Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2024; 30(36): 4044-4056
Published online Sep 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i36.4044
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the patients, n (%)
Characteristics
Training cohort (n = 145)
Validation cohort (n = 63)
P value
Age (years)54.6 ± 11.654.3 ± 13.80.869
Sex0.250
    Male82 (56.6)41 (65.1)
    Female63 (43.4)22 (34.9)
Etiology0.112
    HBV95 (65.5)44 (69.8)
    Alcohol18 (12.4)1 (1.6)
    PBC9 (6.2)4 (6.3)
    AIH5 (3.4)1 (1.6)
    HCV2 (1.4)2 (3.2)
    HLD2 (1.4)1 (1.6)
    Other14 (9.7)10 (15.9)
Ascites0.624
    Absent66 (45.5)31 (49.2)
    Present79 (54.5)32 (50.8)
Hypertension0.149
    Absent129 (89.0)60 (95.2)
    Present16 (11.0)3 (4.8)
PVT0.175
    Absent118 (81.4)46 (73)
    Present27 (18.6)17 (27)
Child-Pugh0.629
    Class A55 (37.9)27 (42.9)
    Class B68 (46.9)25 (39.7)
    Class C22 (15.2)11 (17.5)
AFP (μg/L)0.772
    < 20122 (84.1)54 (85.7)
    ≥ 2023 (15.9)9 (14.3)
ALB (g/L), mean ± SD34.5 ± 6.033.5 ± 6.00.271
PT (second), median (range)16.1 (14.9-17.5)15.8 (14.7-17.4)0.480
PLT (109/L), median (range)54.0 (41.0-73.5)57.0 (43.0-84.0)0.395
ALT (U/L), median (range)28.0 (19.5-50.0)31.0 (21.0-57.0)0.362
AST (U/L), median (range)42.0 (29.5-69.0)45.0 (29.0-73.0)0.754
GGT (U/L), median (range)44.0 (24.0-97.5)44.0 (24.0-97.0)0.953
TBIL (μmol/L), median (range)28.0 (20.4-44.1)23.1 (18.3-43.9)0.226
DBIL (μmol/L), median (range)10.0 (6.9-16.4)9.1 (6.4-16.8)0.712
IBIL (μmol/L), median (range)17.8 (11.7-27.3)14.9 (10.3-22.5)0.076
Table 2 Univariate and multivariable analysis of clinical variables
Variables
Univariate logistic regression
Multivariable logistic regression
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age1.000 (0.978-1.022)0.973
Sex1.677 (0.959-2.932)0.070
Etiology1.008 (0.880-1.154)0.905
Ascites2.826 (1.597-5.001)< 0.0012.625 (1.367-5.039)0.004
Hypertension0.690 (0.268-1.775)0.441
PVT4.622 (2.215-9.645)< 0.0013.500 (1.547-7.916)0.003
Child-Pugh1.352 (0.916-2.007)0.130
AFP0.977 (0.457-2.088)0.953
ALB0.965 (0.921-1.011)0.135
PT1.158 (1.032-1.299)0.0131.199 (1.033-1.390)0.017
PLT0.999 (0.992-1.007)0.832
ALT0.978 (0.966-0.991)0.001
AST0.982 (0.973-0.992)0.001
GGT0.998 (0.995-1.001)0.136
TBIL0.996 (0.988-1.005)0.405
DBIL0.994 (0.981-1.008)0.427
IBIL0.995 (0.977-1.012)0.546
Table 3 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of different models in training and validation cohorts
Models
Training cohort
Validation cohort
AUC (95%CI)
P value
AUC (95%CI)
P value
Rad-score (liver)0.801 (0.727-0.875)< 0.0010.763 (0.646-0.880)0.002
Rad-score (spleen)0.831 (0.766-0.897)< 0.0010.792 (0.677-0.906)0.016
Rad-score (esophagus)0.864 (0.807-0.922)< 0.0010.857 (0.762-0.952)0.109
Rad-score (liver+ spleen + esophagus)0.930 (0.891-0.970)0.0490.886 (0.808-0.964)0.139
Clinical model0.727 (0.644-0.811)< 0.0010.692 (0.556-0.828)< 0.001
RC model0.951 (0.919-0.983)0.93 (0.872-0.987)
Table 4 Evaluation of predictive performance in training and validation cohorts
Models
Cohort
Sensitivity
Specificity
Accuracy
PPV
NPV
Rad-score (liver)Training0.6560.8150.7450.7370.750
Validation0.6430.6860.6670.6210.706
Rad-score (spleen)Training0.7500.7650.7590.7160.795
Validation0.7140.8290.7780.7690.784
Rad-score (esophagus)Training0.7340.8020.7720.7460.793
Validation0.7860.8570.8250.8150.833
Rad-score (liver + spleen + esophagus)Training0.8440.8520.8480.8180.873
Validation0.7790.8860.7940.8260.775
Clinical modelTraining0.5310.7900.6760.6670.687
Validation0.5710.6860.6350.6000.667
RC modelTraining0.8750.8770.8760.8480.899
Validation0.8210.8570.8410.8210.857