Yoon J, Yoo SY, Park YS, Choi KD, Kim BS, Yoo MW, Lee IS, Yook JH, Kim GH, Na HK, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Jung KW, Kim DH, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY. Reevaluation of the expanded indications in undifferentiated early gastric cancer for endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(15): 1548-1562 [PMID: 35582127 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i15.1548]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Kee Don Choi, MD, PhD, Doctor, Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea. keedon@amc.seoul.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2022; 28(15): 1548-1562 Published online Apr 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i15.1548
Table 1 Clinical and endoscopic features of the patients according to the presence of lymph node metastasis
Variables
LNM- (n = 73)
LNM+ (n = 14)
P value
Age at diagnosis, yr (median, IQR)
47.0 (41.0-52.0)
43.5 (37.0-51.0)
0.276
Lesion size, cm (median, IQR)
1.5 (1.2-1.7)
1.5 (1.3-1.8)
0.485
Male, n (%)
25 (34.2)
4 (28.6)
0.918
Longitudinal location, n (%)
0.269
Upper
4 (5.5)
0 (0.0)
Middle
22 (30.1)
2 (14.3)
Lower
47 (64.4)
12 (85.7)
Cross-sectional circumference, n (%)
0.421
Anterior wall
16 (21.9)
6 (42.9)
Great curvature
16 (21.9)
2 (14.3)
Posterior wall
23 (31.5)
3 (21.4)
Lesser curvature
18 (24.7)
3 (21.4)
Gross type, n (%)
0.440
Depressed
42 (57.5)
10 (71.4)
Flat
25 (34.2)
4 (28.6)
Elevated
6 (8.2)
0 (0.0)
Number of retrieved LNs (median, IQR)
30.0 (25.0-37.0)
30.5 (25.5-37.0)
0.862
Endoscopic appearances, n (%)
Exudate
6 (8.2)
1 (7.1)
> 0.999
Endoscopic ulcer
30 (41.1)
7 (50.0)
0.747
Converging fold
11 (15.1)
1 (7.1)
0.715
Tumor island
14 (19.2)
3 (21.4)
> 0.999
Table 2 Detailed clinical information of the 14 patients with lymph node metastasis
Case No.
Age (yr)
Sex
Type
Size (cm)
Location
Histology
Depth of invasion
Total number of dissected LNs
Number of metastatic LNs
1
59
Female
IIb
1.5
Middle
PD with SRC
LP
31
3
2
41
Female
IIc
1.3
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
18
3
3
57
Male
IIc
1.3
Lower
SRC
LP
21
1
4
47
Female
IIc
1.8
Middle
PD with SRC
LP
21
3
5
46
Female
IIb
2.0
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
25
6
6
37
Female
IIc
1.5
Lower
PD with SRC
MM
31
3
7
48
Female
IIc
1.5
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
37
1
8
35
Male
IIc
0.9
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
38
1
9
35
Female
IIc
1.5
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
27
1
10
52
Female
IIb
0.7
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
29
1
11
60
Male
III
0.6
Lower
PD with SRC
MM
30
1
12
39
Female
IIc
2.0
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
37
1
13
37
Female
IIb
1.8
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
42
1
14
33
Male
IIc
2.0
Lower
PD with SRC
LP
48
3
Table 3 Histologic features of the tumors and background stomach according to the presence of lymph node metastasis
Variables
LNM- (n = 73)
LNM+ (n = 14)
P value
Depth of invasion
0.503
LP
53 (72.6)
12 (85.7)
MM
20 (27.4)
2 (14.3)
Size, cm
1.5 (1.2-1.7)
1.5 (1.3-1.8)
0.642
% of SRCs
0.157
< 10%
17 (23.3)
0 (0)
≥ 10% and < 50%
35 (47.9)
10 (71.4)
≥ 50% and < 90%
14 (19.2)
3 (21.4)
≥ 90%
7 (9.6)
1 (7.1)
Diagnostic category according to the proportion of SRCs
0.059
Non-mixed (SRCC and PD)
24 (32.9)
1 (7.1)
Mixed (PD with SRC component)
49 (67.1)
13 (92.9)
Background stomach
0.278
Mild CG
8 (11.0)
0 (0)
Moderate CG or IM
24 (32.9)
3 (21.4)
CAG
22 (30.1)
4 (28.6)
CAG with visible H. pylori
19 (26.0)
7 (50.0)
H. pylori abundance, n/total n
0.263
0
23/71 (32.4)
2/14 (14.3)
1+
14/71 (19.7)
3/14 (21.4)
2+
14/71 (19.7)
6/14 (42.9)
3+
20/71 (28.2)
3/14 (21.4)
TP53 expression, n/total
> 0.999
Loss (0)
3/70 (4.3)
0/14 (0)
Wildtype pattern (1+/2+)
63/70 (90.0)
13/14 (92.9)
Overexpression (3+)
4/70 (5.7)
1/14 (7.1)
Table 4 Histologic features of the tumor microenvironment according to the presence of lymph node metastasis
Variables
LNM- (n = 73)
LNM+ (n = 14)
P value
TIL abundance
0.438
< 10%
25 (34.2)
7 (50.0)
10%-20%
33 (45.2)
6 (42.9)
≥ 20%
15 (20.5)
1 (7.1)
Degree of central fibrosis
0.522
Mild
6 (8.5)
2 (14.3)
Moderate
35 (49.3)
8 (57.1)
Marked
30 (42.3)
4 (28.6)
Degree of peripheral fibrosis
Mild
11 (15.5)
2 (14.3)
0.495
Moderate
53 (74.6)
9 (64.3)
Marked
7 (9.9)
3 (21.4)
Distribution of fibrosis
Central = peripheral
32 (45.1)
7 (50.0)
0.204
Central > peripheral
33 (46.5)
4 (28.6)
Central < peripheral
6 (8.5)
3 (21.4)
Fibrosis score
0.55 (0.38-0.83)
0.53 (0.31-0.77)
0.273
Blurring of MM, n/total
0.028
Non-diffuse (absent/focal)
43/71 (60.6)
13/14 (92.9)
Diffuse
28/71 (39.4)
1/14 (7.1)
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis for the risk of Lymph node metastasis
Variable
OR
95%CI
P value
Depth of invasion
LP
1
MM
0.44
0.09-2.15
0.312
Diagnostic category according to % of SRCs
Non-mixed (SRC and PD)
1
Mixed (PD with SRC component)
6.37
0.79-51.6
0.083
Background stomach
CG
1
CAG
2.86
0.74-11.1
0.129
Presence of H. pylori
Absent (0)
1
Present (≥ 1+)
2.88
0.59–13.9
0.190
TIL abundance
0.409
< 10%
1
10%-20%
0.65
0.19-2.17
0.484
≥ 20%
0.24
0.03-2.13
0.199
Fibrosis score
0.34
0.05-2.49
0.285
Blurring of MM
Non-diffuse (absent/focal)
1
Diffuse
0.12
0.02-0.95
0.045
Citation: Yoon J, Yoo SY, Park YS, Choi KD, Kim BS, Yoo MW, Lee IS, Yook JH, Kim GH, Na HK, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Jung KW, Kim DH, Song HJ, Lee GH, Jung HY. Reevaluation of the expanded indications in undifferentiated early gastric cancer for endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(15): 1548-1562