Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2024; 30(43): 4620-4635
Published online Nov 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i43.4620
Published online Nov 21, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i43.4620
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the bevacizumab plus sintilimab plus interventional treatment and lenvatinib plus sintilimab plus interventional treatment groups before and after propensity score matching, n (%)
Variable | Before PSM | After PSM | ||||
BeSiIT (n = 32) | LeSiIT (n = 95) | P value | BeSiIT (n = 28) | LeSiIT (n = 50) | P value | |
Age | 1.000 | 0.835 | ||||
< 65 years | 24 (75.0) | 70 (73.7) | 21 (75.0) | 35 (70.0) | ||
≥ 65 years | 8 (25.0) | 25 (26.3) | 7 (25.0) | 15 (30.0) | ||
Sex | 0.663 | 0.916 | ||||
Female | 4 (12.5) | 17 (17.9) | 4 (14.3) | 9 (18.0) | ||
Male | 28 (87.5) | 78 (82.1) | 24 (85.7) | 41 (82.0) | ||
Hepatitis | 0.212 | 1.000 | ||||
No | 4 (12.5) | 4 (4.2) | 3 (10.7) | 4 (8.0) | ||
Yes | 28 (87.5) | 91 (95.8) | 25 (89.3) | 46 (92.0) | ||
Liver cirrhosis | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
No | 9 (28.1) | 27 (28.4) | 8 (28.6) | 14 (28.0) | ||
Yes | 23 (71.9) | 68 (71.6) | 20 (71.4) | 36 (72.0) | ||
AFP, ng/mL | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
≤ 400 | 18 (56.2) | 52 (54.7) | 15 (53.6) | 28 (56.0) | ||
> 400 | 14 (43.8) | 43 (45.3) | 13 (46.4) | 22 (44.0) | ||
Tumor size, cm | 0.532 | 0.689 | ||||
≤ 10 | 20 (62.5) | 67 (70.5) | 17 (60.7) | 34 (68.0) | ||
> 10 | 12 (37.5) | 28 (29.5) | 11 (39.3) | 16 (32.0) | ||
Tumor number | 0.021a | 0.953 | ||||
≤ 3 | 24 (75.0) | 47 (49.5) | 20 (71.4) | 34 (68.0) | ||
> 3 | 8 (25.0) | 48 (50.5) | 8 (28.6) | 16 (32.0) | ||
Child-Pugh | 0.880 | 1.000 | ||||
A | 26 (81.2) | 74 (77.9) | 23 (82.1) | 40 (80.0) | ||
B | 6 (18.8) | 21 (22.1) | 5 (17.9) | 10 (20.0) | ||
BCLC stage | 0.130 | 0.984 | ||||
B | 8 (25.0) | 40 (42.1) | 7 (25.0) | 14 (28.0) | ||
C | 24 (75.0) | 55 (57.9) | 21 (75.0) | 36 (72.0) | ||
ECOG PS | 0.136 | 0.673 | ||||
0 | 26 (81.2) | 59 (62.1) | 22 (78.6) | 36 (72.0) | ||
1 | 5 (15.6) | 31 (32.6) | 5 (17.9) | 13 (26.0) | ||
2 | 1 (3.1) | 5 (5.3) | 1 (3.6) | 1 (2.0) | ||
Metastasis | 0.327 | 1.000 | ||||
No | 20 (62.5) | 70 (73.7) | 19 (67.9) | 34 (68.0) | ||
Yes | 12 (37.5) | 25 (26.3) | 9 (32.1) | 16 (32.0) | ||
Vascular invasion | 0.027a | 0.417 | ||||
No | 12 (37.5) | 59 (62.1) | 10 (35.7) | 24 (48.0) | ||
Yes | 20 (62.5) | 36 (37.9) | 18 (64.3) | 26 (52.0) |
Table 2 Summary of the best responses, n (%)
Variable | RECIST 11 | mRECIST | ||||
BeSiIT (n = 28) | LeSiIT (n = 50) | P value | BeSiIT (n = 28) | LeSiIT (n = 50) | P value | |
CR | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - | 8 (28.6) | 4 (8.0) | 0.016a |
PR | 17 (60.7) | 23 (46.0) | 0.212 | 9 (32.1) | 25 (50.0) | 0.127 |
SD | 5 (17.9) | 7 (14.0) | 0.651 | 5 (17.9) | 5 (1.0) | 0.319 |
PD | 6 (21.4) | 20 (40.0) | 0.095 | 6 (21.4) | 16 (32.0) | 0.320 |
ORR | 17 (60.7) | 23 (46.0) | 0.791 | 17 (60.7) | 29 (58.0) | 0.815 |
DCR | 22 (78.6) | 30 (60.0) | 0.095 | 22 (78.6) | 34 (68.0) | 0.320 |
Table 3 A summary of adverse reactions in the bevacizumab plus sintilimab plus interventional treatment and lenvatinib plus sintilimab plus interventional treatment groups, n (%)
Variable | BeSiIT (n = 28) | LeSiIT (n = 50) | P value | |||
Any grade | Grade 3 or 4 | Any grade | Grade 3 or 4 | Any grade | Grade 3 or 4 | |
Thrombocytopenia | 8 (28.5) | 2 (7.1) | 9 (18.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.335 | 0.059 |
Neutropenia | 4 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (18.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0.699 | 0.454 |
Hypertension | 5 (17.9) | 0 (0.0) | 15 (30.0) | 7 (14.0) | 0.306 | 0.047a |
Rash | 4 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (16.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0.853 | 0.454 |
Hand-foot skin reaction | 4 (14.3) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (16.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0.853 | 0.454 |
Abdominal pain | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (6.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0.649 | 0.454 |
Bleeding | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (14.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.167 | - |
Fever | 2 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.059 | - |
Nausea | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.018a | - |
Decreased appetite | 1 (3.6) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (24.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.033a | - |
Diarrhea | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.018a | - |
Fatigue | 2 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | 16 (32.0) | 2 (4.0) | 0.027a | 0.290 |
Vomiting | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (16.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.034a | - |
Proteinuria | 8 (28.5) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (10.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.053 | - |
Hyperbilirubinemia | 6 (21.4) | 0 (0.0) | 11 (22.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.958 | - |
Elevated ALT | 2 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (16.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.293 | - |
Elevated AST | 6 (21.4) | 0 (0.0) | 13 (26.0) | 1 (2.0) | 0.693 | 0.677 |
Hypoalbuminemia | 2 (7.1) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (14.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.391 | - |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of clinical characteristics with progression-free survival as the dependent variable
Independent variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Group (LeSiIT/BeSiIT) | 0.876 (0.460-1.670) | 0.688 | ||
Tumor size (> 10/≤ 10 cm) | 1.143 (0.597-2.187) | 0.687 | ||
Tumor number (> 3/≤ 3) | 0.759 (0.369-1.561) | 0.453 | ||
Gender (male/female) | 0.969 (0.404-2.321) | 0.943 | ||
Age (years) | 0.989 (0.961-1.017) | 0.432 | ||
Age (≥ 65/< 65 years) | 0.878 (0.425-1.813) | 0.725 | ||
Etiology (yes/no) | 0.559 (0.196-1.598) | 0.278 | ||
Liver cirrhosis (yes/no) | 0.735 (0.375-1.440) | 0.369 | ||
Metastasis (yes/no) | 0.767 (0.391-1.504) | 0.440 | ||
Vascular invasion (yes/no) | 1.041 (0.554-1.957) | 0.900 | ||
Child-Pugh (B/A) | 1.390 (0.655-2.951) | 0.391 | ||
BCLC stage (C/B) | 0.869 (0.432-1.750) | 0.694 | ||
ECOG PS | ||||
0 | Reference | - | ||
1 | 1.562 (0.772-3.163) | 0.215 | ||
2 | NA | 0.972 | ||
ALBI grade | ||||
1 | Reference | - | ||
2 | 0.668 (0.343-1.301) | 0.235 | ||
3 | 1.643 (0.382-7.069) | 0.505 | ||
AFP concentration (ng/mL) | 1.000 (1.000-1.000) | 0.042a | 1.000 (1.000-1.000) | 0.191 |
AFP (> 28.0/≤ 28.0 ng/mL) | 1.754 (0.830-3.708) | 0.141 | ||
CEA (> 3.6/≤ 3.6 ng/mL) | 1.645 (0.811-3.338) | 0.168 | ||
AFCE | ||||
0 | Reference | - | Reference | - |
1 | 3.255 (1.244-8.516) | 0.016a | 2.973 (1.120-7.888) | 0.029a |
2 | 6.153 (2.011-18.821) | 0.001a | 5.746 (1.865-17.708) | 0.002a |
- Citation: Han RY, Gan LJ, Lang MR, Ren SH, Liu DM, Li GT, Liu YY, Tian XD, Zhu KW, Sun LY, Chen L, Song TQ. Lenvatinib, sintilimab combined interventional treatment vs bevacizumab, sintilimab combined interventional treatment for intermediate-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(43): 4620-4635
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i43/4620.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i43.4620