Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2020; 26(44): 7022-7035
Published online Nov 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i44.7022
Published online Nov 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i44.7022
Table 1 Predictive factor for response of preoperative chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the literature
| Ref. | Study design | pCR (%) | Related factor with response of preoperative CRT | Independent factor for pCR |
| Restivo et al[7], 2013 | Prospective (n = 260) | 16.5% | CEA < 5 ng/mL and distance from anal verge > 5 cm | |
| Huh et al[8], 2013 | Retrospective (n = 391) | 14.6% | Noncircumferential tumors, nonmacroscopic ulceration, WELL differentiation, Early T, N stage, low level of pretreatment CEA | Tumor circumferentiality, macroscopic ulceration, pretreatment CEA < 5 ng/mL |
| Wallin et al[9], 2013 | Retrospective (n = 469) | 20.0% | Pretreatment CEA ≤ 5 ng/mL | |
| Kleiman et al[10], 2015 | Prospective (n = 141) | 13.5% | Low post CRT CEA level, normalization of CEA from initial elevated; CEA level | |
| Hu et al[11], 2018 | Prospective (n = 146) | 15.0% | CEA exponential decrease group between pretreatment and during-CRT: Higher rates of downstaging and pCR | CEA clearance pattern |
| Yamamoto et al[12], 2019 | Prospective (n = 111) | Combination of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and ypN; status: poor prognosis | Low pretreatment LMR ypN(+) |
Table 2 Patient characteristics
| Characteristics | Distribution |
| Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 60.1 ± 10.9 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 99 (73.3%) |
| Female | 36 (26.7%) |
| BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 22.9 ± 3.1 |
| Smoker | 46 (34.1%) |
| ASA | |
| 1 | 80 (59.3%) |
| 2 | 40 (29.6%) |
| 3 | 14 (10.4%) |
| 4 | 1 (0.7%) |
| Distance of tumor from the anal verge (cm, mean ± SD) | 6.4 ± 3.0 |
| Pre-CRT CEA (ng/mL, mean ± SD) | 18.1 ± 45.0 |
| Pre-CRT tumor size (cm, mean ± SD) | 4.6 ± 1.4 |
| Pre-CRT TNM stage | |
| I | 1 (0.7%) |
| II | 13 (9.6%) |
| III | 121 (89.6%) |
| Curative resection after CRT | |
| Low anterior resection | 64 (47.4%) |
| Ultra-low anterior resection | 17 (12.6%) |
| Abdominoperineal resection | 46 (34.1%) |
| Hartmann operation | 7 (5.2%) |
| Total colectomy | 1 (0.7%) |
| Radiation dose, cGy | 5040 |
| Interval from preoperative CRT to operation (wk) | 7.8 ± 1.7 |
| Post-CRT CEA (ng/mL) | 4.8 ± 8.1 |
| Down-staging after preoperative CRT | 60 (44.4%) |
| Pathologic complete response | 27 (20.0%) |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 121 (89.6%) |
| Follow-up (mo) | 60.4 ± 24.3 |
Table 3 Comparison of the changes in the carcinoembryonic antigen level before and after chemoradiotherapy
| Variables | Group A (n = 27) | Group B (n = 43) | Group C (n = 65) | P value |
| Age, yr | > 0.999 | |||
| < 65 | 17 (63.0%) | 27 (62.8%) | 41 (63.1%) | |
| ≥ 65 | 10 (37.0%) | 16 (37.2%) | 24 (36.9%) | |
| Sex | 0.358 | |||
| Male | 21 (77.8%) | 34 (79.1%) | 44 (67.7%) | |
| Female | 6 (22.2%) | 9 (20.9%) | 21 (32.3%) | |
| ASA | 0.734 | |||
| < 3 | 23 (85.2%) | 38 (88.4%) | 59 (90.8%) | |
| ≥ 3 | 4 (14.8%) | 5 (11.6%) | 6 (9.2%) | |
| Pre-CRT tumor size (cm) | 4.6 (3.7-5.0) | 4.5 (4.0-5.1) | 4.3 (3.8-5.0) | 0.515 |
| Pre-CRT CEA (ng/mL) | 25.8 (10.6-70.7) | 11.3 (6.8-21.3) | 2.4 (1.8-3.3) | < 0.001 |
| Pre-CRT NLR | 0.983 | |||
| < 2.8 | 17 (63.0%) | 28 (65.1%) | 42 (64.6%) | |
| ≥ 2.8 | 10 (37.0%) | 15 (34.9%) | 23 (35.4%) | |
| Pre-CRT PLR | 0.132 | |||
| < 138.2 | 11 (40.7%) | 19 (44.2%) | 39 (60.0%) | |
| ≥ 138.2 | 16 (59.3%) | 24 (55.8%) | 26 (40.0%) | |
| Pre-CRT T stage | 0.217 | |||
| T3 | 18 (66.7%) | 34 (79.1%) | 54 (83.1%) | |
| T4 | 9 (33.3%) | 9 (20.9%) | 11 (16.9%) | |
| Pre-CRT N stage | 0.021 | |||
| N0 | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (2.3%) | 11 (16.9%) | |
| N+ | 26 (96.3%) | 42 (97.7%) | 54 (83.1%) | |
| Pre-CRT TNM stage | 0.021 | |||
| I | 1 (3.7%) | 0 | 0 | |
| II | 1 (3.7%) | 1 (2.3%) | 11 (16.9%) | |
| III | 25 (92.6%) | 42 (97.7%) | 54 (83.1%) | |
| Post-CRT CEA (ng/dL) | 8.4 (6.0–13.7) | 2.9 (2.0–4.0) | 1.8 (1.2–2.9) | < 0.001 |
| Post-CRT T stage | 0.001 | |||
| 0–2 | 3 (11.1%) | 5 (11.6%) | 25 (38.5%) | |
| 3–4 | 24 (88.9%) | 38 (88.4%) | 40 (61.5%) | |
| Post-CRT N stage | 0.006 | |||
| N0 | 8 (29.6%) | 20 (46.5%) | 42 (64.6%) | |
| N+ | 19 (70.4%) | 23 (53.5%) | 23 (35.4%) | |
| Post-CRT M stage | 0.090 | |||
| 0 | 25 (92.6%) | 42 (97.7%) | 65 (100%) | |
| 1 | 2 (7.4%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | |
| Post-CRT TNM Stage | 0.008 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (3.1%) | |
| I | 2 (7.4%) | 4 (9.3%) | 19 (29.2%) | |
| II | 5 (18.5%) | 15 (34.9%) | 21 (32.3%) | |
| III | 19 (66.7%) | 23 (53.5%) | 23 (35.4%) | |
| IV | 2 (7.4%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | |
| Down-staging on MRI after CRT | 0.013 | |||
| No | 21 (77.8%) | 25 (58.1%) | 29 (44.6%) | |
| Yes | 6 (22.2%) | 18 (41.9%) | 36 (55.4%) |
Table 4 Comparison of the changes in the carcinoembryonic antigen level after curative resection
| Variables | Group A (n = 27) | Group B (n = 43) | Group C (n = 65) | P value |
| Name of surgery | 0.272 | |||
| Low anterior resection | 15 (55.6%) | 22 (51.2%) | 43 (66.2%) | |
| Others1 | 12 (44.4%) | 21 (48.8%) | 22 (33.8%) | |
| Differentiation | 0.781 | |||
| Well–Moderate | 8 (29.6%) | 13 (30.2%) | 16 (24.6%) | |
| Poorly + others2 | 19 (70.4%) | 30 (69.8%) | 49 (75.4%) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.444 | |||
| No | 22 (81.5%) | 35 (81.4%) | 58 (89.2%) | |
| Yes | 5 (18.5%) | 8 (18.6%) | 7 (10.8%) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.005 | |||
| No | 21 (77.8%) | 38 (88.4%) | 64 (98.5%) | |
| Yes | 6 (22.2%) | 5 (11.6%) | 1 (1.5%) | |
| Postoperative T stage | < 0.001 | |||
| 0–2 | 2 (7.4%) | 11 (25.6%) | 38 (58.5%) | |
| 3–4 | 25 (92.6%) | 32 (74.4%) | 27 (41.5%) | |
| Postoperative N stage | 0.538 | |||
| N0 | 15 (55.6%) | 27 (62.8%) | 44 (67.7%) | |
| N+ | 12 (44.4%) | 16 (37.2%) | 21 (32.3%) | |
| Postoperative M stage | 0.002 | |||
| M0 | 24 (88.9%) | 43 (100%) | 65 (100%) | |
| M1 | 3 (11.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| Postoperative TNM stage | < 0.001 | |||
| 0 | 0 | 3 (7.0%) | 25 (38.5%) | |
| I | 2 (7.4%) | 5 (11.6%) | 8 (12.3%) | |
| II | 13 (48.1%) | 19 (44.2%) | 11 (16.9%) | |
| III | 9 (33.3%) | 16 (37.2%) | 21 (32.3%) | |
| IV | 3 (11.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| CEA on postoperative day 7 | 3.7 (2.8-5.2) | 1.6 (1.1-2.2) | 1.1 (0.7-1.7) | < 0.001 |
| Tumor regression grade | < 0.001 | |||
| 0 | 1 (3.7%) | 3 (7.0%) | 26 (40.0%) | |
| 1 | 7 (25.9%) | 23 (53.5%) | 18 (27.7%) | |
| 2 | 11 (40.7%) | 14 (32.6%) | 17 (26.2%) | |
| 3 | 8 (29.6%) | 3 (7.0%) | 4 (6.2%) | |
| Good response (TRG 0,1) | 0.003 | |||
| TRG 0, 1 | 8 (29.6%) | 26 (60.5%) | 44 (67.7%) | |
| TRG 2, 3 | 19 (70.4%) | 17 (39.5%) | 21 (32.3%) | |
| Pathologic complete response | < 0.001 | |||
| pCR (-) | 27 (100%) | 41 (95.3%) | 40 (61.5%) | |
| pCR (+) | 0 | 2 (4.7%) | 25 (38.5%) |
Table 5 Comparison of the non- pathologic complete response and pathologic complete response groups after the chemoradiotherapy following surgical resection
| Variables | Non-pCR (n = 108) | pCR (n = 27) | P value |
| Pre-CRT tumor size (cm, mean ± SD) | 4.7 ± 1.5 | 4.4 ± 1.3 | 0.246 |
| Pre-CRT CEA, ng/mL | < 0.001 | ||
| CEA ≤ 5 | 40 (37.0%) | 25 (92.6%) | |
| CEA > 5 | 68 (63.0%) | 2 (7.4%) | |
| Pre-CRT T stage | 0.875 | ||
| T3 | 84 (77.8%) | 22 (81.5%) | |
| T4 | 24 (22.2%) | 5 (18.5%) | |
| Pre-CRT N stage | 0.004 | ||
| N0 | 6 (5.6%) | 7 (25.9%) | |
| N+ | 102 (94.4%) | 20 (74.1%) | |
| Pre-CRT TNM stage | 0.005 | ||
| I | 1 (0.9%) | 0 | |
| II | 6 (5.6%) | 7 (25.9%) | |
| III | 101 (93.5%) | 20 (74.1%) | |
| Post-CRT CEA, ng/mL | 0.008 | ||
| ≤ 5 | 81 (75.0%) | 27 (100%) | |
| > 5 | 27 (25.0%) | 0 | |
| Downstaging after CRT | 0.051 | ||
| No | 65 (60.2%) | 10 (37.0%) | |
| Yes | 43 (39.8%) | 17 (63.0%) | |
| Differentiation | > 0.999 | ||
| Well–Moderate | 30 (27.8%) | 7 (25.9%) | |
| Poor + others1 | 78 (72.2%) | 20 (74.1%) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.034 | ||
| No | 88 (81.5%) | 27 (100%) | |
| Yes | 20 (18.5%) | 0 | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.151 | ||
| No | 96 (88.9%) | 27 (100%) | |
| Yes | 12 (11.1%) | 0 |
Table 6 Multivariate analysis for prognostic markers to predict the response to the chemoradiotherapy
| Pathologic complete response | Good response (TRG 0,1) | |||
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Sex (female vs male) | 0.26 (0.08–0.80) | 0.022 | ||
| Pre-CRT CEA (> 5 vs ≤ 5 ng/mL) | 18.71 (4.62–129.51) | < 0.001 | ||
| Pre-CRT NLR (≥ 2.8 vs < 2.8) | 5.27 (1.55–22.55) | 0.013 | 2.82 (1.27–6.48) | 0.013 |
| Post-CRT CEA (> 5 vs ≤ 5 ng/mL) | 5.07 (1.92–14.83) | 0.002 | ||
| Post-CRT T stage (≥ T3 vs < T3) | 3.25 (1.09–9.97) | 0.036 | 3.28 (1.23–9.90) | 0.023 |
| Postop differentiation (poorly1vs well-mod.) | 3.41 (1.35–9.48) | 0.013 | ||
- Citation: Cheong C, Shin JS, Suh KW. Prognostic value of changes in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels for preoperative chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(44): 7022-7035
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i44/7022.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i44.7022
