Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2020; 26(28): 4151-4158
Published online Jul 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i28.4151
Published online Jul 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i28.4151
Table 1 Distribution of patient characteristics, lesion size and location
WD group (n = 13) | MD group (n = 21) | PD group (n = 8) | P value | |
Age, mean ± SD | 61.69 ± 10.13 | 64.85 ± 11.95 | 55.25 ± 10.17 | 0.051 |
Sex | 0.542 | |||
Male | 8 | 12 | 3 | |
Female | 5 | 9 | 5 | |
Size, mean ± SD | 2.75 ± 1.61 | 2.95 ± 0.91 | 4.23 ± 3.62 | 0.114 |
Location | 0.076 | |||
Head and uncinate process | 10 | 17 | 3 | |
Body and neck | 3 | 4 | 4 | |
Tail | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of computed tomography parameters for the prediction of pathological grading
WD-MD (n = 34) vs PD (n = 8) | WD (n = 13) vs MD-PD (n = 8) | |||||||
Az | SD | P value | 95%CI | Az | SD | P value | 95%CI | |
TARarterial | 0.71 | 0.101 | 0.467 | 0.549 - 0.839 | 0.509 | 0.107 | 0989 | 0.351 - 0.667 |
TARpancreatic | 0.654 | 0.112 | 0.742 | 0.492 - 0.794 | 0.512 | 0.0993 | 0.196 | 0.353 - 0.669 |
TAF | 0.757 | 0.102 | 0.428 | 0.601 - 0.876 | 0.692 | 0.0829 | 0.093 | 0.531 - 0.825 |
Table 3 Differences in computed tomography parameters among the well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated group groups
WD (n = 13) | MD (n = 21) | PD (n = 8) | P value | |
VTarterial | 69.01 ± 25.16 (64.22) | 75.23 ± 19.69 (75.41) | 59.80 ± 29.47 (56.30) | 0.145 |
VTpancreatic | 85.34 ± 23.20 (76.08) | 90.58 ± 21.99 (90.58) | 73.19 ± 39.88 (69.01) | 0.184 |
VAarterial | 280.71 ± 66.66 (262.74) | 290.37 ± 61.12 (279.38) | 320.04 ± 86.26 (311.20) | 0.496 |
VApancreatic | 201.73 ± 55.81 (200.00) | 200.85 ± 43.82 (209.44) | 188.28 ± 46.94 (195.43) | 0.683 |
DT | 16.32 ± 6.48 (13.65) | 15.34 ± 8.06 (13.97) | 13.39 ± 13.25 (10.16) | 0.678 |
DA | 78.98 ± 49.68 (61.54) | 89.51 ± 34.84 (91.01) | 131.76 ± 58.68 (120.79) | 0.077 |
TARarterial | 0.26 ± 0.12 (0.23) | 0.27 ± 0.09 (0.25) | 0.19 ± 0.07 (0.20) | 0.164 |
TARpancreatic | 0.45 ± 0.16 (0.36) | 0.48 ± 0.17 (0.47) | 0.37 ± 0.12 (0.38) | 0.339 |
TAF | 0.28 ± 0.24 (0.19) | 0.19 ± 0.12 (0.17) | 0.10 ± 0.08 (0.10) | 0.034 |
- Citation: Seo W, Kim YC, Min SJ, Lee SM. Enhancement parameters of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Correlation with pathologic grading. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(28): 4151-4158
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i28/4151.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i28.4151