Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2026; 32(43): 119315
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i43.119315
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i43.119315
Table 1 Representative studies supporting the ras homolog enriched in brain-colony stimulating factor 1 receptor-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin-autophagy framework in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
| Ref. | Study type | Molecule/pathway | Principal finding | Relevance to PDAC progression/metastasis | Translational implication |
| Tan et al[12], 2021 | Bioinformatics + cell assays | RHEB | RHEB is overexpressed in PDAC and promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion, with additional links to cell-cycle regulation and Wnt signaling | Supports RHEB as a pro-aggressive signaling node in PDAC | Potential prognostic biomarker and pathway target |
| Deng et al[23], 2026 | Tissue, cell, and in vivo study | RHEB-CSF1R/PI3K/AKT/mTOR | Proposed a tumor-cell RHEB-CSF1R complex that enhances PI3K/AKT/mTOR phosphorylation, suppresses autophagy-associated programs, and promotes EMT and metastasis | Directly links RHEB-centered signaling to metastatic behavior | Provides a biomarker-driven and combination-targeting hypothesis |
| Zhu et al[25], 2014 | Preclinical PDAC model | CSF1/CSF1R-TAM axis | CSF1R blockade reprograms TAMs and improves the response to T-cell checkpoint immunotherapy | Demonstrates macrophage-driven support of progression and immune escape | Supports CSF1R-directed microenvironmental therapy |
| Mitchem et al[26], 2013 | Preclinical PDAC model | CSF1R-TAM axis | Targeting TAMs reduces tumor-initiating cells, relieves immunosuppression, and enhances response to chemotherapy | Supports a metastasis-promoting role of macrophage-rich microenvironments | Supports combining CSF1R/TAM-directed therapy with cytotoxic treatment |
| Chen et al[10], 2023 | Multi-omics analysis | Autophagy-related genes, including RHEB | Constructed an autophagy-related mRNA/miRNA/transcription factor/immune-cell network and identified RHEB among key autophagy-related hub genes | Supports the prognostic and regulatory relevance of autophagy-associated signaling in PDAC | Suggests candidate autophagy-modulator targets |
| Deng et al[13], 2025 | Bioinformatics | Five autophagy-related genes, including RHEB | Developed a five-gene autophagy-related prognostic model with potential relevance to immune targeting | Supports the association between RHEB-centered signatures and immune infiltration | Suggests potential immunotherapy-oriented biomarker development |
Table 2 Representative small molecules that modulate autophagy-and epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related pathways in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
| Agent/target | Signaling pathway | Effect on autophagy | Principal phenotypic effect | Ref. |
| Umbelliprenin | AKT/mTOR, Notch1 | Induces autophagy | Inhibits cancer stemness and induces apoptosis | [42] |
| Alisertib | PI3K/AKT/mTOR, p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, Sirtuin 1 | Induces autophagy | Suppresses EMT and induces cell-cycle arrest | [55] |
| Qingyihuaji formula | MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR | Induces autophagy | Induces apoptosis | [44] |
| Tetrandrine | ROS-related signaling | Inhibits autophagy | Promotes ROS accumulation and enhances therapeutic efficacy | [46] |
| Rhus coriaria | Not specified | Induces autophagy | Induces apoptosis | [47] |
| Hernandezine | ROS/AMPK | Induces autophagic cell death | Promotes cancer-cell death | [48] |
| G6PD | AMPK-mTOR axis | Modulates autophagy | Promotes ferroptosis resistance | [43] |
| PITPNC1 | KRAS-MYC axis | Inhibits autophagy | Links KRAS to MYC and restrains autophagy | [45] |
Table 3 Context-dependent roles of autophagy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression
| Context | Functional role of autophagy | Mechanistic basis | Biological consequence | Ref. |
| Basal PDAC state | Tumor-promoting | High basal autophagic activity in PDAC cell lines and patient tissues | Supports tumor growth and metabolic fitness | [38] |
| Genetic inhibition (ATG7 or HMGB1 knockout) | Functionally tumor-supportive under basal conditions | Autophagy blockade induces ROS accumulation, DNA damage, and metabolic abnormalities | Suppresses PDAC progression | [39] |
| Pharmacological inhibition (chloroquine) | Functionally tumor-supportive under basal conditions | Pharmacologic blockade disrupts autophagic recycling and promotes oxidative/metabolic stress | Suppresses PDAC progression | [39] |
| Environmental stress (hypoxia or nutrient deprivation) | Pro-survival | Provides metabolic sub strates and stress adaptation | Supports tumor-cell survival under hostile microenvironmental conditions | [35,72] |
Table 4 Major controversies and priority future directions in the ras homolog enriched in brain-colony stimulating factor 1 receptor-autophagy field
| Key question | Current evidence | Major limitation | Why it matters | Priority next step |
| Is tumor-cell CSF1R broadly reproducible in PDAC | Recent work suggests that tumor-cell CSF1R may participate in metastatic signaling | CSF1R is classically macrophage-enriched, and tissue-level reproducibility remains uncertain | Determines whether this reflects a tumor-cell mechanism, a microenvironmental signal, or both | Spatially resolved validation using multiplex IF, RNAscope, or scRNA-seq[65] |
| Is autophagy suppressive or permissive for PDAC metastasis | Available evidence supports a context-dependent dual role of autophagy in PDAC progression[34,35] | Stage, treatment context, and model system can alter interpretation | Directly affects therapeutic strategy | Phenotype-linked, context-aware autophagy studies |
| Are class I and class III PI3K being conceptually conflated | Class I PI3K–AKT–mTOR signaling is generally linked to autophagy suppression, whereas class III PI3K/VPS34 is required for autophagosome initiation | Many studies refer broadly to PI3K without class-specific clarification | Prevents mechanistic overstatement and improves pathway precision | Class-specific wording and validation |
| Can RHEB-based signatures improve risk stratification | RHEB is associated with poor prognosis in PDAC datasets and functional models[12] | Existing cohorts remain limited and require independent confirmation | Essential for biomarker development and clinical risk stratification | External validation with C-index, calibration, and time-dependent ROC analysis |
| What is the most rational translational strategy | CSF1R/TAM, PI3K/mTOR, and autophagy are all targetable in principle | Single-pathway strategies may be insufficient in a highly adaptive tumor | Guides clinical trial design | Evaluate mechanism-driven combinations, including CSF1R-directed therapy with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or pathway-targeted agents[25,63] |
- Citation: Hu JX, Zhang Y, Chen YM, Cao L. RHEB-CSF1R signaling, autophagy, and metastatic plasticity in pancreatic cancer: Current advances, controversies, and translational opportunities. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(43): 119315
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i43/119315.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i43.119315