76). According to the GRADE approach, the evidence was very uncertain for both comparisons. By excluding studies with high risk of bias, there was a similar size of effect (VAS MD -1.54, 95 % CI -2.09 to -0.98; p = 0.70) with improved (moderate) certainty of evidence, suggesting that MSC therapy probably reduces pain slightly better than VS. Regarding serious adverse events, there was no difference from advanced MSC therapy to placebo or to VS, with very uncertain evidence.

Advanced MSC therapy resulted in lower pain compared to placebo or VS for the treatment of knee OA after 12 months, with no difference in adverse events. However, the evidence was considered uncertain.

Currently, there is a lack of studies with good methodological structure aiming to evaluate the real clinical impact of advanced cell therapy for knee OA. The present study was well structured and conducted, with Risk of Bias, GRADE certainty assessment and sensitivity analysis. It explores the translational aspect of the benefits and safety of MSC compared with placebo and gold-standard therapy to give practitioners and researchers support to expand this therapy in their practice.

CRD42020158173. Access at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=158173.

Chondral defect repair is challenging due to a scarcity of reparative cells and the need to fill a large surface area, compounded by the absence of self-healing mechanisms. Fibronectin adhesion assay-derived chondroprogenitors (FAA-CPs) have emerged as a promising alternative with enhanced chondrogenic ability and reduced hypertrophy. De-cellularized bio-scaffolds are reported to act as extracellular matrix, mimicking the structural and functional characteristics of native tissue, thereby facilitating cell attachment and differentiation. This study primarily assessed the synergistic effect of FAA-CPs suspended in fetal cartilage-derived collagen-containing scaffolds in repairing chondral defects.

The de-cellularized and lyophilized fetal collagen was prepared from the tibio-femoral joint of a 36 + 4-week gestational age fetus. FAA-CPs were isolated from osteoarthritic cartilage samples (n = 3) and characterized. In ex vivo analysis, FAA-CPs at a density of 1 × 106 cells were suspended in the lyophilized scaffold and placed into the chondral defects created in the Osteochondral Units and harvested on the 35th day for histological examination.

The lyophilized scaffold of de-cellularized fetal cartilage with FAA-CPs demonstrated effective healing of the critical size chondral defect. This was evidenced by a uniform distribution of cells, a well-organized collagen-fibrillar network, complete filling of the defect with alignment to the surface, and favorable integration with the adjacent cartilage. However, these effects were less pronounced in the plain scaffold control group and no demonstrable repair observed in the empty defect group.

This study suggests the synergistic potential of FAA-CPs and collagen scaffold for chondral repair which needs to be further explored for clinical therapy.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01192-6.

To assess compliance with statutory requirements to register and report outcomes in interventional trials of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal disorders and to describe the trials' clinical and design characteristics.

A systematic review of published trials and trials submitted to public registries.

The databases Medline, Cochrane Library and McMaster; six public clinical registries. All searches were done until 31 January 2023.

Trials submitted to registries and completed before January 2021. Prospective interventional trials published in peer-reviewed journals.

The first author searched for trials that had (1) posted trial results in a public registry, (2) presented results in a peer-reviewed publication and (3) submitted a pretrial protocol to a registry before publication. Other extracted variables included trial design, number of participants, funding source, follow-up duration and cell type.

In total 124 trials were found in registries and literature databases. Knee osteoarthritis was the most common indication. Of the 100 registry trials, 52 trials with in total 2 993 participants had neither posted results in the registry nor published results. Fifty-two of the registry trials submitted a protocol retrospectively. Forty-three of the 67 published trials (64%) had registered a pretrial protocol. Funding source was not associated with compliance with reporting requirements. A discrepancy between primary endpoints in the registry and publication was found in 16 of 25 trials. In 28% of trials, the treatment groups used adjuvant therapies. Only 39% of controlled trials were double-blinded.

A large proportion of trials failed to comply with statutory requirements for the registration and reporting of results, thereby increasing the risk of bias in outcome assessments. To improve confidence in the role of MSCs for musculoskeletal disorders, registries and medical journals should more rigorously enforce existing requirements for registration and reporting.

This review evaluates the current landscape and future directions of regenerative medicine for knee cartilage repair, with a particular focus on tissue engineering strategies. In this context, scaffold-based approaches have emerged as promising solutions for cartilage regeneration. Synthetic scaffolds, while offering superior mechanical properties, often lack the biological cues necessary for effective tissue integration. Natural scaffolds, though biocompatible and biodegradable, frequently suffer from inadequate mechanical strength. Hybrid scaffolds, combining elements of both synthetic and natural materials, present a balanced approach, enhancing both mechanical support and biological functionality. Advances in decellularized extracellular matrix scaffolds have shown potential in promoting cell infiltration and integration with native tissues. Additionally, bioprinting technologies have enabled the creation of complex, bioactive scaffolds that closely mimic the zonal organization of native cartilage, providing an optimal environment for cell growth and differentiation. The review also explores the potential of gene therapy and gene editing techniques, including CRISPR-Cas9, to enhance cartilage repair by targeting specific genetic pathways involved in tissue regeneration. The integration of these advanced therapies with tissue engineering approaches holds promise for developing personalized and durable treatments for knee cartilage injuries and osteoarthritis. In conclusion, this review underscores the importance of continued multidisciplinary collaboration to advance these innovative therapies from bench to bedside and improve outcomes for patients with knee cartilage damage.

There is an ongoing debate about the value of animal experiments to inform medical practice, yet there are limited data on how well therapies developed in animal studies translate to humans. We aimed to assess 2 measures of translation across various biomedical fields: (1) The proportion of therapies which transition from animal studies to human application, including involved timeframes; and (2) the consistency between animal and human study results. Thus, we conducted an umbrella review, including English systematic reviews that evaluated the translation of therapies from animals to humans. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception until August 1, 2023. We assessed the proportion of therapeutic interventions advancing to any human study, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and regulatory approval. We meta-analyzed the concordance between animal and human studies. The risk of bias was probed using a 10-item checklist for systematic reviews. We included 122 articles, describing 54 distinct human diseases and 367 therapeutic interventions. Neurological diseases were the focus of 32% of reviews. The overall proportion of therapies progressing from animal studies was 50% to human studies, 40% to RCTs, and 5% to regulatory approval. Notably, our meta-analysis showed an 86% concordance between positive results in animal and clinical studies. The median transition times from animal studies were 5, 7, and 10 years to reach any human study, an RCT, and regulatory approval, respectively. We conclude that, contrary to widespread assertions, the rate of successful animal-to-human translation may be higher than previously reported. Nonetheless, the low rate of final approval indicates potential deficiencies in the design of both animal studies and early clinical trials. To ameliorate the efficacy of translating therapies from bench to bedside, we advocate for enhanced study design robustness and the reinforcement of generalizability.

Marrow stimulation is a common reparative approach to treat injuries to cartilage and other soft tissues (e.g., rotator cuff). It involves the recruitment of bone marrow elements and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into the defect, theoretically initiating a regenerative process. However, the resulting repair tissue is often weak and susceptible to deterioration with time. The populations of cells at the marrow stimulation site (beyond MSCs), and their contribution to inflammation, vascularity, and fibrosis, may play a role in quality of the repair tissue.

In this review, we accomplish three goals: (1) systematically review clinical trials on the augmentation of marrow stimulation and evaluate their assumptions on the biological elements recruited; (2) detail the cellular populations in bone marrow and their impact on healing; and (3) highlight emerging technologies and approaches that could better guide these specific cell populations towards enhanced cartilage or soft tissue formation.

We found that most clinical trials do not account for cell heterogeneity, nor do they specify the regenerative element recruited, and those that do typically utilize descriptions such as "clots," "elements," and "blood." Furthermore, our review of bone marrow cell populations demonstrates a dramatically heterogenous cell population, including hematopoietic cells, immune cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, and only a small population of MSCs. Finally, the field has developed numerous innovative techniques to enhance the chondrogenic potential (and reduce the anti-regenerative impacts) of these various cell types. We hope this review will guide approaches that account for cellular heterogeneity and improve marrow stimulation techniques to treat chondral defects.

Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) is known to induce several types of tissue regeneration by activating tissue-specific stem cells. Here, we investigated the therapeutic potential of PEDF 29-mer peptide in the damaged articular cartilage (AC) in rat osteoarthritis (OA).

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) were isolated from rat bone marrow (BM) and used to evaluate the impact of 29-mer on chondrogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs in culture. Knee OA was induced in rats by a single intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) in the right knees (set to day 0). The 29-mer dissolved in 5% hyaluronic acid (HA) was intra-articularly injected into right knees at day 8 and 12 after MIA injection. Subsequently, the therapeutic effect of the 29-mer/HA on OA was evaluated by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) histopathological scoring system and changes in hind paw weight distribution, respectively. The regeneration of chondrocytes in damaged AC was detected by dual-immunostaining of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and chondrogenic markers.

The 29-mer promoted expansion and chondrogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs cultured in different defined media. MIA injection caused chondrocyte death throughout the AC, with cartilage degeneration thereafter. The 29-mer/HA treatment induced extensive chondrocyte regeneration in the damaged AC and suppressed MIA-induced synovitis, accompanied by the recovery of cartilage matrix. Pharmacological inhibitors of PEDF receptor (PEDFR) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling substantially blocked the chondrogenic promoting activity of 29-mer on the cultured BM-MSCs and injured AC.

The 29-mer/HA formulation effectively induces chondrocyte regeneration and formation of cartilage matrix in the damaged AC.

Mesenchymal stem cells/medicinal signaling cells (MSCs) possess therapeutic potential and are used in regenerative orthopaedics. The infra-patellar fat pad (IFP) is partially resected during knee arthroscopy (KASC) and contains MSCs. Heat, irrigation, and mechanical stress during KASC may decrease MSC's therapeutic potential. This study assessed MSCs' regenerative potential after arthroscopic IFP harvest and potential effects of two blood products (BP) (platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyperacute serum (HAS)) on MSCs' viability and chondrogenic differentiation capacity.

IFP was arthroscopically harvested, isolated, and counted (n = 5). Flow cytometry was used to assess cell viability via staining with annexin V/7-AAD and stemness markers via staining for CD90, CD73, and CD105. MSCs were incubated with blood products, and metabolic activity was determined via an XTT assay. Deposition of cartilage extracellular matrix was determined in histologic sections of chondrogenically differentiated 3D pellet cultures via staining with Alcian Blue. Expression of cartilage-specific genes (SOX9, MMP3/13, ACAN, COL1/2) was analyzed via quantitative PCR.

MSC isolation from IFP yielded 2.66*106 ± 1.49*106 viable cells from 2.7 (0.748) g of tissue. MSC markers (CD 90/105/73) were successfully detected and annexin V staining showed 81.5% viable cells. XTT showed increased metabolic activity. Within the BP groups, this increase was significant (days 0-14, p < 0.05). PCR showed expression of cartilage-specific genes in each group. COL2 (p < 0.01) as well as ACAN (p < 0.001) expression levels were significantly higher in the HAS group. Histology showed successful differentiation.

Arthroscopic harvest of IFP-MSCs yields sufficient cells with maintained regenerative potential and viability. Blood products further enhance MSCs' viability.

Articular cartilage is a common cartilage type found in a multitude of joints throughout the human body. However, cartilage is limited in its regenerative capacity. A range of methods have been employed to aid adults under the age of 45 with cartilage defects, but other cartilage pathologies such as osteoarthritis are limited to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and total joint arthroplasty. Cell therapies and synthetic biology can be utilized to assist not only cartilage defects but have the potential as a therapeutic approach for osteoarthritis as well. In this review, we will cover current cell therapy approaches for cartilage defect regeneration with a focus on autologous chondrocyte implantation and matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation. We will then discuss the potential of stem cells for cartilage repair in osteoarthritis and the use of synthetic biology to genetically engineer cells to promote cartilage regeneration and potentially reverse osteoarthritis.

Articular cartilage is a smooth and elastic connective tissue playing load-bearing and lubricating roles in the human body. Normal articular cartilage comprises no blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, nerves, or undifferentiated cells, so damage self-repair is very unlikely. The injuries of articular cartilage are often accompanied by damage to the subchondral bone. The subchondral bone mainly provides mechanical support for the joint, and the successful repair of articular cartilage depends on the ability of the subchondral bone to provide a suitable environment. Currently, conventional repair treatments for articular cartilage and subchondral bone defects can hardly achieve good results due to the poor self-repairing ability of the cartilage Here, we propose a bioactive injectable double-layer hydrogel to repair articular cartilage and subchondral bone. The hydrogel scaffold mimics the multilayer structure of articular cartilage and subchondral bone. Agarose was used as a common base material for the double-layer hydrogel scaffold, in which a sodium alginate (SA)/agarose layer was used for the repair of artificially produced subchondral bone defects, while a decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM)/agarose layer was used for the repair of articular cartilage defects. The double-layer hydrogel scaffold is injectable, easy to use, and can fill in the damaged area. The hydrogel scaffold is also anisotropic both chemically and structurally. Animal experiments showed that the surface of the new cartilage tissue in the double-layer hydrogel scaffold group was closest to normal articular cartilage, with a structure similar to that of hyaline cartilage and a preliminary calcified layer. Moreover, the new subchondral bone in this group exhibited many regular bone trabeculae, and the new cartilage and subchondral bone were mechanically bound without mutual intrusion and tightly integrated with the surrounding tissue. The continuous double-layer hydrogel scaffold prepared in this study mimics the multilayer structure of articular cartilage and subchondral bone and promotes the functional repair of articular cartilage and subchondral bone, favoring close integration between the newborn tissue and the original tissue.

Introduction: The unavailability of adequate human primary cells presents multiple challenges in terms of bone and cartilage regeneration and disease modeling experiments in vitro. Periosteal cells (PCs), which represent promising skeletal stem cell sources, could be a promising strategy in tissue engineering. The present study aimed to summarize the characteristics of PCs to investigate the efficacy of these cells in bone and cartilage regeneration in different models, paying special attention to the comparison of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus for articles published in English until April 2023. Only original researches in which PCs were employed for bone or cartilage regeneration experiments were included. Results: A total of 9140 references were retrieved. After screening the results, 36 publications were considered to be eligible for inclusion in the present literature review. Overall, PCs demonstrated beneficial bone and cartilage regenerative efficacy compared to the bare scaffold since almost all included studies reported positive results. The 9 studies assessing the differences in bone formation capacity between PCs and BMSCs indicated that PCs exhibited stronger in vivo osteogenic differentiation capabilities compared to BMSCs, while the other study demonstrated stronger chondrogenic potential of BMSCs. Discussion: PCs demonstrated beneficial to bone regenerative efficacy compared to the bare scaffold with a low risk of most studies included. However, the cartilage formation capacity of BMSCs still needs to be investigated due to the limited research available and the certain risk of bias. PCs exhibited higher osteogenic capabilities compared to BMSCs in combination with various scaffolds in vivo with good evidence. Further researches are needed to elucidate the comparative benefits of cartilage regeneration. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023411522, CRD42023411522.

By means of a "live-cell" template strategy, silica replicas displaying the same morphology and topography of the mammalian cells used as templates are fabricated. The replicas are used as substrates to direct the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to predefined cell lineages. Upregulation of specific genes shows how the silica replica-based substrates have the ability to induce the molecular characteristics of the mature cell types from which they have been derived from. Thus, MSCs cultured in the presence of silica replicas of human osteoblasts (HObs) differentiate into HObs-like cells, as shown by the upregulation of specific osteogenic genes. Likewise, when MSCs are incubated with silica replicas derived from human chondrocytes, an enhanced expression of chondrogenic markers is observed. Importantly, the effects of the silica replicas are cell type-specific since the incubation of MSCs with HObs silica replicas does not result in upregulation of chondrogenic markers and vice versa. What is more, for both cases, the differentiation rate is enhanced when the silica replicas are used in combination with growth factors, suggesting a potential synergistic effect. These results demonstrate the potential of this innovative method as an efficient and cheap approach with the potential to eliminate, or at least reduce, the use of biochemically soluble compounds in stem cells research.

The treatment of osteoarthritis (OA)-related cartilage defects is a great clinical challenge due to the complex pathogenesis of OA and poor self-repair ability of cartilage tissue. Combining local and long-term anti-inflammatory therapies to promote cartilage repair is an effective method to treat OA. In this study, a zinc-organic framework-incorporated extracellular matrix (ECM)-mimicking hydrogel platform was constructed for the inflammatory microenvironment-responsive delivery of neobavaisoflavone (NBIF) to promote cartilage regeneration in OA. The NBIF was encapsulated in situ in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8 MOFs). The NBIF@ZIF-8 MOFs were decorated with polydopamine and incorporated into a methacrylate gelatin/hyaluronic acid hybrid network to form the NBIF@ZIF-8/PHG hydrogel. The hydrogel featured excellent cell/tissue affinity, providing a favorable microenvironment for recruiting cells and cytokines to the defect sites. The hydrogel enabled the on-demand NBIF released in response to a weakly acidic microenvironment at the injured joint site to resolve inflammatory responses during the early stages of OA. Consequently, the cooperativity of the loaded NBIF and hydrogel synergistically modulated the immune response and assisted in cartilage defect repair. In summary, the NBIF@ZIF-8/PHG hydrogel delivery platform represents an effective treatment strategy for OA-related cartilage defects and may attract attentions for applications in other inflammatory diseases.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease of the joints for which no curative treatment exists. Intra-articular injection of stem cells is explored as a regenerative approach, but rapid clearance of cells from the injection site limits the therapeutic outcome. Microencapsulation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can extend the retention time of MSCs, but the outcomes of the few studies currently performed are conflicting. We hypothesize that the composition of the micromaterial's shell plays a deciding factor in the treatment outcome of intra-articular MSC injection. To this end, we microencapsulate MSCs using droplet microfluidic generators in flow-focus mode using various polymers and polymer concentrations. We demonstrate that polymer composition and concentration potently alter the metabolic activity as well as the secretome of MSCs. Moreover, while microencapsulation consistently prolongs the retention time of MSC injected in rat joints, distinct biodistribution within the joint is demonstrated for the various microgel formulations. Furthermore, intra-articular injections of pristine and microencapsulated MSC in OA rat joints show a strong material-dependent effect on the reduction of cartilage degradation and matrix loss. Collectively, this study highlights that micromaterial composition and concentration are key deciding factors for the therapeutic outcome of intra-articular injections of microencapsulated stem cells to treat degenerative joint diseases.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are excellent seed cells for cartilage tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Though the condensation of MSCs is the first step of their differentiation into chondrocytes in skeletal development, the process is a challenge in cartilage repairing by MSCs. The pericellular matrix (PCM), a distinct region surrounding the chondrocytes, acts as an extracellular linker among cells and forms the microenvironment of chondrocytes. Inspired by this, sericin nano-gel soft-agglomerates were prepared and used as linkers to induce MSCs to assemble into micro-spheres and differentiate into cartilage-like micro-tissues without exogenous stimulation of growth factors. These sericin nano-gel soft-agglomerates are composed of sericin nano-gels prepared by the chelation of metal ions and sericin protein. The MSCs cultured on 2D culture plates self-assembled into cell-microspheres centered by sericin nano-gel agglomerates. The self-assembly progress of MSCs is superior to the traditional centrifugation to achieve MSC condensation due to its facility, friendliness to MSCs and avoidance of the side-effects of growth factors. The analysis of transcriptomic results suggested that sericin nano-gel agglomerates offered a soft mechanical stimulation to MSCs similar to that of the PCM to chondrocytes and triggered some signaling pathways as associated with MSC chondrogenesis. The strategy of utilizing biomaterials to mimic the PCM as a linker and as a mechanical micro-environment and to induce cell aggregation and trigger the differentiation of MSCs can be employed to drive 3D cellular organization and micro-tissue fabrication in vitro. These cartilage micro-masses reported in this study can be potential candidates for cartilage repairing, cellular building blocks for 3D bio-printing and a model for cartilage development and drug screening.

Micro-nano robots have emerged as a promising research field with vast potential applications in biomedicine. The motor is the key component of micro-nano robot research, and the design of the motor is crucial. Among the most commonly used motors are those derived from living cells such as bacteria with flagella, sperm, and algal cells. Additionally, scientists have developed numerous self-adaptive biomimetic motors with biological functions, primarily cell membrane functionalized micromotors. This novel type of motor exhibits remarkable performance in complex media. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the structure and performance of micro-nano robots that utilize living cells and functionalized biological cell membranes. We also discuss potential practical applications of these mirco-nano robots as well as potential challenges that may arise in future development.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a whole-joint disease primarily characterized by the deterioration of hyaline cartilage. Current treatments include microfracture and chondrocyte implantation as early surgical strategies that can be combined with scaffolds to repair osteochondral lesions; however, intra-articular (IA) injections or implantations of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are new approaches that have presented encouraging therapeutic results in animal models and humans. We critically reviewed clinical trials with MSC therapies for OA, focusing on their effectiveness, quality, and outcomes in the regeneration of articular cartilage. Several sources of autologous or allogeneic MSCs were used in the clinical trials. Minor adverse events were generally reported, indicating that IA applications of MSCs are potentially safe. The evaluation of articular cartilage regeneration in human clinical trials is challenging, particularly in the inflammatory environment of osteoarthritic joints. Our findings indicate that IA injections of MSCs are efficacious in the treatment of OA and the regeneration of cartilage, but that they may be insufficient for the full repair of articular cartilage defects. The possible interference of clinical and quality variables in the outcomes suggests that robust clinical trials are still necessary for generating reliable evidence with which to support these treatments. We suggest that the administration of just-sufficient doses of viable cells in appropriate regimens is critical to achieve effective and durable effects. In terms of future perspectives, genetic modification, complex products with extracellular vesicles derived from MSCs, cell encapsulation in hydrogels, and 3D bioprinted tissue engineering are promising approaches with which to improve MSC therapies for OA.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common joint disease affecting humans and horses, resulting in significant morbidity, financial expense, and loss of athletic use. While the pathogenesis is incompletely understood, inflammation is considered crucial in the development and progression of the disease. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have received increasing scientific attention for their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and pro-regenerative effects. However, there are concerns about their ability to become a commercially available therapeutic. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are now recognized to play a crucial role in the therapeutic efficacy observed with MSCs and offer a potentially novel cell-free therapeutic that may negate many of the concerns with MSCs. There is evidence that EVs have profound anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and pro-regenerative effects equal to or greater than the MSCs they are derived from in the treatment of OA. Most of these studies are in small animal models, limiting the translation of these results to humans. However, highly translational animal models are crucial for further understanding the efficacy of potential therapeutics and for close comparisons with humans. For this reason, the horse, which experiences the same gravitational impacts on joints similar to people, is a highly relevant large animal species for testing. The equine species has well-designed and validated OA models, and additionally, therapies can be further tested in naturally occurring OA to validate preclinical model testing. Therefore, the horse is a highly suitable model to increase our knowledge of the therapeutic potential of EVs.

Cartilage damage caused by trauma or osteoarthritis is a common joint disease that can increase the social and economic burden in society. Due to its avascular characteristics, the poor migration ability of chondrocytes, and a low number of progenitor cells, the self-healing ability of cartilage defects has been significantly limited. Hydrogels have been developed into one of the most suitable biomaterials for the regeneration of cartilage because of its characteristics such as high-water absorption, biodegradation, porosity, and biocompatibility similar to natural extracellular matrix. Therefore, the present review article presents a conceptual framework that summarizes the anatomical, molecular structure and biochemical properties of hyaline cartilage located in long bones: articular cartilage and growth plate. Moreover, the importance of preparation and application of hyaluronic acid - gelatin hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering are included. Hydrogels possess benefits of stimulating the production of Agc1, Col2α1-IIa, and SOX9, molecules important for the synthesis and composition of the extracellular matrix of cartilage. Accordingly, they are believed to be promising biomaterials of therapeutic alternatives to treat cartilage damage.

Cell delivery using magnetic microswimmers is a promising tool for targeted therapy. However, it remains challenging to rapidly and uniformly manufacture cell-loaded microswimmers that can be assembled into cell-supporting structures at diseased sites. Here, rapid and uniform manufacturable 2D magnetic achiral microswimmers with pores were fabricated to deliver bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) to regenerate articular-damaged cartilage. Under actuation with magnetic fields, the BMSC-loaded microswimmers take advantage of the achiral structure to exhibit rolling or swimming motions to travel on smooth and rough surfaces, up inclined planes, or in the bulk fluid. Cell viability, proliferation, and differentiation tests performed days after cell seeding verified the microswimmers' biocompatibility. Long-distance targeting and in situ assemblies into 3D cell-supporting structures with BMSC-loaded microswimmers were demonstrated using a knee model and U-shaped wells. Overall, combining the advantages of preparing an achiral 2D structured microswimmer with magnetically driven motility results in a platform for cell transport and constructing 3D cell cultures that can improve cell delivery at lesion sites for biomedical applications.

Osteoarthritis remains an unfortunate long-term consequence of focal cartilage defects of the knee. Associated with functional loss and pain, it has necessitated the exploration of new therapies to regenerate cartilage before significant deterioration and subsequent joint replacement take place. Recent studies have investigated a multitude of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources and polymer scaffold compositions. It is uncertain how different combinations affect the extent of integration of native and implant cartilage and the quality of new cartilage formed. Implants seeded with bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMSCs) have demonstrated promising results in restoring these defects, largely through in vitro and animal studies. A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL) to identify studies using BMSC-seeded implants in animal models of focal cartilage defects of the knee. Quantitative results from the histological assessment of integration quality were extracted. Repair cartilage morphology and staining characteristics were also recorded. Meta-analysis demonstrated that high-quality integration was achieved, exceeding that of cell-free comparators and control groups. This was associated with repair tissue morphology and staining properties which resembled those of native cartilage. Subgroup analysis showed better integration outcomes for studies using poly-glycolic acid-based scaffolds. In conclusion, BMSC-seeded implants represent promising strategies for the advancement of focal cartilage defect repair. While a greater number of studies treating human patients is necessary to realize the full clinical potential of BMSC therapy, high-quality integration scores suggest that these implants could generate repair cartilage of substantial longevity.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disorder, is associated with an increasing socioeconomic impact owing to the ageing population.

To analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) in knee OA management from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Independent and duplicate electronic database searches were performed, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, until August 2021 for RCTs that analyzed the efficacy and safety of AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs in the management of knee OA. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Lysholm score, Tegner score, magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue score, knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and adverse events were analyzed. Analysis was performed on the R-platform using OpenMeta (Analyst) software. Twenty-one studies, involving 936 patients, were included. Only one study compared the two MSC sources without patient randomization; hence, the results of all included studies from both sources were pooled, and a comparative critical analysis was performed.

At six months, both AD-MSCs and BM-MSCs showed significant VAS improvement (P = 0.015, P = 0.012); this was inconsistent at 1 year for BM-MSCs (P < 0.001, P = 0.539), and AD-MSCs outperformed BM-MSCs compared to controls in measures such as WOMAC (P < 0.001, P = 0.541), Lysholm scores (P = 0.006; P = 0.933), and KOOS (P = 0.002; P = 0.012). BM-MSC-related procedures caused significant adverse events (P = 0.003) compared to AD-MSCs (P = 0.673).

Adipose tissue is superior to bone marrow because of its safety and consistent efficacy in improving pain and functional outcomes. Future trials are urgently warranted to validate our findings and reach a consensus on the ideal source of MSCs for managing knee OA.

Articular cartilage covers the ends of bones in synovial joints acting as a shock absorber that helps movement of bones. Damage of the articular cartilage needs treatment as it does not repair itself and the damage can progress to osteoarthritis. In osteoarthritis all the joint tissues are involved with characteristic progressive cartilage degradation and inflammation. Autologous chondrocyte implantation is a well-proven cell-based treatment for cartilage defects, but a main downside it that it requires two surgeries. Multipotent, aka mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-based cartilage repair has gained attention as it can be used as a one-step treatment. It is proposed that a combination of immunomodulatory and regenerative capacities make MSC attractive for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Furthermore, since part of the paracrine effects of MSCs are attributed to extracellular vesicles (EVs), small membrane enclosed particles secreted by cells, EVs are currently being widely investigated for their potential therapeutic effects. Although MSCs have entered clinical cartilage treatments and EVs are used in in vivo efficacy studies, not much attention has been given to determine their potency and to the development of potency assays. This chapter provides considerations and suggestions for the development of potency assays for the use of MSCs and MSC-EVs for the treatment of cartilage defects and osteoarthritis.

Human articular cartilage has a poor ability to self-repair, meaning small injuries often lead to osteoarthritis, a painful and debilitating condition which is a major contributor to the global burden of disease. Existing clinical strategies generally do not regenerate hyaline type cartilage, motivating research toward tissue engineering solutions. Prospective cartilage tissue engineering therapies can be placed into two broad categories: i) Ex situ strategies, where cartilage tissue constructs are engineered in the lab prior to implantation and ii) in situ strategies, where cells and/or a bioscaffold are delivered to the defect site to stimulate chondral repair directly. While commonalities exist between these two approaches, the core point of distinction-whether chondrogenesis primarily occurs "within" or "without" (outside) the body-can dictate many aspects of the treatment. This difference influences decisions around cell selection, the biomaterials formulation and the surgical implantation procedure, the processes of tissue integration and maturation, as well as, the prospects for regulatory clearance and clinical translation. Here, ex situ and in situ cartilage engineering strategies are compared: Highlighting their respective challenges, opportunities, and prospects on their translational pathways toward long term human cartilage repair.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is an immensely pervasive joint disorder-typically concerning large weight-bearing joints-affecting over 30 million people in the United States, with this number predicted to reach 67 million by 2030 [...].

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a tremendously widespread joint ailment, typically affecting large weight-bearing joints and influencing over 30 million individuals in the United States, with the anticipated number of patients to reach 67 million by 2030 [...].

Interest in use of perinatal allogenic tissues including clinical-grade minimally manipulated umbilical cord tissue-derived allograft formulations to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients is increasing. Limited studies have characterized these formulations and evaluated their safety and efficacy in knee OA patients. We developed such formulation and reported the presence of growth factors, cytokines, hyaluronic acid, and exosomes. We reported that its administration is safe, and resulted in 50% pain reduction and improvement in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (over 10%) and 36-item short form survey (25%). Another study reported no adverse events post injection of similar formulation and statistically significant ( P <0.001) improvement in visual analog scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores and reduction in medication usage in patients (77.8%). We also summarized the clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov utilizing umbilical cord tissue for knee OA treatment. In conclusion, available studies are preliminary but pave the way to higher level appropriately powered investigations, and these formulations should be considered as nonoperative alternative to manage knee OA.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is an extremely prevalent joint condition in the United States, affecting over 30 million people [...].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown promising results in stimulating cartilage repair and in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). However, the fate of the MSCs after intra-articular injection and their role in cartilage regeneration is not clear. To address these questions, this study investigated (1) homing of labeled human adipose tissue derived integrin α10β1-selected MSCs (integrin α10-MSCs) to a cartilage defect in a rabbit model and (2) the ability of the integrin α10-MSCs to differentiate to chondrocytes and to produce cartilage matrix molecules in vivo.

Integrin α10-MSCs were labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) co-conjugated with Rhodamine B to allow visualization by both MRI and fluorescence microscopy. A cartilage defect was created in the articular cartilage of the intertrochlear groove of the femur of rabbits. Seven days post-surgery, labeled integrin α10-MSCs or vehicle were injected into the joint. Migration and distribution of the SPION-labeled integrin α10-MSCs was evaluated by high-field 9.4 T MRI up to 10 days after injection. Tissue sections from the repair tissue in the defects were examined by fluorescence microscopy.

In vitro characterization of the labeled integrin α10-MSCs demonstrated maintained viability, proliferation rate and trilineage differentiation capacity compared to unlabeled MSCs. In vivo MRI analysis detected the labeled integrin α10-MSCs in the cartilage defects at all time points from 12 h after injection until day 10 with a peak concentration between day 1 and 4 after injection. The labeled MSCs were also detected lining the synovial membrane at the early time points. Fluorescence analysis confirmed the presence of the labeled integrin α10-MSCs in all layers of the cartilage repair tissue and showed co-localization between the labeled cells and the specific cartilage molecules aggrecan and collagen type II indicating in vivo differentiation of the MSCs to chondrocyte-like cells. No adverse effects of the α10-MSC treatment were detected during the study period.

Our results demonstrated migration and homing of human integrin α10β1-selected MSCs to cartilage defects in the rabbit knee after intra-articular administration as well as chondrogenic differentiation of the MSCs in the regenerated cartilage tissue.

Biologics are increasingly used for cartilage repair and osteoarthritis (OA) treatment. This study aimed to provide an overview of the clinical trials conducted on this subject.

Two-word combinations of two sets of key words "cartilage"; "joint"; "osteoarthritis" and "biologics"; "stem cells"; "cell implantation" were used to search the database of ClinicalTrials.gov and supplemented with searches of PubMed and EMbase. The registered trials were analyzed for clinical conditions, completion status, phases, and investigated biologics. Recently completed trials with posted/published results were summarized.

From 2000 to 2022, a total of 365 clinical trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to use biologics for cartilage repair and OA treatment. Since 2006, the number of registered trials accelerated at an annual rate of 16.4%. Of the 265 trials designated with a phase, 72% were early Phase 1, Phase 1, and Phase 2. Chondrocytes and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) were studied in nearly equal number of early- and late-stage trials. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) were the most commonly investigated biologics (38%) and mostly derived from bone marrow and adipose tissue (70%). In last 5 years, 32 of the 72 completed trials posted/published results, among which seven Phase 3 trials investigated chondrocytes, PRP, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, hyaluronic acid, collagen membrane, and albumin.

There was a rapid increase in the number of registered clinical trials in recent years, using a variety of biologics for cartilage repair and OA treatment. Majority of the biologics still require late-stage trials to validate their clinical effectiveness.

Focal chondral defects of the knee occur commonly in the young, active population due to trauma. Damage can insidiously spread and lead to osteoarthritis with significant functional and socioeconomic consequences. Implants consisting of autologous chondrocytes or mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) seeded onto scaffolds have been suggested as promising therapies to restore these defects. However, the degree of integration between the implant and native cartilage still requires optimization. A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using five databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL) to identify studies that used autologous chondrocyte implants (ACI) or MSC implant therapies to repair chondral defects of the tibiofemoral joint. Data on the integration of the implant-cartilage interface, as well as outcomes of clinical scoring systems, were extracted. Most eligible studies investigated the use of ACI only. Our meta-analysis showed that, across a total of 200 patients, 64% (95% CI (51%, 75%)) achieved complete integration with native cartilage. In addition, a pooled improvement in the mean MOCART integration score was observed during post-operative follow-up (standardized mean difference: 1.16; 95% CI (0.07, 2.24), p = 0.04). All studies showed an improvement in the clinical scores. The use of a collagen-based scaffold was associated with better integration and clinical outcomes. This review demonstrated that cell-seeded scaffolds can achieve good quality integration in most patients, which improves over time and is associated with clinical improvements. A greater number of studies comparing these techniques to traditional cartilage repair methods, with more inclusion of MSC-seeded scaffolds, should allow for a standardized approach to cartilage regeneration to develop.

To compare the effectiveness of intra-articular injection (IAI) of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) with Triamcinolone Hexacetonide (TH) and Saline Solution (SS), in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

A randomized controlled trial, with blinded patients and assessor.

Outpatient rheumatology service.

Patients with knee osteoarthritis grades II and III.

Patients received IAI with PRP, 40 mg TH, or SS.

Patients were assessed at baseline and after 4, 8, 12 e 52 weeks with: visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at rest and movement, WOMAC questionnaire, Timed to Up and Go test, 6-min walk test, percentage of improvement, goniometry, quality of life SF-36 questionnaire, Likert scale and Kelgreen & Lawrence (KL) radiographic scale (only at baseline and 52 weeks).

100 patients were studied, with a mean age of 67.13(6.56) years. The TH group was superior for: percentage of improvement (versus SS group from 4 to 52 weeks); WOMAC total and pain (versus PRP group at 4 weeks); and WOMAC stiffness (versus SS group at 12 weeks). The SS group was inferior for WOMAC function (from 8 to 52 weeks). The PRP group showed lowest radiographic progression [TH 17 (51.51%) to 24 (72.72%); SS 17 (51.51%) to 30 (90.90%); PRP 20 (58.82%) to 21 (61.76%)].

The Triamcinolone Hexacetonide group was superior for percentage of improvement and WOMAC, pain and stiffness. For the WOMAC function, the Platelet-Rich Plasma group and Triamcinolone Hexacetonide group were superior to the Saline group. The Platelet-Rich Plasma group showed the lowest radiographic progression at 52 weeks of follow-up.

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) have paved a way for treating musculoskeletal diseases in a minimally invasive manner. The regenerative medicine cocktail involves the usage of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs), either uncultured or culture-expanded cells along with growth factors, cytokines, exosomes, and secretomes to provide a better regenerative milieu in degenerative diseases. The successful regeneration of cartilage depends on the selection of the appropriate source of MSCs, the quality, quantity, and frequency of MSCs to be injected, and the selection of the patient at an appropriate stage of the disease. However, confirmation on the most favorable source of MSCs remains uncertain to clinicians. The lack of knowledge in the current cellular treatment is uncertain in terms of how beneficial MSCs are in the long-term or short-term (resolution of pain) and improved quality of life. Whether MSCs treatments have any superiority, exists due to sources of MSCs utilized in their potential to objectively regenerate the cartilage at the target area. Many questions on source and condition remain unanswered. Hence, in this review, we discuss the lineage differentiation potentials of various sources of MSCs used in the management of knee osteoarthritis and emphasize the role of tissue engineering in cartilage regeneration.

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) cascades are upregulated during bone marrow-derived stromal cell (BMSC) chondrogenesis, contributing to hypertrophy and preventing effective BMSC-mediated cartilage repair. Previous work demonstrated that a proprietary BMP inhibitor prevented BMSC hypertrophy, yielding stable cartilage tissue. Because of the significant therapeutic potential of a molecule capable of hypertrophy blockade, we evaluated the capacity of a commercially available BMP type I receptor inhibitor with similar properties, LDN 193189, to prevent BMSC hypertrophy. Using 14-day microtissue chondrogenic induction cultures we found that LDN 193189 permitted BMSC chondrogenesis but did not prevent hypertrophy. LDN 193189 was sufficiently potent to counter mineralization and adipogenesis in response to exogenous BMP-2 in osteogenic induction cultures. LDN 193189 did not modify BMSC behavior in adipogenic induction cultures. Although LDN 193189 is effective in countering BMP signaling in a manner that influences BMSC fate, this blockade is insufficient to prevent hypertrophy.

Meta-analysis.

We aim to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee from Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) available in the literature.

We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database searches including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library till August 2021 for RCTs analyzing the efficacy and safety of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Visual Analog Score (VAS) for Pain, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score, and adverse events were the outcomes analyzed. Analysis was performed in R-platform using OpenMeta [Analyst] software.

21 studies involving 936 patients were included for analysis. None of the studies made a direct comparison of the direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs, hence we pooled the results of all the included studies of both groups and made a comparative analysis of their outcomes. Although at 6 months, both direct and vehicle-based delivery of MSCs showed significantly better VAS improvement (p = 0.002, p = 0.010), it was not consistent at 1 year for the vehicle delivery (p = 0.973). During 6 months and 12 months, direct delivery of MSCs (p < 0.001, p < 0.001) outperformed vehicle delivery (p = 0.969, p = 0.922) compared to their control based on WOMAC scores respectively. Both direct (p = 0.713) and vehicle-based delivery (p = 0.123) of MSCs did not produce significant adverse events compared to their controls.

Our analysis of literature showed that current clinically employed methods of vehicle-based delivery of MSCs such as platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid did not demonstrate superior results compared to direct delivery, concerning the efficacy of treatment measured by improvement in pain, functional outcomes, and safety. Hence, we urge future clinical trials to be conducted to validate the effectiveness of advanced delivery vehicles such as composite bioscaffolds to establish their practical utility in cartilage regeneration with respect to its encouraging in-vitro evidence.