Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2019; 25(9): 1142-1157
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142
Table 1 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical remission in Crohn’s disease
Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission, RR (95%CI) | Quality of evidence |
Chande et al[23] | AZA or 6-MP | Placebo | 6 wk-9 mo | 380 | RR 1.23 (0.97-1.55)1 | Moderate |
AZA or 6-MP | MTX | 6 wk-9 mo | 143 | RR 1.13 (0.85-1.49)1 | Low | |
AZA or 6-MP | 5-ASA | 6 wk-9 mo | 156 | RR 1.24 (0.80-1.91)1 | Very low | |
AZA | IFX | 26 wk | 399 | RR 0.66 (0.51-0.87)1 | Moderate |
Table 2 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission, RR (95%CI) or OR (95%CI) | Quality of evidence |
Chande et al[24] | MTX | Placebo | 36 wk | 67 | RR 0.96 (0.58-1.59)1 | Low |
MTX | 6-MP | 30 wk | 26 | RR 0.74 (0.43-1.29)2 | Very low | |
MTX | 5-ASA | 30 wk | 20 | RR 2.33 (0.66-3.64) 2 | Very low | |
Baumgart et al[25] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wk | 63 | OR 2.27 (0.35-14.75)3 | High |
Lasa et al[26] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 12 wk | 127 | RR 0.91 (0.82-1.00)4 | High |
Table 3 Meta-analyses included for maintenance of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
Table 4 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical response in Crohn’s disease
Table 5 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical response in ulcerative colitis
Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | n | Clinical response, RR (95%CI) or OR (95%CI) | Quality of evidence |
Komaki et al[28] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wks (RCT) | 103 | RR 4.61 (2.09-10.17)1 | High |
Baumgart et al[25] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wk | 63 | OR 8.66 (1.79-42.00)2 | High |
Lasa et al[26] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 12 wk | 127 | RR 0.58 (0.45-0.73)3 | High |
Narula et al[29] | IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (RCT) | 412 | 43.8% (IFX); 41.7% (C) OR 1.08 (0.73-1.60)4 | Low |
IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (non RCT) | 801 | 74.8% (IFX); 55.4% (C) OR 2.96 (2.12-4.14)5 | Very low |
Table 6 Meta-analyses included for induction of mucosal healing in Crohn’s disease
Table 7 Meta-analyses included for induction of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
Table 8 Meta-analyses included for inflammatory bowel disease-related surgeries in ulcerative colitis
Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | N | Colectomy rate %, or OR (95% CI) | Quality of evidence |
Komaki et al[28] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wk (RCT) | 103 | 0% | High |
Narula et al[29] | IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (RCT) | 385 | 26.6% (IFX); 26.4% (C) OR 1.00 (0.64-1.59) | Low |
IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (non RCT) | 478 | 24.1% (IFX); 42.5% (C) OR 0.53 (0.22-1.28) | Very low | |
IFX | Cyclosporine | 12 mo (RCT) | 415 | 34.4% (IFX); 40.8% (C) OR 0.76 (0.51-1.14) | Low | |
IFX | Cyclosporine | 12 mo (non RCT) | 854 | 20.7% (IFX); 36.8% (C) OR 0.42 (0.22-0.83) | Very low |
Table 9 Individual studies included for induction of clinical remission in Crohn’s disease
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission |
Thomsen et al[45] | Denmark, France, United Kingdom, Norway, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, South Africa, Austria, Australia, and Ireland | Budesonide | Mesalamine | RCT | 8 wk | 182 | 69% (budesonide) 45% (mesalamine) (P = 0.001)1 |
Budesonide | Mesalamine | RCT | 16 wk | 182 | 62% (budesonide) 36% (mesalamine) (P < 0.001)1 | ||
Pavez et al[41] | Chile | IFX | AZA | RCT | 26 wk | 508 | 0.44 (event rate IFX); 0.3 (event rate AZA)2 |
Table 10 Individual studies included for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission |
Schmidt et al[30] | Germany | Tacrolimus | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 58 | 51%1 |
Tacrolimus with purine analogues | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 79 | 82%1 | ||
Llaó et al[31] | Spain | IV corticosteroids | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 d | 110 | 52%2 |
IV corticosteroids | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 d | 110 | 75% 2 | ||
Campbell et al[35] | UK | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | Acute phase | 76 | 74%3 |
Sood et al[33] | India | AZA | Placebo | RCT | 1 yr | 83 | 56% (AZA); 40% (placebo)4 |
Prieux-Klotz et al[37] | France | AZA or 6-MP | Retrospective cohort | 38 mo | 80 | 61.2%5 | |
Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 100 | 40% (tacrolimus); 28% (anti-TNF); P = 0.296 |
Ogata et al[39] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 2 wk | 62 | 9.4% (tacrolimus); 0% (placebo); P = 0.2387 |
Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 12 wk | 21 | 28.6% (tacrolimus)7 | ||
Hyde et al[44] | United Kingdom | Hydrocortisone | - | Retrospective cohort | 5 d | 216 | 61%8 |
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 4.5 d | 50 | 56%8 | ||
Kjeldsen et al[43] | Denmark | Prednisolone | - | Retrospective cohort | 6 wk | 51 | 47% (severe disease); 80% (moderate disease)9 |
Meyers et al[42] | United States | ACTH | Hydrocortisone | RCT | 10 d | 66 | 44% (ACTH); 41% (Hydrocortisone)10 |
Table 11 Individual studies included for maintenance of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Maintenance of clinical remission |
Sood et al[32] | India | AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 12 mo | 111 | 91%1 |
AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | N/A | 88%1 | ||
AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 36 mo | N/A | 76%1 | ||
AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 48 mo | N/A | 53%1 | ||
AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 60 mo | N/A | 38%1 | ||
Campbell et al[35] | United Kingdom | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 76 | 35%2 |
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 yr | N/A | 10%2 | ||
Arts et al[36] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 34 | 27.8%3 |
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 yr | 5 | 50%3 | ||
Hyde et al[44] | United Kingdom | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 19 mo | 50 | 40%4 |
Meyers et al[42] | United States | ACTH | Hydrocortisone | RCT | 1 yr | 66 | 37.5% (ACTH); 23.5% (hydrocortisone)5 |
Table 12 Individual studies included for induction or maintenance of clinical response in Crohn’s disease
Table 13 Individual studies included for induction or maintenance of clinical response in ulcerative colitis
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Clinical response |
Arts et al[36] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 9 d | 86 | 83.7%1 |
Prieux-Klotz et al[37] | France | AZA or 6-MP | - | Retrospective cohort | 38 mo | 80 | 70%2 |
Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 100 | 62% (tacrolimus); 64% (anti-TNF); P > 0.993 |
Ogata et al[39] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 2 wk | 62 | 50% (tacrolimus); 13.3% (placebo); P = 0.0034 |
Van Assche et al[48] | Belgium | Cyclosporine 4 mg/kg | Cyclosporine 2 mg/kg | RCT | 2 wk | 73 | 84.2% (4 mg/kg); 85.7% (2 mg/kg)5 |
Oshitani et al[47] | Japan | Prednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Retrospective cohort | 7-14 d | 71 | 82% (prednisolone); 82% (methylprednisolone)6 |
Table 14 Individual studies included for mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | N | Mucosal healing |
Prieux-Klotz et al[37] | France | AZA or 6-MP | - | Retrospective cohort | 38 mo | 80 | 43.7%1 |
Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 73 | 32% (tacrolimus); 28% (anti-TNF); P = 0.862 |
Ogata et al[39] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 2 wk | 62 | 43.8% (tacrolimus); 13.3% (placebo); P = 0.0123 |
Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 12 wk | 21 | 85.7% (tacrolimus)3 | ||
Oshitani et al[47] | Japan | Prednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Retrospective cohort | 6 wk | 71 | 78% (prednisolone); 82% (methylprednisolone)4 |
Table 15 Individual studies included for surgeries related to Crohn’s disease
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Colectomy |
Chun et al[46] | United States | ACTH | Hydrocortisone | RCT | 3 yr | 88 | 28% (both groups) |
Table 16 Individual studies included for surgeries related to ulcerative colitis
Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Colectomy |
Schmidt et al[30] | Germany | Tacrolimus | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 58 | 22% |
Tacrolimus with purine analogues | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 79 | 18% | ||
Llaó et al[31] | Spain | IV corticosteroids | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 d | 110 | 15% |
Moskovitz et al[34] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 9.3 d | 142 | 16.9% |
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | N/A | 37% | ||
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 4 yr | N/A | 59% | ||
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 6 yr | N/A | 84% | ||
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 yr | N/A | 88% | ||
Campbell et al[35] | UK | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 yr | 58% | |
Arts et al[36] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 9 d | 86 | 16.3% |
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 45 | 36% | ||
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 yr | 13 | 45% | ||
Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 100 | 10% (tacrolimus); 16% (anti-TNF); P = 0.55 |
Cheifetz et al[40] | United States | Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 4 wk | 71 | 15% | |
Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 71 | 39% | |||
Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 2 yr | 71 | 42% | |||
Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 5 yr | 71 | 46% | |||
Gustavsson et al[49] | Sweden | Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 3 mo | 45 (moderate) | 8.9% | |
Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 3 mo | 61 (severe) | 45.9% | |||
Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 20 yr | 41 (moderate) | 48.8% | |||
Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 20 yr | 33 (severe) | 33.3% | |||
Van Assche et al[48] | Belgium | Cyclosporine 4 mg/kg | Cyclosporine 2 mg/kg | RCT | 2 wk | 73 | 13.1% (4 mg/kg); 8.6% (2 mg/kg) |
Hyde et al[44] | United Kingdom | Hydrocortisone | - | Retrospective cohort | 5 d | 216 | 15.7% |
Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 19 mo | 50 | 16% | ||
Kjeldsen et al[43] | Denmark | Prednisolone | - | Retrospective cohort | 8 mo | 51 | 42% (severe disease); 13% (moderate disease) |
- Citation: Damião AOMC, Azevedo MFC, Carlos AS, Wada MY, Silva TVM, Feitosa FC. Conventional therapy for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(9): 1142-1157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i9/1142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142