Yang LM, Wang HJ, Li SL, Gan GH, Deng WW, Chang YS, Zhang LF. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib for treating liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(11): 1533-1544 [PMID: 38617449 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i11.1533]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Li-Min Yang, MD, Associate Chief Physician, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 Jianshe East Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China. ylmsunny6153@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups [n (%)]
Group
Diaphragm injury
Diarrhea
Rash
Portal vein and biliary tract injury
Gastrointestinal bleeding
Nausea and vomiting
Fatigue
Research group (n = 50)
3 (6.00)
14 (28.00)
20 (40.00)
13 (26.00)
5 (10.00)
9 (18.00)
33 (66.00)
Control group (n = 50)
1 (2.00)
2 (4.00)
2 (4.00)
10 (20.00)
3 (6.00)
1 (2.00)
10 (20.00)
χ2 value
1.042
10.714
18.881
0.508
0.543
7.111
21.583
P value
0.307
0.001
< 0.001
0.476
0.461
0.008
< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates between the two groups
Group
1-yr survival rate
2-yr survival rate
3-yr survival rate
Number of cases
Survival rate (%)
Number of cases
Survival rate (%)
Number of cases
Survival rate (%)
Research group (n = 50)
47
94.00
42
84.00
36
72.00
Control group (n = 50)
40
80.00
32
64.00
20
40.00
Log-χ2 value
4.465
5.337
9.223
P value
0.035
0.021
0.002
Table 6 Univariate analysis of the survival group and death group [n (%)]
Item
Survival group (n = 56)
Death group (n = 44)
χ2 value
P value
Age
≤ 60 yr
43 (76.79)
29 (65.91)
1.446
0.229
> 60 yr
13 (23.21)
15 (34.09)
Child-Pugh grade
Grade A
45 (80.36)
23 (52.27)
8.931
0.003
Grade B
11 (19.64)
21 (47.73)
History of hepatitis
Yes
18 (32.14)
29 (65.91)
11.278
0.001
None
38 (67.86)
15(34.09)
Number of tumors
1
35 (62.50)
15 (34.09)
8.266
0.016
2
16 (28.57)
20 (45.45)
3
5 (8.93)
9 (20.45)
Tumor size (cm)
< 6
49 (87.50)
15 (34.09)
30.506
<0.001
6-10
7 (12.50)
29 (65.91)
Use of sorafenib
Yes
36 (64.29)
14 (31.82)
10.390
0.001
No
20 (35.71)
30 (68.18)
Stage of liver cancer
IIIB
47 (83.93)
20 (45.45)
16.496
< 0.001
IIIC
9 (16.07)
24 (54.55)
Histological differentiation
High
28 (50.00)
14 (31.82)
6.810
0.033
Low-moderate
18 (32.14)
12 (27.27)
Necrosis
10 (17.86)
18 (40.91)
Previous splenectomy
Yes
18 (32.14)
30 (68.18)
12.822
< 0.001
None
38 (67.86)
14 (31.82)
Table 7 Logistic multivariate regression analysis of poor prognosis in patients with liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension
Item
β
SE
Wald
P value
Exp (B)
95%CI
High Child-Pugh grade
1.470
0.738
3.970
0.046
4.349
1.024-18.469
History of hepatitis
2.286
0.803
8.098
0.004
9.833
2.037-47.463
Tumor size (6-10 cm)
2.399
0.788
9.268
0.002
11.008
2.350-51.567
No use of sorafenib
2.483
0.829
8.963
0.003
11.981
2.357-60.884
Liver cancer of stage IIIC
1.900
0.719
6.988
0.008
6.683
1.634-27.329
Previous splenectomy
1.629
0.741
4.835
0.028
5.101
1.194-21.800
Constant
6.685
1.486
20.226
< 0.001
0.001
Citation: Yang LM, Wang HJ, Li SL, Gan GH, Deng WW, Chang YS, Zhang LF. Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation combined with sorafenib for treating liver cancer complicated with portal hypertension and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(11): 1533-1544