Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2020; 26(23): 3293-3303
Published online Jun 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293
Published online Jun 21, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293
Name | Institute |
Dietmar Öfner | Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria |
Robin McLeod | University of Toronto, Canada |
Zhou-Qiao Wu | Peking University Cancer Hospital, China |
Ismail Gögenur | Zealand University Hospital, Centre for surgical Science, Denmark |
Lars Nannestad Jørgensen | Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark |
Yves Panis | Beaujon Hospital, Paris, France |
Pablo Ortega-Deballon | University Hospital of Dijon, France |
Markus Büchler | University of Heidelberg, Germany |
Gianluca Pellino | Università degli Studi della Campania ''Luigi Vanvitelli'', Italy |
Harry van Goor | Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands |
Adam Dziki | Medical University of Lodz, Poland |
Eduardo García-Granero | Hospital La Fe, University of Valencia, Spain |
Martin Rutegård | Umea University, Sweden |
Ignazio Tarantino | Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland |
Steven D Wexner | Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States |
Michael Stamos | University of California, Irvine, CA, United States |
John Alverdy | University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States |
James Kinross | Imperial college London, United Kingdom |
Dermot Burke | Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom |
Category | Consensus |
Clinical parameters | Tachycardia, clinical deterioration, abdominal pain, discharge from abdominal drain, discharge from rectum, rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic defect found by digital examination contribute to the suspicion of CAL |
Laboratory tests | CRP and the combination of CRP and leukocytosis contribute to the suspicion of CAL; Albumin, urea and creatinine do not contribute to the suspicion of CAL |
Radiological findings | Extravasation of endoluminal administrated contrast, collection around the anastomosis, presacral abscess near anastomosis, perianastomotic air and free intra-abdominal air are defined as CAL on CT-scan |
Findings during reoperation | Necrosis of anastomosis, necrosis of blind loop, signs of peritonitis and dehiscence of anastomosis are defined as CAL during reoperation |
Grading systems | Grading or classifying CAL is important; Both the ISREC-classification and Clavien-Dindo classification are suitable |
Timing | Distinction between early and late anastomosis should be made; There should not be a fixed range of days in which CAL can occur to define it as CAL |
Colon/rectum | Colon and rectum should be seen as separate entities |
Category | Recommendation |
General definition | The ISREC definition of CAL is used by the majority of the participants (71%) |
Clinical parameters | Tachycardia, clinical deterioration, abdominal pain other than wound pain, discharge from the abdominal drain, discharge from the rectum, rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic defect found by digital examination are clinical symptoms that contribute to the suspicion of CAL |
Laboratory tests | CRP and the combination of CRP and leukocytosis are appropriate laboratory tests and should be tested if there is a suspicion of CAL. Albumin, urea and creatinine do not contribute to the suspicion of CAL and therefore should not be tested |
Radiological findings | Extravasation of endoluminal administrated contrast, collection around the anastomosis, presacral abscess near the anastomosis, perianastomotic air and free intra-abdominal air should be defined as CAL on CT-scan. However, defining free intra-abdominal air as CAL depends on the amount of post-operative days |
Findings during reoperation | Necrosis of the anastomosis, necrosis of the blind loop, signs of peritonitis and dehiscence of the anastomosis should all be defined as CAL when observed during reoperation |
Grading systems | It is important to grade or classify CAL. Both the ISREC-classification and Clavien-Dindo classification are appropriate grading systems |
Timing | Distinction between early and late anastomotic leakage should be made. There should not be a fixed range of days in which CAL can occur to define it as CAL |
Colon/rectum | Colonic anastomotic leakage and rectal anastomotic leakage should be seen as two separate problems, based on different incidence rates, different anatomy, different surgical technique |
- Citation: van Helsdingen CP, Jongen AC, de Jonge WJ, Bouvy ND, Derikx JP. Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(23): 3293-3303
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i23/3293.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i23.3293