BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2026; 32(28): 117181
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.117181
Table 1 Selected Asian cohort studies linking metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease to cardiovascular outcomes
Ref.
Study population
Sample size
Outcome
Key finding
Effect size
[21]Korea9584399Composite CVD eventMASLD identified a larger, more cardiometabolically complex population than MASLDHR 1.43 for MASLD-only; HR 1.56 for both-FLD vs neither
[22]Korea351068Incident MI or strokeMASLD independently increased CVD riskSHR 1.19 vs no SLD
[23]Korea104399Incident CVDExcess risk in MASLD concentrated in FIB-4-defined fibrosisHR 2.27 for MASLD with FIB-4 ≥ 1.3
[24]Taiwan26676Incident HFMASLD associated with HF, especially HFpEFSHR 2.59 for HF; SHR 1.91 for HFpEF
[25]Korea2773Coronary artery calcificationBoth labels associated with CAC, but MASLD tracked severe CAC more consistentlyaOR 1.21 for CAC and 1.38 for severe CAC
[26]China
203Obstructive CAD and high-risk plaqueMASLD predicted adverse plaque anatomy and physiologyaOR 2.44 for obstructive CAD; 2.52 for HRP; 3.53 for FFRCT ≤ 0.8
[27]Taiwan6058Coronary artery calcificationFIB-4 provided incremental referral value within MASLDOR 1.217 per FIB-4 unit for CAC presence
[28]Korea8622Any plaque and obstructive CADSAFE score and MASLD both stratified subclinical coronary atherosclerosisMASLD OR 3.64 for obstructive CAD; higher SAFE strongly associated with plaque and obstruction
Table 2 Biomarker-centred studies relevant to cardiovascular risk stratification in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or closely overlapping fatty liver phenotypes
Biomarker
Study population
Sample size
Key finding
Effect size or performance
UHR[43]Lean Chinese adults with MASLD by ultrasound6285UHR independently associated with MASLD; marked gradient across quintilesOR 1.105 per unit; prevalence 191% to 24.54% across quintiles
UHR[44]Non-obese Chinese adults with normal lipids, 5-year follow-up9837UHR predicted incident MASLD better than uric acid or HDL aloneHR 1.76 in highest quintile; AUC: 0.690; sensitivity: 71%
UHR[45]Chinese case-control MASLD study1390Strong positive dose-response relation between UHR and MASLDOR: 3.888, highest vs lowest quartile
UHR[46]Lean Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes343UHR useful for MASLD discrimination in non-overweight diabetesAUC: 0.697; sensitivity: 0.761; specificity: 0.553
hs-CRP[47]North Indian MASLD case-control study200hs-CRP rose with MASLD and severityAdjusted OR: 1.311; mean: 3.12 mg/L vs 1.05 mg/L
TyG[48]Chinese MASLD patients with chest pain undergoing angiography424TyG associated with prevalent CHD and angiographic severityOR 2.519 for CHD; per 1-unit OR 2.06; β 2.44 in Gensini per 0.1-unit
TyG[49]Chinese MASLD cohort with carotid follow-up739TyG predicted incident carotid atherosclerosisHR 3.11 in Q2 and 4.51 in Q3 vs Q1
FIB-4, NFS, WFA+-M2BP[39]Japanese prospective screening cohort3512Advanced fibrosis markers independently linked to high CV riskFatty liver plus advanced fibrosis OR 5.90-35.6 for high Framingham risk
FIB-4[50]Korean MASLD prospective cohort104399Fibrosis enriched incident CVD risk in MASLDHR 2.27 for CVD when FIB-4 ≥ 1.3
FIB-4[40]Taiwanese MASLD-CAC referral study6058FIB-4 associated with CAC beyond MASLD statusOR 1.217 for CAC presence


Write to the Help Desk