Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2025; 31(37): 107665
Published online Oct 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i37.107665
Published online Oct 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i37.107665
Table 1 Wilson and Jungner criteria for assessing screening eligibility
Wilson and Jungner criteria | |
Disease | The condition sought should be an important health problem |
The natural history of the condition, including development from latent to declared disease, should be adequately understood | |
There should be a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage | |
Diagnosis | There should be a suitable test or examination |
The test should be acceptable to the population | |
Case-finding should be a continuing process and not a “once and for all” project | |
Treatment | There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients |
There should be an accepted treatment for patients with recognized disease | |
Setting | Facilities for diagnosis and treatment should be available |
Cost-effectiveness | The cost of case-finding should be economically balanced in relation to possible expenditure on medical care as a whole |
Table 2 Summary of guideline recommendations on target population for screening
Metabolic dysfunction | Elevated ALT | Steatosis | |||
T2DM | Obesity + ≥ 1 other criteria | ≥ 2 criteria | |||
2021 EASL NIT clinical practice guideline | + | +1 | +1 | +1 | - |
2021 AGA clinical care pathway | + | + | + | + | + |
2023 AASLD practice guidance | + | +1 | +1 | +2 | + |
2024 EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guideline | + | + | - | +3 | + |
2025 APASL clinical practice guideline | + | +4 | + | + | + |
Table 3 Recommended primary non-invasive tests for screening for liver disease in at-risk populations
Rule out | Rule in | |
2021 EASL NIT clinical practice guideline | FIB-4: < 1.3 | FIB-4: ≥ 2.67 |
2021 AGA clinical care pathway | FIB-4: < 1.3 (2.0 aged ≥ 65 years) | FIB-4: ≥ 2.67 |
2023 AASLD practice guidance | FIB-4: < 1.3 (< 2.0 aged ≥ 65 years) | FIB-4: ≥ 2.67 |
2024 EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guideline | FIB-4: < 1.3 (2.0 aged ≥ 65 years) | FIB-4: ≥ 2.67 |
2025 APASL clinical practice guideline | FIB-4: 1.3 NFS1 | FIB-4: ≥ 2.67 NFS1 |
Table 4 Recently presented non-invasive tests for liver disease detection
Components | Target | Derivation population | |
SAFE | Age, BMI, diabetes, AST, ALT, globulin, platelets | ≥ F2 fibrosis | MASLD patients |
LRS | Age, sex, fasting glucose, cholesterol, AST, ALT, GGT and platelets | LSM (score correlates with expected LSM) | General population/primary care population |
MAF-5 | BMI, waist circumference, diabetes AST and platelets | ≥ LSM 8 kPa | General population |
FIB-9 | AST, ALT, GGT, ALP, bilirubin, albumin, platelets, prothrombin index and urea | ≥ F2 fibrosis | MASLD patients |
LiverPRO | Age, AST, GGT, alkaline phosphatase, total cholesterol, sodium, INR, bilirubin, albumin, platelets | ≥ F2 fibrosis | At-risk metALD population |
acMASH | AST, creatine | MASH | MASLD patients |
CORE | Age, sex, GGT, AST, ALT | Liver related events | General population |
CLivD | Age, sex, alcohol use, waist-hip ratio, diabetes, smoking, with or without GGT values | Fatal and non-fatal advanced liver disease | General population |
Table 5 Test characteristics to obtain 80% sensitivity in a general population setting
Cut-off | Specificity (%) | NPV | PPV | |
FIB-4 | 0.73 | 24 | 0.93 | 0.08 |
SAFE | -7.04 | 52 | 0.97 | 0.12 |
LRS | 4.98 | 46 | 0.97 | 0.11 |
MAF-5 | -0.37 | 62 | 0.97 | 0.15 |
CORE | 0.0018 | 37 | 0.96 | 0.10 |
Table 6 Confirmatory non-invasive tests to diagnose advanced liver disease when the primary non-invasive test is inconclusive
Rule out | Rule in | |
2021 EASL NIT clinical practice guideline | LSM: < 8 kPa | LSM: ≥ 8 kPa |
Alternatives: ELF, FibroMeter, Fibrotest | Alternatives: ELF, FibroMeter, Fibrotest | |
2021 AGA clinical care pathway | LSM: < 8 kPa | LSM: ≥ 12 kPa |
Alternatives: SWE, ultrasound | Alternatives: SWE, ultrasound | |
2023 AASLD practice guidance | LSM: < 8 kPa | LSM: ≥ 8 kPa |
Alternatives: ELF | ||
2024 EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guideline | LSM: < 8 kPa | LSM: ≥ 8 kPa |
Alternatives: MRE, SWE or ELF with adjusted thresholds | ||
2025 APASL clinical practice guideline | Not mentioned | LSM: ≥ 12 kPa, SWE ≥ 8 kPa, MRE ≥ 3.6 kPa, ELF ≥ 9.8, ADAPT ≥ 6.328 |
Table 7 Recommended re-evaluation strategies
Interval | Early re-evaluation | Screening test | |
2021 EASL NIT clinical practice guideline | 1-3 years | FIB-4 | |
2021 AGA clinical care pathway | 2-3 years | FIB-4 | |
2023 AASLD practice guidance | 2-3 years | After 1-2 years in individuals with T2DM or ≥ 2 metabolic risk factors | FIB-4 |
2024 EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guideline | 1-3 years | Within 1 year when FIB-4 was indeterminate and management of comorbidities was intensified, whilst VCTE was not performed | FIB-4 |
2025 APASL clinical practice guideline | 2-3 years | FIB-4, NFS |
- Citation: Pustjens J, Brouwer WP, Ayada I, Janssen HLA, van Kleef LA. Considerations and clinical utility of referral pathways for early detection of liver disease in at-risk populations. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(37): 107665
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i37/107665.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i37.107665