Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy aims to reduce neurocognitive decline in patients receiving cranial irradiation. Advances in radiotherapy planning systems offer improved sparing of organs at risk while maintaining target coverage. This study compared the dosimetric performance of five planning techniques for hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy: Radixact with 1cm and 2.5cm field widths, Ethos, HyperArc, and volumetric modulated arctherapy using advanced optimization algorithms.

Eleven patients who underwent whole brain irradiation were included in this retrospective planning study. The prescribed dose was 30Gy in 12 fractions, with hippocampus dose constraints of D98 %≤9Gy and D2 %≤17Gy. Radixact plans were created using the VOLO™ Ultra optimizer with normal tissue objective parameters for dose fall-off control. Ethos plans were generated using an intelligent optimization engine with automated planning. HyperArc employed four non-coplanar arcs with SRS normal tissue objective optimization, while volumetric modulated arctherapy utilized six arcs. Dosimetric parameters, including planning target volume coverage, hippocampal doses, and organs at risk constraints, were analyzed using one-way ANOVA.

Radixact with 1cm field width achieved the lowest hippocampal doses, whereas HyperArc and volumetric modulated arctherapy provided superior planning target volume coverage. Ethos resulted in the lowest doses to organs at risk, while HyperArc had the shortest treatment duration. Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were observed across techniques for hippocampal D98 %, D2 %, and sparing of organs at risk.

Advanced planning techniques offer distinct dosimetric advantages for hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy. Radixact with 1cm field width optimally spares the hippocampus, while HyperArc and volumetric modulated arctherapy balance sparing of organs at risk with shorter treatment times. Selection of an optimal planning approach should consider both dosimetric outcomes and clinical workflow efficiency.

While treatments for primary brain tumors increase survival, they have cognitive sequelae. Neurocognition's anatomical distribution makes it susceptible to brain damage. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of radiotherapy on short-term cognitive impairment.

Using a prospective database of cognitive rehabilitation in adults operated on for primary brain tumors, a retrospective sub-analysis of the contribution of radiotherapy was performed. Thirty-four subdivisions of 12 neurocognitive regions were delineated in 48 irradiated patients and 30 non-irradiated patients. In the first group, the correlation between radiation dose and deterioration was evaluated. In all patients, the impact of tumor and surgical changes on dysfunction was calculated and compared with dose-dependent response.

The correlation between cognitive status and radiation dose is especially strong and significant in the left hemisphere and in specific subdivisions such as the posterior hippocampus or the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with the left prevailing over posterior dominance. Memory is the most affected domain 1 month after radiotherapy, as attention is three months later. The hippocampus is involved in various cognitive domains in addition to memory. The prefrontal subregions and the genu of the corpus callosum are more affected by the relationship with disease and surgical changes than by radiation exposure. Patients ongoing a course of radiotherapy do not benefit from concurrent cognitive rehabilitation.

There is a correlation between the dose of radiation received by several encephalic regions and degree of short-term domain-specific cognition decline, considering other factors of risk and cognitive rehabilitation.

Results of a prospective, randomized controlled trial at our institute demonstrate an association between the dose to the left hippocampus and neurocognitive decline post-radiotherapy for patients with glioblastoma. To minimize the dose to the left hippocampus, a left hippocampus sparing model was created using RapidPlan (RP) and multi-criteria optimization (MCO).

For 147 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the left and right hippocampus were delineated. Ninety-seven of 147 VMAT plans were used to configure a RP model named HCS1. The remaining 50 VMAT plans were used for the model validation. All 97 plans were replanned with the HCS1 and further optimized using MCO (HCS1+MCO). MCO was used to explore the trade-off between reducing the left hippocampus mean dose and planning objectives for the targets and other organs-at-risk (OAR) for HCS1 plans. These plans were used to create a new model called HCS2. MCO and RP model configuration were done within the Eclipse treatment planning system.

The final HCS2 model decreased the mean dose to the left hippocampus by 26% compared to clinically treated plans without reducing target coverage for 50 validation data. The mean dose to the left hippocampus decreased from 32.65 Gy in clinically treated plans, 30.45 Gy in HCS1-generated plans, and 24.04 Gy in HCS2-generated plans. The mean volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose (V95%) of the planning target volume was 99.08% ± 1.39% in clinically treated plans, 99.03% ± 1.37% in HCS1-generated plans, and 98.80% ± 1.48% in HCS2-generated plans. Mean dose to 0.1 cc of the brainstem improved from 45.91 Gy in clinically treated plans to 39.29 Gy in HCS2-generated plans.

The RP model and MCO helps to decrease left hippocampus mean dose while maintaining the target volume coverage and OAR sparing comparable to clinically treated plans for glioblastoma patients.

Hippocampal injury from WBRT contributes to neurocognitive decline in brain malignancy patients. HA-WBRT may mitigate this by reducing hippocampal radiation exposure, but its feasibility in PCNSL remains unassessed regarding hippocampal involvement and failure rates. This study evaluates hippocampal involvement at diagnosis and after treatment in PCNSL patients.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 278 immunocompetent PCNSL patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2021. Following high-dose methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy, patients either received consolidation therapy, including RT, cytarabine alone, or autologous stem cell transplantation or underwent observation. Hippocampus was outlined on T1 MRI images and expanded by a 5 mm margin to create the hippocampal avoidance region (HAR). Hippocampal failure was defined as recurrence or progression at HAR. The median follow-up was 38.7 months (range 3.1-239.4 months).

Of the 278 patients diagnosed with PCNSL, 39.9% presented initial lesions at HAR. After induction therapy, 212 evaluable patients received consolidation treatments or observation. Intracranial failures occurred in 47.6% (n = 101), with 66.3% (n = 67) occurring outside the HAR and 33.7% (n = 34) inside the HAR. Unifocal disease (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96, p = 0.025) was associated with a lower risk of hippocampal failures, while initial HAR involvement significantly increased the risk (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.18-4.47, p = 0.018). Patients with unifocal disease outside the HAR had the lowest 3-year hippocampal failure rate (6.2%). RT that included the hippocampus did not significantly affect hippocampal failure rates in patients without initial HAR lesions (p = 0.282), with three-year rates of 9.2 vs. 14.6% for other treatments. However, among patients with initial HAR involvement, RT including the hippocampus significantly reduced hippocampal failure rates compared to other approaches (p = 0.002). Hippocampal failure rates were comparable, with conventional WBRT at 14.6% and HA-WBRT at 19% in patients without initial HAR lesions (p = 0.734).

The routine application of the HA-WBRT strategy is not supported due to the high risk of hippocampal failures in general and requires further investigation to establish its feasibility and safety in well-defined subgroups. Our results suggest that the HA-WBRT strategy could be evaluated for select PCNSL patients with unifocal lesions or those located outside the HAR.

Background and Objectives: Brain radionecrosis is an under-recognized but potentially life-altering late complication of radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. Temporal lobe radionecrosis and high-dose exposure to the hippocampus are strongly associated with cognitive decline and radiation-induced dementia, negatively impacting patients' long-term quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to evaluate and compare radiation dose distributions to critical brain structures across three radiotherapy techniques-3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-in order to assess potential neurocognitive risks and support hippocampal-sparing protocols. Materials and Methods: Ten patients previously treated with 3D-CRT were retrospectively replanned using IMRT and VMAT techniques on the Eclipse v13.3 (VARIAN) planning system. Bilateral hippocampi and temporal lobes were delineated as organs at risk (OARs) according to the RTOG atlas, and dosimetric parameters including D_max, D_mean, and D_min were recorded. V7.3 values were evaluated for hippocampal avoidance regions. Results: While IMRT and VMAT provided improved target volume coverage and reduced high-dose exposure to many standard OARs, both techniques were associated with increased D_mean and D_min to the hippocampus and temporal lobes compared to 3D-CRT. The highest D_max values to the temporal lobes were observed in 3D-CRT plans, indicating a potential risk of radionecrosis. VMAT plans showed hippocampal mean doses exceeding 10 Gy in some cases, with V7.3 > 40%, breaching established neurocognitive risk thresholds. Conclusions: These findings support the routine delineation of the hippocampus and temporal lobes as OARs in radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal cancer. The implementation of hippocampal-sparing strategies, particularly in IMRT and VMAT, is recommended to reduce the risk of radiation-induced cognitive toxicity and preserve long-term QoL in survivors.

Radiation therapy (RT) is a cornerstone in the management of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Recent advancements in RT delivery and techniques aim to enhance therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing both acute and long-term complications associated with pediatric brain RT. This paper highlights innovative developments in the field, including the clinical indications, benefits, and challenges of proton therapy and stereotactic radiotherapy. The ongoing refinement of risk-adapted RT volumes is highlighted, with examples of newly proposed germinoma RT volumes and hippocampal-sparing RT. Additionally, emerging experimental approaches, including FLASH therapy and theranostics, are also discussed as promising future directions. Further prospective, multi-institutional collaborative studies are essential to validate and expand upon the benefits outlined in this review.

Hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) is increasingly used for multiple brain metastases. However, most studies have not reported dose conformity indices (CI). In the only study indicating the CI, conformity was low (CI=0.7). We developed a new technique to achieve a significantly higher CI and better dose coverage.

Ten patients received 30 Gy of HS-WBRT for brain metastases. Three variants of treatment plans (VAR1, VAR2, VAR3) were investigated. Volumetric modulated arc therapy plans with two (2ROT) or three rotations (3ROT) were created for each variant. Plans were compared for compliance with hippocampal sparing criteria, CI (where a higher value indicates better conformity), and homogeneity index (HI, where a lower value indicates better homogeneity).

Best results (highest CI, lowest HI) were achieved with the VAR3-3ROT technique (a new method), which yielded a CI=0.92-0.95 and a HI=0.05-0.09. VAR3-2ROT led to a CI=0.90-0.95 and a HI=0.06-0.11. With the other techniques, CI and HI ranged between 0.77-0.87 and 0.15-0.32, respectively.

Our new technique achieved both appropriate hippocampal sparing and very high dose conformity of ≥0.9. Significant underdosage outside the hippocampal-sparing area was avoided.

To demonstrate the ease and feasibility that hippocampal sparing whole brain (WB) simultaneous integrated boost (HSWB-SIB) plans can be generated using knowledge-based planning and Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) for three different modalities, HyperArc on TrueBeam (TB-HA), a coplanar beam arrangement on TrueBeam (TB-Co), and the ring-mounted Halcyon LINAC (Hal).

Twelve patients with 2-14 brain metastases were retrospectively replanned for HSWB-SIB using a published HSWB RapidPlan model with modifications for the automated addition of SIB to metastases. Prescribed dose was 30 Gy to the WB planning target volume (PTV) and 50 Gy to the metastases in 10 fractions. Eclipse treatment planning system (v16.1) was used with a 6 MV-FFF beam and Acuros XB dose algorithm.

The methodology was successfully used for all modalities, generating plans in under 30 min. The plan doses were normalized to the WB PTV D95% receiving 30 Gy. Reporting values in the order of Hal, TB-Co, and TB-HA: The WB PTV received a V48 Gy of 4.58, 3.98, and 4.45 cc with statistically insignificant differences (p = 0.806). The boost PTVs received a D95% of 50.60, 50.43, and 51.13 Gy with statistically significant comparisons between TB-HA and the other two modalities (p = 0.005). The hippocampus maximum dose was 11.81, 11.51, and 11.13 Gy with no statistically significant comparisons (p = 0.105). All other oragns-at-risk (OAR) doses were clinically acceptable. The modalities were evaluated using a dosimetric scorecard, achieving average scores of 84.85%, 86.45%, and 87.39%. End-to-end testing ensured the deliverability of the HSWB-SIB plans for all modalities.

The novel modification of the preexisting HSWB RapidPlan model with the automated inclusion of SIB objectives allows for easy, intuitive planning of complex HSWB-SIB treatments. All modalities demonstrated can be used with clinically comparable results. Other institutions are recommended to pursue and validate this HSWB-SIB technique to increase the accessibility of a single-course of high-quality treatment for patients with multiple brain lesions.

The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric differences between non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in hippocampus-avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy with a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT+SIB) for brain metastases using the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS).

A total of 22 patients with brain metastases were retrospectively enrolled. Two radiotherapy treatment plans were designed for each patient: non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar fixed field IMRT. The dose distribution of targets and organs at risk (OAR), the number of monitor units (MUs), and pre-treatment plan verification were compared between the two plans while meeting the prescribed dose requirements of the target volume.

There were no significant differences in V50, V55, Dmax, heterogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of target PGTV between the two plans (p>0.05). For PTV-brain-SIB, there was no significant difference in D98% between IMRT and VMAT (p=0.103). VMAT significantly improved the V30 of PTV-brain-SIB (p<0.001), decreased HI (p=0.003), and increased CI (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the Dmax to the brain stem, left and right lens, optic chiasm, pituitary gland, and left and right hippocampus between the two plans (p>0.05). Compared with IMRT, VMAT significantly reduced the Dmax to the left and right eyes (p<0.001) and significantly increased the Dmax to the right inner ear (p=0.010). There was no significant difference in the Dmax to the left inner ear between VMAT and IMRT (p=0.458). Compared with IMRT, VMAT significantly reduced the Dmax to the left optic nerve (p=0.006), but significantly increased the Dmax to the right optic nerve (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in the Dmax to the left and right hippocampus between VMAT and IMRT (p>0.05), but VMAT significantly increased the D100% (p<0.05) compared with IMRT. Compared with VMAT, IMRT significantly reduced the MU (p<0.001) but VMAT has a higher treatment efficiency than IMRT, with an average reduction of 41 seconds (294.1 ± 16.4 s for VMAT, 335.8 ± 34.9 s for IMRT, p<0.001). Under the conditions of 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm, the gamma passing rate of the IMRT QA was improved compared to VMAT, with an average increase of 0.6%, p=0.013, and 1.7%, p<0.001, respectively.

Both non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar fixed field IMRT based on the Monaco TPS produce clinically acceptable results for HA-WBRT+SIB in patients with brain metastases. Compared with IMRT, VMAT has better dose distribution in the target volume and treatment efficiency, but IMRT can better protect the hippocampus and reduce the number of MUs.

Clinical management of melanoma brain metastases is complex and requires multidisciplinary approach. With close collaboration between neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and medical oncologists, melanoma patients with brain are offered different treatment modalities: surgery, radiation therapy, systemic therapy or combined treatments. Radiation therapy (whole brain radiotherapy- WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery- SRS) is an integral part of treating melanoma brain metastases. Use of immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy (BRAF/MEK inhibitors) significantly changed the outcome in patients with melanoma metastases. Currently, ipilimumab and nivolumab (COMBO) is the preferred first-line systemic therapy for all patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, regardless of BRAF status (BRAF wild-type and BRAF-mutated). Although at the moment there is no consensus on the concomitant use of SRS and COMBO, results from clinical trials suggest that this combined treatment modality should be considered the standard of care for melanoma patients with brain metastases. However, further clinical research is required to define optimal treatment modalities for routine management of melanoma brain lesions.

To validate a CT-based deep learning (DL) hippocampal segmentation model trained on a single-institutional dataset and explore its utility for multi-institutional contour quality assurance (QA).

A DL model was trained to contour hippocampi from a dataset generated by an institutional observer (IO) contouring on brain MRIs from a single-institution cohort. The model was then evaluated on the RTOG 0933 dataset by comparing the treating physician (TP) contours to blinded IO and DL contours using Dice and Haussdorf distance (HD) agreement metrics as well as evaluating differences in dose to hippocampi when TP vs. IO vs. DL contours are used for planning. The specificity and sensitivity of the DL model to capture planning discrepancies was quantified using criteria of HD > 7 mm and Dmax hippocampi > 17 Gy.

The DL model showed greater agreement with IO contours compared to TP contours (DL:IO L/R Dice 74%/73%, HD 4.86/4.74; DL:TP L/R Dice 62%/65%, HD 7.23/6.94, all p < 0.001). Thirty percent of contours and 53 % of dose plans failed QA. The DL model achieved an AUC L/R 0.80/0.79 on the contour QA task via Haussdorff comparison and AUC of 0.91 via Dmax comparison. The false negative rate was 17.2%/20.5% (contours) and 5.8% (dose). False negative cases tended to demonstrate a higher DL:IO Dice agreement (L/R p = 0.42/0.03) and better qualitative visual agreement compared with true positive cases.

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using a single-institutional DL model to perform contour QA on a multi-institutional trial for the task of hippocampal segmentation.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases of atypical carcinoid tumors are exceptionally rare. Isolated studies suggest a survival benefit in patients who receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT); however, it has been known to have detrimental effects on long-term memory and executive function. Here, we present a case of a patient initially diagnosed with stage IIB bronchopulmonary carcinoid who later developed hepatic and intracranial metastases despite receiving adjuvant systemic therapy over a two-year period. She underwent hippocampal-sparing WBRT (HS-WBRT), receiving 30 Gy in 10 fractions via daily image-guided photon therapy using two coplanar arcs. Subsequent clinical evaluations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain at 11 months post-treatment demonstrated a decrease in the size and number of brain metastases, with the patient reporting stable memory and cognition. This case demonstrates the efficacious delivery of palliative HS-WBRT in a patient with a rare presentation of brain-metastatic atypical carcinoid, conferring effective local control and preservation of cognition. Multi-therapy regimens that incorporate HS-WBRT may be considered for improved disease control and quality of life. Further investigation of systemic agents, and possible molecular targets that could confer greater efficacy against treatment-progressive atypical carcinoids, is also warranted.

This article discusses commonly encountered medical and neurological complications in patients with brain tumors and highlights recommendations for their management based on updated evidence.

Use of dexamethasone is correlated with worse prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, and in brain metastases, high doses may lead to increased side effects without additional clinical benefit. There are multiple antiseizure medications (ASM) to choose from and possible interactions and toxicity must be considered when choosing an agent. Additionally, there is growing interest in the use of AMPA receptor blockers as ASM in patients with brain tumors. Nonpharmacological strategies for the management of fatigue remain paramount. Cognitive decline is common after whole brain radiation (WBRT) and hippocampal-sparing WBRT results in superior cognitive outcomes. Venous thromboembolism is a common complication and there is growing evidence on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population.

There is evolving evidence on the management of medical and neurological complications in patients with brain tumors. These complications, require early identification and multidisciplinary collaboration and expertise.

Hippo-avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) requires a hippocampal avoidance zone expanded from hippocampus to ensure dose fall-off and compensate for setup errors. Most studies recommend a 5-mm margin, while it could be optimized to a 2-mm expansion. Here, we showed the details of optimized HA-PCI for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

This cohort study reviewed patients with LS-SCLC receiving optimized HA-PCI from August 2014 to June 2020 in the National Cancer Center of China. The hippo-related dose parameters were summarized. The comparison of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) scores in different time points was conducted. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rates.

A total of 112 patients were included. The average doses of hippocampus and hippocampal avoidance zone were 6.80 Gy (IQR: 6.40-7.44) and 7.63 Gy (IQR: 7.14-8.39). No differences were observed in the two radiation techniques (tomotherapy [TOMO] vs. volumetric-modulated arc therapy [VMAT]). The decline of HVLT-R score remained in a low level and not significant in assessable patients (p = 0.095). With a median follow-up of 52 months (95% CI: 47.2-56.7), the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 74.1% and 50.0%, respectively. Two intracranial recurrence lesions (2.3%) located <2 mm from the hippocampus.

Optimized HA-PCI could achieve similar dose limitation by TOMO and VMAT techniques with favorable efficacy and minor toxicity.

This study aims to develop and validate SwinHS, a deep learning-based automatic segmentation model designed for precise hippocampus delineation in patients receiving hippocampus-protected whole-brain radiotherapy. By streamlining this process, we seek to significantly improve workflow efficiency for clinicians.

A total of 100 three-dimensional T1-weighted MR images were collected, with 70 patients allocated for training and 30 for testing. Manual delineation of the hippocampus was performed according to RTOG0933 guidelines. The SwinHS model, which incorporates a 3D ELSA Transformer module and an sSE CNN decoder, was trained and tested on these datasets. To prove the effectiveness of SwinHS, this study compared the segmentation performance of SwinHS with that of V-Net, U-Net, ResNet and VIT. Evaluation metrics included the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). Dosimetric evaluation compared radiotherapy plans generated using automatic segmentation (plan AD) versus manual hippocampus segmentation (plan MD).

SwinHS outperformed four advanced deep learning-based models, achieving an average DSC of 0.894, a JSC of 0.817, and an HD of 3.430 mm. Dosimetric evaluation revealed that both plan (AD) and plan (MD) met treatment plan constraints for the target volume (PTV). However, the hippocampal Dmax in plan (AD) was significantly greater than that in plan (MD), approaching the 17 Gy constraint limit. Nonetheless, there were no significant differences in D100% or maximum doses to other critical structures between the two plans.

Compared with manual delineation, SwinHS demonstrated superior segmentation performance and a significantly shorter delineation time. While plan (AD) met clinical requirements, caution should be exercised regarding hippocampal Dmax. SwinHS offers a promising tool to enhance workflow efficiency and facilitate hippocampal protection in radiotherapy planning for patients with brain metastases.

This study aimed to evaluate the modulated arc therapy (mARC) technique as a planning and treatment option for hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0933 dosimetric criteria. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were selected retrospectively for 15 patients. Two types of plans were created for each patient, namely an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and a mARC plan. IMRT and mARC plans were compared in terms of plan quality indices, absorbed dose to organs at risk (OARs), number of monitor units (MUs), and treatment time. All plans in both techniques were considered clinically acceptable for treatment. However, IMRT plans presented a higher conformity (p = 0.01) as well as a higher homogeneity as compared to mARC plans, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In terms of the preservation of the hippocampus, it was observed that the IMRT plans achieved significantly lower doses for both 100% of its volume and for its maximum dose (p < 0.001). The evaluation of the remaining OARs showed that the IMRT technique resulted in lower doses, and significant differences were observed for the following organs: left cochlea (p < 0.001), left eye (p < 0.001), right eye (p = 0.03), both lenses of the eye (p < 0.001), and right optic nerve (p = 0.02). Despite these differences, the absolute differences in all dosimetric parameters were low enough to bear any clinical relevance. A drastic (close to 65%) and significant (p < 0.001) decrease was observed in the number of MUs for the mARC plans. This resulted in a substantial decrease in treatment time (60.45%, p < 0.001). It is concluded that the mARC technique is a feasible planning and treatment solution for HS-WBRT that meets the RTOG 0933 criteria. The main advantage of using mARC over IMRT for HS-WBRT is the considerable reduction in MUs and treatment time.

In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy.

MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms "Hippocampus", "Brain Neoplasms", and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included.

Forty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 - 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 - 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 - 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17).

The overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant pathological type of lung cancer with the highest mortality, and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM) is in high frequency. So far, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been suggested as an effective treatment for preventing brain metastasis of SCLC. PCI has long been applied to limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) patients who have achieved complete remission after radiotherapy and chemotherapy as a standard treatment. However, the neurocognitive decline is a major concern surrounding PCI. New therapeutic approaches targeting PCI-induced neurotoxicity, including hippocampal protection or memantine, have been increasingly incorporated into the therapeutic interventions of PCI. Helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a head-tilting baseplate are recommended for hippocampal protection. Besides, in the MRI and immunotherapy era, the significance of PCI in SCLC patients is controversial. SCLC patients with PCI should be recruited in clinical trials since this is the only way to improve the existing standard of care. This review summarizes the current therapeutic strategy and dilemma over PCI for SCLC, providing a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making and suggestions for PCI practice in clinical.

A PENTEC review of childhood cancer survivors who received brain radiation therapy (RT) was performed to develop models that aid in developing dose constraints for RT-associated central nervous system (CNS) morbidities.

A comprehensive literature search, through the PENTEC initiative, was performed to identify published data pertaining to 6 specific CNS toxicities in children treated with brain RT. Treatment and outcome data on survivors were extracted and used to generate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models.

The search identified investigations pertaining to 2 of the 6 predefined CNS outcomes: neurocognition and brain necrosis. For neurocognition, models for 2 post-RT outcomes were developed to (1) calculate the risk for a below-average intelligence quotient (IQ) (IQ <85) and (2) estimate the expected IQ value. The models suggest that there is a 5% risk of a subsequent IQ <85 when 10%, 20%, 50%, or 100% of the brain is irradiated to 35.7, 29.1, 22.2, or 18.1 Gy, respectively (all at 2 Gy/fraction and without methotrexate). Methotrexate (MTX) increased the risk for an IQ <85 similar to a generalized uniform brain dose of 5.9 Gy. The model for predicting expected IQ also includes the effect of dose, age, and MTX. Each of these factors has an independent, but probably cumulative effect on IQ. The necrosis model estimates a 5% risk of necrosis for children after 59.8 Gy or 63.6 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) to any part of the brain if delivered as primary RT or reirradiation, respectively.

This PENTEC comprehensive review establishes objective relationships between patient age, RT dose, RT volume, and MTX to subsequent risks of neurocognitive injury and necrosis. A lack of consistent RT data and outcome reporting in the published literature hindered investigation of the other predefined CNS morbidity endpoints.

This study aimed to explore the spatial distribution of brain metastases (BMs) from breast cancer (BC) and to identify the high-risk sub-structures in BMs that are involved at first diagnosis.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were retrospectively reviewed at our centre. The brain was divided into eight regions according to its anatomy and function, and the volume of each region was calculated. The identification and volume calculation of metastatic brain lesions were accomplished using an automatically segmented 3D BUC-Net model. The observed and expected rates of BMs were compared using 2-tailed proportional hypothesis testing.

A total of 250 patients with BC who presented with 1694 BMs were retrospectively identified. The overall observed incidences of the substructures were as follows: cerebellum, 42.1 %; frontal lobe, 20.1 %; occipital lobe, 9.7 %; temporal lobe, 8.0 %; parietal lobe, 13.1 %; thalamus, 4.7 %; brainstem, 0.9 %; and hippocampus, 1.3 %. Compared with the expected rate based on the volume of different brain regions, the cerebellum, occipital lobe, and thalamus were identified as higher risk regions for BMs (P value ≤ 5.6*10-3). Sub-group analysis according to the type of BC indicated that patients with triple-negative BC had a high risk of involvement of the hippocampus and brainstem.

Among patients with BC, the cerebellum, occipital lobe and thalamus were identified as higher-risk regions than expected for BMs. The brainstem and hippocampus were high-risk areas of the BMs in triple negative breast cancer. However, further validation of this conclusion requires a larger sample size.

In the United States, brain metastases (BMs) affect 10% to 20% of patients with cancer, presenting a significant health care challenge and necessitating intricate, high-cost treatments. Few studies have explored the comprehensive care cost for BMs, and none have used real insurance claims data. Partnering with a northeastern health care insurer, we investigated the true costs of various brain-directed radiation methods, aiming to shed light on treatment expenses, modalities, and their efficacy.

We analyzed medical claims from Highmark Health-insured patients in Pennsylvania, Delware, West Virginia, and New York diagnosed with BMs (ICD-10 code C79.31) and treated with radiation from January 1, 2020 to July 1, 2022. Costs for radiation techniques were grouped by specific current procedural terminology claim codes. We subdivided costs into technical and physician components and separated hospital from freestanding costs for some modalities.

From January 1, 2020 to July 1, 2022, 1048 Highmark Health members underwent treatment for BMs. Females (n = 592) significantly outnumbered males (n = 456), with an average age of 64.4 years. Each member had, on average, 5.309 claims costing $2015 per claim. Total cost totaled $10,697,749. Per-treatment analysis showed that hippocampal avoidance intensity modulated radiation therapy was the costliest treatment at $47,748, followed by stereotactic radiation therapy at $37,230, linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) at $30,737, Gamma Knife SRS at $30,711, and whole-brain radiation therapy at $5225.

Whole-brain radiation therapy was the least costly radiation technique. Similar per-treatment prices for Gamma Knife and linear accelerator SRS support their use in treating BMs. Stereotactic radiation therapy in general was costlier on a per-use basis than SRS, prompting further scrutiny on its frequent use. Hippocampal avoidance intensity modulated radiation therapy was the costliest radiation therapy on a per-use basis by a moderate amount, prompting further discussion about its comparative cost effectiveness against other radiation modalities. This study underscores the importance of multiple considerations in treating BMs, such as tumor control, survival, side effects, and costs.

To compare treatment planning and dosimetric outcomes for hippocampal sparing whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in brain metastasis (BM) patients using tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) formalism between IMRT, VMAT, and HT techniques. In this retrospective study, the treatment data of 20 BM patients who typically received whole brain radiation with SIB treatment were used. Prescription doses of 30 Gy and 36 Gy was delivered in 10 fractions for WBRT and SIB, respectively. Niemierko and LKB models were applied for calculating TCP and NTCP. All the plans were evaluated for the RTOG 0933 protocol criteria and found acceptable. Additionally, the homogeneity of the PTV boost is 0.07 ± 0.01, 0.1 ± 0.04, and 0.08 ± 0.02 for IMRT, VMAT, and HT, respectively (P < 0.05). The percentage of TCP for the PTV boost was 99.99 ± 0.003, 99.98 ± 0.004, and 99.99 ± 0.002 of IMRT, VMAT, and HT, respectively, (P < 0.005). The NTCP value of the lenses was higher with the VMAT plan as compared to IMRT and HT Plans. The hippocampal NTCP values are equal in all three planning proficiencies. The techniques like IMRT, VMAT, and HT can reduce the dose received by hippocampus to the dosimetric threshold during the delivery of WBRT with hippocampal sparing and can simultaneously boost multiple metastases. Overall, the high-quality dose distribution, TCP, and NTCP comparison between all three planning techniques show that the HT technique has better results when compared to the VMAT and IMRT techniques.

Hippocampal sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) showed significantly lower long-term side effects compared to standard WBRT. Aim of this study is to describe a HS-WBRT real-world monoinstitutional experience within a retrospective cohort.

Patients who completed HS-WBRT course, with Karnofsky Performance Status ⩾ 60 and radiological diagnosis of brain metastases (BMs) were enrolled. Treatment was performed using helical Tomotherapy scheduled in 30 Gy in 10 or 12 fractions or 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Oncological outcomes were clinically and radiologically assessed every three months. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.3.

One hundred and nineteen patients from 2016 to 2020 met inclusion criteria; after a median follow-up of 18 months, 29 patients were alive; 6- and 12-months overall survival rates were 66% and 41%, respectively. HS-WBRT response was assessed for 72 patients. Median time to any progression and intracranial failure (IF) was 4.5 and 13.7 months, respectively. The 6- and 12-month IF rates were 85% and 57%. Among 40 patients (34%) who experienced IF, 17 (42%) were oligometastatic, 23 (58%) polymetastatic and 15/40 developed IF within the hippocampi avoidance zone. No grade (G) ⩾ 2 acute toxicities were reported and one G2 (dizziness) late toxicity was described.

HS-WBRT is well tolerated, and despite the hippocampal sparing region, the oncological control is satisfying. Further investigation is warranted to find patients who could most benefit from a HS-WBRT approach.

Recent advances to preserve neurocognitive function in patients treated for brain metastases include stereotactic radiosurgery, hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), and memantine administration. The hippocampus, corpus callosum, fornix, and amygdala are key neurocognitive substructures with a low propensity for brain metastases. Herein, we report our preliminary experience using a "memory-avoidance" WBRT (MA-WBRT) approach that spares these substructures for patients with >15 brain metastases.

Ten consecutive patients treated with MA-WBRT on a phase 2 clinical trial were reviewed. In each patient, the hippocampi, amygdalae, corpus callosum, and fornix were contoured. Patients were not eligible for MA-WBRT if they had metastases in these substructures. A memory-avoidance region was created using a 5-mm volumetric expansion around these substructures. Hotspots were avoided in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. Coverage of brain metastases was prioritized over memory avoidance dose constraints. Dose constraints for these avoidance structures included a D100% ≤ 9 Gy and D0.03 cm3 ≤ 16 Gy (variation acceptable to 20 Gy). LINAC-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were generated for a prescription dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions.

On average, the memory avoidance structure volume was 37.1 cm3 (range, 25.2-44.6 cm3), occupying 2.5% of the entire whole brain target volume. All treatment plans met the D100% dose constraint, and 8 of 10 plans met the D0.03 cm3 constraint, with priority given to tumor coverage for the remaining 2 cases. Target coverage (D98% > 25 Gy) and homogeneity (D2% ≤ 37.5 Gy) were achieved for all plans.

Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques allow for sparing of the hippocampus, amygdala, corpus callosum, and fornix with good target coverage and homogeneity. After enrollment is completed, quality of life and cognitive data will be evaluated to assess the efficacy of MA-WBRT to mitigate declines in quality of life and cognition after whole brain radiation.

Background and Objectives: Brain metastases (BMs) pose significant clinical challenges in systemic cancer patients. They often cause symptoms related to brain compression and are typically managed with multimodal therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). With modern oncology treatments prolonging survival, concerns about the neurocognitive side effects of BM treatments are growing. WBRT, though widely used for multiple BMs, has recognized neurocognitive toxicity. SRS, particularly Gamma Knife (GK) therapy, offers a minimally invasive alternative with fewer side effects, suitable for patients with a quantifiable number of metastases and better prognoses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 94 patients with multiple BMs treated exclusively with GK at an academic medical center. Patients with prior WBRT were excluded. This study focused on the mean radiation dose received by the hippocampal area, estimated according to the 'Hippocampal Contouring: A Contouring Atlas for RTOG 0933' guidelines. Results: The precision of GK equipment results in mean doses of radiation that are lower than those suggested by RTOG 0933 and observed in other studies. This precision may help mitigate cognitive dysfunction and other side effects of hippocampal irradiation. Conclusions: GK therapy facilitates the administration of smaller, safer radiation doses to the hippocampi, which is advantageous even for lesions in the temporal lobe. It is feasible to treat multiple metastases, including cases with more than 10, but it is typically reserved for patients with fewer metastases, with an average of 3 in this study. This underlines GK's potential for reducing adverse effects while managing BMs effectively.

Radiotherapy (RT) plays an integral role in the management of low-grade gliomas (LGG). Late toxicity from RT can cause progressive neurocognitive dysfunction. Radiation-induced damage to the hippocampus (HCP) plays a considerable role in memory decline. Advancements in photon planning software have resulted in the development of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) and HyperArc technologies which may improve HCP sparing while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) target coverage.

Three planning methods for hippocampal sparing (HS) were compared, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) without HS (VMAT_noHS), VMAT with HS (VMAT_HS), MCO with HS (MCO_HS), and HyperArc with HS (HyperArc_HS).

Twenty-five patients were identified. The contralateral HCP was spared in 16 patients and bilateral HCP in 9 patients with superiorly located tumors. All 3 HS planning techniques showed significant reductions in dose to the spared HCP in contralateral cases but only VMAT_HS and MCO_HS achieved this in bilateral cases (P < .008). Only MCO_HS was superior to VMAT_HS in lowering the dose to both contralateral HCP and bilateral HCP in all measured metrics (P < .008). PTV and OAR (organ at risk) dose constraints were achieved for all plans.

This retrospective dosimetric study demonstrated the feasibility of HS for low-grade glioma. All 3 HS planning techniques achieved significant dose reductions to the spared contralateral hippocampus, but only MCO_HS and VMAT_HS achieved this in bilateral cases. MCO was superior to other planning techniques for sparing both bilateral and contralateral hippocampi.

Neurocognitive function is a key outcome indicator of therapy in brain tumors. Understanding the underlying anatomical substrates involved in domain function and the pathophysiological basis of dysfunction can help ameliorate the effects of therapy and tailor directed rehabilitative strategies.

Hundred adult diffuse gliomas were co-registered onto a common demographic-specific brain template to create tumor localization maps. Voxel-based lesion symptom (VLSM) technique was used to assign an association between individual voxels and neuropsychological dysfunction in various domains (attention and executive function (A & EF), language, memory, visuospatial/constructive abilities, and visuomotor speed). The probability maps thus generated were further co-registered to cortical and subcortical atlases. A permutation-based statistical testing method was used to evaluate the statistically and clinically significant anatomical parcels associated with domain dysfunction and to create heat maps.

Neurocognition was affected in a high proportion of subjects (93%), with A & EF and memory being the most affected domains. Left-sided networks were implicated in patients with A & EF, memory, and language deficits with the perisylvian white matter tracts being the most common across domains. Visuospatial dysfunction was associated with lesions involving the right perisylvian cortical regions, whereas deficits in visuomotor speed were associated with lesions involving primary visual and motor output pathways.

Significant baseline neurocognitive deficits are prevalent in gliomas. These are multidomain and the perisylvian network especially on the left side seems to be very important, being implicated in dysfunction of many domains.

Hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) planning can present challenges. This study examines the influence of head tilt angles on the dosimetric characteristics of target and organs at risk (OARs), aiming to identify the optimal tilt angle that yields optimal dosimetric outcomes using tomotherapy (TOMO).

Eight patients diagnosed with brain metastases underwent CT scans at five tilt angles: [0°, 10°), [10°, 20°), [20°, 30°), [30°, 40°), and [40°, 45°]. Treatment plans were generated using TOMO and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Dosimetric parameters including conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D2cc, D98%, and Dmean of PTV, as well as Dmax, and Dmean of OARs were analyzed. Furthermore, a comparison was made between the dosimetric parameters of TOMO and VMAT plans. Finally, delivery efficiency of TOMO plans were assessed.

For the PTV, [40°, 45°] tilt angle demonstrated significantly better conformity, homogeneity, lower D2cc, and lower Dmean for the PTV. Regarding the OARs, the [40°, 45°] head tilt angle demonstrated significantly lower Dmax and Dmean in hippocampus, eyes, optic chiasm, and optic nerves. The [40°, 45°] tilt angle also showed significantly lower Dmax for brainstem and cochleas, as well as a lower Dmean for lens. In the [40°,45°] tilt angle for HA-WBRT, TOMO showed superior performance over VMAT for the PTV. TOMO achieved lower Dmax for brainstem, cochleas, optic nerves, and optic chiasm, as well as a lower Dmean for hippocampus. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between delivery time and the PTV projection length in the sagittal plane.

The TOMO plan utilizing a tilt angle range of [40°, 45°] demonstrated superior PTV conformity and uniformity, along with enhanced OARs sparing. Furthermore, it exhibited a dosimetric advantage over VMAT for PTV and most OARs at the same angle range.

This study aimed to discuss the dosimetric advantages of helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technology in hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy and provide references for clinical selection of ideal radiotherapy technology.

A total of 20 patients with hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy were chosen randomly. Computed tomography (CT) and MRI scanning images were input into the treatment planning system (TPS). After the CT and enhanced magnetic resonance T1 weighted images were fused and registered, the same radiation therapy physician was invited to outline the tumor target volume. PTV-HS refers to the whole brain subtracted by 5 mm outward expansion of the hippocampus (HP). The prescribed dose was 30 Gy/10 fractions. HT and VMAT plans were designed for each patient in accordance with PTV. Under the premise that the 95% isodose curve covers the PTV, dose-volume histogram was applied to evaluate the PTV, conformal index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), maximum dose (Dmax), mean dose (Dmean), minimum dose (Dmin) and absorbed doses of organs at risk (OARs) in HT and VMAT plans. Paired t-test was performed to compare the differences between two radiation therapy plans, and p  <  0.05 was considered statistically significant.

These two plans had no significant difference in PTV-HS (max, min, and mean). However, the HI and CI of the HT plan were significantly better than those of the VMAT plan, showing statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The HT plan was significantly superior to the VMAT plan in terms of the Dmax, Dmin, and Dmean of HP, left and right eye lens, left and right eye, and spinal cord, showing statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The HT plan was also better than the VMAT plan in terms of the Dmax of the left optic nerve. However, the two plans showed no obvious differences in terms of the absorbed doses of the right optic nerve and brainstem, without statistical significance.

Compared with the VMAT plan of hippocampal avoidance, HT technology has significant dosimetric advantages. HT plans significantly decreased the radiation dose and radiation volume of OARs surrounding the target area (e.g., surrounding eye lens and eye, especially hippocampal avoidance area) while increasing the CI and HI of PTV dose in whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) greatly, thus enabling the decrease in the incidence rate of radioactive nerve function impairment.

This study provides a concise and structured overview of a dosimetric comparison study conducted to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of 4 advanced radiotherapy techniques in treating brain metastases with hippocampus sparing and simultaneous integrated boost (HS-WBRT+SIB). Eleven patients with brain metastases previously treated with radiotherapy were included in the study. Planning CT scans with 2 mm slice thickness and MR imaging were used for contouring and dose prescription. The bilateral hippocampus and other organs at risk (OARs) were automatically contoured, and hippocampal avoidance regions (HAR) were defined as a 7 mm 3D expansion around the hippocampus. Gross tumor volume for each metastasis (GTVmet) and planning target volume for metastases (PTVmet) were delineated. The whole-brain CTV (CTVWB) and planning target volume for whole brain (PTVWB) were defined accordingly. Treatment planning and optimization were conducted using state-of-the-art radiotherapy techniques: Ethos, HyperArc, VMAT, and Tomotherapy. Tomotherapy achieved the highest D98% for PTVmet, indicating the best metastasis coverage. HyperArc plans showed the highest D98% for PTVWB, suggesting superior whole-brain coverage. Tomotherapy demonstrated significantly lower D98%, D2%, and Dmean values for the hippocampus, indicating its superiority in sparing the hippocampus. VMAT resulted in the lowest D2% values for the eyes, optic nerves, brainstem, and hypophysis, showing the best sparing of these critical structures. Tomotherapy consistently achieved lower Dmean values for parotids, oral cavity, and lips compared to the other techniques. The dosimetric comparison revealed distinct strengths and weaknesses for each radiotherapy technique. Tomotherapy excelled in sparing the hippocampus, while VMAT showed promise in sparing OARs. HyperArc plans demonstrated the best overall whole-brain coverage. These findings should guide clinicians in selecting the most suitable technique based on patient characteristics and institutional resources.

Although data are limited, difficulty in social cognition occurs in up to 83% of patients with brain tumors. It is unknown whether cranial radiation therapy (RT) dose to the amygdala-orbitofrontal network can impact social cognition.

We prospectively enrolled 51 patients with low-grade and benign brain tumors planned for cranial RT. We assessed longitudinal changes on an emotion recognition task (ERT) that measures the ability to recognize emotional states by displaying faces expressing six basic emotions and their association with the RT dose to the amygdala-orbitofrontal network. ERT outcomes included the median time to choose a response (ERTOMDRT) or correct response (ERTOMDCRT) and total correct responses (ERTHH).

The RT dose to the amygdala-orbitofrontal network was significantly associated with longer median response times on the ERT. Increases in median response times occurred at lower doses than decreases in total correct responses. The medial orbitofrontal cortex was the most important variable on regression trees predicting change in the ERTOMDCRT.

This is, to our knowledge, the first study to show that off-target RT dose to the amygdala-orbitofrontal network is associated with performance on a social cognition task, a facet of cognition that has previously not been mechanistically studied after cranial RT.

Initial report of NRG Oncology CC001, a phase 3 trial of whole-brain radiation therapy plus memantine (WBRT + memantine) with or without hippocampal avoidance (HA), demonstrated neuroprotective effects of HA with a median follow-up of fewer than 8 months. Herein, we report the final results with complete cognition, patient-reported outcomes, and longer-term follow-up exceeding 1 year.

Adult patients with brain metastases were randomized to HA-WBRT + memantine or WBRT + memantine. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive function failure, defined as decline using the reliable change index on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R), Controlled Oral Word Association, or the Trail Making Tests (TMT) A and B. Patient-reported symptom burden was assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory with Brain Tumor Module and EQ-5D-5L.

Between July 2015 and March 2018, 518 patients were randomized. The median follow-up for living patients was 12.1 months. The addition of HA to WBRT + memantine prevented cognitive failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.74, P = .016) and was associated with less deterioration in TMT-B at 4 months (P = .012) and HVLT-R recognition at 4 (P = .055) and 6 months (P = .011). Longitudinal modeling of imputed data showed better preservation of all HVLT-R domains (P < .005). Patients who received HA-WBRT + Memantine reported less symptom burden at 6 (P < .001 using imputed data) and 12 months (P = .026 using complete-case data; P < .001 using imputed data), less symptom interference at 6 (P = .003 using complete-case data; P = .0016 using imputed data) and 12 months (P = .0027 using complete-case data; P = .0014 using imputed data), and fewer cognitive symptoms over time (P = .043 using imputed data). Treatment arms did not differ significantly in overall survival, intracranial progression-free survival, or toxicity.

With median follow-up exceeding 1 year, HA during WBRT + memantine for brain metastases leads to sustained preservation of cognitive function and continued prevention of patient-reported neurologic symptoms, symptom interference, and cognitive symptoms with no difference in survival or toxicity.

One of the main limiting factors of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is the impairment of neurocognitive functions (NCFs), which is mainly caused by radiation-induced injury to the hippocampus. With a view to preventing NCF impairment and personalizing treatment, we explored the feasibility of sparing the hippocampus during WBRT by correlating the sites of PCNSL lesions with the hippocampus.

Pre-treatment MR images from patients who underwent WBRT between 2010 and January 2020-and post-radiotherapy images in cases of relapse-were imported into the Varian Eclipse treatment-planning system and registered with the simulation CT. We constructed three 3-dimensional envelopes around the hippocampus at distances of 5, 10 and 15 mm and also contoured primary lesions and recurrences.

We analyzed 43 patients with 66 primary lesions: 9/66 (13.6%) involved the hippocampus and 11/66 (16.7%) were located within 5 mm of it. Thirty-six lesions (54.5%) were situated more than 15 mm from the hippocampus, while 10/66 (15.2%) were between 5 and 15 mm from it. The most common location was in deep brain structures (31%). Thirty-five of the 66 lesions relapsed: in field in 14/35 (40%) and outfield in 21/35 (60%) in different sites. Globally, 16/35 recurrences (45.7%) were located in the hippocampus or within 5 mm of it.

These data show that routinely sparing the hippocampus is not feasible. This approach could be considered in selected patients, when the lesion is more than 15 mm from the hippocampus.

Hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) can be a time-consuming process compared to conventional whole brain techniques, thus potentially limiting widespread utilization. Therefore, we evaluated the in silico clinical feasibility, via dose-volume metrics and timing, by leveraging a computed tomography (CT)-based commercial adaptive radiotherapy (ART) platform and workflow in order to create and deliver patient-specific, simulation-free HA-WBRT.

Ten patients previously treated for central nervous system cancers with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging were included in this study. The CBCT was the adaptive image-of-the-day to simulate first fraction on-board imaging. Initial contours defined on the MRI were rigidly matched to the CBCT. Online ART was used to create treatment plans at first fraction. Dose-volume metrics of these simulation-free plans were compared to standard-workflow HA-WBRT plans on each patient CT simulation dataset. Timing data for the adaptive planning sessions were recorded.

For all ten patients, simulation-free HA-WBRT plans were successfully created utilizing the online ART workflow and met all constraints. The median hippocampi D100% was 7.8 Gy (6.6-8.8 Gy) in the adaptive plan vs 8.1 Gy (7.7-8.4 Gy) in the standard workflow plan. All plans required adaptation at first fraction due to both a failing hippocampal constraint (6/10 adaptive fractions) and sub-optimal target coverage (6/10 adaptive fractions). Median time for the adaptive session was 45.2 min (34.0-53.8 min).

Simulation-free HA-WBRT, with commercially available systems, was clinically feasible via plan-quality metrics and timing, in silico.

Multimodal therapies have significantly improved prognosis in glioma. However, in particular radiotherapy may induce long-term neurotoxicity compromising patients' neurocognition and quality of life. The present prospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate associations of multimodal treatment with neurocognition with a particular focus on hippocampal irradiation.

Seventy-one glioma patients (WHO grade 1-4) were serially evaluated with neurocognitive testing and quality of life questionnaires. Prior to (baseline) and following further treatment (median 7.1 years [range 4.6-11.0] after baseline) a standardized computerized neurocognitive test battery (NeuroCog FX) was applied to gauge psychomotor speed and inhibition, verbal short-term memory, working memory, verbal and non-verbal memory as well as verbal fluency. Mean ipsilateral hippocampal radiation dose was determined in a subgroup of 27 patients who received radiotherapy according to radiotherapy plans to evaluate its association with neurocognition.

Between baseline and follow-up mean performance in none of the cognitive domains significantly declined in any treatment modality (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, combined radio-chemotherapy, watchful-waiting), except for selective attention in patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Apart from one subtest (inhibition), mean ipsilateral hippocampal radiation dose > 50 Gy (Dmean) as compared to < 10 Gy showed no associations with long-term cognitive functioning. However, patients with Dmean < 10 Gy showed stable or improved performance in all cognitive domains, while patients with > 50 Gy numerically deteriorated in 4/8 domains.

Multimodal glioma therapy seems to affect neurocognition less than generally assumed. Even patients with unilateral hippocampal irradiation with > 50 Gy showed no profound cognitive decline in this series.

Whole-brain radiotherapy is associated with neurocognitive decline and decreased quality-of-life (QOL) among survivors of brain metastasis. Hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) has shown advantage in delaying or preventing the neurocognitive decline while maintaining disease control. This study was done to assess the benefits and feasibility of HA-WBRT in patients with cerebral metastasis in terms of preservation of neurocognitive function and quality of life.

27 patients with brain metastasis treated by HA-WBRT and having the records of detailed neurocognitive-assessments were analysed from the database of our hospital. The patients were treated with HA-WBRT to a total dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions with LINAC based IMRT using the VMAT technique. Cognitive function assessment was carried out using "Examination of the Cognitive Functions" scale provided by Bangur-Institute-of-Neurosciences, Kolkata, 2 weeks prior to radiotherapy and post-treatment two-monthly up to 6 months followed by every 3 months till the last follow up. QOL was assessed at the same interval using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy with Brain Subscale (FACT-BR). Follow-up was done till the date of death.

Mean relative cognitive decline percentage decreased over subsequent follow-up visits and was 13% (SD ± 6%), 5% (SD ± 5%), 5% (SD ± 9%) and 2% (SD ± 12%) at 2 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Statistically significant improvement was seen in the mean social-wellbeing (SWB) parameter of QOL (8%. ± 13%, 12%. ± 16%, 7%. ± 20%, no change at 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 9 months, respectively) (p ≤ 0.05). Mean relative decline in the Emotional-Well Being (EWB) parameter was significant only at 12 months and was 20% (SD ± 35%) (p = 0.04). Mean FACT-BR total Score showed a slight decrease till 9 months from baseline, and then showed a slight improvement up to 12 months.

HA-WBRT is feasible with LINAC-based IMRT using the VMAT technique and beneficial to the patients in preserving neurocognitive function and quality of life without compromising disease control.

The optimal treatment for multiple brain metastases has been recently controversially discussed.This study was aimed to explore the feasibility of Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy plus a simultaneous integrated boost (HA-WBRT + SIB) in patients with multiple brain metastases and assess tumor control in comparison with Hippocampus-Avoidance Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) alone for brain metastases.

In this study, 63 patients with multiple brain metastases (≥ 4 metastases) had undergone HA-WBRT + SIB between January 2016 and December 2020 in the observation group:HA-WBRT (30 Gy in 12 fractions, the maximum dose of the hippocampus ≤ 14 Gy) plus a simultaneous integrated boost (48 Gy in 12 fractions) for brain metastases.Overall Survival (OS), Median survival,intracranial control (IC = control within the entire brain), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and adverse events were compared with the control group (a HA-WBRT retrospective cohort) by propensity score matching analysis.

After 1:1 propensity score matching,there were 56 patients in each group (the observation group, the control group). OS, median survival and iPFS were significantly longer in the observation group (18.4 vs. 10.9 months, P<0.001), (13.0 vs. 8.0 months, P<0.001), (13.9 vs.7.8 months, P<0.001). In comparison of 1-year-IC rates, the observation group also demonstrated higher than the control group (51.8% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002), respectively. Seven hippocampal metastases were found in the control group (4/56,7.1%) and the observation group (3/56,5.4%) after HA-WBRT. The death rate of intracranial progression were 23.2% in the observation group and 37.5% in the control group.All adverse events were not significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

HA-WBRT + SIB resulted in better OS,median survival, IC, iPFS, an acceptable risk of radiation response, and a potential way of declining neurocognitive adverse events, which may be a better treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.