Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2025; 31(28): 109468
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.109468
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.109468
Table 1 Comparison between various available endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies
Therapy | Mechanism | Benefit | Risk | TBWL | Metabolic effects | Quantitative risk data | Study period | Ref. |
Intragastric balloon | Space-occupying balloon induces satiety | Minimally invasive, well-studied | Gastrointestinal symptoms, risk of deflation or migration | 8%-15% | Improved insulin sensitivity, reduced liver fat | Overall complication rate: 5%-22%, balloon rupture: 0.7%, severe complication: 0.17% | 12 months | [40,41] |
Transpyloric shuttle | Delays gastric emptying via the anchoring bulb-pair device | Targets appetite and satiety, reversible | Gastric ulceration, device migration, and limited long-term data | 9.5%-14.5% | Improved glycemic control and improved lipid profile | Device-related adverse events: 2.8% | 12 months | [25] |
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty | Endoscopic suturing to reduce gastric volume | Durable, anatomy-preserving, repeatable | Requires expertise, rare bleeding/perforation risk | 16%-20% | Improved HbA1c, transaminitis, insulin resistance | Serious adverse events: 2.2%, perforation: 0.1%-0.4% | 3 months | [42,43] |
Aspiration therapy | Removes part of ingested food via PEG tube | Effective long-term behavioral modification | Requires an external device, social stigma, and risk of electrolyte imbalance | 18%-20% | Improved glycemic control and improved lipid profile | No severe adverse events; buried bumper syndrome: 3.3% | 12 months; 4 years | [44,45] |
Endoluminal bypass liner | Endoscopic liner bypasses the duodenum and proximal jejunum | Mimics gastric bypass, no surgery, improves metabolic markers | Gastrointestinal symptoms, risk of hepatic abscess, and early removal | 10%-15% | Improved HbA1c, hepatic steatosis, and insulin resistance | Perforation: < 1%; overall serious adverse events: 3%-5% | 26 weeks; 3 months | [46,47] |
Duodenal mucosal ablation | Thermal or electrical ablation of the duodenal mucosa to reset signaling | Restores metabolic function, with no permanent implant | Experimental, safety/durability still under evaluation | 7%-10% | Reduced fasting glucose, improved insulin sensitivity, and liver steatosis | Adverse event: At least one adverse event in 52% (81% mild) | 12 months | [48] |
Incisionless magnetic anastomosis system | Creates jejuno-ileal bypass using self-assembling magnets | Incisionless, mimics surgical bypass, promotes malabsorption | Still under evaluation, may cause malabsorption and diarrhoea | 14%-18% | Improved glycemic control and potential GLP-1 elevation | Perforation: 10% | 12 months | [49] |
- Citation: Fernandez CJ, Jena S, Lakshmi V, Pappachan JM. Duodenal mucosal ablation: An emerging therapeutic concept for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(28): 109468
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i28/109468.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i28.109468