Multifactorial analysis of recurrence of cholecystolithiasis in Shanghai area

Table 1 Difference between recurrence and non-recurrence groups

	Odds ratio	M-H Chi square	P value
Incipient stone	1.52	6.43	< 0.05
Sex proportion	0.91	0.31	0.58
Diet hobby	0.66	6.02	< 0.05
Related disease	0.85	0.87	0.35
Clinical symptom	12.51	190.97	< 0.01
Medical treatment	1.70	9.03	< 0.01
Family history	1.55	4.54	< 0.05
Mean thickness of gallbladder wall	1.95	2.75	0.10
Adipose infiltration of liver	1.01	0.00	0.98

Table 2 Difference between recurrence and non-recurrence groups

	Recurrence	Non-recurrence	F test	P value
Mean age	43.85 ± 11.3	43.15 ± 11.9	0.534	0.528
Mean weight/height	0.387 ± 0.05	0.380 ± 0.05	2.701	0.097
Mean contraction ratio of gallbladder	0.500 ± 0.264	0.522 ± 0.277	0.196	0.663
Mean value of serum insulin	0.611 ± 0.320	0.753 ± 0.261	7.289	< 0.01
Mean value of serum TBA	5.963 ± 1.883	5.00 ± 1.955	7.545	< 0.01

Table 3 Difference between multiple stones and solitary stone groups

	Odds ratio	M-H Chi square	P value
Recurrence	1.52	6.43	< 0.05
Sex proportion	1.08	0.21	0.65
Diet hobby	1.26	2.10	0.15
Related disease	0.95	0.09	0.76
Medical treatment	1.42	4.35	< 0.05
Clinical symptom	1.21	1.38	0.24
Family history	1.08	0.13	0.72
Mean thickness of \gallbladder wall	0.55	2.15	0.14
Adipose infiltration of liver	0.91	0.05	0.83

*Because of abnormal distribution of the value of ser um insulin, all data were changed into log value.

Table 4 Difference between multiple stones and solitary stone groups

	Multiple stones	Solitary stone	F test	P value
Mean age	45.52 ± 12.02	43.98 ± 11.47	2.438	0.115
Mean weight/height	0.382 ± 0.048	0.383 ± 0.052	0.108	0.742
Mean contraction ratio of gallbladder	0.538 ± 0.251	0.50 ± 0.28	0.528	0.524
Mean value of serum insulin*	0.586 ± 0.331	0.739 ± 0.266	7.526	< 0.01
Mean value of serum TBA	5.590 ± 1.788	5.349 ± 2.063	0.391	0.540

*Because of abnormal distribution of the value of ser um insulin, all data were changed into log value.