Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2020; 26(1): 70-85
Published online Jan 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i1.70
Published online Jan 7, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i1.70
Table 1 Characteristics of the different faecal immunochemical tests evaluated
Ref. | Country | Analytical system for estimation of faecal haemoglobin concentration |
Cubiella et al[9], 2016 (DC) | Spain | OC-Sensor: 100% |
Rodríguez-Alonso et al[8], 2015 | Spain | OC-Sensor: 100% |
Cubiella et al[9], 2016 (VC) | Spain | OC-Sensor: 49.7%; OC-Auto 3 Latex 13.8%; FOB Gold 2.4%; Linear i-FOB 34.1% |
Overall | Spain | OC-Sensor: 81.8%; OC-Auto 3 Latex 5.0%; FOB Gold 0.9%; Linear i-FOB 12.3% |
Table 2 Characteristics of the individuals included in the analysis, n (%)
Characteristics | Overall (n = 2709) | FIT < 10 µg/g (n = 1979) | FIT ≥ 10 µg/g (n = 730) | P value8 |
Demographic | ||||
Age (yr) | 62.9 ± 13.5 | 62.0 ± 13.5 | 65.5 ± 13.0 | < 0.001 |
Female sex | 1432 (52.9) | 1084 (54.8) | 348 (47.7) | 0.001 |
Primary healthcare referral1 | 617 (24.2) | 397 (21.2) | 220 (32.2) | < 0.001 |
Previous colonoscopy2 | 444 (25.9) | 287 (25.8) | 157 (26.0) | 0.9 |
Daily using ASA2 | 330 (19.2) | 193 (17.3) | 137 (22.7) | 0.01 |
Indications | ||||
Rectal bleeding1 | 1234 (48.3) | 843 (45.1) | 391 (57.2) | < 0.001 |
Change of bowel habit1 | 1271 (49.8) | 913 (48.8) | 358 (52.4) | 0.1 |
Anaemia3,4 | 368 (16.2) | 236 (13.9) | 132 (23.1) | < 0.001 |
Abdominal pain5 | 766 (41.3) | 587 (41.8) | 179 (40.0) | 0.4 |
Weight loss5 | 391 (21.1) | 301 (21.4) | 90 (20.1) | 0.6 |
Basal colonoscopy findings | ||||
Benign anorectal lesion2 | 756 (44.0) | 495 (44.4) | 261 (43.3) | 0.6 |
Significant colonic lesions6 | 480 (17.7) | 204 (10.3) | 276 (37.8) | < 0.001 |
Advanced adenoma1,7 | 337 (13.2) | 139 (7.4) | 198 (29.0) | < 0.001 |
Follow-up (mo) | 45.5 ± 20.0 | 47.9 ± 21.2 | 39.2 ± 14.1 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Risk of cancer and death according to faecal immunochemical test result
Event | Risk | Overall (n = 2709) | FIT < 10 µg/g (n = 1979) | FIT ≥10 µg/g (n = 730) | RR1 (95%CI) | HR2 (95%CI) |
GIC | Cumulative3 | 2.1% (1.6-2.6) | 1.7% (1.1-2.3) | 3.2% (1.9-4.4) | 1.9 (1.1-3.2) | 1.5 (0.8-2.7) |
GIC | Density4 | 5.6 (4.1-7.0) | 4.3 (2.9-5.8) | 9.7 (5.8-13.7) | ||
GIC | Cumulative death3 | 1.3% (0.9-1.8) | 1.0% (0.5-1.4) | 2.3% (1.2-3.4) | 2.5 (1.3-4.7) | 2.2 (1.1-4.3) |
GIC | Death density4 | 3.5 (2.4-4.6) | 2.4 (1.3-3.5) | 7.1 (3.7-10.5) | ||
Up GIC5 | Cumulative3 | 1.3% (0.9-1.7) | 1.2% (0.7-1.6) | 1.6% (0.7-2.6) | 1.4 (0.7-2.8) | 1.0 (0.5-2.2) |
Up GIC5 | Density4 | 3.4 (2.3-4.6) | 2.9 (1.7-4.1) | 5.1 (2.2-8.0) | ||
Up GIC5 | Cumulative death3 | 0.8% (0.5-1.2) | 0.7% (0.3-1.0) | 1.2% (0.4-2.0) | 1.6 (0.7-3.7) | 1.4 (0.6-3.3) |
Up GIC5 | Death density4 | 2.1 (1.2-3.0) | 1.6 (0.8-2.5) | 3.8 (1.3-6.2) | ||
CRC | Cumulative3 | 0.5% (0.2-0.8) | 0.3% (0.1-0.5) | 1.1% (0.3-1.9) | 3.6 (1.3-10.5) | 3.8 (1.2-11.9) |
CRC | Density4 | 1.4 (0.7-2.1) | 0.8 (0.2-1.4) | 3.4 (1.0-5.7) | ||
CRC | Cumulative death3 | 0.3% (0.1-0.5) | 0.1% (0.0-0.2) | 1.0% (0.3-1.7) | 9.5 (2.0-46.2) | 10.8 (2.1-57.1) |
CRC | Death density4 | 0.9 (0.3-1.4) | 0.3 (-0.1-0.6) | 2.9 (0.8-5.1) | ||
Cancer | Cumulative3 | 7.6% (6.6-8.6) | 7.3% (6.2-8.5) | 8.2% (6.2-10.2) | 1.1 (0.8-1.5) | 1.1 (0.8-1.5) |
Cancer | Density4 | 20.5 (17.7-23.3) | 18.8 (15.8-21.9) | 25.9 (19.4-32.5) | ||
Cancer | Cumulative death3 | 3.6% (2.9-4.3) | 3.2% (2.4-4.0) | 4.8% (3.2-6.3) | 1.5 (1.0-2.3) | 1.4 (0.9-2.2) |
Cancer | Death density4 | 9.5 (7.6-11.4) | 8.0 (6.0-9.9) | 14.7 (9.8-19.6) | ||
Death | Cumulative3 | 7.3% (6.3-8.2) | 7.0% (5.9-8.1) | 7.9% (6.0-9.9) | 1.1 (0.8-1.5) | 1.1 (0.8-1.5) |
Death | Density4 | 19.2 (16.5-21.8) | 17.6 (14.7-20.5) | 24.3 (18.1-30.6) |
Table 4 Factors associated with upper gastrointestinal cancer detection the first year after baseline colonoscopy, n (%)
Upper gastrointestinal cancer | Odds ratio (95 %CI)1 | Odds ratio (95 %CI)2 | |
Sex | |||
Female (n = 1432) | 10 (0.7) | 1 | |
Male (n = 1277) | 12 (0.9) | 1.3 (0.6-3.1) | |
Age | |||
< 70 yr (n = 1757) | 8 (0.5) | 1 | 1 |
≥ 70 yr (n = 952) | 14 (1.5) | 3.3 (1.4-7.8) | 2.7 (1.1-7.0) |
Primary healthcare referral | |||
No (n = 1936) | 19 (1.0) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 617) | 3 (0.5) | 0.5 (0.1-1.7) | |
Rectal bleeding | |||
No (n = 1319) | 16 (1.2) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 1234) | 6 (0.5) | 0.4 (0.1-1.0) | |
Change of bowel habit | |||
No (n = 1282) | 12 (0.9) | 1 | |
Adequate (n = 1271) | 10 (0.8) | 0.8 (0.4-1.9) | |
Anaemia3 | |||
No (n = 2077) | 13 (0.6) | 1 | 1 |
Yes (n = 191) | 8 (4.2) | 6.9 (2.8-17.0) | 5.6 (2.2-13.9) |
Abdominal pain | |||
No (n = 1319) | 12 (1.1) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 1234) | 5 (0.7) | 0.6 (0.2-1.7) | |
Weight loss | |||
No (n = 1462) | 12 (0.8) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 391) | 5 (1.3) | 1.5 (0.5-4.4) | |
Faecal immunochemical test | |||
< 10 µg/g (n = 1979) | 14 (0.7) | 1 | |
≥ 10 µg/g (n = 730) | 8 (1.1%) | 1.5 (0.6-3.7) | |
Benign anorectal lesion | |||
No (n = 961) | 7 (0.7) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 756) | 6 (0.8) | 1.1 (0.4-3.2) | |
Significant colonic lesion4 | |||
No (n = 2216) | 16 (0.7) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 480) | 6 (1.3) | (0.7-4.5) | |
Advanced adenoma5 | |||
No (n = 2968) | 16 (0.7) | 1 | |
Yes (n = 337) | 6 (1.8) | 2.5 (1.0-6.4) |
- Citation: Pin-Vieito N, Iglesias MJ, Remedios D, Rodríguez-Alonso L, Rodriguez-Moranta F, Álvarez-Sánchez V, Fernández-Bañares F, Boadas J, Martínez-Bauer E, Campo R, Bujanda L, Ferrandez Á, Piñol V, Rodríguez-Alcalde D, Guardiola J, Cubiella J, on behalf of the COLONPREDICT study investigators. Risk of gastrointestinal cancer in a symptomatic cohort after a complete colonoscopy: Role of faecal immunochemical test. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(1): 70-85
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v26/i1/70.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i1.70