Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2024; 30(18): 2418-2439
Published online May 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i18.2418
Published online May 14, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i18.2418
Table 1 Scoring system for assessing difficulty of laparoscopic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer
Criteria | Score |
Duration of postoperative hospital stay > 15 d | 2 |
Surgical duration > 250 min | 3 |
Intraoperative blood loss > 100 mL | 1 |
Conversion to open surgery | 3 |
Intraoperative use of trans-anal approach | 2 |
Postoperative complications classified as CD grade II or above | 1 |
Table 2 Pelvic measurement parameters and definitions
Parameter name | Definition |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet (AB) | Distance between the midpoint of the superior pubic symphysis and the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory |
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet (PQ) | Maximum distance between the left and right iliopectineal line |
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis (CD) | Distance between the midpoint of the inferior pubic symphysis and the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal junction |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet (CE) | Distance between the midpoint of the inferior pubic symphysis and the tip of the coccyx |
Interischial spine diameter (LM) | Shortest distance between the ischial spines |
Interischial tuberosity diameter (NO) | Shortest distance between the ischial tuberosities |
Superior-inferior diameter of the pubic symphysis (AC) | Distance between the superior and inferior borders of the pubic symphysis |
Sacrococcygeal distance (BE) | Distance between the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory and the tip of the coccyx |
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum (BD) | Distance between the midpoint of the anterior margin of the sacral promontory and the midpoint of the sacrococcygeal junction |
Sacrococcygeal-pubic angle (α) | The angle between the extended lines of the anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet and the anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet |
Sacropubic angle (β) | Angle between the extended lines of the anteroposterior diameter of pelvic inlet and the anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis |
Sacrococcygeal curvature height (FI) | Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacrococcygeal curve to the sacrococcygeal distance |
Sacral curvature height (FH) | Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacral curve to the superior-inferior diameter of sacrum |
Superior pubococcygeal diameter (AE) | Distance between the midpoint of the superior pubic symphysis and the tip of the coccyx |
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance (FG) | Vertical distance from the most convex point of the sacrococcygeal curve to the superior-inferior diameter of pubic symphysis or its extended line |
Table 3 Soft tissue measurement parameters and definitions
Parameter name | Definition |
Rectal area (a) | Area of the rectum at the level of the ischial spine |
Mesorectal fat area (b) | Area of the mesorectal fat at the level of the ischial spine |
Visceral fat area (c) | Area of visceral fat at the level of the umbilicus |
Subcutaneous fat area (d) | Area of subcutaneous fat at the level of the umbilicus |
Waist circumference (e) | Circumference of the waist at the level of the umbilicus |
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter (RS) | Measurement distance from the umbilicus to the spine-wall intersection in the abdominal plane |
Transverse abdominal diameter (TU) | Measurement distance along the horizontal line of the lumbar vertebrae anterior margin at the level of the umblicus |
Table 4 Clinical and pathological characteristics data of 162 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer
Range | mean ± SD | No. of cases [n (%)] | |
Age (yr) | (32.00, 89.00) | 65 (59, 72) | |
Gender | |||
Male | 105 (64.81) | ||
Female | 57 (35.19) | ||
BMI (kg/m2) | (15.94, 31.25) | 22.75 ± 3.25 | |
Underlying comorbidities | 72 (44.44) | ||
Diabetes | 26 (16.05) | ||
Hypertension | 58 (35.8) | ||
Heart disease | 8 (4.94) | ||
Pulmonary disease | 3 (1.85) | ||
Stroke | 5 (3.09) | ||
Other | 1 (0.62) | ||
ASA grade | |||
I | 18 (11.11) | ||
II | 137 (84.57) | ||
III | 7 (4.32) | ||
History of previous abdominal surgery | 15 (9.26) | ||
Preoperative total protein (g/L) | (53.8, 81) | 65.45 (62.4, 68.83) | |
Preoperative albumin (g/L) | (29, 48.5) | 38.64 ± 3.32 | |
Preoperative albumin to globulin ratio | (0.9, 2.1) | 1.4 (1.3, 1.6) | |
Preoperative hemoglobin (g/L) | (89, 166) | 134.5 (119, 143.75) | |
PNI | (35, 58) | 47.23 ± 5.02 | |
Preoperative CEA (ug/L) | (0.4, 49.9) | 2.9 (1.9, 5.18) | |
Preoperative CA199 (kU/L) | (0.6, 128.1) | 8.55 (5.18, 17.98) | |
Tumor height (cm) | (2, 15) | 8 (6.25, 10) | |
Tumor Location | |||
Upper rectum (10 cm < distance ≤ 15 cm) | 30 (18.52) | ||
Midrectum (5 cm < distance ≤ 10 cm) | 103 (63.58) | ||
Lower rectum (distance ≤ 5 cm) | 29 (17.9) | ||
Maximum tumor diameter (cm) | (0.8, 10) | 3.8 (3, 4.88) | |
Surgical approach | |||
L-AR | 20 (12.35) | ||
L-LAR | 135 (83.33) | ||
L-ISR | 7 (4.32) | ||
Intraoperative preventive ostomy | 39 | ||
L-AR + preventive ostomy | 0 | ||
L-LAR + preventive ostomy | 32 (82.05) | ||
L-ISR + preventive ostomy | 7 (17.95) | ||
pT staging | |||
Tis | 4 (2.47) | ||
T1 | 19 (11.73) | ||
T2 | 26 (16.05) | ||
T3 | 109 (67.28) | ||
T4a | 4 (2.47) | ||
pN staging | |||
N0 | 94 (58.02) | ||
N1 | 36 (22.22) | ||
N2 | 32 (19.75) | ||
pTNM staging | |||
0 | 4 (2.47) | ||
I | 38 (23.46) | ||
II | 52 (32.1) | ||
III | 68 (41.98) | ||
Tumor differentiation grade | |||
Well-differentiated | 9 (5.56) | ||
Moderately-differentiated to well-differentiated | 20 (12.35) | ||
Moderately differentiated | 112 (69.14) | ||
Moderately differentiated to poorly differentiated | 17 (10.49) | ||
Poorly-differentiated | 4 (2.47) | ||
Tumor nodules | 16 (9.88) | ||
Vascular tumor emboli | 47 (29.01) | ||
Neural invasion | 40 (24.69) | ||
Number of lymph nodes removed | (3, 36) | 15 (13, 18) | |
Surgical duration (min) | (78, 465) | 216.5 (179.25, 260) | |
Intraoperative blood loss (ml) | (10, 300) | 50 (20, 100) | |
Postoperative complications (CD grade) | |||
No complications | 125 (77.16) | ||
Grade I | 7 (4.32) | ||
Grade II | 21 (12.96) | ||
Grade III | 8(4.94) | ||
Grade IV | 1(0.62) | ||
Postoperative anastomotic fistula grading | |||
No anastomotic fistula | 152 (93.83) | ||
Grade A | 0 | ||
Grade B | 6 (3.7) | ||
Grade C | 4 (2.47) | ||
Duration of postoperative hospital stay (d) | (6, 56) | 14 (12, 16) | |
Intraoperative use of transanal approach (n) | 7 (4.32) | ||
Conversion to open surgery | 1 (0.62) | ||
Postoperative anal evacuation time (d) | (1, 7) | 2 (2, 3) | |
Postoperative resumption of semi-liquid food time (d) | (3, 25) | 8 (5, 9) | |
Anastomosis method | |||
Manual anastomosis (Hand-sewn anastomosis) | 7 (4.32) | ||
Stapler anastomosis | 155 (95.68) | ||
Number of staple nail cartridges used in surgery (n) | |||
L-AR | (1, 2) | 2 (1, 2) | |
L-LAR | (1, 4) | 2 (1, 2) | |
L-ISR | 0 | 0 | |
Length of stapler cartridge used in surgery (mm) | |||
L-AR | (45, 120) | 90 (56.25, 90) | |
L-LAR | (45, 180) | 90 (60, 90) | |
L-ISR | 0 | 0 |
Table 5 Pelvic bone parameters and soft tissue parameters data of 162 patients undergoing laparoscopic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer
Measurement | mean ± SD or median (Q1, Q3) (range) |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet (mm) | 115.23 ± 11.79 |
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet (mm) | 123.52 ± 8.14 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis (mm) | 111.83 (106.36, 117.74) |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet (mm) | 88.97 (82.35, 96.86) |
Interischial spine diameter (mm) | 96.06 (87.3, 104.27) |
Interischial tuberosity diameter (mm) | 106.63 ± 14.15 |
Superior-inferior diameter of pubic symphysis (mm) | 42.25 (39.31, 45.42) |
Sacrococcygeal distance (mm) | 123.19 ± 11.95 |
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum (mm) | 105.77 ± 10.17 |
Sacrococcygeal curvature height (mm) | 39.61 (36.15, 42.71) |
Sacral curvature height (mm) | 20.82 ± 5.87 |
Superior pubococcygeal diameter (mm) | 120.26 ± 9.56 |
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance (mm) | 119.84 (113.14, 126.49) |
Sacrococcygeal-pubic angle (°) | 48.05 ± 7.01 |
Sacropubic angle (°) | 33.04 ± 5.43 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet/sacrococcygeal distance | 0.94 (0.86, 1) |
Rectal area (cm2) | 16.67 (12.23, 21.48) |
Mesorectal fat area (cm2) | 39.26 (27.41, 51.62) |
Visceral fat area (cm2) | 215.9 (126.21, 274.02) |
Subcutaneous fat area (cm2) | 258.24 (198.25, 340.77) |
Waist circumference (cm) | 82.37 ± 9.15 |
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter (cm) | 18.42 ± 2.91 |
Transverse abdominal diameter (cm) | 28.84 ± 2.79 |
Table 6 Perioperative outcomes of 162 cases of laparoscopic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer grouped into two groups of high and low surgical difficulty, the postoperative pathological baseline characteristics and univariate analysis, n (%)
Univariate analysis | ||||
Whole group (n = 162) | Low surgical difficulty group (n = 141) | High surgical difficulty group (n = 21) | P value | |
pT staging | 0.73901 | |||
Tis | 4 (2.47) | 4 (2.84) | 0 | |
T1 | 19 (11.73) | 17 (12.06) | 2 (9.52) | |
T2 | 26 (16.05) | 20 (14.18) | 6 (28.57) | |
T3 | 109 (67.28) | 97 (68.79) | 12 (57.14) | |
T4a | 4 (2.47) | 3 (2.13) | 1 (4.76) | |
pN staging | 0.43271 | |||
N0 | 94 (58.02) | 83 (58.87) | 11 (52.38) | |
N1 | 36 (22.22) | 32 (22.7) | 4 (19.05) | |
N2 | 32 (19.75) | 26 (18.44) | 6 (28.57) | |
pTNM staging | 0.58951 | |||
0 | 4 (2.47) | 4 (2.84) | 0 | |
Ⅰ | 38 (23.46) | 33 (23.4) | 5 (23.81) | |
Ⅱ | 52 (32.1) | 46 (32.62) | 6 (28.57) | |
III | 68 (41.98) | 58 (41.13) | 10 (47.62) | |
Degree of tumor differentiation | 0.07301 | |||
Well differentiated | 9 (5.56) | 9 (6.38) | 0 | |
High-moderate differentiation | 20 (12.35) | 17 (12.06) | 3 (14.29) | |
Moderate differentiation | 112 (69.14) | 100 (70.92) | 12 (57.14) | |
Moderate-Low differentiation | 17 (10.49) | 13 (9.22) | 4 (19.05) | |
Low differentiation | 4 (2.47) | 2 (1.42) | 2 (9.52) | |
Tumor nodules | 16 (9.88) | 16 (11.35) | 0 | 0.22952 |
Vascular tumor emboli | 47 (29.01) | 40 (28.37) | 7 (33.33) | 0.83372 |
Neural invasion | 40 (24.69) | 36 (25.53) | 4 (19.05) | 0.71012 |
Number of Lymph Nodes Removed | 15 (13, 18) | 15 (13, 18) | 15 (12, 17) | 0.79291 |
Surgical duration (min) | 216.5 (179.25, 260) | 205 (176, 238) | 324.19 ± 59.62 | 3.423e-101 |
Intraoperative Blood Loss (ml) | 50 (20, 100) | 50 (20, 50) | 100 (50, 200) | 4.436e-061 |
Postoperative complications (CD grade) | 0.01851 | |||
No complications | 125 (77.16) | 113 (80.14) | 12 (57.14) | |
Grade I | 7 (4.32) | 5 (3.55) | 2 (9.52) | |
Grade II | 21 (12.96) | 17 (12.06) | 4 (19.05) | |
Grade III | 8 (4.94) | 5 (3.55) | 3 (14.29) | |
Grade IV | 1 (0.62) | 1 (0.71) | 0 | |
Postoperative anastomotic fistula grading | 0.09071 | |||
No anastomotic fistula | 152 (93.83) | 134 (95.04) | 18 (85.71) | |
Grade B | 6 (3.7) | 5 (3.55) | 1 (4.76) | |
Grade C | 4 (2.47) | 2 (1.42) | 2 (9.52) | |
Duration of postoperative hospital stay (d) | 14 (12, 16) | 13 (12, 15) | 23 (22, 27) | 6.01e-111 |
Intraoperative use of trans-anal approach | 7 (4.32) | 2 (1.42) | 5 (23.81) | 0.00041 |
Conversion to open surgery | 1 (0.62) | 0 | 1 (4.76) | 0.12962 |
Postoperative anal evacuation time(d) | 2 (2, 3) | 2 (2, 3) | 2 (2, 2) | 0.02841 |
Postoperative resumption of semi-liquid food time (d) | 8 (5, 9) | 8 (6, 9) | 6 (4, 10) | 0.17981 |
Table 7 Univariate analysis of risk factors associated with surgical difficulty in 162 cases of laparoscopic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer
Factors | Entire group | Low difficulty group | High difficulty group | P value |
Age (yr) | 65 (59, 72) | 65 (58, 73) | 65 (62, 71) | 0.992 |
Gender | 0.15712 | |||
Male | 105 (64.81) | 88 (62.41) | 17 (80.95) | |
Female | 57 (35.19) | 53 (37.59) | 4 (19.05) | |
BMI (kg/m²) | 22.75 ± 3.25 | 22.7 ± 3.2 | 23.04 ± 3.64 | 0.6965 |
Underlying comorbidities | 72 (44.44) | 65 (46.1) | 7 (33.33) | 0.38812 |
ASA grade | 0.83321 | |||
I | 18 (11.11) | 15 (10.64) | 3 (14.29) | |
II | 137 (84.57) | 121 (85.82) | 16 (76.19) | |
III | 7 (4.32) | 5 (3.55) | 2 (9.52) | |
History of previous abdominal surgery | 15 (9.26) | 15 (10.64) | 0 | 0.22172 |
Preoperative total Protein (g/L) | 65.45 (62.4, 68.83) | 65.1 (62.4, 68.3) | 66.4 (62.5, 70.2) | 0.32101 |
Preoperative albumin (g/L) | 38.64 ± 3.32 | 38.54 ± 3.25 | 39.3 ± 3.79 | 0.3892 |
Preoperative albumin to globulin ratio | 1.4 (1.3, 1.6) | 1.4 (1.3, 1.6) | 1.4 (1.3, 1.6) | 0.70931 |
Preoperative Hemoglobin (g/L) | 134.5 (119, 143.75) | 134 (119, 143) | 141 (126, 151) | 0.09621 |
PNI | 47.23 ± 5.02 | 47.02 ± 4.81 | 48.63 ± 6.2 | 0.2637 |
Preoperative CEA (ug/L) | 2.9 (1.9, 5.18) | 2.9 (1.8, 5.2) | 2.9 (1.9, 4.6) | 0.22571 |
Preoperative CA199 (kU/L) | 8.55 (5.18, 17.98) | 8.3 (5, 18) | 10.8 (6.9, 17.9) | 0.56631 |
Tumor height (cm) | 8 (6.25, 10) | 8 (7, 10) | 7 (5, 8) | 0.00241 |
Tumor maximum diameter (cm) | 3.8 (3, 4.88) | 3.8 (3, 4.5) | 3 (2.8, 5) | 0.55071 |
Surgical approach | 6.775e-41 | |||
L-AR | 20 (12.35) | 19 (13.48) | 1 (4.76) | |
L-LAR | 135 (83.33) | 120 (85.11) | 15 (71.43) | |
L-ISR | 7 (4.32) | 2 (1.42) | 5 (23.81) | |
Intraoperative preventive ostomy | 39 (20.07) | 26 (18.44) | 13 (61.90) | 4.644e-052 |
Intraoperative stapler cartridge count | 2 (1, 2) | 2 (1, 2) | 1 (1, 2) | 0.09531 |
Intraoperative stapler cartridge length (mm) | 90 (60, 90) | 90 (60, 90) | 60 (45, 90) | 0.09691 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet (mm) | 115.23 ± 11.79 | 115.53 ± 11.85 | 113.23 ± 11.49 | 0.4025 |
Transverse diameter of pelvic inlet (mm) | 123.52 ± 8.14 | 123.98 ± 7.79 | 120.42 ± 9.83 | 0.126 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of mid-pelvis (mm) | 111.83 (106.36, 117.74) | 112.16 (106.74, 118.12) | 110.69 (103.69, 115.17) | 0.42211 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic outlet (mm) | 88.97 (82.35, 96.86) | 89.18 (82.52, 96.92) | 86.53 (81.69, 94.37) | 0.86681 |
Interischial spine diameter (mm) | 96.06 (87.3, 104.27) | 96.35 (88.76, 104.58) | 90.34 (85.01, 100.56) | 0.06211 |
Interischial tuberosity diameter (mm) | 104.3 (96.08, 116.95) | 104.09 (96.6, 118.44) | 107.77 (95.7, 112.01) | 0.61451 |
Superior-inferior diameter of the pubic symphysis (mm) | 42.21 ± 4.75 | 42.14 ± 4.88 | 42.71 ± 3.77 | 0.5341 |
Sacrococcygeal distance (mm) | 123.19 ± 11.95 | 122.49 ± 12.04 | 127.91 ± 10.42 | 0.0378 |
Superior-inferior diameter of sacrum (mm) | 105.77 ± 10.17 | 105.36 ± 10.18 | 108.5 ± 9.9 | 0.1881 |
Sacrococcygeal curvature height (mm) | 39.61 (36.15, 42.71) | 39.63 (36.14, 43.43) | 38.97 (37.68, 40.96) | 0.55961 |
Sacral curvature height (mm) | 20.82 ± 5.87 | 20.83 ± 6.04 | 34.61 ± 4.11 | 0.9529 |
Superior pubococcygeal diameter (mm) | 120.26 ± 9.56 | 120.01 ± 9.28 | 121.98 ± 11.35 | 0.4555 |
Anterior-posterior sacropubic distance (mm) | 119.84 (113.14, 126.49) | 120.04 (113.25, 127.11) | 119.01 (112.86, 121.95) | 0.30551 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet/sacrococcygeal distance | 0.94 (0.86, 1) | 0.94 (0.86, 1.02) | 0.87 (0.82, 0.97) | 0.01651 |
Sacrococcygeal-pubic angle (°) | 48.05 ± 7.01 | 47.64 ± 7.21 | 34.61 ± 4.11 | 0.0116 |
Sacropubic angle (°) | 33.22 (29.5, 36.66) | 32.83 (28.98, 36.56) | 34.89 (32.05, 36.79) | 0.14131 |
Rectal area (cm2) | 16.67 (12.23, 21.48) | 16.64 (12.23, 22.57) | 17.07 (10.44, 19.59) | 0.47581 |
Mesorectal fat area (cm2) | 39.26 (27.41, 51.62) | 38.62 (28.18, 51.35) | 46.32 (24.25, 54.02) | 0.53641 |
Visceral fat area (cm2) | 215.9 (126.21, 274.02) | 213.65 (126.1, 260.2) | 240.25 (137.54, 320.74) | 0.58341 |
Subcutaneous fat area (cm2) | 258.24 (198.25, 340.77) | 264.32 (204.34, 341.38) | 240.91 (139.23, 310.51) | 0.30911 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 82.37 ± 9.15 | 82.36 ± 8.92 | 82.44 ± 10.83 | 0.9741 |
Anterior-posterior abdominal diameter (cm) | 18.44 (16.38, 20.4) | 18.41 (16.48, 20.25) | 19.11 (16.2, 20.96) | 0.59881 |
Transverse abdominal diameter (cm) | 28.84 ± 2.79 | 28.83 ± 2.69 | 28.92 ± 3.48 | 0.6991 |
Table 8 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of surgical difficulty in 162 cases of laparoscopic radical sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer
Variable | β | SE | Wald | Odds ratio (95%CI) | P value |
Intercept | 1.945 | 6.353 | 0.094 | 6.99 (0.000-1787454.283) | 0.760 |
Tumor Height | 0.230 | 0.196 | 1.387 | 1.259 (0.858-1.848) | 0.239 |
Surgical approach (Control group = L-ISR) | |||||
L-AR | -5.050 | 2.425 | 4.336 | 0.006 (0.000-0.743) | 0.037 |
L-LAR | -3.417 | 1.311 | 6.789 | 0.033 (0.003-0.429) | 0.009 |
Intraoperative preventive ostomy | 2.604 | 0.861 | 9.147 | 13.517 (2.500-73.069) | 0.002 |
Sacrococcygeal distance | 0.086 | 0.04 | 4.567 | 1.09 (1.007-1.180) | 0.033 |
Sacrococcygeal-pubic angle | -0.115 | 0.082 | 1.959 | 0.891 (0.759-1.047) | 0.162 |
Anterior-posterior diameter of pelvic inlet/sacrococcygeal distance | -9.328 | 4.151 | 5.050 | 0.00009 (0.000-0.304) | 0.025 |
- Citation: Zhou XC, Guan SW, Ke FY, Dhamija G, Wang Q, Chen BF. Construction of a nomogram model to predict technical difficulty in performing laparoscopic sphincter-preserving radical resection for rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(18): 2418-2439
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v30/i18/2418.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i18.2418