Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2025; 31(42): 112577
Published online Nov 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112577
Published online Nov 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112577
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study subjects, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Variables | Total population (n = 174) | Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | χ²/t | P value |
| Sex | 2.271 | 0.132 | |||
| Male | 63 (36.2) | 37 (41.6) | 26 (30.6) | ||
| Female | 111 (63.8) | 52 (58.4) | 59 (69.4) | ||
| Age, years | 2.987 | 0.394 | |||
| ≤ 29 | 49 (28.2) | 26 (29.2) | 23 (27.1) | ||
| 30-39 | 59 (33.9) | 25 (28.1) | 34 (40.0) | ||
| 40-49 | 35 (20.1) | 20 (22.5) | 15 (17.6) | ||
| ≥ 50 | 31 (17.8) | 18 (20.2) | 13 (15.3) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.081 | 0.960 | |||
| < 18.5 | 12 (6.9) | 6 (6.7) | 6 (7.1) | ||
| 18.5-23.9 | 107 (61.5) | 54 (60.7) | 53 (62.4) | ||
| ≥ 24.0 | 55 (31.6) | 29 (32.6) | 26 (30.6) | ||
| Ethnic group | 0.528 | 0.468 | |||
| Han | 164 (94.3) | 85 (95.5) | 79 (92.9) | ||
| Other | 10 (5.7) | 4 (4.5) | 6 (7.1) | ||
| Household characteristics | 0.169 | 0.681 | |||
| Urban | 101 (58.0) | 53 (59.6) | 48 (56.5) | ||
| Rural | 73 (42.0) | 36 (40.4) | 37 (43.5) | ||
| Marital status | 1.316 | 0.518 | |||
| Unmarried | 45 (25.9) | 25 (28.1) | 20 (23.5) | ||
| Married | 118 (67.8) | 60 (67.4) | 58 (68.2) | ||
| Other | 11 (6.3) | 4 (4.5) | 7 (8.2) | ||
| Education | 0.109 | 0.991 | |||
| Junior high school and below | 21 (12.1) | 11 (12.4) | 10 (11.8) | ||
| High school | 26 (14.9) | 13 (14.6) | 13 (15.3) | ||
| College/vocational university | 28 (16.1) | 15 (16.9) | 13 (15.3) | ||
| Bachelor's degree and above | 99 (56.9) | 50 (56.1) | 49 (57.6) | ||
| Vocation | 0.708 | 0.702 | |||
| Working | 101 (58.0) | 50 (56.2) | 51 (60.0) | ||
| Unemployed/household | 25 (14.4) | 12 (13.5) | 13 (15.3) | ||
| Other | 48 (27.6) | 27 (30.3) | 21 (24.7) | ||
| Per capita monthly income (CNY) | 2.358 | 0.670 | |||
| < 4000 | 46 (26.4) | 23 (25.8) | 23 (27.1) | ||
| 4001-6000 | 33 (19.0) | 20 (22.5) | 13 (15.3) | ||
| 6001-8000 | 31 (17.8) | 17 (19.1) | 14 (16.5) | ||
| 8001-10000 | 19 (10.9) | 8 (9.0) | 11 (12.9) | ||
| > 10000 | 45 (25.9) | 21 (23.6) | 24 (28.2) | ||
| Smoking | 0.009 | 0.923 | |||
| Yes | 16 (9.2) | 8 (9.0) | 8 (9.4) | ||
| Drinking | 0.071 | 0.789 | |||
| Yes | 76 (43.7) | 38 (42.7) | 38 (44.7) | ||
| Reason for visit | 1.446 | 0.485 | |||
| Digestive discomfort | 109 (62.6) | 52 (58.4) | 57 (67.1) | ||
| Chronic gastritis | 52 (29.9) | 30 (33.7) | 22 (25.9) | ||
| Ulcers | 13 (7.5) | 7 (7.9) | 6 (7.0) | ||
| 13C/14C expiratory value | 22.23 ± 16.17 | 21.94 ± 15.48 | 23.80 ± 16.93 | 0.739 | 0.461 |
Table 2 Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale total and dimensional scores of study participants before and after intervention, mean ± SD
| Variables | Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | Z | P value |
| Baseline | ||||
| Reflux syndrome | 3.87 ± 2.13 | 3.09 ± 1.43 | -2.606 | 0.009b |
| Abdominal pain syndrome | 2.76 ± 2.91 | 2.44 ± 2.94 | -0.999 | 0.318 |
| Dyspepsia | 5.78 ± 4.61 | 4.79 ± 3.71 | -1.232 | 0.218 |
| Diarrhea | 3.76 ± 3.78 | 3.13 ± 3.02 | -0.876 | 0.381 |
| Constipation | 2.75 ± 3.50 | 2.56 ± 3.34 | -0.370 | 0.711 |
| GSRS total score | 18.67 ± 12.75 | 16.25 ± 10.43 | -1.094 | 0.274 |
| After 4 weeks of intervention | ||||
| Reflux syndrome | 0.55 ± 1.11 | 0.42 ± 1.43 | -0.896 | 0.370 |
| Abdominal pain syndrome | 0.60 ± 0.98 | 0.68 ± 1.51 | -1.283 | 0.196 |
| Dyspepsia | 1.71 ± 1.94 | 2.05 ± 2.86 | -0.362 | 0.717 |
| Diarrhea | 0.90 ± 1.07 | 1.44 ± 1.80 | -1.396 | 0.163 |
| Constipation | 0.88 ± 1.49 | 1.32 ± 2.15 | -1.027 | 0.304 |
| GSRS total score | 4.64 ± 4.36 | 5.90 ± 7.05 | -0.351 | 0.726 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | ||||
| Reflux syndrome | 0.34 ± 1.21 | 0.33 ± 1.32 | -0.044 | 0.965 |
| Abdominal pain syndrome | 0.54 ± 1.13 | 0.74 ± 1.47 | -0.220 | 0.826 |
| Dyspepsia | 1.41 ± 1.81 | 1.97 ± 2.55 | -1.308 | 0.191 |
| Diarrhea | 0.85 ± 1.09 | 1.12 ± 1.74 | -0.009 | 0.314 |
| Constipation | 0.80 ± 1.38 | 1.05 ± 1.58 | -1.027 | 0.304 |
| GSRS total score | 3.94 ± 4.45 | 5.22 ± 6.26 | -1.096 | 0.273 |
Table 3 Changes in the gastrointestinal symptom scores of the study participants after intervention, mean ± SD
| Variables | Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | Z | P value |
| GSRS score after 2 weeks of intervention - baseline GSRS score | ||||
| Reflux syndrome2-0 | -3.06 ± 1.50 | -2.58 ± 1.26 | 2.243 | 0.025a |
| Abdominal pain syndrome2-0 | -1.25 ± 2.11 | -1.46 ± 2.68 | 0.016 | 0.987 |
| Dyspepsia2-0 | -3.00 ± 3.66 | -2.58 ± 3.17 | 0.801 | 0.423 |
| Diarrhea2-0 | -1.70 ± 3.74 | -1.87 ± 2.83 | -0.831 | 0.406 |
| Constipation2-0 | -1.62 ± 3.08 | -1.62 ± 2.93 | -0.164 | 0.870 |
| GSRS total score2-0 | -8.63 ± 9.54 | -8.11 ± 8.30 | 0.495 | 0.620 |
| GSRS score after 4 weeks of intervention - baseline GSRS score | ||||
| Reflux syndrome4-0 | -3.09 ± 1.41 | -2.64 ± 1.34 | -1.933 | 0.053 |
| Abdominal pain syndrome4-0 | -1.93 ± 2.39 | -1.58 ± 2.68 | -0.754 | 0.451 |
| Dyspepsia4-0 | -3.89 ± 3.87 | -2.45 ± 3.59 | -1.813 | 0.070 |
| Diarrhea4-0 | -2.90 ± 3.21 | -1.60 ± 2.77 | -2.458 | 0.014a |
| Constipation4-0 | -1.74 ± 2.54 | -1.14 ± 2.87 | -1.525 | 0.127 |
| GSRS total score4-0 | -13.55 ± 9.26 | -9.40 ± 8.46 | -2.356 | 0.018a |
| GSRS score after 8 weeks of intervention - baseline GSRS score | ||||
| Reflux syndrome8-0 | -3.00 ± 1.41 | -2.62 ± 1.64 | -1.365 | 0.172 |
| Abdominal pain syndrome8-0 | -2.02 ± 2.32 | -1.60 ± 3.04 | -1.350 | 0.177 |
| Dyspepsia8-0 | -4.19 ± 3.75 | -2.59 ± 3.20 | -2.381 | 0.017a |
| Diarrhea8-0 | -2.98 ± 3.31 | -1.83 ± 2.62 | -1.846 | 0.065 |
| Constipation8-0 | -1.87 ± 3.02 | -1.36 ± 3.00 | -1.316 | 0.188 |
| GSRS total score8-0 | -14.06 ± 9.32 | -10.00 ± 8.56 | -2.279 | 0.023a |
Table 4 Protective effects of probiotic intervention on the occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms
| Variables | Incidence of gastrointestinal reactions after 2 weeks of intervention (%) | Relative risk reduction (%) | Incidence of gastrointestinal reactions after 4 weeks of intervention (%) | Relative risk reduction (%) | Incidence of gastrointestinal reactions after 8 weeks of intervention (%) | Relative risk reduction (%) | |||
| Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | ||||
| Reflux syndrome | 37.8 | 24.1 | 0.6 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 7.1 | 59.2 |
| Abdominal pain syndrome | 48.8 | 48.1 | 0.01 | 12.9 | 14.8 | 12.8 | 8.7 | 16.9 | 48.5 |
| Dyspepsia | 74.4 | 70.9 | 0.05 | 34.3 | 37.9 | 9.5 | 26.1 | 36.6 | 28.7 |
| Diarrhea | 69.5 | 55.7 | 0.2 | 26.8 | 37.8 | 29.1 | 23.3 | 28.2 | 13.9 |
| Constipation | 39.0 | 34.2 | 0.1 | 18.6 | 21.6 | 13.9 | 13.1 | 17.0 | 22.9 |
Table 5 Comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication rates in the study population, n (%)
| Variables | Intervention group (n = 89) | Placebo-controlled group (n = 85) | χ² | P value |
| Eradication rate | 79 (88.8) | 72 (84.7) | 0.790 | 0.430 |
Table 6 Adherence assessment of the study participants, n (%)
| Time points | Good compliance |
| After 2 weeks of intervention | |
| Intervention group (n = 82) | 77 (93.9) |
| Placebo-controlled group (n = 79) | 70 (88.6) |
| Total population (n = 161) | 147 (91.3) |
| After 4 weeks of intervention | |
| Intervention group (n = 78) | 70 (89.7) |
| Placebo-controlled group (n = 76) | 67 (88.2) |
| Total population (n = 154) | 137 (89.0) |
- Citation: Liu WJ, Zhao YM, Xie QQ, Wu MC, Pan YF, Yan HK, Shan XX, Xu WT, Liu YL, Peng CX, Zhang XM, Lin Q. Multistrain probiotics alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms during bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 112577
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i42/112577.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112577
