Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2002.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2002; 8(4): 763-765
Published online Aug 15, 2002. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i4.763
Table 1 Clinical data of patients included in this study
Main parameterCommon hepatectomy (n = 179)Ultrasonic aspiration hepatectomy (n = 136)
Mean age (yrs)55 ± 1657 ± 15
M/F166/13128/8
T B/(μmol•L-1)17.4 ± 1.416.4 ± 1.5
D B/(μmol•L-1)3.1 ± 0.33.0 ± 0.3
ALB/(g•L-1)40.0 ± 7.042.4 ± 7.4
ALT/(nkat•L⁻¹-1)667.0 ± 49.8538.1 ± 51.2
AST/(nkat•L⁻¹-1)602.6 ± 50.8566.3 ± 40.0
TT/(g•L-1)78.62 ± 7.8573.32 ± 8.26
Size of tumor
T ≤ 2 cm8467
2 cm ≤ T ≤ 5 cm5944
5 cm ≥ T3625
Location
Right4032
Tri-liver lobe32
Left tri-liver lobe85
VIII segment1916
Others10981
Number of tumor
1135102
23827
≥ 367
Table 2 Comparison of operation and treatment conditions between the two groups
Main parameterCommon hepatectomy (n = 179)Ultrasonic aspiration hepatectomy (n = 136)
Operation time/min1441115211
Bleeding volume/mL5572046315a
Transfusion volume/mL5071838112a
Hospitalization day11.70.68.90.6a
Liver failure20
Postoperative jaundice314a
Cholorrhea60
Hydrothorax3921a
Ascites549a
1-year survival rate92.5%94.8%
3-year survival rate55.7%64.2%b