Maholarnkij S, Sanpavat A, Decharun K, Dumrisilp T, Tubjareon C, Kanghom B, Patcharatrakul T, Chaijitraruch N, Chongsrisawat V, Sintusek P. Detection of reflux-symptom association in children with esophageal atresia by video-pH-impedance study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(28): 4159-4169 [PMID: 32821077 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i28.4159]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Palittiya Sintusek, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Gastroenterology and Pediatric Liver Diseases and Immunology STAR (Special Task Force for Activating Research), Department of Pediatrics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, No. 1873, Rama 4 Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand. palittiya.s@chula.ac.th
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Parameters used and the analysis result of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH study in children diagnosed esophageal atresia after esophageal anastomosis (n = 17)
Parameters
Median (IQR)
Monitoring period excluding fed periods (h)
21.2 (19.3-22.1)
RI (%)
2.7 (0.5-9.5)
Longest reflux period (min)
20 (5-29)
Esophageal clearance (min)
1.4 (0.6-2.5)
Total reflux (times)
19 (11-36)
Acid
9 (4-14)
Weakly acid
10 (6-15)
Weakly alkaline
0 (0-0)
mean bolus clearance time (s)
14.9 (10.4-19.2)
Table 5 Parameters used and results from the analysis of combined Video Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH study in children diagnosed esophageal atresia after esophageal anastomosis between using and non-using acid suppression therapy (n = 17)
Parameters
Acid suppression therapy (n = 7)
No acid suppression therapy (n = 10)
P value
Monitoring period (h)
21.2 (18.1-24.5)
21.3 (19.5-22.1)
0.696
RI (%)
7.1 (1.4-10)
1.45 (0.3-4.2)
0.24
Longest reflux period (min)
29 (5-96)
16 (4-24)
0.143
Esophageal clearance (min)
2.0 (1.0-3.6)
1.0 (0.5-1.7)
0.261
Total reflux (times)
19.0 (11-46)
19.0 (11-29)
0.66
Acid
10.0 (4-16)
6.5 (3-11)
0.558
Weakly acid
13.0 (4-32)
9.0 (6-14)
0.733
Weakly alkaline
0.0 (0-0)
0.0 (0-1)
0.123
Mean bolus clearance time (s)
11.9 (9.3-16.5)
17.3 (10.4-21.7)
0.242
Number of symptoms (times)
3.0 (1.0-5.0)
4.0 (1.0-7.0)
0.452
SI (%)
25 (0.0-50)
10.5 (0-66.7)
0.84
SSI (%)
1.4 (0-5.3)
3.7 (0.0-17.6)
0.419
SAP (%)
73.9 (0-90.9)
83.9 (0-99.1)
0.649
Table 6 Symptoms and symptom correlation from video recording in children with esophageal atresia (n = 17)
Symptom
Symptoms
Symptom-refluxcorrelation
Acid
Weakly acid
Non acid
SI
SSI
SAP
Cough
35
16 (45.7)
9
7
0
58.5 (6.2-100)
2.9 (0.3-7.1)
95 (18.9-99.2)
Vomit
9
8 (89)
5
3
0
75 (50-100)
3.9 (2.3-60.7)
99.6 (87.8-99.9)
Irritability or unexplained crying
7
5 (71)
4
1
0
50 (25-50)
3.8 (2.5-3.8)
92.8 (72.9-92.8)
Dysphagia
1
0 (0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
52
29 (55.7)
18
11
0
58.4 (27-100)
3.9 (1.3-7.1)
92.3 (77.4-99.6)
Citation: Maholarnkij S, Sanpavat A, Decharun K, Dumrisilp T, Tubjareon C, Kanghom B, Patcharatrakul T, Chaijitraruch N, Chongsrisawat V, Sintusek P. Detection of reflux-symptom association in children with esophageal atresia by video-pH-impedance study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(28): 4159-4169