Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2022; 28(10): 1055-1066
Published online Mar 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1055
Published online Mar 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1055
Table 1 Clinical characteristics of ulcerative colitis patients with neoplastic lesions (mean ± SD)
UCAN group (n = 19) | SN group (n = 22) | P value | |
Age at UC onset (yr) | 35.7 ± 10.9 | 48.8 ± 14.6 | 0.003a |
Disease duration (yr) | 17.8 ± 9.4 | 12.9 ± 10.7 | 0.120a |
Sex | 0.829b | ||
Male | 11 | 12 | |
Female | 8 | 10 | |
Extent of disease | 0.231b | ||
Total colitis | 16 | 14 | |
Left-sided colitis | 3 | 6 | |
Proctitis | 0 | 2 | |
Clinical type | 0. 139b | ||
Relapse and remission | 10 | 15 | |
Chronic persistent | 9 | 5 | |
First attack | 0 | 2 | |
Pathological type | < 0.001b | ||
LGD | 2 | 16 | |
HGD | 11 | 5 | |
Shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma | 3 | 0 | |
Deep submucosal invasive carcinoma | 5 | 2 | |
Primary sclerosing cholangitis | 1 | 0 | 0.463c |
Family history of colorectal cancer | 1 | 2 | 0.639c |
Table 2 Characteristics of endoscopic and macroscopic findings
UCAN group (n = 21) | SN group (n = 23) | P value | |
Tumor location | 0.044a | ||
Proctosigmoid colon | 17 | 12 | |
Others | 4 | 11 | |
Tumor color | 0.032a | ||
Red | 15 | 9 | |
Pale or the same as the surrounding mucosa | 6 | 14 | |
Lesion border | < 0.001a | ||
Clear | 5 | 23 | |
Unclear | 16 | 0 | |
Tumor morphology | 0.173a | ||
Pedunculated | 0 | 0 | |
Sessile | 8 | 7 | |
Superficial elevated | 7 | 14 | |
Flat | 2 | 0 | |
Depressed | 4 | 2 | |
UCEIS (median, range) | 2 (0–4) | 0 (0–5) | < 0.001b |
Table 3 Diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) for each type in the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification
Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
UCAN JNET type 2A | |||||
Experts | 50.0 (10.2–85.6) | 94.7 (90.5–98.5) | 50.0 (10.2–85.6) | 94.7 (90.5–98.5) | 90.5 (82.9–97.3) |
Non-experts | 100 (36.9–100) | 78.9 (72.3–78.9) | 33.3 (12.3–33.3) | 100 (91.6–100) | 81.0 (68.9–81.0) |
UCAN JNET type 2B | |||||
Experts | 78.6 (64.6–89.5) | 57.1 (29.2–79.1) | 78.6 (64.6–89.5) | 57.1 (29.2–79.1) | 71.4 (52.8–86.1) |
Non-experts | 78.6 (63.8–87.9) | 71.4 (41.9–90.0) | 84.6 (68.7–94.6) | 62.5 (36.6–78.8) | 76.2 (56.5–88.6) |
UCAN JNET type 3 | |||||
Experts | 60.0 (27.5–75.9) | 93.8 (83.6–98.7) | 75.0 (34.4–94.9) | 88.2 (78.7–92.9) | 85.7 (70.3–93.3) |
Non-experts | 40.0 (14.9–40.0) | 100 (92.2–100) | 100 (37.3–100) | 84.2 (77.6–84.2) | 85.7 (73.8–85.7) |
SN JNET type 2A | |||||
Experts | 75.0 (62.6–75.0) | 100 (71.6–100) | 100 (83.4–100) | 63.6 (45.5–63.6) | 82.6 (65.3–82.6) |
Non-experts | 87.5 (74.7–92.5) | 85.7 (56.4–97.1) | 93.3 (79.6–98.7) | 75.0 (49.3–85.0) | 87.0 (69.1–93.9) |
SN JNET type 2B | |||||
Experts | 100 (63.4–100) | 83.3 (73.2–83.3) | 62.5 (39.6–62.5) | 100 (87.8–100) | 87.0 (71.0–87.0) |
Non-experts | 80.0 (42.6–96.1) | 83.3 (72.9–87.8) | 57.1 (30.4–68.7) | 93.8 (82.1–98.8) | 82.6 (66.4–89.6) |
SN JNET type 3 | |||||
Experts | 50.0 (11.2–50.0) | 100 (96.3–100) | 100 (22.4–100) | 95.5 (91.9–95.5) | 95.7 (88.9–95.7) |
Non-experts | 50.0 (11.2–50.0) | 100 (96.3–100) | 100 (22.4–100) | 95.5 (91.9–95.5) | 95.7 (88.9–95.7) |
Table 4 Diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) for each type in the pit pattern classification
Sensitivity, (%) | Specificity, (%) | PPV, (%) | NPV, (%) | Accuracy, (%) | |
UCAN pit pattern type III/IV | |||||
Experts | 100 (37.3–100) | 84.2 (77.6–84.2) | 40.0 (14.9–40.0) | 100 (92.2–100) | 85.7 (73.8–85.7) |
Non-experts | 100 (36.4–100) | 57.9 (51.2–57.9) | 20.0 (7.3–20.0) | 100 (88.4–100) | 61.9 (49.8–61.9) |
UCAN pit pattern type VI low irregularity | |||||
Experts | 50.0 (35.2–59.8) | 71.4 (41.9–91.0) | 77.8 (54.8–93.0) | 41.7 (24.4–53.1) | 57.1 (37.5–70.2) |
Non-experts | 42.9 (28.4–48.7) | 85.7 (56.7–97.3) | 85.7 (56.7–97.3) | 42.9 (28.4–48.7) | 57.1 (37.8–64.9) |
UCAN pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN | |||||
Experts | 60.0 (26.1–85.8) | 81.3 (70.7–89.3) | 50.0 (21.8–71.5) | 86.7 (75.4–95.3) | 76.2 (60.1–88.5) |
Non-experts | 60.0 (27.5–75.9) | 93.8 (83.6–98.7) | 75.0 (34.4–94.9) | 88.2 (78.7–92.9) | 85.7 (70.3–93.3) |
SN pit pattern type III/IV | |||||
Experts | 87.5 (75.6–87.5) | 100 (72.8–100) | 100 (86.4–100) | 77.8 (56.6–77.8) | 91.3 (74.8–91.3) |
Non-experts | 81.3 (68.1–86.3) | 85.7 (55.6–97.3) | 92.9 (77.8–98.6) | 66.7 (43.3–75.6) | 82.6 (64.3–89.6) |
SN pit pattern type VI low irregularity | |||||
Experts | 100 (63.4–100) | 83.3 (73.2–83.3) | 62.5 (39.6–62.5) | 100 (87.8–100) | 87.0 (71.0–87.0) |
Non-experts | 60.0 (26.0–85.9) | 83.3 (73.9–90.5) | 50.0 (21.7–71.6) | 88.2 (78.2–95.8) | 78.3 (63.5–89.5) |
SN pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN | |||||
Experts | 50.0 (11.2–50.0) | 100 (96.3–100) | 100 (22.4–100) | 95.5 (91.9–95.5) | 95.7 (88.9–95.7) |
Non-experts | 50.0 (10.2–85.6) | 95.2 (91.4–98.6) | 50.0 (10.2–85.6) | 95.2 (91.4–98.6) | 91.3 (84.4–97.5) |
Table 5 Intra-observer agreement
Experts | Non-experts | |
UCAN | ||
JNET classification | 0.387 (0.369–0.521) | 0.640 (0.566–0.708) |
Pit pattern classification | 0.454 (0.391–0.509) | 0.569 (0.422–0.599) |
SN | ||
JNET classification | 0.803 (0.581–0.832) | 0.828 (0.686–0.849) |
Pit pattern classification | 0.567 (0.477–0.595) | 0.628 (0.422–0.766) |
Table 6 Inter-observer agreement
Experts | Non-experts | |
UCAN | ||
JNET classification | 0.401 | 0.237 |
Pit pattern classification | 0.364 | 0.378 |
SN | ||
JNET classification | 0.666 | 0.503 |
Pit-pattern classification | 0.597 | 0.437 |
Table 7 Diagnostic results of Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification type 2A and pit pattern classification type III/IV in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms
Number | Pathological result | |||
LGD (n = 2) | HGD-sSM (n = 14) | dSM (n = 5) | ||
Endoscopist 1 | ||||
JNET type 2A | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
Pit type III/IV | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Endoscopist 2 | ||||
JNET type 2A | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Pit type III/IV | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Endoscopist 3 | ||||
JNET type 2A | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Pit type III/IV | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
Endoscopist 4 | ||||
JNET type 2A | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
Pit type III/IV | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
Endoscopist 5 | ||||
JNET type 2A | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Pit type III/IV | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Endoscopist 6 | ||||
JNET type 2A | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
Pit type III/IV | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
- Citation: Kida Y, Yamamura T, Maeda K, Sawada T, Ishikawa E, Mizutani Y, Kakushima N, Furukawa K, Ishikawa T, Ohno E, Kawashima H, Nakamura M, Ishigami M, Fujishiro M. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(10): 1055-1066
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i10/1055.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1055