Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2025; 31(39): 110971
Published online Oct 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i39.110971
Published online Oct 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i39.110971
Table 1 Application of high-accuracy artificial intelligence models in the diagnosis and prognosis management of pancreatitis
Application | Prediction target | AI methodology | Patient cohort | Input data type | Performance metrics | Stage of clinical translation | Ref. |
Diagnosis | AP early diagnosis and risk stratification | XGBoost model | 61894 | Vital signs and lab measurements | AUC: 0.921 | Experimental | [47] |
Logistic regression model | 275 | 28 important radiomics features, lipase levels | AUC: 0.933 | Experimental | [32] | ||
Pancreatic lesions detection and segmentation | V-Net model | 144 | Pancreatic volume. The split volume ratios | AUC: 0.854 | Experimental | [31] | |
SegFormer model | 165 | EUS images | AUC: 0.95 | Validation phase | [41] | ||
Pediatric pancreas segmentation | PanSegNet | 84 | Imaging parameters, biologic sex, age at imaging, clinical diagnosis | Dice coefficient: Approximately 0.88 | Validation phase | [37] | |
Non-invasive diagnosis of PDAC and CP | DLR model | 558 | CEUS images | Training cohort AUC: 0.986. Internal validation cohort AUC: 0.978. External validation cohorts 1 AUC: 0.967. External validation cohorts 2 AUC: 0.953 | Validation phase | [39] | |
491 | EUS images | AUC: 0.936 | Validation phase | [40] | |||
Distinguish AIP from PDAC | SVM-RFE model | 111 | 251 expert-designed features from 2D and 3D PET/CT images | AUC: 0.93 ± 0.01 | Validation phase | [44] | |
Random forest model | 182 | 431 radiomics features. Two types of CT parameters with dual phase CT | AUC: 0.975 | Validation phase | [45] | ||
AP severity early prediction | LightGBM model | 215 | Radiomics features | Training cohort AUC: 0.992. Validation cohort AUC: 0.965. Test cohort AUC: 0.894 | Hospital IT integration | [33,64] | |
CTA model | 192 | Age, gender, BMI, temperature, pulse, systolic blood pressure, WBC, CRP, albumin, calcium, APACHE II and BISAP, Balthazar grade, CTSI, MCTSI, EPIC score | Training cohort AUC: 0.853. Validation cohort AUC: 0.833 | Validation phase | [51] | ||
Random forest model | 648 | Blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, albumin, HDL, LDL, calcium, glucose | Training cohort AUC: 0.89. Test cohort AUC: 0.96 | Validation phase | [48] | ||
740 | Age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, serum biochemical index, CT | Training cohort AUC: 0.969. Training cohort AUC: 0.961 | Validation phase | [52] | |||
Prognosis management | Mortality | XGBoost model | 499 | WBC count, hemoglobin, platelet count, serum creatinine, albumin | AUC: 0.881 | Hospital IT integration | [61,64] |
ANNs model | 337 | Total bilirubin, creatinine, amylase, lipase, LDH | AUC: 0.769 | Experimental | [72] | ||
Multiple organ failure | ANNs model | 312 | Age, hematocrit, serum glucose, BUN, serum calcium | AUC: 0.96 ± 0.02 | Experimental | [62] | |
SVM model | 263 | HCT, K-time, IL-6, creatinine | AUC: 0.840 | Validation phase | [69] | ||
Complications | ANNs model | 217 | Pancreatic necrosis rate, LDH, oxyhemoglobin saturation | AUC: 0.859 ± 0.048 | Experimental | [66] | |
XGBoost model | 334 | APACHE II, IAP, PCT rank | AUC: 0.9193 | Experimental | [67] | ||
GBDT model | 1672 | Age, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, GCS | AUC: 0.985 | Validation phase | [70] | ||
Recurrence | XGBoost model | 531 | TG levels, smoking, drinking, ANC | AUC: 0.779 | Experimental | [79] | |
CECT model | 389 | Age, etiology, CTSI, hospital stay, pancreatic necrosis | AUC: 0.941 | Experimental | [76] |
- Citation: Zhang XY, Hu MD, Maimaitijiang D, Wang T, Wang L. Artificial intelligence in pancreatitis: A narrative review on advancing precision diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(39): 110971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i39/110971.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i39.110971