Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2024; 30(6): 516-522
Published online Feb 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i6.516
Published online Feb 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i6.516
Scoring system | Structure | Weighted | Score range |
Pescatori Incontinence Score | 3 items of type, 3 items of frequency | Yes | 0: Full continence; 6: Daily incontinence of solid stool |
Wexner/Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Score | 3 items of type, 2 additional items, 5 items of frequency | No | 0: Full continence; 20: Complete incontinence |
St. Mark’s/Vaizey Incontinence Score | 3 items of type, 3 additional items, 5 items of frequency | Yes | 0: Perfect continence; 24: Complete incontinence |
Fecal Incontinence Severity Score | 4 items of type, 6 types of frequency | Yes | Patient range: 0: least severe; 61: most severe. Surgeon range: 0: Least severe; 59: Most severe |
Rapid Assessment Fecal Incontinence Score | 6 items for perception, 6 items for frequency | No | Leaks: 0: For none; 10: for daily. Perception: 0: For excellent, 10: For very bad |
Garg’s New Severity Scale | 6 items for type, 3 items for frequency | Yes | 0: No incontinence; 80: Total incontinence |
- Citation: Liptak P, Duricek M, Banovcin P. Diagnostic tools for fecal incontinence: Scoring systems are the crucial first step. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(6): 516-522
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i6/516.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i6.516