BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2025; 31(34): 111541
Published online Sep 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i34.111541
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of included patients
Training cohort (n = 459)
Validation cohort (n = 196)
Test cohort (n = 171)
PD HCC (n = 89)
nPD HCC (n = 370)
P value
PD HCC (n = 30)
nPD HCC (n = 166)
P value
PD HCC (n = 36)
nPD HCC (n = 135)
P value
Age (years)55.67 ± 10.5657.24 ± 9.690.1858.07 ± 9.1258.95 ± 9.960.6557.58 ± 8.7559.67 ± 10.410.16
Sex (male), n (%)73 (82.02)312 (84.32)0.7125 (83.33)141 (84.94)1.0027 (75.00)112 (82.96)0.15
BMI (kg/m2)25.39 ± 3.3925.14 ± 3.580.6024.69 ± 3.6824.95 ± 3.280.6124.55 ± 3.2325.07 ± 3.080.40
HBV, n (%)61 (68.54)253 (68.38)1.0023 (76.67)125 (75.30)1.0026 (72.22)92 (68.15)0.79
HCV, n (%)6 (6.74)23 (6.22)1.000 (0)5 (3.01)0.741 (2.78)7 (5.19)0.87
Cirrhosis, n (%)64 (71.91)236 (63.78)0.1925 (83.33)100 (60.24)0.0324 (66.67)76 (56.30)0.35
AFP (ng/mL), n (%)
    < 2021 (23.60)215 (58.11)< 0.0016 (20.00)89 (53.61)0.00111 (30.56)88 (65.19)< 0.001
    20-40029 (32.58)83 (22.43)0.0611 (36.67)49 (29.52)0.5712 (33.33)27 (20.00)0.14
    > 40039 (43.82)72 (19.46)< 0.00113 (43.33)28 (16.87)0.00213 (36.11)20 (14.81)0.01
ALT (U/L)39.43 ± 31.0833.74 ± 27.290.0630.81 ± 12.5733.48 ± 26.510.4737.92 ± 34.0331.51 ± 25.200.17
AST (U/L)32.54 ± 23.9130.03 ± 22.880.1329.26 ± 9.2528.70 ± 18.830.0932.58 ± 22.1427.73 ± 14.450.11
TB (umol/L)18.91 ± 27.9013.55 ± 5.850.3114.38 ± 5.3213.78 ± 6.480.4513.76 ± 9.1412.16 ± 5.220.35
Albumin (g/L)41.65 ± 4.1941.53 ± 3.950.7941.64 ± 4.6341.14 ± 3.900.5340.58 ± 4.1241.78 ± 3.860.08
PT (S)13.45 ± 0.9713.51 ± 1.070.5613.63 ± 0.8513.39 ± 1.010.3413.56 ± 1.1413.60 ± 0.840.77
Tumors size (mm)47.57 ± 22.0847.91 ± 21.10.7348.10 ± 25.7849.83 ± 23.060.5245.64 ± 19.5150.90 ± 21.530.19
Number of tumors, n (%)
    Solitary80 (89.89)330 (89.19)1.0026 (86.67)153 (92.17)0.5336 (100.00)126 (93.33)0.24
    Multiple9 (10.11)40 (10.81)4 (13.33)13 (7.83)0 (0)9 (6.67)
Table 2 Predictive performance of different radiomics models based on XGBoost
Models
Cohorts
Original NR MRI
Deep learning-based SR MRI
AUC (95%CI)
Accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
AUC (95%CI)
Accuracy
Sensitivity
Specificity
T2WITraining0.782 (0.732-0.832)0.7410.7080.7490.813 (0.765-0.861)0.7170.8540.684
Validation0.721 (0.613-0.828)0.7450.6000.7710.738 (0.636-0.840)0.7550.6330.777
Test0.685 (0.585-0.785)0.6370.7220.6150.721 (0.620-0.820)0.6370.8330.585
DWITraining0.785 (0.732-0.834)0.6780.7420.6620.770 (0.716-0.825)0.7150.7080.716
Validation0.697 (0.595-0.800)0.6530.7330.6390.721 (0.614-0.827)0.8010.5000.855
Test0.695 (0.595-0.795)0.5500.8610.4670.694 (0.586-0.802)0.6960.6390.711
PVPTraining0.816 (0.765-0.866)0.7780.6850.8000.834 (0.791-0.877)0.7410.7640.735
Validation0.727 (0.610-0.844)0.8010.5670.8430.762 (0.664-0.859)0.8160.5670.861
Test0.713 (0.620-0.805)0.6780.6110.6960.752 (0.659-0.845)0.7430.6670.763
All-sequences1Training0.890 (0.854-0.925)0.7930.8760.7730.884 (0.847-0.920)0.8150.8090.816
Validation0.792 (0.700-0.883)0.8420.5330.8980.832 (0.748-0.915)0.7350.8000.723
Test0.779 (0.695-0.862)0.6670.7780.6370.798 (0.720-0.875)0.7660.6950.785
Table 3 Difference of selected radiomics features for all-sequence model between normal-resolution and super-resolution magnetic resonance imaging

Original NR MRI
Deep learning-based SR MRI
1DWI_original_glrlm_RunVarianceDWI_original_glrlm_LongRunEmphasis
2DWI_original_glszm_ZonePercentageDWI_original_glszm_SmallAreaEmphasis
3DWI_original_shape_ElongationDWI_wavelet_HLL_glcm_ClusterShade
4DWI_wavelet_LHH_firstorder_SkewnessDWI_wavelet_LLL_ngtdm_Complexity
5DWI_wavelet_LHL_firstorder_RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviationDWI_log_sigma_5_0_mm_3D_glcm_DifferenceVariance
6DWI_wavelet_LLL_glszm_GrayLevelVariancePVP_original_firstorder_Kurtosis
7PVP_log_sigma_5_0_mm_3D_glrlm_ShortRunEmphasisPVP_wavelet_HLL_firstorder_Kurtosis
8PVP_wavelet_LHH_glcm_ClusterShadePVP_wavelet_LHL_firstorder_Median
9PVP_wavelet_LHH_glcm_CorrelationPVP_wavelet_LLL_glszm_ZonePercentage
10PVP_wavelet_LHL_firstorder_MedianT2WI_wavelet_HHL_glszm_SmallAreaEmphasis
11T2WI_wavelet_HHL_firstorder_KurtosisT2WI_wavelet_HLH_firstorder_Median
12T2WI_wavelet_HHL_firstorder_MedianT2WI_wavelet_HLH_glszm_SmallAreaEmphasis
13T2WI_wavelet_LLL_firstorder_RootMeanSquared
Table 4 Univariable and multivariable cox proportional hazards analyses for overall survival and recurrence-free survival
Variable
Overall survival
Recurrence-free survival
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
Signature from SR MRI1.67 (1.21, 2.30)0.0021.81 (1.29, 2.55)0.0011.39 (1.04, 1.88)0.0281.36 (1.02, 1.85)0.042
Age (> 65 years)1.20 (0.80, 1.79)0.3811.12 (0.79, 1.59)0.533
Gender (male)1.08 (0.70, 1.67)0.7231.13 (0.75, 1.71)0.559
HBV0.97 (0.67, 1.39)0.8550.93 (0.67, 1.29)0.677
Cirrhosis1.30 (0.94, 1.80)0.1181.15 (0.86, 1.54)0.341
MVI1.78 (1.28, 2.47)< 0.0011.48 (1.04, 2.09)0.0291.80 (1.34, 2.42)0.0011.67 (1.23, 2.28)0.001
INR (> 1.5 ratio)2.31 (0.32, 16.64)0.4052.61 (0.64, 10.54)0.179
AFP1.48 (1.02, 2.14)0.041.53 (1.06, 2.19)0.2191.44 (1.03, 2.02)0.031
Multiple1.07 (0.67, 1.72)0.7661.59 (1.07, 2.37)0.0211.53 (1.03, 2.28)0.036
Pseudocapsule0.74 (0.52, 1.04)0.0830.88 (0.65, 1.20)0.426
Tumor size1.38 (1.01, 1.90)0.0491.53 (1.06, 2.19)0.0221.38 (1.01, 1.91)0.0481.38 (0.96, 1.98)0.08


Write to the Help Desk