Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2022; 28(18): 1996-2007
Published online May 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i18.1996
Published online May 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i18.1996
Table 1 Reasons for not proceeding with oncological resection, n (%)
Reason | IGBC (n = 33, 19%) | NIGBC (n = 138, 81%) | Total number (n = 171)1 |
Locally advanced inoperable disease | 0 | 41 (30) | 41 (24) |
Metastatic disease | 21 (64) | 78 (56) | 99 (58) |
Patient declined surgery | 5 (15) | 3 (2) | 8 (5) |
Unfit for surgery | 4 (12) | 15 (11) | 19 (11) |
Surgery not required | 3 (9) | 0 | 3 (2) |
Table 2 Patient and tumour characteristics for the surgical group, n (%)
Variable | IGBC (n = 58) | NIGBC (n = 32) | P value |
Median age (range) | 63 yr (55.8-71.3) | 66 yr (66.0-71.5) | 0.302 |
Gender | 0.08 | ||
Male | 9 (16) | 10 (32) | |
Female | 49 (84) | 22 (68) | |
Ethnicity | 0.507 | ||
Caucasian | 39 (67) | 23 (72) | |
Asian | 15 (26) | 5 (16) | |
Black | 3 (5) | 2 (6) | |
Missing | 1 (2) | 2 (6) | |
Median BMI (range) | 28.2 (24.3-32.1) | 28.2 (24.2-30.7) | 0.563 |
ASA score | 0.829 | ||
1 | 4 (7) | 2 (6) | |
2 | 43 (74) | 23 (72) | |
3 | 10 (17) | 6 (19) | |
Missing | 1 (2) | 1 (3) | |
Median CCI (range) | 4 (3-5) | 4 (4-6) | 0.635 |
Extent of surgery | < 0.001 | ||
Minor resection | 57 (98) | 24 (75) | |
Major resection | 1 (2) | 8 (25) | |
T stage | < 0.001 | ||
CIS | 1 (2) | 1 (3) | |
T1a | 3 (5) | 0 | |
T1b | 4 (7) | 1 (3) | |
T2 | 42 (72) | 12 (38) | |
T3 | 7 (12) | 15 (47) | |
T4 | 1 (2) | 3 (9) | |
N status | 0.051 | ||
N0 | 41 (71) | 16 (50) | |
N1/2 | 17 (29) | 16 (50) | |
Histologic type | 0.746 | ||
CIS | 1 (2) | 1 (3) | |
Adenocarcinoma | 55 (94) | 30 (94) | |
Adeno-squamous | 1 (2) | 1 (3) | |
Mixed | 1 (2) | 0 | |
Degree of differentiation (CIS excluded) | 0.614 | ||
Well | 7 (12) | 4 (13) | |
Moderate | 30 (52) | 20 (63) | |
Poor | 12 (21) | 5 (16) | |
Undifferentiated/unclassified | 8 (14) | 2 (6) | |
Resection margin | 0.169 | ||
Negative | 53 (91) | 26 (81) | |
Positive | 5 (9) | 6 (19) | |
Cystic duct margin on index cholecystectomy | 6 (10) | N/A | N/A |
Post-operative complications | 15 (26) | 11 (34) | 0.394 |
Pattern of recurrence | 0.628 | ||
Local/regional | 5 (9) | 5 (16) | |
Distant | 6 (10) | 5 (16) | |
Local and distant | 2 (3) | 1 (3) | |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 12 (21) | 8 (25) | 0.502 |
Table 3 Types of surgeries performed in surgically treated patients of the study group, n (%)
Type of surgery | IGBC (n = 58) | NIGBC (n = 32) | Total number (n = 90) |
Radical cholecystectomy | 0 | 18 (56) | 18 (20) |
Radical cholecystectomy +extrahepatic bile duct excision | 0 | 6 (19) | 6 (7) |
Gallbladder bed resection | 36 (62) | 0 | 36 (40) |
Gallbladder bed resection + extrahepatic bile duct excision | 17 (30) | 0 | 17 (19) |
Segment IVb + V liver resection | 2 (3) | 0 | 2 (2) |
Extrahepatic bile duct excision | 2 (3) | 0 | 2 (2) |
Extended resections: | 4 (4) | ||
Central hepatectomy + caudate lobe resection + extrahepatic bile duct excision | 0 | 1 (3) | 1 (1) |
Pancreaticoduodenectomy + Gallbladder bed resection + right hemicolectomy | 0 | 1 (3) | |
Pancreaticoduodenectomy + right hepatectomy | 0 | 1 (3) | |
Radical cholecystectomy + right hemicolectomy + partial gastrectomy | 0 | 1 (3) |
Table 4 Cox proportional hazard analysis for overall survival
Variable | P value | HR (95%CI)
| P value | HR (95%CI)
| P value | HR (95%CI) |
Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | Multivariable analysis (excluding timing of diagnosis variable) | ||||
Age | 0.011 | 1.04 (1.01-1.07) | 0.453 | 1.02 (0.97-1.08) | 0.153 | 1.04 (0.99-1.10) |
Gender | 0.96 | 1.01 (0.71-1.44) | - | - | - | - |
Race | 0.853 | 1.05 (0.61-1.81) | - | - | - | - |
BMI | 0.601 | 0.983 (0.92-1.05) | - | - | - | - |
ASA score | 0.024 | 1.96 (1.09-3.52) | 0.121 | 2.26 (0.81-6.31) | 0.061 | 2.53 (0.96-6.66) |
CCI score | 0.064 | 1.19 (0.99-1.42) | 0.66 | 0.91 (0.58-1.41) | 0.269 | 0.78 (0.50-1.21) |
T stage | < 0.001 | 2.73 (1.72-4.34) | 0.913 | 1.04 (0.56-1.90) | 0.088 | 1.62 (0.93-2.81) |
N stage | < 0.001 | 5.65 (2.84-11.25) | < 0.001 | 3.07 (1.72-5.46) | 0.001 | 3.59 (1.72-7.49) |
R status | < 0.001 | 7.35 (3.38-15.95) | < 0.001 | 5.26 (2.10-13.13) | 0.012 | 3.00 (1.27-7.07) |
Post-operative complications | 0.885 | 1.05 (0.53-2.09) | - | - | - | - |
Non-incidental diagnosis | 0.004 | 2.41 (1.32-4.38) | 0.026 | 2.25 (1.10-4.58) | Not included in analysis | Not included in analysis |
Degree of differentiation | 0.443 | 1.40 (0.61-3.21) | - | - | - | - |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.87 | 1.07 (0.47-2.44) | - | - | - | - |
Table 5 Cox proportional hazard analysis for disease free survival
Variable | P value | HR (95%CI)
| P value | HR (95%CI)
| P value | HR (95%CI) |
Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | Multivariable analysis (excluding timing of diagnosis variable) | ||||
Age | 0.275 | 1.02 (0.98-1.06) | - | - | - | - |
Gender | 0.732 | 0.85 (0.34-2.13) | - | - | - | - |
Race | 0.997 | 1.13 (0.15-8.51) | - | - | - | - |
BMI | 0.782 | 0.99 (0.91-1.07) | - | - | - | - |
ASA score | 0.817 | 0.91 (0.42-1.98) | - | - | - | - |
CCI score | 0.842 | 0.98 (0.76-1.26) | - | - | - | - |
T stage | 0.021 | 2.06 (1.12-3.82) | 0.504 | 1.26 (0.64-2.47) | 0.21 | 1.53 (0.79-2.97) |
N stage | 0.001 | 4.08 (1.83-9.08) | 0.006 | 3.18 (1.39-7.26) | 0.008 | 3.08 (1.35-7.06) |
R status | < 0.001 | 11.05 (3.31-36.94) | 0.006 | 5.76 (1.67-19.88) | 0.002 | 6.95 (1.98-24.34) |
Post-operative complications | 0.404 | 0.63 (0.22-1.85) | - | - | - | - |
Non-incidental diagnosis | 0.011 | 2.78 (1.26-6.12) | 0.09 | 2.13 (0.89-5.09) | Not included in analysis | Not included in analysis |
Degree of differentiation | 0.211 | 0.65 (0.33-1.28) | - | - | - | - |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.457 | 1.42 (0.56-3.58) | - | - | - | - |
- Citation: Alarabiyat M, Raza SS, Isaac J, Mirza D, Marudanayagam R, Roberts K, Abradelo M, Bartlett DC, Dasari BV, Sutcliffe RP, Chatzizacharias NA. Incidental gallbladder cancer diagnosis confers survival advantage irrespective of tumour stage and characteristics. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(18): 1996-2007
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i18/1996.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i18.1996