BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2026; 32(3): 114677
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.114677
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, n (%)

UC (n = 100)
CD (n = 103)
Male sex54 (54.0)69 (67.0)
Age (years old), median (IQR)50 (40-61)43 (33-56)
Time interval, day, median (IQR)111.5 (3-24)15.5 (6.5-24)
Disease extent
    E12 (2.0)-
    E216 (16.0)-
    E382 (82.0)-
    L1-2 (1.9)
    L2-11 (10.7)
    L3-90 (87.4)
    Upper GI modifier-5 (4.9)
    Perianal disease modifier-14 (13.6)
Laboratory data, median (IQR)
    Hb (g/dL)13.5 (12.5-14.5)13.9 (12.6-15)
    Alb (g/dL)4.5 (4.3-4.7)4.5 (4.4-4.8)
    CRP (mg/dL)0.1 (0.05-0.23)0.11 (0.05-0.33)
    LRG (μg/mL)8.6 (7.05-11.1)9.0 (6.9-12.1)
    FC (mg/kg)47.5 (17-230)68 (32-257)
Endoscopic activity
    MES < 251 (51)-
    MES ≥ 249 (49)-
    SES-CD < 6-76 (73.8)
    SES-CD ≥ 6-27 (26.2)
Clinical disease activity, median (IQR)
    Partial Mayo score0 (0-1)-
    HBI-1 (0-2)
Medications
    No current therapies3 (3.0)8 (7.8)
    5-ASA91 (91.0)15 (14.6)
    Immunomodulators16 (16.0)57 (55.3)
    Corticosteroid9 (9.0)3 (2.9)
    Biologics
        Anti-TNF2 (2.0)40 (38.8)
        Anti-integrin17 (17.0)5 (4.9)
        Anti-IL12/23 or anti-IL235 (5.0)19 (18.4)
    JAK inhibitor9 (9.0)1 (1.0)
Table 2 Correlation of leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein with other biomarkers



CRP
Alb
Hb
FC
IBDCorrelation coefficientLRG0.565-0.484-0.4790.155
Two-tailed significance< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.028
UCCorrelation coefficientLRG0.376-0.358-0.4890.201
Two-tailed significance< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.045
CDCorrelation coefficientLRG0.629-0.584-0.4950.179
Two-tailed significance< 0.001< 0.001< 0.0010.07
Table 3 Comparison of biomarkers between endoscopically active and inactive groups, median (interquartile range)

Active
Inactive
P value
IBD
LRG, μg/mL9.5 (7.25-11.75)8.5 (6.75-11.2)0.049a
CRP, mg/dL0.13 (0.06-0.33)0.08 (0.04-0.23)0.079
Hb, g/dL13.9 (12.6-15.0)13.7 (12.5-14.6)0.403
Alb, g/dL4.5 (4.3-4.7)4.5 (4.4-4.8)0.582
FC, mg/kg217 (45-880)47 (18-132)< 0.001a
UC
LRG, μg/mL8.8 (7.5-11.2)8.3 (6.7-11)0.431
CRP, mg/dL0.11 (0.05-0.23)0.08 (0.05-0.21)0.815
Hb, g/dL14 (12.8-14.8)13.3 (12.4-14.5)0.221
Alb, g/dL4.6 (4.3-4.8)4.5 (4.4-4.7)0.905
FC, mg/kg102 (45-1336)31 (10-79.5)0.006a
CD
LRG, μg/mL11 (7-16.5)8.6 (6.9-11.4)0.012a
CRP, mg/dL0.2 (0.1-0.65)0.09 (0.04-0.23)0.019a
Hb, g/dL14.3 (12.2-15.5)13.9 (12.8-14.6)0.753
Alb, g/dL4.5 (4.4-4.6)4.5 (4.4-4.8)0.269
FC, mg/kg273 (55-626)57.5 (27-167)< 0.001a
Table 4 Summary of previous and current studies using leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein to predict inflammatory bowel disease activity
Reference
Endpoints/AUC
Sensitivity/specificity
Cutoff for LRG
Serada et al[6], 2012UC/clinical CAI
LRG, μg/mL0.90184.0%/82.5%7.21
CRP, mg/dL0.84580.0%/80.7%0.20
Takenaka et al[17], 2023CD/transmural inflammation
LRG, μg/mL0.84567%/90%14
CRP, mg/dL0.76648%/94%0.03
Asonuma et al[12], 2023CD/small bowel lesions
LRG, μg/mL0.7789.0%/100%9/16
CRP, mg/dL0.7450%/89%1
Shimoyama et al[16], 2023IBD/MES > 0 or SES-CD > 2
LRG (UC), μg/mL0.8071%/85%12.7
CRP (UC), mg/dL0.7256%/80%0.14
LRG (CD), μg/mL0.7988%/63%13.3
CRP (CD), mg/dL0.7865%/75%0.46
IBD/partial Mayo > 0/CDAI > 150
LRG (UC), μg/mL0.7369%/73%12.7
CRP (UC), mg/dL0.6366%/53%0.08
LRG (CD), μg/mL0.7167%/71%22.2
CRP (CD), mg/dL0.6464%/68%0.9
Takada et al[28], 2025CD/SES-CD > 6
LRG, μg/mL0.7470.8%/87.5%15.5
CRP, mg/dL0.6358.3%/71.9%0.13
Aoyama et al[29], 2025UC/MES > 1
LRG, μg/mL0.6850%/82%14.8
CRP, mg/dL0.6244%/83%0.21
Ojaghi Shirmard et al[23], 2025IBD/meta-analysis
LRG, μg/mL0.8275.4%/77.3%-
Current studyIBD/MES ≥ 2 for UC, SES-CD ≥ 6
LRG (UC), μg/mL0.5769%/50%8.1
CRP (UC), mg/dL0.4598%/6%1.01
LRG (CD), μg/mL0.6159%/70%10.8
CRP (CD), mg/dL0.7085%/46%0.08