BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2027.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2027; 33(1): 123000
Published online Jan 7, 2027. doi: 10.3748/wjg.123000
Table 1 Scoring criteria for the Glasgow prognostic score, modified Glasgow prognostic score, high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score
Score
GPS
mGPS
hs-mGPS
0CRP ≤ 10 mg/L and ALB ≥ 35 g/LCRP ≤ 10 mg/Lhs-CRP ≤ 3 mg/L
1CRP > 10 mg/L or ALB < 35 g/LCRP > 10 mg/L and ALB ≥ 35 g/Lhs-CRP > 3 mg/L and ALB ≥ 35 g/L
2CRP > 10 mg/L and ALB < 35 g/LCRP > 10 mg/L and ALB < 35 g/Lhs-CRP > 3 mg/L and ALB < 35 g/L
Table 2 Comparison of baseline clinical characteristics, n (%)/median interquartile range
Characteristic
Total (n = 762)
Decompensation (n = 113)
Non-decompensation (n = 649)
P value
Age (years)56 (49-66)57 (50-70.5)56 (49-65)0.112
Sex0.973
Female606 (79.5)90 (79.6) 516 (79.5)
Male156 (20.5)23 (20.4) 133 (20.5)
BMI (kg/m2)22.06 (20.02-24.22)21.50 (19.95-23.90)22.06 (20.04-24.38)0.222
Hypertension0.974
Yes183 (24) 27 (23.9) 156 (24)
No579 (76) 86 (76.1) 493 (76)
Diabetes mellitus0.898
Yes85 (11.2) 13 (11.5) 72 (11.1)
No677 (88.8) 100 (88.5) 577 (88.9)
Atherosclerosis0.990
Yes47 (6.2) 7 (6.2) 40 (6.2)
No715 (93.8) 106 (93.8) 609 (93.8)
TBIL (μmol/L)18.4 (12.4-40.08) 27.1 (12.65-80.6) 17.8 (12.35-35)0.002
ALT (U/L)53.5 (28-106) 63 (29.1-111.5) 52 (28-104)0.249
AST (U/L)54 (33-103.93) 75 (37.85-119) 50 (32-98.95) 0.002
ALP (U/L)176.15 (113-320) 252 (139.75-440.5) 171 (108.5-285) < 0.001
GGT (U/L)205 (71-415.75) 253 (104-521.5) 196 (68-404.5) 0.011
INR1 (0.94-1.09) 1.01 (0.91-1.13) 1 (0.94-1.09) 0.737
GLOB (g/L)33.15 (29-37.6) 32.5 (28.5-39.05) 33.2 (29-37.5) 0.829
ALB (g/L)37.9 (33.5-42) 34 (29.5-38.4) 38.4 (34.2-42.2) < 0.001
CRP (mg/L)2.47 (1.1-7.35) 10.8 (3.63-12.75) 1.97 (1.02-5) < 0.001
MELD score3.86 (1.53-7.34) 5.57 (2.16-9.13) 3.67 (1.48-6.79) 0.007
AMA-M20.877
1528 (69.3) 79 (69.9) 449 (69.2)
0234 (30.7) 34 (30.1) 200 (30.8)
SP1000.623
184 (11.1) 14 (12.4) 70 (10.8)
0676 (88.9) 99 (87.6) 577 (89.2)
GP2100.361
1164 (21.5) 28 (24.8) 136 (21)
0598 (78.5) 85 (75.2) 513 (79)
Paris I0.001
Response495 (65)58 (51.3) 437 (67.3)
Suboptimal response267 (35) 55 (48.7) 212 (32.7)
Paris II0.011
Response319 (41.9) 35 (31) 284 (43.8)
Suboptimal response443 (58.1) 78 (69) 365 (56.2)
Mayo4 (3-5) 5 (4-6)4 (3-5) < 0.001
GLOBE< 0.001
> 0.3133 (17.5)37 (32.7) 96 (14.8)
≤ 0.3629 (82.5) 76 (67.3) 553 (85.2)
UK-PBC0.57 (-0.32 to 1.98) 1.49 (0.26-3.10) 0.46 (-0.40 to 1.77) < 0.001
GPS< 0.001
0475 (62.3)26 (23.0) 449 (69.2)
1198 (26.0)49 (43.4) 149 (23.0)
289 (11.7)38 (33.6) 51 (7.8)
mGPS< 0.001
0616 (80.8)51 (45.1) 565 (87.1)
158 (7.6)24 (21.3) 34 (5.2)
288 (11.6)38 (33.6) 50 (7.7)
hs-mGPS< 0.001
0445 (58.4)27 (23.9) 418 (64.4)
1166 (21.8) 36 (31.9) 130 (20.0)
2151 (19.8) 50 (44.2) 101 (15.6)
Table 3 Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses of the association between Glasgow prognostic scores and decompensation risk
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Model A
Model B
Model C
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
GPS
0ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
15.593 (3.475-9.003)< 0.0015.805 (3.589-9.389)< 0.0015.911 (3.647-9.580) < 0.0015.540 (3.346-9.173) < 0.001
214.289 (8.617-23.694)< 0.00113.618 (8.133-22.804) < 0.00113.942 (8.290-23.450) < 0.00113.573 (7.835-23.514) < 0.001
P for trend3.690 (2.922-4.660)< 0.0013.595 (2.837-4.556) < 0.0013.654 (2.875-4.643) < 0.0013.605 (2.783-4.670) < 0.001
mGPS
0ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
17.747 (4.755-12.62) < 0.0018.512 (5.169-14.016) < 0.0018.537 (5.180-14.070) < 0.0018.025 (4.805-13.405) < 0.001
210.09 (6.546-15.551) < 0.0019.219 (5.926-14.340) < 0.0019.511 (6.082-14.873) < 0.0018.459 (5.211-13.732) < 0.001
P for trend3.238 (2.644-3.965) < 0.0013.128 (2.544-3.846) < 0.0013.188 (2.584-3.932) < 0.0013.103 (2.469-3.900) < 0.001
hs-mGPS
0ReferenceReferenceReferenceReference
17.161 (4.291-11.952) < 0.0017.315 (4.349-12.305) < 0.0017.307 (4.322-12.353) < 0.0017.343 (4.269-12.630) < 0.001
212.224 (7.523-19.862) < 0.00111.951 (7.257-19.679) < 0.00112.187 (7.382-20.120) < 0.00111.407 (6.669-19.511) < 0.001
P for trend3.283 (2.639-4.084) < 0.0013.245 (2.591-4.064) < 0.0013.300 (2.628-4.143) < 0.0013.261 (2.549-4.171) < 0.001
Table 4 Association between Glasgow prognostic scores and decompensation risk, stratified by model for end-stage liver disease score
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Model A
Model B
Model C
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
MELD ≥ 10
GPS3.173 (2.142-4.698)< 0.0013.024 (2.017-4.534)< 0.0013.072 (2.041-4.623)< 0.0013.521 (2.215-5.597)< 0.001
mGPS2.683 (2.000-3.599)< 0.0012.592 (1.909-3.519)< 0.0012.629 (1.933-3.577)< 0.0013.014 (2.113-4.299)< 0.001
hs-mGPS2.205 (1.584-3.069)< 0.0012.115 (1.499-2.984)< 0.0012.096 (1.485-2.959)< 0.0012.207 (1.509-3.226)< 0.001
MELD < 10
GPS3.598 (2.618-4.943)< 0.0013.484 (2.519-4.817)< 0.0013.673 (2.648-5.094)< 0.0013.982 (2.768-5.729)< 0.001
mGPS3.266 (2.407-4.431)< 0.0013.101 (2.278-4.221)< 0.0013.217 (2.345-4.413)< 0.0013.685 (2.569-5.288)< 0.001
hs-mGPS3.937 (2.909-5.328)< 0.0013.846 (2.821-5.244)< 0.0014.132 (2.997-5.697)< 0.0014.347 (3.069-6.159)< 0.001
Table 5 Association between Glasgow prognostic scores and decompensation risk in the sensitivity analysis after excluding patients with hypertension, atherosclerosis, or diabetes mellitus
VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Model A
Model B
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
GPS4.306 (3.230-5.740) < 0.0014.341 (3.246-5.805) < 0.0014.265 (3.118-5.834) < 0.001
mGPS3.602 (2.827-4.589) < 0.0013.547 (2.776-4.534) < 0.0013.400 (2.605-4.437) < 0.001
hs-mGPS3.464 (2.676-4.483) < 0.0013.463 (2.661-4.506) < 0.0013.423 (2.580-4.541) < 0.001


Write to the Help Desk