Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2026; 32(5): 115301
Published online Feb 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.115301
Published online Feb 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.115301
Table 1 Association between serum intercellular adhesion molecule 2 levels and clinicopathological features in advanced gastric cancer patients, n (%)
| Variables | Cases | Low serum ICAM2 (n = 47) | High serum ICAM2 (n = 38) | P value |
| TRG-Ryan | < 0.001 | |||
| 0 | 16 | 2 (4) | 14 (37) | |
| 1 | 11 | 1 (2) | 10 (26) | |
| 2 | 43 | 33 (70) | 10 (26) | |
| 3 | 15 | 11 (24) | 4 (11) | |
| Chemotherapy | < 0.001 | |||
| Sensitive | 27 | 3 (6) | 24 (63) | |
| Resistant | 58 | 44 (94) | 14 (37) | |
| Age (years) | 0.241 | |||
| < 60 | 50 | 25 (53) | 25 (66) | |
| ≥ 60 | 35 | 22 (47) | 13 (34) | |
| Sex | 0.483 | |||
| Male | 64 | 34 (72) | 30 (79) | |
| Female | 21 | 13 (28) | 8 (21) | |
| CEA (ng/mL) | 0.271 | |||
| ≤ 5 | 61 | 36 (77) | 25 (66) | |
| > 5 | 24 | 11 (23) | 13 (34) | |
| CA19-9 (U/mL) | 0.879 | |||
| ≤ 37 | 71 | 39 (83) | 32 (84) | |
| > 37 | 14 | 8 (17) | 6 (16) | |
| Tumor differentiation | 0.008 | |||
| High and moderate | 36 | 14 (30) | 22 (59) | |
| Poor | 47 | 32 (70) | 15 (41) | |
| Advanced TNM stage | 0.041 | |||
| II | 41 | 18 (38) | 23 (61) | |
| III | 44 | 29 (62) | 15 (39) | |
| Tumor location | 0.613 | |||
| Esophagogastric junction | 23 | 12 (26) | 11 (29) | |
| Pylorus/corpus | 29 | 18 (39) | 11 (29) | |
| Antrum | 32 | 16 (35) | 16 (42) |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with overall and disease-free survival in advanced gastric cancer patients
| Variables | OS (univariate analysis) | OS (multivariate analysis) | DFS (univariate analysis) | DFS (multivariate analysis) | ||||||||
| HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
| ICAM2 in serum (high vs low) | 0.378 | 0.202-0.707 | 0.002 | 0.441 | 0.234-0.828 | 0.011 | 0.403 | 0.222-0.730 | 0.003 | 0.446 | 0.245-0.811 | 0.008 |
| Age (years; ≥ 60 vs < 60) | 1.429 | 0.806-2.532 | 0.222 | 1.450 | 0.831-2.531 | 0.191 | ||||||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.824 | 0.435-1.562 | 0.553 | 1.004 | 0.534-1.887 | 0.991 | ||||||
| CEA (ng/mL; > 5 vs ≤ 5) | 0.788 | 0.416-1.492 | 0.465 | 0.660 | 0.351-1.242 | 0.198 | ||||||
| CA19-9 (U/mL; > 37 vs ≤ 37) | 1.954 | 0.995-3.838 | 0.052 | 1.751 | 0.896-3.421 | 0.101 | ||||||
| Differentiation (high and moderate vs poor) | 0.588 | 0.323-1.067 | 0.081 | 0.688 | 0.388-1.221 | 0.201 | ||||||
| Advanced TNM stage (III vs II) | 3.298 | 1.763-6.170 | < 0.001 | 2.938 | 1.562-5.528 | 0.001 | 3.226 | 1.776-5.860 | < 0.001 | 2.977 | 1.644-5.462 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Tang XC, Chen ZJ, Chen CY, Qiu J, Huang JT, Tan RC, Li WY, Chen H, Yang ZL. ICAM2 loss drives 5-fluorouracil resistance via TGF-β/Smad/SP1/PTN-dependent apoptosis evasion and macrophage remodeling in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(5): 115301
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i5/115301.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.115301
