Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2020; 26(48): 7664-7678
Published online Dec 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i48.7664
Table 1 Clinicopathological features of liver tissues
Clinicopathological parametersNo. of cases (%)
HCCCCA
Total213203
GenderMale185 (86.9)112 (55.2)
Female28 (13.1)91 (44.8)
Age of diagnosis< 50106 (49.8)49 (24.1)
≥ 50107 (50.2)154 (75.9)
Mean (range)50 (19-85)57 (41-78)
RegionCountry82 (38.5)112 (55.2)
Urban131 (61.5)91 (44.8)
AFP< 400134 (62.9)-
≥ 40079 (37.1)-
HBsAg+166 (77.9)140 (69.0)
-47 (22.1)63 (31.0)
Tumor size< 5 cm92 (43.2)98 (48.3)
≥ 5 cm121 (56.8)105 (51.7)
StagepT19 (4.2)14 (6.9)
pT273 (34.3)105 (51.7)
pT324 (11.3)21 (10.3)
pT4107 (50.2)63 (31.0)
Nodal statusN0190 (89.2)182 (89.7)
N123 (10.8)21 (10.3)
MetastasisM0188 (88.2)182 (89.7)
M125 (11.8)21 (10.3)
UICC stage at diagnosisI16 (7.5)14 (6.9)
II106 (49.8)98 (48.3)
III28 (13.6)21 (10.3)
IV63 (29.6)70 (34.5)
Tumor gradingI79 (37.1)75 (36.9)
II76 (35.7)72 (35.7)
III58 (27.2)56 (27.6)
Table 2 Standard for evaluation
ScoreStain intensityPercent of vessels staining
0None0
1Low≤ 10%
2 (type 1)Low10%-50%
2 (type 2)High≤ 25%
3 (type 1)Low≥ 50%
3 (type 2)High> 25%
Table 3 Cells and tumor-associated neovascular endothelial cells of liver cancers compared with liver cirrhosis
NumberPSMA expression score, n
Positive staining, n (%)
0123
HCCCells213187816226 (12.2)
NECs21329316489184 (86.4)
Total21328326489185 (86.8)
CCACells2031960707 (3.4)
NECs20342428435161 (79.3)
Total20342428435161 (79.3)
CirrhosisCells30282002 (6.6)
Table 4 Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in neovascularization of hepatocellular carcinoma and its relationship with clinicopathological parameters
Clinicopathological parametersNo. of casesTumor PSMA-positive, n
P value
0123
Gender
Male185252752810.912
Female2844128
Age of diagnosis
< 50106121429510.331
≥ 5010717173538
Mean (range)50 (19-85)
Region
Urban131151644560.080
Country8214152033
AFP
< 400134211838570.254
≥ 400798132632
HBsAg
+166242349700.990
-47581519
Tumor size
< 5 cm92141023450.552
≥ 5 cm12115214144
Stage
pT1912420.812
pT27319151854
pT32424612
pT41077103621
Nodal status
N0190272458820.466
N1232767
Metastasis
M0188233157770.136
M12560712
UICC stage at diagnosis
I-II122251737430.001a, r = 0.226
III-IV914142746
Tumor grading
I7917817370.004a, r = 0.224
II761172533
III581162219
All case21329316489
Table 5 Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in neovascularization of cholangiocellular carcinoma and its relationship with clinicopathological parameters
Clinicopathological parametersNo. of casesTumor PSMA-positive, n
P value
0123
Gender
Male112241346290.773
Female911829386
Age of diagnosis
< 50498226130.387
≥ 5015434207822
Mean (range)57 (41-78)
Region
Urban9116234750.325
Country11226193730
HBsAg
+140292669160.990
-6313161519
Tumor size
< 5 cm98232730180.178
≥ 5 cm10519155417
Stage
pT11453420.293
pT210523214912
pT3215574
pT4639132417
Nodal status
N0182363974330.346
N12163102
Metastasis
M0182374076290.709
M1215286
UICC stage at diagnosis
I-II112322638160.002a, r = 0.211
III-IV9110164619
Tumor grading
I7524182850.001a, r = 0.253
II721518356
III5636215
All case20342428435