Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2001.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2001; 7(4): 476-481
Published online Aug 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i4.476
Published online Aug 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i4.476
            Table 1 Prognostic accuracy of the APACHE II, the Imrie and Ranson scores, plasma CRP and urinary TAP levels[18]
        
    | Scoring System | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | 
| % | % | % | % | % | |
| Post-symptom 24 hrs | |||||
| Urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 58 | 73 | 39 | 86 | 70 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L | 0 | 90 | 0 | 75 | 69 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L | |||||
| or urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 58 | 72 | 37 | 86 | 69 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L and | |||||
| urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 0 | 92 | 0 | 74 | 70 | 
| Post-symptom 48 hrs | |||||
| Urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 81 | 71 | 42 | 94 | 73 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L | 65 | 73 | 37 | 90 | 72 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L | |||||
| or urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 86 | 60 | 35 | 94 | 65 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L and | |||||
| urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 60 | 85 | 50 | 90 | 80 | 
| Post-hospitalisation 24 hrs | |||||
| Urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 68 | 74 | 44 | 89 | 73 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L | 47 | 82 | 42 | 84 | 74 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L or | |||||
| urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 74 | 66 | 38 | 90 | 68 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L and | |||||
| urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 40 | 91 | 57 | 83 | 79 | 
| APACHE II ≥ 8 | 63 | 73 | 38 | 88 | 71 | 
| Post-hospitalisation 48 hrs | |||||
| Urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 83 | 72 | 44 | 94 | 74 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L | 86 | 61 | 37 | 94 | 66 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L or | |||||
| urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 94 | 49 | 32 | 97 | 58 | 
| Plasma CRP > 150 mg/L and | |||||
| urinary TAP > 35 nmol/L | 74 | 85 | 58 | 92 | 83 | 
| APACHE II ≥ 8 | 56 | 64 | 30 | 85 | 63 | 
| Imrie Score ≥ 3 | 77 | 75 | 44 | 93 | 76 | 
| Ranson Score ≥ 3 | 89 | 64 | 38 | 96 | 69 | 
            Table 2 Bacteria isolated from operative specimens taken at necrosectomy prior to the introduction of routine antibiotic prophylaxis, Beger et al[29], 1986
        
    | Bacteria isolated | No. of patients | 
| Gram - ve aerobic | |
| Escherichia coli | 24 | 
| Enterobacter aerogenes | 16 | 
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 5 | 
| Proteus species | 5 | 
| Klebsiella pneumonia | 3 | 
| Citrobacter freundi | 1 | 
| Gram - ve anaerobic | |
| Bacteroides species | 5 | 
| Gram + ve aerobic | |
| Streptococcus faecalis | 6 | 
| Staphlococcus aureus | 4 | 
| Streptococcus viridans | 1 | 
| Staplococcis epidermidis | 1 | 
| Others | |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis | 1 | 
| Candida species | 3 | 
            Table 3 Indications for surgical intervention
        
    | Absolute | ﹒Presence of infected pancreatic necrosis shown by CE-CT or FNAB. | 
| Relative | ﹒In a patient with > 50% pancreatic necrosis, failure | 
| to improve appreciably after 2-3 weeks, | |
| unexplained deterioration, or a suspicion of infected | |
| pancreatic necrosis even in the absence of firm | |
| evidence on CE-CT and FNAB. | |
| In a patient with > 50% pancreatic necrosis, | |
| ﹒prolonged illness with an unacceptably slow recovery | 
- Citation: Slavin J, Ghaneh P, Sutton R, Hartley M, Rowlands P, Garvey C, Hughes M, Neoptolemos J. Management of necrotizing pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7(4): 476-481
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v7/i4/476.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v7.i4.476

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        