Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2026; 32(43): 120562
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120562
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120562
Table 1 Characteristics of the included patients, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Training set | P value | Internal validation set (n = 72) | P value | External validation set (n = 61) | P value | |||
| Total (n = 168) | ER (n = 67) | Non-ER (n = 101) | ||||||
| Patient characteristic | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 56.54 ± 9.56 | 56.15 ± 9.73 | 56.79 ± 9.48 | 0.671 | 56.28 ± 8.73 | 0.84 | 54.95 ± 9.34 | 0.266 |
| Sex | 0.874 | 0.215 | 0.173 | |||||
| Male | 123 (73.2) | 48 (71.6) | 75 (74.3) | 47 (65.3) | 50 (65.3) | |||
| Female | 45 (26.8) | 19 (28.4) | 26 (25.7) | 25 (34.7) | 11 (34.7) | |||
| Etiology | 0.147 | 0.915 | 0.934 | |||||
| HBV | 155 (92.3) | 64 (95.5) | 91 (90.1) | 67 (93.1) | 57 (93.4) | |||
| HCV | 9 (5.4) | 3 (4.5) | 6 (5.9) | 3 (4.2) | 3 (4.9) | |||
| Others | 4 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (4.0) | 2 (2.8) | 1 (1.6) | |||
| Tumor characteristics | ||||||||
| Tumor size (cm) | 2.39 ± 0.91 | 2.72 ± 0.91 | 2.18 ± 0.91 | < 0.001 | 2.33 ± 0.81 | 0.651 | 2.46 ± 0.97 | 0.612 |
| No. of tumors | < 0.001 | 0.705 | 0.516 | |||||
| Solitary | 123 (73.2) | 39 (58.2) | 84 (83.2) | 51 (70.8) | 42 (68.9) | |||
| Multiple | 45 (26.8) | 28 (41.8) | 17 (16.8) | 21 (29.2) | 19 (31.1) | |||
| Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage | < 0.001 | 0.702 | 0.862 | |||||
| 0 | 46 (27.4) | 5 (7.5) | 41 (40.6) | 18 (25.0) | 16 (26.2) | |||
| A | 122 (72.6) | 62 (92.5) | 60 (59.4) | 54 (75.0) | 45 (73.8) | |||
| Laboratory index | ||||||||
| AST, IU/L | 36.86 ± 5.25 | 37.00 ± 5.38 | 36.76 ± 5.19 | 0.779 | 36.25 ± 5.22 | 0.408 | 35.19 ± 5.41 | 0.036 |
| ALT, IU/L | 31.01 ± 21.78 | 34.42 ± 23.96 | 28.76 ± 20.01 | 0.099 | 33.12 ± 25.71 | 0.517 | 28.23 ± 15.93 | 0.362 |
| TBIL, μmol/L | 24.59 ± 13.65 | 25.63 ± 14.80 | 23.89 ± 12.87 | 0.423 | 21.34 ± 11.74 | 0.08 | 21.44 ± 12.96 | 0.12 |
| ALB, g/L | 30.78 ± 12.66 | 31.36 ± 10.08 | 30.40 ± 14.14 | 0.634 | 33.43 ± 20.90 | 0.229 | 32.74 ± 10.53 | 0.28 |
| r-GGT (U/L) | 35.78 ± 26.68 | 38.60 ± 31.92 | 33.91 ± 22.52 | 0.266 | 32.01 ± 18.89 | 0.278 | 40.42 ± 29.96 | 0.261 |
| PLT, × 109/L | 110.54 ± 55.67 | 106.62 ± 51.70 | 113.14 ± 58.14 | 0.459 | 112.81 ± 56.08 | 0.774 | 104.41 ± 54.45 | 0.459 |
| Child-Pugh grade | 0.249 | 0.975 | 0.204 | |||||
| A | 121 (72.0) | 47 (70.1) | 74 (73.3) | 52 (72.2) | 49 (80.3) | |||
| B | 47 (29.0) | 20 (29.9) | 27 (26.7) | 20 (27.8) | 12 (19.7) | |||
| AFP, ng/mL | 215.98 ± 351.69 | 329.83 ± 440.58 | 140.44 ± 252.97 | 0.001 | 187.27 ± 331.25 | 0.556 | 294.55 ± 378.51 | 0.144 |
Table 2 Predictive performance of seven machine learning models of all classifiers across different feature sets, area under the curve (95% confidence interval)
| KNN | SVM | LR | DT | GBDT | RF | XGBoost | ||
| Clinical + rad-preop | Training set | 0.966 (0.947-0.984) | 0.928 (0.893-0.964) | 0.941 (0.91-0.973) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.973 (0.954-0.992) | 0.909 (0.871-0.946) | 0.987 (0.974-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.76 (0.631-0.888) | 0.848 (0.936-0.98) | 0.867 (0.772-0.963) | 0.756 (0.64-0.87) | 0.845 (0.799-0.892) | 0.76 (0.636-0.884) | 0.864 (0.817-0.91) | |
| External validation set | 0.752 (0.622-0.883) | 0.849 (0.747-0.951) | 0.84 (0.735-0.945) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.825 (0.715-0.935) | 0.752 (0.625-0.878) | 0.83 (0.72-0.939) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (5 mm) | Training set | 0.97 (0.954-0.987) | 0.957 (0.933-0.982) | 0.963 (0.94-0.986) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.986 (0.974-0.999) | 0.917 (0.88-0.953) | 0.993 (0.984-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.938 (0.911-0.964) | 0.894 (0.852-0.935) | 0.865 (0.819-0.911) | 0.751 (0.618-0.883) | 0.933 (0.898-0.967) | 0.839 (0.788-0.89) | 0.839 (0.928-0.985) | |
| External validation set | 0.81 (0.692-0.928) | 0.863 (0.761-0.965) | 0.859 (0.752-0.966) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.819 (0.706-0.932) | 0.824 (0.709-0.94) | 0.816 (0.702-0.93) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (10 mm) | Training set | 0.952 (0.929-0.975) | 0.942 (0.912-0.972) | 0.95 (0.921-0.979) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.973 (0.953-0.993) | 0.913 (0.875-0.951) | 0.987 (0.975-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.833 (0.717-0.949) | 0.898 (0.859-0.936) | 0.898 (0.859-0.937) | 0.736 (0.678-0.794) | 0.907 (0.878-0.943) | 0.803 (0.688-0.919) | 0.904 (0.869-0.939) | |
| External validation set | 0.818 (0.7-0.935) | 0.876 (0.784-0.969) | 0.873 (0.775-0.971) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.871 (0.773-0.969) | 0.795 (0.674-0.917) | 0.855 (0.749-0.961) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (15 mm) | Training set | 0.96 (0.94-0.98) | 0.941 (0.908-0.974) | 0.95 (0.919-0.981) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.976 (0.958-0.994) | 0.913 (0.876-0.95) | 0.985 (0.97-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.927 (0.893-0.96) | 0.875 (0.784-0.967) | 0.873 (0.777-0.9969) | 0.725 (0.599-0.851) | 0.913 (0.876-0.951) | 0.833 (0.72-0.946) | 0.839 (0.74-0.937) | |
| External validation set | 0.851 (0.747-0.954) | 0.863 (0.763-0.962) | 0.856 (0.754-0.958) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.84 (0.734-0.946) | 0.815 (0.7-0.93) | 0.833 (0.727-0.939) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (20 mm) | Training set | 0.971 (0.955-0.987) | 0.986 (0.974-0.997) | 0.958 (0.934-0.982) | 0.767 (0.711-0.823) | 0.927 (0895-0.959) | 0.918 (0.885-0.952) | 0.995 (0.99-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.771 (0.712-0.831) | 0.792 (0.67-0.913) | 0.79 (0.732-0.849) | 0.742 (0.684-0.8) | 0.801 (0.676-0.926) | 0.81 (0.691-0.929) | 0.834 (0.72-0.948) | |
| External validation set | 0.717 (0.583-0.851) | 0.795 (0.676-0.915) | 0.773 (0.645-0.9) | 0.664 (0.537-0.791) | 0.763 (0.637-0.889) | 0.753 (0.625-0.881) | 0.782 (0.654-0.91) |
Table 3 Comparative performance of the optimal preoperative clinical-radiomic model vs optimal models incorporating peri-ablation zones features, area under the curve (95% confidence interval)
| AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | F1 score | ||
| Clinical + rad-preop | Training set | 0.928 (0.893-0.964) | 0.934 (0.882-0.964) | 0.809 (0.715-0.877) | 0.764 (0.713-0.832) | 0.949 (0.803-0.968) | 0.859 | 0.841 |
| Internal validation set | 0.848 (0.742-0.955) | 0.842 (0.696-0.926) | 0.739 (0.535-0.875) | 0.554 (0.503-0.773) | 0.924 (0.835-0.975) | 0.768 | 0.668 | |
| External validation set | 0.849 (0.747-0.951) | 0.763 (0.608-0.87) | 0.826 (0.629-0.93) | 0.707 (0.698-0.847) | 0.864 (0.747-0.897) | 0.804 | 0.734 | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (5 mm) | Training set | 0.957 (0.933-0.982) | 0.921 (0.866-0.954) | 0.888 (0.805-0.938) | 0.845 (0.791-0.903) | 0.944 (0.803-0.965) | 0.901 | 0.881 |
| Internal validation set | 0.894 (0.852-0.9935) | 0.821 (0.752-0.874) | 0.831 (0.74-0.895) | 0.651 (0.613-0.734) | 0.924 (0.839-0.979) | 0.828 | 0.726 | |
| External validation set | 0.863 (0.761-0.965) | 0.816 (0.666-0.908) | 0.783 (0.581-0.903) | 0.674 (0.615-0.839) | 0.886 (0.724-0.927) | 0.803 | 0.795 | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (10 mm) | Training set | 0.942 (0.912-0.972) | 0.894 (0.835-0.934) | 0.854 (0.766-0.913) | 0.803 (0.782-0.901) | 0.924 (0.836-0.974) | 0.87 | 0.846 |
| Internal validation set | 0.898 (0.859-0.936) | 0.815 (0.745-0.868) | 0.843 (0.753-0.904) | 0.666 (0.612-0.788) | 0.922 (0.874-0.965) | 0.835 | 0.733 | |
| External validation set | 0.876 (0.784-0.969) | 0.947 (0.827-0.985) | 0.652 (0.449-0.812) | 0.59 (0.543-0.705) | 0.957 (0.857-0.997) | 0.757 | 0.734 | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (15 mm) | Training set | 0.941 (0.908-0.974) | 0.907 (0.85-0.944) | 0.854 (0.766-0.913) | 0.805 (0.743-0.849) | 0.933 (0.856-0.969) | 0.875 | 0.853 |
| Internal validation set | 0.875 (0.784-0.967) | 0.789 (0.637-0.889) | 0.826 (0.629-0.93) | 0.636 (0.612-0.782) | 0.911 (0.815-0.941) | 0.816 | 0.704 | |
| External validation set | 0.863 (0.763-0.962) | 0.868 (0.727-0.942) | 0.783 (0.581-0.903) | 0.688 (0.627-0.742) | 0.915 (0.831-0.958) | 0.813 | 0.768 | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (20 mm) | Training set | 0.986 (0.974-0.997) | 0.94 (0.891-0.968) | 0.955 (0.889-0.982) | 0.933 (0.867-0.989) | 0.960 (0.826-0.987) | 0.949 | 0.937 |
| Internal validation set | 0.792 (0.67-0.913) | 0.868 (0.727-0.942) | 0.696 (0.491-0.844) | 0.523 (0.501-0.713) | 0.932 (0.849-0.987) | 0.744 | 0.653 | |
| External validation set | 0.795 (0.676-0.915) | 0.658 (0.499-0.788) | 0.864 (0.667-0.953) | 0.727 (0.701-0.863) | 0.821 (0.723-0.895) | 0.791 | 0.691 |
- Citation: Liu T, Wu C, Dong TT, Jia YY, Zhu YY, Wei CM, Duan Y, Li YX, Nie F. Optimal 10-mm window: Integrating peri-ablation radiomics with preoperative features to predict early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after thermal ablation. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(43): 120562
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i43/120562.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.120562