Copyright
©The Author(s) 2000.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 2000; 6(6): 888-892
Published online Dec 15, 2000. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v6.i6.888
Published online Dec 15, 2000. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v6.i6.888
Table 1 Comparison of detection of HCVM in GI and GII
| Parameter | GI (%) (n = 43) | GII (%) (n = 19) | P value |
| anti-HCVIgM (+) | 21 (48.8) | 6 (31.6) | > 0.05 |
| anti-HCVIgG (+) | 25 (58.1) | 4 (21.1) | < 0.05 |
| HCV RNA (+) | 27 (62.8) | 7 (36.8) | > 0.05 |
| All three (+) | 18 (41.9) | 4 (21.1) | > 0.05 |
| At least one (+) | 29 (67.4) | 8 (42.2) | > 0.05 |
Table 2 Comparison of clinical manifestation in HCV positive and negative group of HD patients
| Clinical manifestation | HCVM positive group (n = 37) | HCVM negative group (n = 25) | P value |
| M/F | 22/15 | 16/9 | > 0.05 |
| Mean age (years) | 49.6 ± 16.8 | 48.4 ± 14.4 | > 0.05 |
| Range | 16-71 | 26-67 | |
| Mean duration of HD (months) | 31.2 ± 8.6 | 8.1 ± 4.7 | < 0.01 |
| Range | 2-96 | 1-24 | |
| History of transfusion | 29 (78.4%) | 11 (44.0%) | < 0.01 |
| EPO | 12 (32.4%) | 8 (32.0%) | > 0.05 |
| History of kidney transplantation (n = 6) | 6 (16.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | < 0.05 |
| History of CAPD (n = 8) | 6 (16.2%) | 2 (8.0%) | > 0.05 |
| HBVM positive | 18 (48.6%) | 10 (40.0%) | < 0.01 |
| ALT abnormality | 10 (27.0%) | 1 (4.0%) | < 0.01 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 24.6 ± 8.6 | 28.4 ± 10.2 | > 0.05 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 1154.4 ± 402.6 | 1164.8 ± 468.5 | > 0.05 |
Table 3 Relationship between dialysis times and HCV markers
| HD time (Year) | n | IgM | IgG | HCV RNA | Only one marker positive | ||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| < 1 | 32 | 9 | 28.1 | 8 | 25.0 | 12 | 37.5 | 14 | 43.8 |
| 1-2 | 18 | 9 | 50.0 | 10 | 55.6 | 11 | 61.1 | 12 | 66.7 |
| 2-3 | 5 | 3 | 60.0 | 4 | 80.0 | 4 | 80.0 | 4 | 80.0 |
| > 3 | 7 | 6 | 85.7 | 7 | 100.0 | 7 | 100.0 | 7 | 100.0 |
Table 4 Relationship between number of transfusion and HCV markers
| Transfusion (U) | n | IgM | IgG | HCV RNA | Only one marker positive | ||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| 0 | 22 | 6 | 27.3 | 7 | 31.8 | 6 | 27.3 | 8 | 36.4 |
| 1-5 | 8 | 2 | 25.0 | 2 | 25.0 | 4 | 50.0 | 4 | 50.0 |
| 6-10 | 16 | 7 | 43.8 | 6 | 37.5 | 10 | 62.5 | 11 | 68.8 |
| 11-20 | 6 | 4 | 66.7 | 5 | 83.3 | 5 | 83.3 | 5 | 83.3 |
| > 30 | 10 | 8 | 80.0 | 9 | 90.0 | 9 | 90.0 | 9 | 90.0 |
Table 5 Comparison the clinical manifestation between HCVM positive and negative group in 22 patients without transfusion
| Clinical manifestation | Positive group | Negative group | P value |
| Cases | 8 | 14 | |
| M/F | 5/3 | 8/6 | > 0.05 |
| Mean age (Years) | 53.1 ± 14.2 | 49.6 ± 12.5 | > 0.05 |
| Range | 30-71 | 30-67 | |
| Mean duration of HD (months) | 24.2 ± 6.4 | 3.4 ± 1.6 | < 0.01 |
| Range | 4-36 | 1-6 | |
| History of kidney transplantation | 0 | 0 | |
| History of CAPD | 0 | 0 | |
| EPO | 3 | 5 | > 0.05 |
| ALT abnormality | 3 | 0 | < 0.01 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 25.7 ± 7.8 | 26.4 ± 6.8 | > 0.05 |
| Cr (μmol/L) | 1132.6 ± 482.6 | 1182.4 ± 464.3 | > 0.05 |
Table 6 Positive prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in six consecutive periods of 6 mo
| Time | Cases | Positive (%) | Negative (%) |
| 1995.6 | 63 | 37 (58.7) | 26 (41.3) |
| 1995.12 | 67 | 36 (53.7) | 31 (46.3) |
| 1996.6 | 62 | 34 (54.8) | 28 (45.2) |
| 1996.12 | 64 | 32 (50.0) | 32 (50.0) |
| 1997.6 | 76 | 40 (52.6) | 36 (47.4) |
| 1997.12 | 83 | 44 (53.0) | 39 (47.0) |
Table 7 Positive prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in uremic patients when they were admitted to our HD center
| Time | New patient | Positive (%) | Negative (%) |
| 1995.6-1995.11 | 42 | 2 (4.8) | 40 (95.2) |
| 1995.12-1996.5 | 39 | 1 (2.6) | 38 (97.4) |
| 1996.6-1996.11 | 45 | 3 (6.7) | 42 (93.3) |
| 1996.12-1997.5 | 65 | 3 (4.6) | 62 (95.4) |
| 1997.6-1997.11 | 71 | 2 (2.8) | 20 (97.2) |
| 1997.12 | 21 | 0 (0.0) | 21 (100.0) |
| Total | 283? | 11 (3.9) | 273 (96.1) |
- Citation: Wang NS, Liao LT, Zhu YJ, Pan W, Fang F. Follow-up study of hepatitis C virus infection in uremic patients on maintenance hemodialysis for 30 months. World J Gastroenterol 2000; 6(6): 888-892
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v6/i6/888.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v6.i6.888
