Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2021; 27(12): 1182-1193
Published online Mar 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1182
Published online Mar 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1182
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of malignant and benign focal liver lesions of 73 patients
| Characteristic | Malignant | Benign | Total |
| Per-patient basis | |||
| No. of patients (%) | 49 (67.1) | 24 (32.9) | 73 |
| Age (yr) | |||
| mean ± SD | 56.3 ± 10.3 | 52.1 ± 12.9 | 55.0 ± 11.2 |
| Range | 40-81 | 31-73 | 31-81 |
| Sex, n (%) | |||
| Male | 30 (61.2) | 11 (45.8) | 41 |
| Female | 19 (38.8) | 13 (54.2) | 32 |
| Per-lesion basis | |||
| No. of lesions | 78 (72.3) | 30 (27.8) | 108 |
| Maximum diameter (mm) | |||
| mean ± SD | 48.2 ± 37.7 | 32.3 ± 22.5 | 43.8 ± 34.8 |
| Range | 11-163 | 14-94 | 11-163 |
| Methods of diagnosis (%) | |||
| Pathology | 42 (38.9) | 7 (6.5) | 49 (45.4) |
| Imaging follow-up | 25 (23.1) | 23 (21.3) | 48 (44.4) |
| PET-CT | 11 (10.2) | – | 11 (10.2) |
Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics of 108 focal liver lesions
| Characteristic | Malignant | Benign | ||||
| HCC | IHCC | Hemangioma | FNH | Abscess | ||
| No. of lesions (%) | 32 (29.6) | 9 (8.3) | 37 (34.3) | 25 (23.1) | 3 (2.8) | 2 (1.9) |
| Maximum diameter (mm) | ||||||
| mean ± SD | 66.3 ± 43.0 | 61.9 ± 5.9 | 29.1 ± 24.1 | 29.4 ± 21.8 | 32.0 ± 8.5 | 69.5 ± 12.0 |
| Range | 15-163 | 32-111 | 11-122 | 14-94 | 23-40 | 61-78 |
| Methods of diagnosis (%) | ||||||
| Pathology | 29 (26.9) | 6 (5.6) | 7 (6.5) | 5 (4.6) | 2 (1.9) | 0 (0) |
| Imaging follow-up | 3 (2.8) | 3 (2.8) | 19 (17.6) | 20 (18.5) | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.9) |
| PET-CT | – | – | 11 (10.2) | – | – | – |
| Viral infection | ||||||
| HBV | 30 | 6 | 34 | 9 | 1 | 2 |
| Non-HBV | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Cirrhosis on pathology (%) | ||||||
| Yes | 25 | – | – | – | – | – |
| No | 1 | – | – | – | – | – |
| NA | 6 | – | – | – | – | – |
| AFP (ng/mL) | ||||||
| ≤ 25 | 12 | 9 | 29 | – | – | – |
| > 25 | 20 | 0 | 7 | – | – | – |
| NA | 0 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – |
| CA 19-9 (U/mL) | ||||||
| ≤ 34 | 21 | 4 | 15 | – | – | – |
| > 34 | 9 | 5 | 20 | – | – | – |
| NA | 2 | 0 | 2 | – | – | – |
| CEA (ng/mL) | – | – | – | |||
| ≤ 5 | 27 | 7 | 15 | – | – | – |
| > 5 | 5 | 2 | 22 | – | – | – |
| NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
Table 3 Mean R2* values for different focal liver lesions
| FFL | 2D-ROI method | VOI method |
| Malignant | ||
| Liver metastasis | 44.17 ± 21.90 | 48.42 ± 23.61 |
| HCC | 33.45 ± 10.15 | 35.41 ± 10.04 |
| IHCC | 28.72 ± 10.21 | 31.34 ± 9.65 |
| Benign | ||
| Hemangioma | 16.66 ± 8.18 | 19.36 ± 8.93 |
| FNH | 26.21 ± 5.61 | 27.87 ± 7.46 |
| Abscess | 23.29 ± 9.31 | 25.29 ± 10.46 |
- Citation: Shi GZ, Chen H, Zeng WK, Gao M, Wang MZ, Zhang HT, Shen J. R2* value derived from multi-echo Dixon technique can aid discrimination between benign and malignant focal liver lesions. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(12): 1182-1193
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i12/1182.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1182
