Copyright
©The Author(s) 2001.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 2001; 7(2): 281-284
Published online Apr 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i2.281
Published online Apr 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i2.281
Table 1 Comparison of operation manner with numbers of lymph nodes, time for operation, amount of blood transfusion during operation, hospitalization days and complications (-x±sx)
Manners of operation | N (1200) | Numbers lymph nodes | Time for operation (h) | Amount of blood transfusion (mL) | Hospitalization stays (days) | Complication (%) | Positive resection margin (%) |
Distal gastrectomy | 768 | 11.7 ± 0.3* | 3.3 ± 0.04 | 426.5 ± 17.1* | 16.9 ± 0.7 | 9.1 | 3.8 |
Proximal gastrectomy via abdomen | 72 | 9.6 ± 0.4 | 4.0 ± 0.1* | 629.5 ± 43.3* | 18.3 ± 1.5 | 17* | 8.2* |
Proximal gastrectomy via thorax | 264 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.03 | 771.5 ± 19.5 | 15.5 ± 0.6 | 1.6 | 8.7* |
Total gastrectomy | 96 | 13.8 ± 0.7* | 4.6 ± 0.1* | 768.2 ± 47.6 | 19.8 ± 1.7 | 12.9 | 9.3* |
P | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | > 0.05 | < 0.001 | = 0.01 |
Table 2 Comparison of depth of infiltration with age, diameter, hemoglobin, and lymphatic metastasis rate (-x±sx)
Depth of invasion | N (1200) | Age (yrs) | Diameter (cm) | Hemoglobin(g/L) | Lymphatic metastasis rate (%) |
pT1(m) | 114 | 51.6 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 12.1 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.8 |
pT1(ms) | 65 | 55.7 ± 1.5* | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 11.3 ± 0.4* | 4.1 ± 1.3 |
pT2 | 91 | 56.8 ± 1.4* | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 11.2 ± 0.1* | 9.8 ± 1.6* |
pT3 | 95 | 57.1 ± 1.2* | 4.2 ± 0.6* | 11.4 ± 0.2* | 20.4 ± 2.9* |
pT4 | 835 | 56.9 ± 0.3* | 5.6 ± 0.1* | 11.2 ± 0.1* | 37.1 ± 1.2* |
P | < 0.003 | < 0.0001 | < 0.001 | < 0.0001 |
Table 3 Comparison of differentiation with age, diameter, hemoglobin and lymphatic metastasis rate (-x±sx)
Differentiation | N (1200) | Age (yrs) | Diameter (cm) | Hemoglobin (g/L) | Lymphatic metastasis rate (%) |
I | 37 | 61.4 ± 1.4 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 10.7 ± 0.4 | 10.3 ± 3.2* |
II | 161 | 57.9 ± 0.8 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | 11.1 ± 0.1 | 26.1 ± 2.5 |
III | 329 | 58.6 ± 0.7 | 4.2 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 22.7 ± 1.4 |
IV | 673 | 53.2 ± 0.3* | 4.9 ± 0.3* | 11.8 ± 0.1* | 33.6 ± 1.2* |
P | < 0.0001 | = 0.004 | = 0.01 | < 0.0001 |
Table 4 Comparison of tumor site with age, diameter, hemoglobin and positive lymph node rate (-x±sx)
Location of tumor | N (1200) | Age (yrs) | Diameter (cm) | Hemoglobin (g/L) | Lymphatic metastasis rate (%) |
Pylorus | 27 | 54.3 ± 2.9 | 3.9 ± 0.7 | 12.6 ± 0.7 | 13.9 ± 3.2 |
Antrum | 379 | 56.6 ± 0.5* | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 11.5 ± 0.3 | 26.3 ± 1.4 |
Incisura | 372 | 54.2 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 12.5 ± 0.1 | 22.5 ± 1.3 |
Corpus | 91 | 55.2 ± 1.2 | 6.4 ± 0.5* | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 38.3 ± 4.2* |
Fundus | 331 | 59.8 ± 0.6* | 5.6 ± 0.2* | 12.8± 0.2 | 35.1 ± 1.9* |
P | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | > 0.005 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of sex with tumor location, differentiation, depth of invasion and positive lymph node rate (-x±sx)
Sex | Location (%) | Differentiation (%) | Depth of invasion (%) | Frequency of metastatic lymph node (%) | |||||||
Proximal | Middle | Distal | Well | Middle | Bad | pT1 | pT2 | pT3 | < 30 | > 30 | |
Male (836) | 31 | 2 | 40 | 18 | 30 | 52 | 14 | 8 | 78 | 64 | 36 |
Female (364) | 40 | 3 | 25 | 13 | 21 | 66 | 15 | 7 | 78 | 56 | 44 |
P | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | > 0.05 | = 0.01 |
Table 6 Multi-factors analysis of lymphatic metastasis in gastric patients
Related factors | Regression coefficient | Standard error | Standard regression coefficient | P |
Constant | -24.3 | 7.1 | 0.001 | |
Age | -0.006144 | 0.079 | -0.22 | 0.438 |
Sex | -6.489 | 2.027 | -0.092 | 0.001 |
Tumor location | 2.326 | 0.780 | 0.087 | 0.003 |
Diameter of tumor | 2.368 | 0.459 | 0.165 | 0.0001 |
Depth of invasion | 7.043 | 0.786 | 0.285 | 0.0001 |
Differentiation | 3.687 | 1.146 | 0.094 | 0.001 |
- Citation: Niu WX, Qin XY, Liu H, Wang CP. Clinicopathological analysis of patients with gastric cancer in 1200 cases. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7(2): 281-284
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v7/i2/281.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v7.i2.281