Basic Study
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2020; 26(16): 1926-1937
Published online Apr 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1926
Table 1 Clinicopathological data of enrolled patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
Case No .Onset time of pigment spots (yr) Gender Family history or not (detail) Load of gastric polyps Maximum diameter of gastric polyps (mm) Load of duodenal and small intestinal polyps Maximum diameter of duodenal and small intestinal polyps (mm) Load of colorectal polyps Maximum diameter of colorectal polyps (mm) Number of hospitalization times Number of operation times Number of intervention times 1 0 Male Yes (Father) 0 0 1-10 30 Unknown Unknown 1 1 3 2 0 Male No 1-10 10 31-40 80 11-20 70 3 1 4 3 7 Female Yes (Father) 1-10 6 21-30 25 Unknown Unknown 1 1 4 4 2 Male No 11-20 17 1-10 25 1-10 40 1 1 4 5 10 Male Yes (Son) 1-10 5 51-60 50 41-50 25 5 3 12 6 1 Male Yes (Mother) 1-10 5 1-10 35 1-10 35 2 1 3 7 1 Male No 1-10 23 1-10 50 Unknown Unknown 1 0 2 8 1 Male Yes (Grandmother and mother) 0 0 Unknown Unknown 51-60 70 1 4 20 9 7 Male Yes (Father) 0 0 11-20 60 21-30 12 1 1 9 10 13 Female No 0 0 1-10 40 1-10 10 3 4 9 11 2 Male No 1-10 8 1-10 25 1-10 6 2 0 4 12 0 Female No 1-10 15 41-50 60 11-20 50 2 4 9 13 5 Female Yes (Father and brother) 21-30 15 41-50 60 21-30 60 4 2 9 14 18 Female No 21-30 5 11-20 30 1-10 6 2 1 5 15 0.8 Female Yes (Father) 1-10 6 1-10 6 0 0 2 0 4 16 2 Male Yes (Father) 21-30 20 31-40 45 51-60 45 2 7 21 17 4 Female Yes (Son) Unknown Unknown 21-30 30 1-10 30 1 1 5 18 0 Male No 1-10 15 Unknown Unknown 1-10 20 1 0 2 19 5 Female No 0 0 11-20 20 Unknown Unknown 1 2 7 20 4 Female Yes (Sister) 1-10 50 21-30 50 Unknown Unknown 1 0 7
Table 2 Mutation status of LKB1/STK11 gene
Case No .Allele Mutation type Exon/intron Amino acid change Base change New mutation 1 Heterozygosis Missense 4 p.L167R c.500T>G No 2 Heterozygosis Nonsense 1 p.K84* c.250A>T No 3 Heterozygosis Frameshift deletion 5 p.A241Vfs*46 c.722delC Yes 4 Homozygous Frameshift insertion 3 p.Q152Pfs*11 c.454_455insC Yes 5 Heterozygosis Frameshift insertion 1 p.Y49Afs*4 c.144_145insGCAAG Yes 6 Heterozygosis Missense 5 p.S240W c.719C>G No 7 Heterozygosis Frameshift deletion 1 p.K82Rfs*14 c.243delG Yes 8 Heterozygosis Cleavage site 5-61 / c.734+1G>A Yes 10 Heterozygosis Cleavage site 3-41 / c.464+1G>T Yes 13 Homozygous Frameshift deletion 3 p.E145Gfs*10 c.426_448delCGTGCCGGAGAAGCGTTTCCCAG No 14 Heterozygosis Nonsense 1 p.K84* c.250A>T No 16 Heterozygosis Frameshift insertion 1 p.Y49Afs*4 c.144_145insGCAAG No 17 Heterozygosis Cleavage site 4-51 / c.598-1G>A Yes 18 Heterozygosis Nonsense 1 p.Y49* c.147C>G No 19 Heterozygosis Frameshift deletion 2 p.K122Afs*40 c.363_364delGA Yes 20 Homozygosis Cleavage site 3-41 / c.464+1G>A No
Table 3 Prediction of protein function and amino acid evolution conservation of LKB1/STK11
Case No .Polyphen-2 Mutation taster FATHMM M-CAP GERP++ phyloP Score Prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction 1 1 Probably damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.5 Damaging 0.591 Damaging 5.6 Conserved 7.91 Conserved 2 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / 3.9 Conserved 8.998 Conserved 3 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 4 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 5 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 6 0.993 Probably damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.79 Damaging 0.704 Damaging 5.6 Conserved 7.799 Conserved 7 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 8 / / / / / / / / / / / / 10 / / / / / / / / / / / / 13 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 14 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / 3.9 Conserved 8.998 Conserved 16 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 17 / / / / / / / / / / / / 18 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / 3.9 Conserved 3.875 Conserved 19 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / / / / / 20 / / / / / / / / / / / /
Table 4 Mutation of other 13 genes except LKB1/STK11 gene
Case No .Gene MMR Type of mutation Amino acid change Base change New mutation 3 MUTYH No Missense p.Ala373Val c.1118C>T No MLH1 Yes Missense p.Val384Asp c.1151T>A No PMS2 Yes Missense p.Thr511Met c.1532C>T No 4 MSH6 Yes Missense p.Ala1230Gly c.3689C>G Yes MLH1 Yes Missense p.Val384Asp c.1151T>A No PMS2 Yes Missense p.Thr511Met c.1532C>T No 7 MLH3 Yes Non-synonymous SNV p.Asp1081His c.3241G>C No AXIN2 No Non-synonymous SNV p.Ser738Phe c.2213C>T No 9 MSH6 Yes Missense p.Glu1163Val c.3488A>T No APC No Missense p.Met2221Thr c.6662T>C No 10 MSH2 Yes Missense p.Ile169Val c.505A>G No MSH6 Yes Intron insertion / c.4001+13C>CTTAC Yes APC No Missense p.Ala2778Ser c.8332G>T No 14 MSH2 Yes Missense p.Val89Ala c.266T>C No MSH2 Yes Cleavage site / c.792+1G>A Yes PMS1 Yes Nonsense p.Gln16Ter c.46C>T Yes PMS1 Yes Missense p.Val308Ile c.922G>A Yes 15 PTEN No Missense in 5 'untranslated region (UTR) p.Gln171Glu c.511C>G No 19 MSH2 Yes Missense p.Leu390Phe c.1168C>T No 20 MLH1 Yes Missense p.Arg217Cys c.649C>T No
Table 5 Prediction of protein function changes caused by MSH6 and other gene mutations
Case No .Gene Polyphen-2_HDIV Mutation Taster FATHMM M-CAP Score prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction Score Prediction 3 MUTYH 0.069 Benign 1 Pathogenic -2.41 Damaging 0.084 Damaging 3 MLH1 1 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.66 Damaging / / 3 PMS2 0.03 Benign 1 Polymorphism 1.06 Tolerable / / 4 MSH6 1 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.52 Damaging 0.292 Damaging 4 MLH1 1 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.66 Damaging / / 4 PMS2 0.239 Benign 1 Polymorphism 1.06 Tolerable / / 7 MLH3 1 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.37 Damaging 0.137 Damaging 7 AXIN2 0.121 Benign 0.997 Polymorphism -0.25 Tolerable / / 9 MSH6 0.67 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -2.12 Damaging / / 9 APC 0.156 Benign 0.737 Pathogenic -2.47 Damaging 0.046 Damaging 10 MSH2 0 Benign 1 Polymorphism -2.29 Damaging 0.028 Damaging 10 MSH6 / / / / / / / / 10 APC 1 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -1.53 Damaging 0.033 Damaging 14 MSH2 0.042 Benign 1 Pathogenic -2.47 Damaging 0.075 Damaging 14 MSH2 / / / / / / / / 14 PMS1 / / 1 Pathogenic / / / / 14 PMS1 0.329 Benign 0.996 Pathogenic -1.34 Tolerable 0.03 Damaging 15 PTEN 0.956 Probably_damaging 0.999 Pathogenic / / / / 19 MSH2 0.148 Benign 1 Pathogenic -3.07 Damaging / / 20 MLH1 1 Probably_damaging 1 Pathogenic -1.91 Damaging 0.247 Damaging
Table 6 Prediction of amino acid evolutionary conservation due to mutations in MSH6 and other genes
Case No .Gene GERP++ phyloP Score Prediction Score Prediction 3 MUTYH 5.67 Conserved 6.955 Conserved 3 MLH1 5.67 Conserved 7.336 Conserved 3 PMS2 -3.23 Nonconserved -0.25 Nonconserved 4 MSH6 5.5 Conserved 7.481 Conserved 4 MLH1 5.67 Conserved 7.336 Conserved 4 PMS2 -3.23 Nonconserved -0.25 Nonconserved 7 MLH3 4.6 Conserved 5.502 Conserved 7 AXIN2 2.07 Conserved 2.225 Conserved 9 MSH6 5.23 Conserved 8.923 Conserved 9 APC 6.02 Conserved 3.925 Conserved 10 MSH2 -1.25 Nonconserved 1.857 Nonconserved 10 MSH6 / / / / 10 APC 5.92 Conserved 8.947 Conserved 14 MSH2 3.94 Conserved 3.331 Conserved 14 MSH2 / / / / 14 PMS1 4.99 Conserved 7.805 Conserved 14 PMS1 2.11 Conserved 4.333 Conserved 15 PTEN / / / / 19 MSH2 4.62 Conserved 1.611 Nonconserved 20 MLH1 5.76 Conserved 2.993 Conserved
Table 7 Relationship between gene mutation and clinical pathological parameters
Mutation Result Load of gastric polyps Maximum diameter of gastric polyps (mm) Load of duodenal and small intestinal polyps Maximum diameter of duodenal and small intestinal polyps (mm) Load of Colorectal polyps Maximum diameter of colorectal polyps (mm) Number of hospitalization times Number of operation times Number of intervention times LKB1/STK11 mutationsU value28.000 30.000 35.500 26.000 20.500 32.000 36.000 49.000 28.500 P value0.885 1.000 0.442 0.878 0.734 0.048 0.750 0.122 0.750 LKB1/STK11 truncating mutationU value62.500 69.000 49.500 47.000 23.500 35.500 56.000 40.500 35.500 P value0.156 0.053 0.436 0.605 0.613 0.397 0.684 0.481 0.280 Other gene mutations U value47.500 42.500 39.000 36.000 22.000 19.500 38.000 46.000 41.500 P value0.842 0.842 0.965 0.762 0.607 0.388 0.412 0.824 0.552