Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2026; 32(28): 117181
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.117181
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.117181
Table 1 Selected Asian cohort studies linking metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease to cardiovascular outcomes
| Ref. | Study population | Sample size | Outcome | Key finding | Effect size |
| [21] | Korea | 9584399 | Composite CVD event | MASLD identified a larger, more cardiometabolically complex population than MASLD | HR 1.43 for MASLD-only; HR 1.56 for both-FLD vs neither |
| [22] | Korea | 351068 | Incident MI or stroke | MASLD independently increased CVD risk | SHR 1.19 vs no SLD |
| [23] | Korea | 104399 | Incident CVD | Excess risk in MASLD concentrated in FIB-4-defined fibrosis | HR 2.27 for MASLD with FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 |
| [24] | Taiwan | 26676 | Incident HF | MASLD associated with HF, especially HFpEF | SHR 2.59 for HF; SHR 1.91 for HFpEF |
| [25] | Korea | 2773 | Coronary artery calcification | Both labels associated with CAC, but MASLD tracked severe CAC more consistently | aOR 1.21 for CAC and 1.38 for severe CAC |
| [26] | China | 203 | Obstructive CAD and high-risk plaque | MASLD predicted adverse plaque anatomy and physiology | aOR 2.44 for obstructive CAD; 2.52 for HRP; 3.53 for FFRCT ≤ 0.8 |
| [27] | Taiwan | 6058 | Coronary artery calcification | FIB-4 provided incremental referral value within MASLD | OR 1.217 per FIB-4 unit for CAC presence |
| [28] | Korea | 8622 | Any plaque and obstructive CAD | SAFE score and MASLD both stratified subclinical coronary atherosclerosis | MASLD OR 3.64 for obstructive CAD; higher SAFE strongly associated with plaque and obstruction |
Table 2 Biomarker-centred studies relevant to cardiovascular risk stratification in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or closely overlapping fatty liver phenotypes
| Biomarker | Study population | Sample size | Key finding | Effect size or performance |
| UHR[43] | Lean Chinese adults with MASLD by ultrasound | 6285 | UHR independently associated with MASLD; marked gradient across quintiles | OR 1.105 per unit; prevalence 191% to 24.54% across quintiles |
| UHR[44] | Non-obese Chinese adults with normal lipids, 5-year follow-up | 9837 | UHR predicted incident MASLD better than uric acid or HDL alone | HR 1.76 in highest quintile; AUC: 0.690; sensitivity: 71% |
| UHR[45] | Chinese case-control MASLD study | 1390 | Strong positive dose-response relation between UHR and MASLD | OR: 3.888, highest vs lowest quartile |
| UHR[46] | Lean Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes | 343 | UHR useful for MASLD discrimination in non-overweight diabetes | AUC: 0.697; sensitivity: 0.761; specificity: 0.553 |
| hs-CRP[47] | North Indian MASLD case-control study | 200 | hs-CRP rose with MASLD and severity | Adjusted OR: 1.311; mean: 3.12 mg/L vs 1.05 mg/L |
| TyG[48] | Chinese MASLD patients with chest pain undergoing angiography | 424 | TyG associated with prevalent CHD and angiographic severity | OR 2.519 for CHD; per 1-unit OR 2.06; β 2.44 in Gensini per 0.1-unit |
| TyG[49] | Chinese MASLD cohort with carotid follow-up | 739 | TyG predicted incident carotid atherosclerosis | HR 3.11 in Q2 and 4.51 in Q3 vs Q1 |
| FIB-4, NFS, WFA+-M2BP[39] | Japanese prospective screening cohort | 3512 | Advanced fibrosis markers independently linked to high CV risk | Fatty liver plus advanced fibrosis OR 5.90-35.6 for high Framingham risk |
| FIB-4[50] | Korean MASLD prospective cohort | 104399 | Fibrosis enriched incident CVD risk in MASLD | HR 2.27 for CVD when FIB-4 ≥ 1.3 |
| FIB-4[40] | Taiwanese MASLD-CAC referral study | 6058 | FIB-4 associated with CAC beyond MASLD status | OR 1.217 for CAC presence |
- Citation: Goyal MK, Hatwal J, Desai R, Sehgal T, Batta A. Do biomarkers matter? Cardiovascular risk stratification in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in the era of fibrosis-centric assessment. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(28): 117181
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i28/117181.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.117181