BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2026; 32(31): 117869
Published online Aug 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.117869
Table 1 Overview of current non-invasive diagnostic approaches for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
Category
Method/model
Principle
Key variables
Advantages
Limitations
Imaging-basedMRI-PDFF/MASTQuantitative imaging of liver fat & fibrosisLiver fat fraction, stiffnessHigh accuracy, quantitativeExpensive, limited availability
MEFIBMRI elastography + FIB-4Liver stiffness + clinical dataHigh PPV for fibrosisRequires MRI access
FibroScan (FAST, Agile)Transient elastographyCAP, liver stiffness, ASTNon-invasive, widely usedIntermediate zone exists
Ultrasound (ATI, 2D-SWE)Acoustic attenuation/elasticityEcho attenuation, stiffnessAccessible, bedside useLower accuracy vs MRI
Serum biomarkersFIB-4Routine lab-based indexAge, AST, ALT, plateletsSimple, widely availableLimited specificity
ELF testFibrosis marker panelHA, PIIINP, TIMP-1Good for advanced fibrosisCost, lab dependence
NIS4/NIS2+Multi-marker panelmiRNA, proteins, HbA1cDetects at-risk MASHLimited accessibility
ADAPT/PRO-C3ECM remodeling biomarkersPRO-C3, platelets, diabetesMechanism-basedNeeds validation
CK-18/FGF21Cell death markersApoptosis-related proteinsReflects inflammationModerate performance
Metabolic indicesTyG indexInsulin resistance proxyTG, glucoseSimple, scalableIndirect marker
Machine learningClinical ML modelsData-driven predictionAnthropometric + lab dataHigh scalabilityData dependency
Microbiome-basedGut microbiome signatureMetagenomic profilingBacterial compositionNovel mechanism insightNot standardized
Digital pathology/AIqFIBSML-assisted histologyFibrosis, inflammationHigh reproducibilityRequires biopsy
EV-based (emerging)EV size + MLNanoparticle + AIEV size, concentration, clinical dataNon-invasive, innovativeNeeds validation


Write to the Help Desk