Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2022; 28(30): 4019-4043
Published online Aug 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019
Published online Aug 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019
Table 1 Characteristics of one-step nucleic acid amplification studies in colorectal cancer patients
Ref. | Nation | Type of study | Patients number (sample number) | Tumor type | Purpose of the OSNA analysis |
Croner et al[11], 2010 | Germany | Prospective study | 184 (184) | Colorectal | Diagnosis of LN metastasis |
Yamamoto et al[16], 2011 | Japan | Prospective multicenter study | 85 (385) | Colorectal | Diagnosis of LN metastasis |
Güller et al[12], 2012 | Switzerland | Prospective study | 22 (313) | Colon | Diagnosis of LN metastasis |
Yamamoto et al[13], 2013 | Japan | Not shown | 30 (66) | Colorectal | Identification of CK19 |
Croner et al[14], 2014 | Germany | Prospective multicenter study | 103 (1594) | Colon | Pathologically nodenegative CC |
Vogelaar et al[15], 2014 | Switzerland | Prospective multicenter study | 128 (325) | Colon | Diagnosis of SLN metastasis |
Yamamoto et al[17], 2016 | Japan | Prospective multicenter study | 204 (1925) | Colorectal | Diagnosis of LN metastasis |
Aldecoa et al[133], 2016 | Spain | Prospective multicenter study | 149 (1940) | Colorectal | Correlation between TTL and tumor’s characteristics |
Rakislova et al[125], 2017 | Spain | Observational study | 188 (3206) | Colon | Diagnosis of pooled LN metastasis |
Miyake et al[193], 2017 | Japan | Prospective study | 25 (306) | Rectum | Indication of LPLN dissection |
Marhic et al[184], 2017 | France | Prospective study | 17 | Colon | Diagnosis of SLN metastasis |
Colling et al[129], 2-17 | United Kingdom | Prospective study | 19 (82) | Colorectal | Diagnosis of LN metastasis |
Aldecoa et al[124], 2017 | Spain | Prospective study | 71 (936) | Colon | OSNA with endoscopic tattooing |
Yeung et al[130], 2018 | United Kingdom | Prospective study | 16 (78) | Colorectal | OSNA with ICG detection |
Brito et al[126], 2018 | Portugal | Prospective multicenter study | 59 (753) | Colon | Pathologically node negative CRC |
Esposito et al[127], 2019 | Italy | Prospective study | 34 (51) | Colorectal | Diagnosis of SLN metastasis |
Diaz-Mercedes et al[109], 2019 | Spain | Prospective study | 17 (980) | Colorectal | Budget impact analysis |
Itabashi et al[18], 2020 | Japan | Prospective multicenter study | 195 | Colorectal | Prognostic value of the OSNA assay for pStage IICRC patients |
Archilla et al[145], 2021 | Spain | Retrospective multicenter study | 342 (5931) | Colorectal | Correlation between the TTL with patient outcome |
Weixler et al[147], 2021 | Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland | Retrospective multicenter study | 87 | Colon | Prognostic value of OSNA |
Tani et al[33], 2021 | Japan | Prospective multicenter study | 92 | Colon | Diagnosis of pooled LN metastasis |
Numata et al[188], 2021 | Japan | Prospective study | 34 | Rectum | Indication of LPLN dissection |
Table 2 A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay in colorectal cancer patients
Ref. | Pathological evaluation | IHC | LN number inspected by OSNA, mean | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | Concordance, % | PPV, % | NPV, % |
Croner et al[11] | Multi-slice | CK19 | 1.0 | 92.5 | 96.5 | 93.6 | 88.1 | 97.9 |
Yamamoto et al[16] | Multi-slice | CK19 | 4.5 | 95.2 | 97.7 | 97.1 | 91.9 | 98.7 |
Güller et al[12] | Multi-slice | CK19 | 14.2 | 94.5 | 97.6 | 97.1 | 89.7 | 98.8 |
Yamamoto et al[17] | Single-slice | None | 9.4 | 86.2 | 96.5 | 95.7 | 66.5 | 98.8 |
Colling et al[129] | Single-slice | None | 4.3 | 92.9 | 97.1 | 96.3 | 86.7 | 98.5 |
Yeung et al[130] | Single-slice | None | 4.9 | 100 | 98.4 | 98.7 | 94.1 | 100 |
Esposito et al[127] | Multi-slice | None | 1.5 | 69.2 | 100 | 88.2 | 100 | 84.0 |
Rakislova et al[125] | Not shown | None | 20.5 (pOSNA) | 88.9 | 79.2 | 80.2 | 33.3 | 98.4 |
Vogelaar et al[15] | Multi-slice | Anti pan-cytokeratin | 15.3 | 51.6 | 84.1 | 67.7 | 76.7 | 63.1 |
Miyake et al[193] | Single-slice | CEA | 11 | 100 | 86 | 88 | 57 | 100 |
Marhic et al[184] | Not shown | None | Not shown | 50 | 100 | 70.6 | 100 | 58 |
Numata et al[188] (predictive value for pathological LatLNM testing OSNA-MesLNM) | Not shown | None | 17 | 100 | 55 | 61.8 | 28 | 100 |
Tani et al[33] | Not shown | CK19 | 6.9 (pOSNA) | 84.6 | 90.9 | 89.1% | 78.6 | 93.7 |
Table 3 Differences in lymph node processing methods and upstage rates of previous reports
Ref. | Subject (patients) | OSNA method | Harvested LN, n | Harvested LN, median | Dividing method of LN | Pathological staining | Measured LN by OSNA, n | Measured LN by OSNA, median | Upstage rate (pStage I and II) |
Yamamoto et al[16] | Stage 0, I (85) | cOSNA | 434 | N/Aa | Fourb; 4 mm over diameter of LN | HE and IHC | 385 | 4.5 | 16.5% (2/16) |
Güller et al[12] | Stage I, II, III (22) | cOSNA | 313 | 30 (16–60) | Fourb; 3 mm over diameter of LN | HE and IHC | 56 | 13 (6–24) | 15.3% (2/13) |
Croner et al[14] | Stage I, II (103) | cOSNA | N/Aa | N/Aa | Centerc; 6 mm over halfd; 4 mm to 6 mm diameter of LN | HE | 1594 | 14 (1–46) | 25.2% (26/103) |
Vogelaar et al[15] | Stage I, II (128) | cOSNA | N/Aa | N/Aa | Fourb; 10 mm over halfd; 10 or less than 10 mm diameter of LN | HE and IHC | 317 | Mean 15.3 (4–40) | 20.2% (20/90) |
Yamamoto et al[17] | Stage I, II, III (204) | cOSNA | 4324 | 19 (3–25) | Halfd | HE | 1925 | 8 (2–25) | 17.6% (13/74) |
Aldecoa et al[133] | Stage I, II (149) | cOSNA | 2483 | 15 | Centerc | HE | 1940 | 12 | 51% (76/149) |
Rakislova et al[125] | Stage I, II, III (188) | cOSNA, pOSNA | cOSNA 1828, pOSNA 1992 | cOSNA 17 (13-22), pOSNA 20.5 (17-27) | Centerc | HE | cOSNA 1757, pOSNA 1449 | cOSNA 13 (10-18), pOSNA 18 (13-25) | cOSNA 55.4% (51/92), pOSNA 20.7% (16/77) |
Brito et al[126] | Stage I, II (59) | cOSNA | 1046 | 13 (9-19) | Centerc; 5 mm over halfd; 4 or less diameter of LN | HE | 753 | 12 (7-16) | 28.8% (17/59) |
Itabashi et al[18] | Stage I, II, III (195) | cOSNA | Not shown | 19 (1-75) | Halfd; 4 mm over diameter of LN | HE | Not shown | 8 (2-25) | 15.7% (11/70) in stage II patients |
Tani et al[33] | Stage II, IIIA (92) | pOSNA | 2236 | 24.3 (5–66) | Halfd; 4 mm over diameter of LN | HE | 636 | 6.9 (1–35) | 9.1% (6/66) |
Table 4 Studies analyzing colorectal cancer metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes with one-step nucleic acid amplification
Author | Patients (samples), n | Injected dye | Intraoperative OSNA assay | Examined SLNs, n |
Vogelaar et al[15] | 128 (325) | Patent blue dye V or indocyanine green | No | 3.0 (median) |
Marhic et al[184] | 17 | Blue dye | Yes | Not shown |
Yeung et al[130] | 16 (78) | Indocyanine green | No | 4.9 (mean) |
Esposito et al[127] | 34 (51) | Indocyanine green | Yes | 1.0 (median) |
- Citation: Crafa F, Vanella S, Catalano OA, Pomykala KL, Baiamonte M. Role of one-step nucleic acid amplification in colorectal cancer lymph node metastases detection. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(30): 4019-4043
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i30/4019.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019