Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 1999.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 1999; 5(2): 132-134
Published online Apr 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i2.132
Published online Apr 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i2.132
            Table 1 Comparison of DIGFA results with ELISA
        
    | ELISA | Total | |||
| + | - | |||
| DIGFA | + | a | b | a+b | 
| - | c | d | c+d | |
| Total | a+c | b+d | N | |
            Table 2 Formulae for evaluation of DIGFA
        
    | Index | Formulae | Index | Formulae | 
| Sensitivity | a/(a+c) | Specificity | d/(b+d) | 
| Positive predictive value | a/(a+b) | Negative predictive value | d/(c+d) | 
| Accuracy | (a+d)/N | Youden index | [a/(a+c)]/[d/(b+d-1)] | 
| Positive likelihood ratio | [a/(a+c)]/[b/(b+d)] | Negative Likelihood ratio | [c/(a+c)]/[d/(b+d)] | 
            Table 3 Comparison of DIGFA results with ELISA
        
    | ELISA | Total | |||
| + | - | |||
| DIGFA | + | 88 | 16 | 104 | 
| - | 14 | 146 | 160 | |
| Total | 102 | 162 | 264 | |
- Citation: Wu W, Xu DZ, Yan YP, Zhang JX, Liu Y, Li RL. Evaluation of dot immunogold filtration assay for anti-HAV IgM antibody. World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5(2): 132-134
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v5/i2/132.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v5.i2.132

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        