BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2026; 32(19): 116837
Published online May 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i19.116837
Table 1 Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the two patients undergoing rescue liver transplantation
Feature
Case 1: Hepatoblastoma
Case 2: Breast cancer
Age/sex at rescue LT25-year-old male40-year-old female
Primary tumor and yearHepatoblastoma (2006; lung metastases at diagnosis)HER2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma (2016; cT2N3M0; AR 7/8, 30%)
Cause of liver failureAcute-on-chronic liver failure due to recurrent hepatic tumors and graft dysfunctionAcute hepatic failure from massive metastatic infiltration
Extrahepatic metastases at LTLung and boneLung and bone
Oncologic status at LTSlowly progressive, unresectable recurrenceProgressive systemic metastases
Timing of rescue LTRapid deterioration requiring emergent DDLT (March 2022; prior LDLT 2013)Acute liver failure with encephalopathy requiring LDLT (April 2024)
Immediate post-LT courseGraft function normalized; later rib/Lung metastasectomy + chemotherapyGraft function normalized; systemic therapy resumed
Survival after rescue LT17 months9 months
Primary determinant of outcomeAggressive tumor biology with repeated extrahepatic recurrenceContinued systemic progression
Cause of deathMultiorgan failure due to advanced malignancyPneumonia and cancer progression
Key pointLT prevented imminent death but did not modify tumor trajectoryLT restored hepatic function but conferred only transient benefit


Write to the Help Desk