Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2026; 32(4): 114842
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.114842
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.114842
Table 1 Comparison of endoscopic hemostatic modalities for colonic diverticular hemorrhage
| Modality | Initial hemostasis rate, % | Early rebleeding rate | Late rebleeding rate | Typical complications | Key advantages | Limitations/optimal indications |
| Endoscopic clipping | 90-98 | 15-25 | 20-35 | Rare perforation | Simple, short procedure time; widely available | Limited durability; higher rebleeding in right-sided lesions or deep diverticula |
| Endoscopic band ligation | 95-100 | 5-10 | 8-15 | Ulcer formation | Superior long-term hemostasis; low recurrence; effective for right-sided bleeding | Technically difficult in narrow lumen; risk of post-ligation ulcer |
| Endoscopic detachable snare ligation | 94-100 | 5-12 | 10-18 | Rare perforation; mild post-procedure discomfort | Combines advantages of clipping + ligation; low recurrence | Requires specialized device; longer setup time |
| Over-the-scope clip | 92-100 | 0-8 | < 10 (limited data) | Local mucosal tear | Strong closure force; effective rescue for refractory bleeding | Higher cost; limited availability; bulky cap limits use in tortuous colon |
- Citation: Hui YQ, Wang ZX, Wang CX, Tong C. Colonic diverticular hemorrhage: Etiology, diagnostic challenges, and evolving therapeutic strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(4): 114842
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i4/114842.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.114842
