BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2026; 32(4): 114842
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.114842
Table 1 Comparison of endoscopic hemostatic modalities for colonic diverticular hemorrhage
Modality
Initial hemostasis rate, %
Early rebleeding rate (≤ 30 days), %
Late rebleeding rate (> 30 days), %
Typical complications
Key advantages
Limitations/optimal indications
Endoscopic clipping90-9815-2520-35Rare perforation (< 1%), clip dislodgementSimple, short procedure time; widely availableLimited durability; higher rebleeding in right-sided lesions or deep diverticula
Endoscopic band ligation95-1005-108-15Ulcer formation (< 2%), transient painSuperior long-term hemostasis; low recurrence; effective for right-sided bleedingTechnically difficult in narrow lumen; risk of post-ligation ulcer
Endoscopic detachable snare ligation94-1005-1210-18Rare perforation; mild post-procedure discomfortCombines advantages of clipping + ligation; low recurrenceRequires specialized device; longer setup time
Over-the-scope clip92-1000-8< 10 (limited data)Local mucosal tear (< 1%), transient painStrong closure force; effective rescue for refractory bleedingHigher cost; limited availability; bulky cap limits use in tortuous colon