Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2020; 26(30): 4501-4522
Published online Aug 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i30.4501
Published online Aug 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i30.4501
Table 1 Hospitals or medical centers that participated in this study
Name | Location (city and province) |
Shanghai Shuguang hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Shanghai |
The Second Hospital Affiliated with Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Hangzhou, Zhejiang |
Xiamen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Xiamen, Fujian |
Shenzhen Hospital Affiliated with Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine | Shenzhen, Guangdong |
Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Foshan, Guangdong |
The Third People’s Hospital of Shenzhen | Shenzhen, Guangdong |
Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Guangzhou, Guangdong |
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University | Guangzhou, Guangdong |
Ruikang Hospital of Guangxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Nanning, Guangxi |
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Nanning, Guangxi |
Attached Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Chengdu, Sichuan |
West China Hospital, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University | Chengdu, Sichuan |
Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing |
Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine | Beijing |
302 Military Hospital of China | Beijing |
Tianjin Infectious Disease Hospital | Tianjin |
Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University | Beijing |
Hubei Provincial Hospital of TCM | Wuhan, Hubei |
People's Hospital of Wuhan University | Wuhan, Hubei |
The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine | Changsha, Hunan |
Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria of patients
Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Conform with the diagnostic criteria of HBeAg (+) chronic hepatitis B | Inactive HBsAg (+) carriers |
Conform with the pathogenesis and syndromes of kidney deficiency | Serum a-fetoprotein abnormal |
Age 30-65 yr | Pregnancy or breast feeding |
ALT ≤ 40 IU/L | Coinfection with HIV, HCV, HDV |
HBsAg > 10 IU/mL and < 105 IU/mL HBV DNA (105-109 IU/mL) | Histologic evidence of cirrhosis; Evidence of any other chronic liver disease |
Liver biopsy: Liver histology showed Knodell HAI > 4, Ishak fibrosis score > 3 were also included | Mental illness or any other serious systemic illness |
Voluntary | Interferon-γ within 6 mo; Antivirus treatment with nucleoside |
Abuse alcohol or illegal drugs; Allergic to the drug ingredients |
Table 3 The list of raw herbs composing the Chinese herbal formula
Chinese name | Latin name | Parts of plant used | Dose of dryplant (grams) | Dose afterextraction (grams) |
Ye xia zhu | Phyllanthus urinaria Linn | Whole plant | 30 | 12.00 |
Ci wu jia | Radix et caulis acanthopanacis senticosi | Root and rhizome | 10 | 0.50 |
Xian ling pi | Herba Epimedii | Overground part | 30 | 1.50 |
Nv zhen zi | Fructus ligustri lucidi | Mature fruit | 15 | 1.50 |
Han lian cao | Herba ecliptae | Overground part | 15 | 1.50 |
Chai hu | Radix bupleuri | Root | 10 | 1.67 |
Bai shao | Radix paeoniae alba | Root | 10 | 1.00 |
Zhi shi | Fructus aurantii immaturus | Fruitlet | 10 | 1.67 |
Tao ren | Semen persicae | Nuts | 10 | 0.50 |
Gan cao | Radix glycyrrhizae | Root and rhizome | 5 | 0.83 |
Hu zhang | Rhizoma polygoni cuspidati | Root and rhizome | 15 | 1.00 |
Xi huang cao | Herba rabdosiae serrae | Whole plant | 30 | 9.00 |
Total | 190 | 32.67 |
Table 4 Baseline characteristics of all study patients
Variable | Treatment (ICE) group (n = 199) | Control group(n = 196) | χ2/t/ Z | P value |
Age (mean ± SD), yr | 38.51 ± 7.63 | 38.90 ± 7.54 | -0.904 | 0.366a |
Range | 30-65 | 30-63 | ||
Sex, n (%) | 0.013 | 0.910b | ||
Male | 128 (64.3) | 125 (63.8) | ||
Female | 71 (35.7) | 71 (36.2) | ||
Regions (N) | 2.796 | 0.593b | ||
Eastern | 30 (14.42) | 28 (14.97) | ||
Western | 22 (10.58) | 18 (9.63) | ||
Southern | 89 (42.79) | 69 (36.90) | ||
Northern | 40 (19.23) | 48 (25.67) | ||
Central | 27 (12.98) | 24 (12.83) | ||
Smoking | 0.491 | 0.484b | ||
Yes | 57 (28.64) | 50 (25.51) | ||
No | 142 (71.36) | 146 (74.49) | ||
Alcohol consumption | 3.626 | 0.057b | ||
Yes | 18 (9.05) | 30 (15.31) | ||
No | 181 (90.95) | 166 (84.69) | ||
Genotype | 0.522 | 0.770b | ||
B | 99 (49.75) | 93 (47.45) | ||
C | 90 (45.23) | 95 (48.47) | ||
D | 10 (5.02) | 8 (4.08) | ||
Genealogy of hepatocellular carcinoma | 2 (1.00) | 3 (1.53) | 0.000 | 0.986b |
Clinical course (mean ± SD) week | 90.21 ± 22.40 | 86.69 ± 27.20 | -1.607 | 0.108a |
Liver function (mean ± SD) | ||||
ALT, IU/L | 29.29 ± 8.19 | 30.12 ± 6.32 | 1.126 | 0.261c |
AST, IU/L | 24.86 ± 7.53 | 25.79 ± 6.19 | 1.340 | 0.181c |
TB, μmol/L | 14.34 ± 3.25 | 13.98 ± 4.15 | 0.961 | 0.337c |
HBV DNA baseline level, (%) | 0.154 | 0.695b | ||
2 to < 5 log10 IU/mL | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
5 to < 7 log10 IU/mL | 14 (2.01) | 12 (1.02) | ||
7to < 9 log10 IU/mL | 185 (97.99) | 184 (98.98) | ||
HBsAg (mean ± SD), log10 IU/mL | 3.86 ± 0.52 | 3.89 ± 0.42 | -0.758 | 0.449a |
HBeAg (mean ± SD), SCO/mL | 1138.18 ± 423.99 | 1158.40 ± 401.86 | -0.393 | 0.695a |
HBeAb (mean ± SD), SCO/mL | 38.43 ± 14.28 | 40.01 ± 12.15 | -0.904 | 0.366a |
Histological scores | ||||
Knodell (HAI), n (%) | 168 (84.40) | 156 (79.60) | 0.010 | 0.922b |
≥ 4 | 60 (35.71) | 55(35.26) | ||
< 4 | 108 (64.29) | 101 (64.74) | ||
Ishak (FIB), n (%) | 0.035 | 0.851b | ||
≥ 2 | 67 (39.90) | 60 (38.46) | ||
< 2 | 101 (60.10) | 96 (61.54) |
Table 5 Virologic response and change in serum hepatitis B virus DNA level after treatment
Treatment response | Treatment (ICE) group (n = 199) | Control group ( n = 196) | χ2/Z | P value |
48 wk | ||||
Patients with HBV DNA level decline > 2 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 30 (15.08) | 13 (6.63) | 7.255 | 0.007 |
Patients with HBV DNA level ≤ 4 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 20 (10.05) | 5 (2.55) | 9.367 | 0.002 |
Patients with undetectable HBV DNA (≤ 20 IU/mL), n (%) | 2 (1.01) | 0 (0.00) | 1.980 | 0.159 |
96 wk | ||||
Patients with HBV DNA level decline > 2 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 60 (30.15) | 12 (6.12) | 38.249 | 0.000 |
Patients with HBV DNA level ≤ 4 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 37 (18.59) | 6 (3.06) | 24.555 | 0.000 |
Patients with undetectable HBV DNA (≤ 20 IU/mL), n (%) | 4 (2.01) | 0 (0.00) | 2.227 | 0.136 |
Table 6 Virologic response and change in serum hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B virus e antigen levels after treatment
Treatment response | Treatment (ICE) group (n = 199) | Control group (n = 196) | χ2/Z | P value |
48 wk | ||||
Patients with HBsAg level decline ≥ 0.5 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 49 (24.62) | 19 (9.69) | 15.443 | 0.000 |
Patients with HBsAg level decline ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 29 (14.57) | 11 (5.61) | 8.712 | 0.003 |
Patients with HBsAg level decline ≥ 2 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 7 (3.52) | 2 (1.02) | 1.758 | 0.185 |
Patients with undetectable HBsAg (≤ 0.05 IU/mL), n (%) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.000 | 1 |
Patients with HBeAg level decline ≥ 1 log10 S/CO), n (%) | 45 (22.61) | 5 (2.55) | 35.947 | 0.000 |
Patients with undetectable HBeAg (≤ 1.00 S/CO), n (%) | 17 (8.54) | 5 (2.55) | 6.740 | 0.009 |
Seroconversion rates of HBeAga, n (%) | 16 (8.04) | 4 (2.04) | 7.394 | 0.007 |
96 wk | ||||
Patients with HBsAg level decline ≥ 0.5 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 83 (41.71) | 41 (20.92) | 19.817 | 0.000 |
Patients with HBsAg level decline ≥ 1 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 63 (31.66) | 22 (11.22) | 24.413 | 0.000 |
Patients with HBsAg level decline ≥ 2 log10 IU/mL, n (%) | 17 (8.54) | 1 (0.51) | 7.129 | 0.008 |
Patients with undetectable HBsAg (≤ 0.05 IU/mL), n (%) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.000 | 1 |
Patients with HBeAg level decline ≥ 1 log10 S/CO), n (%) | 51 (25.63) | 9 (4.59) | 33.919 | 0.000 |
Patients with undetectable HBeAg (≤ 1.00 S/CO), n (%) | 32 (16.08) | 11 (5.61) | 11.154 | 0.001 |
Seroconversion rates of HBeAga, n (%) | 29 (14.57) | 9 (4.46) | 11.962 | 0.001 |
Table 7 Baseline variables and change in hepatitis B virus e antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen from week 12 to week 48 associated with HBeAg clearance
Variables | Univariable analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||||
OR | 95%CI | P | OR | 95%CI | P | |
Sex | 0.788 | (0.367-1.986) | 0.453 | |||
Age | 0.947 | (0.886-1.198) | 0.715 | |||
HBV DNA | 0.633 | (0.574-1.393) | 0.214 | |||
IFN-γ | 0.915 | (0.837-2.131) | 0.656 | |||
IL-2 | 0.773 | (0.512-1.318) | 0.375 | |||
Baseline HBeAg | 1.653 | (1.332-2.257) | 0.030 | 1.027 | (1.145-1. 908) | 0.047 |
Baseline HBsAg | 2.431 | (1.236-3.915) | 0.004 | 1.339 | (1.131-1.862) | 0.009 |
Week 24 HBeAg change from baseline | 2.762 | (1.562-4.256) | < 0.001 | 2.338 | (1.636-4.863) | < 0.001 |
Week 36 HBeAg change from baseline | 3.411 | (1.976-4.526) | < 0.001 | 3.185 | (1.977-5.466) | < 0.001 |
Week 24 HBsAg change from baseline | 4.458 | (2.153-10.198) | < 0.001 | 3.273 | (1.375-5.216) | < 0.001 |
Week 36 HBsAg change from baseline | 5.371 | (3.239-6.392) | < 0.001 | 5.788 | (2.726-10.612) | < 0.001 |
Week 12 ALT elevation | 2.676 | (1.133-5.432) | 0.016 | 2.049 | (1.363-9.198) | 0.006 |
Week 24 ALT elevation | 3.373 | (2.637-7.568) | 0.003 | 3.788 | (2.728-7.687) | 0.003 |
Week 48 IFN-γ elevation | 2.735 | (1.317-6.682) | 0.002 | 2.171 | (1.163-2.961) | 0.007 |
Week 48 IL-2 elevation | 2.133 | (1.171-8.616) | 0.008 | 1.882 | (1.026-2.613) | 0.020 |
- Citation: Xing YF, Wei CS, Zhou TR, Huang DP, Zhong WC, Chen B, Jin H, Hu XY, Yang ZY, He Q, Jiang KP, Jiang JM, Hu ZB, Deng X, Yang F, Li FY, Zhao G, Wang LC, Mi YQ, Gong ZJ, Guo P, Wu JH, Shi WQ, Yang HZ, Zhou DQ, Tong GD. Efficacy of a Chinese herbal formula on hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(30): 4501-4522
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i30/4501.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i30.4501