Hu QG, Zheng QC. The influence of Enteral Nutrition in postoperative patients with poor liver function. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(4): 843-846 [PMID: 12679945 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.843]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Qing-Gang Hu, Department of Surgery, Xiehe hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province China. mailbox_1@163.net
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Research
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 2003; 9(4): 843-846 Published online Apr 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i4.843
Table 1 Grouping of patients
CON (n = 30)
TPN (n = 40)
EN (n = 65)
Cases
Grade
Cases
Grade
Cases
Grade
B
C
B
C
B
C
PVH
13
10
3
14
8
6
21
10
11
HCC
4
2
2
11
7
4
10
5
5
CLA
1
-
1
3
1
2
8
-
8
ROBD
7
3
4
7
3
4
15
5
10
CLT
3
1
2
3
2
1
10
3
7
Others
2
1
1
2
-
2
1
-
1
Table 2 Changes of nutritional status
Parameters
Control (n = 30)
TPN (n = 40)
EN (n = 65)
1st BO*
5th PO**
10th PO
1st BO
5th PO
10th PO
1st BO
5th PO
10th PO
TRF (g/L)
1.1 ± 0.6
0.9 ± 0.3
0.8 ± 0.6
1.2 ± 0.4
1.0 ± 0.6
1.2 ± 0.3
1.3 ± 0.6
1.2 ± 0.5
1.2 ± 0.6
PAB (mg/L)
657 ± 232
591 ± 220
595 ± 213
690 ± 214
669 ± 228
667 ± 239
681 ± 228
719 ± 177
690 ± 221
TP (g/L)
63.6 ± 12.9
46.3 ± 9.7
48.1 ± 9.7
66.6 ± 12.2
48.3 ± 10.1
50.4 ± 9.6
70.1 ± 7.9
55.7 ± 7.8
63.5 ± 8.9
ALB (g/L)
30.8 ± 4.9
29.2 ± 5.9
29.1 ± 4.8
31.4 ± 4.9
30.8 ± 7.1
31.8 ± 5.0
36.5 ± 6.1
30.7 ± 4.0
32.9 ± 3.9
ANE
32.4 ± 10.8 mg·kg-1·7 d-1
105.3 ± 9.4 mg·kg-1·7 d-1
185.3 ± 8.4 mg·kg-1·7 d-1
W (kg)
-3.3 ± 1.7
-2.4 ± 1.1
-2.1 ± 0.9
COUA
23.5 ± 1.2
-
22.2 ± 1.3
23.6 ± 1.1
-
23.2 ± 1.3
24.4 ± 2.6
-
23.7 ± 2.2
Table 3 Changes of liver and kidney function, electrolytes
Parameters
Control (n = 20)
TPN (n = 26)
EN (n = 30)
1st BO
5th PO
10th PO
1st BO
5th PO
10th PO
1st BO
5th PO
10th PO
TB (µmol/L)*
92.3 ± 37.8
71.7 ± 34.5
41.8 ± 35.8
86.3 ± 46.8
68.7 ± 33.8
45.7 ± 33.2
119.8 ± 73.0
96.3 ± 54.4
64.3 ± 47.3
DB (µmol/L)*
53.3 ± 28.6
39.2 ± 23.3
16.5 ± 11.7
50.4 ± 33.7
38.4 ± 22.6
17.7 ± 12.3
60.8 ± 50.2
42.8 ± 32.7
31.9 ± 29.2
TP (g/L)*
63.6 ± 12.9
46.3 ± 9.7
48.1 ± 9.7
66.6 ± 12.2
48.3 ± 10.1
50.4 ± 9.6
70.1 ± 7.9
55.7 ± 7.8
63.5 ± 8.9
ALB (g/L)
30.8 ± 4.9
29.2 ± 5.9
29.1 ± 4.8
31.4 ± 4.9
30.8 ± 7.1
31.8 ± 5.0
36.5 ± 6.1
30.7 ± 4.0
32.9 ± 3.9
AST (U/L)#
71.7 ± 28.9
91.3 ± 33.5
78.7 ± 28.1
73.4 ± 30.6
89.9 ± 35.7
67.7 ± 39.1
94.8 ± 47.8
104.4 ± 80.7
69.6 ± 23.8
ALT (U/L)#
54.7 ± 31.1
101.4 ± 44.9
85.3 ± 33.7
58.7 ± 32.3
99.3 ± 56.2
78.7 ± 35.5
109.1 ± 82.7
148.4 ± 180
67.1 ± 50.1
Cr (µmol/L)
72.9 ± 28.8
82.1 ± 23.3
69.5 ± 37.9
73.9 ± 35.3
80.1 ± 22.9
67.5 ± 33.7
77.4 ± 16.5
80.6 ± 24.7
77.1 ± 19.6
BUN (mmol/L)
6.9 ± 3.3
8.4 ± 3.5
5.9 ± 3.4
7.1 ± 4.1
8.2 ± 3.7
5.6 ± 3.2
5.5 ± 1.8
6.9 ± 4.9
6.0 ± 3.2
K (mmol/L)
3.9 ± 0.5
5.3 ± 1.1
3.8 ± 0.7
3.8 ± 0.6
4.4 ± 0.9
4.3 ± 1.1
4.1 ± 0.5
4.3 ± 0.8
4.4 ± 0.2
Na (mmol/L)
136.5 ± 14.7
139.3 ± 18.3
145.8 ± 15.4
132.7 ± 15.9
140.3 ± 13.7
138.8 ± 7.3
138.3 ± 7.1
135.3 ± 5.7
137.0 ± 7.4
Ca (mmol/L)
2.35 ± 0.39
1.99 ± 0.18
2.17 ± 0.31
2.32 ± 0.43
2.67 ± 0.27
2.27 ± 0.34
2.21 ± 0.22
2.07 ± 0.14
2.24 ± 0.17
Table 4 Changes of L/M ratio
1st BO
5th PO
10th PO
CON (n = 30)
0.028 ± 0.004
0.037 ± 0.017
0.031 ± 0.010
TPN (n = 40)
0.027 ± 0.003
0.038 ± 0.009
0.030 ± 0.006
EN (n = 65)
0.026 ± 0.004
0.030 ± 0.004
0.027 ± 0.005
Citation: Hu QG, Zheng QC. The influence of Enteral Nutrition in postoperative patients with poor liver function. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(4): 843-846