Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2019.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2019; 25(9): 1142-1157
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142
Published online Mar 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142
            Table 1 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical remission in Crohn’s disease
        
    | Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission, RR (95%CI) | Quality of evidence | 
| Chande et al[23] | AZA or 6-MP | Placebo | 6 wk-9 mo | 380 | RR 1.23 (0.97-1.55)1 | Moderate | 
| AZA or 6-MP | MTX | 6 wk-9 mo | 143 | RR 1.13 (0.85-1.49)1 | Low | |
| AZA or 6-MP | 5-ASA | 6 wk-9 mo | 156 | RR 1.24 (0.80-1.91)1 | Very low | |
| AZA | IFX | 26 wk | 399 | RR 0.66 (0.51-0.87)1 | Moderate | 
            Table 2 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission, RR (95%CI) or OR (95%CI) | Quality of evidence | 
| Chande et al[24] | MTX | Placebo | 36 wk | 67 | RR 0.96 (0.58-1.59)1 | Low | 
| MTX | 6-MP | 30 wk | 26 | RR 0.74 (0.43-1.29)2 | Very low | |
| MTX | 5-ASA | 30 wk | 20 | RR 2.33 (0.66-3.64) 2 | Very low | |
| Baumgart et al[25] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wk | 63 | OR 2.27 (0.35-14.75)3 | High | 
| Lasa et al[26] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 12 wk | 127 | RR 0.91 (0.82-1.00)4 | High | 
            Table 3 Meta-analyses included for maintenance of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
        
    
            Table 4 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical response in Crohn’s disease
        
    
            Table 5 Meta-analyses included for induction of clinical response in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | n | Clinical response, RR (95%CI) or OR (95%CI) | Quality of evidence | 
| Komaki et al[28] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wks (RCT) | 103 | RR 4.61 (2.09-10.17)1 | High | 
| Baumgart et al[25] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wk | 63 | OR 8.66 (1.79-42.00)2 | High | 
| Lasa et al[26] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 12 wk | 127 | RR 0.58 (0.45-0.73)3 | High | 
| Narula et al[29] | IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (RCT) | 412 | 43.8% (IFX); 41.7% (C) OR 1.08 (0.73-1.60)4 | Low | 
| IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (non RCT) | 801 | 74.8% (IFX); 55.4% (C) OR 2.96 (2.12-4.14)5 | Very low | 
            Table 6 Meta-analyses included for induction of mucosal healing in Crohn’s disease
        
    
            Table 7 Meta-analyses included for induction of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
        
    
            Table 8 Meta-analyses included for inflammatory bowel disease-related surgeries in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Intervention | Comparator | Follow-up | N | Colectomy rate %, or OR (95% CI) | Quality of evidence | 
| Komaki et al[28] | Tacrolimus | Placebo | 2 wk (RCT) | 103 | 0% | High | 
| Narula et al[29] | IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (RCT) | 385 | 26.6% (IFX); 26.4% (C) OR 1.00 (0.64-1.59) | Low | 
| IFX | Cyclosporine | 3 mo (non RCT) | 478 | 24.1% (IFX); 42.5% (C) OR 0.53 (0.22-1.28) | Very low | |
| IFX | Cyclosporine | 12 mo (RCT) | 415 | 34.4% (IFX); 40.8% (C) OR 0.76 (0.51-1.14) | Low | |
| IFX | Cyclosporine | 12 mo (non RCT) | 854 | 20.7% (IFX); 36.8% (C) OR 0.42 (0.22-0.83) | Very low | 
            Table 9 Individual studies included for induction of clinical remission in Crohn’s disease
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission | 
| Thomsen et al[45] | Denmark, France, United Kingdom, Norway, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Greece, South Africa, Austria, Australia, and Ireland | Budesonide | Mesalamine | RCT | 8 wk | 182 | 69% (budesonide) 45% (mesalamine) (P = 0.001)1 | 
| Budesonide | Mesalamine | RCT | 16 wk | 182 | 62% (budesonide) 36% (mesalamine) (P < 0.001)1 | ||
| Pavez et al[41] | Chile | IFX | AZA | RCT | 26 wk | 508 | 0.44 (event rate IFX); 0.3 (event rate AZA)2 | 
            Table 10 Individual studies included for induction of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Induction of clinical remission | 
| Schmidt et al[30] | Germany | Tacrolimus | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 58 | 51%1 | 
| Tacrolimus with purine analogues | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 79 | 82%1 | ||
| Llaó et al[31] | Spain | IV corticosteroids | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 d | 110 | 52%2 | 
| IV corticosteroids | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 d | 110 | 75% 2 | ||
| Campbell et al[35] | UK | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | Acute phase | 76 | 74%3 | 
| Sood et al[33] | India | AZA | Placebo | RCT | 1 yr | 83 | 56% (AZA); 40% (placebo)4 | 
| Prieux-Klotz et al[37] | France | AZA or 6-MP | Retrospective cohort | 38 mo | 80 | 61.2%5 | |
| Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 100 | 40% (tacrolimus); 28% (anti-TNF); P = 0.296 | 
| Ogata et al[39] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 2 wk | 62 | 9.4% (tacrolimus); 0% (placebo); P = 0.2387 | 
| Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 12 wk | 21 | 28.6% (tacrolimus)7 | ||
| Hyde et al[44] | United Kingdom | Hydrocortisone | - | Retrospective cohort | 5 d | 216 | 61%8 | 
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 4.5 d | 50 | 56%8 | ||
| Kjeldsen et al[43] | Denmark | Prednisolone | - | Retrospective cohort | 6 wk | 51 | 47% (severe disease); 80% (moderate disease)9 | 
| Meyers et al[42] | United States | ACTH | Hydrocortisone | RCT | 10 d | 66 | 44% (ACTH); 41% (Hydrocortisone)10 | 
            Table 11 Individual studies included for maintenance of clinical remission in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Maintenance of clinical remission | 
| Sood et al[32] | India | AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 12 mo | 111 | 91%1 | 
| AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | N/A | 88%1 | ||
| AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 36 mo | N/A | 76%1 | ||
| AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 48 mo | N/A | 53%1 | ||
| AZA | - | Retrospective cohort | 60 mo | N/A | 38%1 | ||
| Campbell et al[35] | United Kingdom | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 76 | 35%2 | 
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 yr | N/A | 10%2 | ||
| Arts et al[36] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 34 | 27.8%3 | 
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 yr | 5 | 50%3 | ||
| Hyde et al[44] | United Kingdom | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 19 mo | 50 | 40%4 | 
| Meyers et al[42] | United States | ACTH | Hydrocortisone | RCT | 1 yr | 66 | 37.5% (ACTH); 23.5% (hydrocortisone)5 | 
            Table 12 Individual studies included for induction or maintenance of clinical response in Crohn’s disease
        
    
            Table 13 Individual studies included for induction or maintenance of clinical response in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Clinical response | 
| Arts et al[36] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 9 d | 86 | 83.7%1 | 
| Prieux-Klotz et al[37] | France | AZA or 6-MP | - | Retrospective cohort | 38 mo | 80 | 70%2 | 
| Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 100 | 62% (tacrolimus); 64% (anti-TNF); P > 0.993 | 
| Ogata et al[39] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 2 wk | 62 | 50% (tacrolimus); 13.3% (placebo); P = 0.0034 | 
| Van Assche et al[48] | Belgium | Cyclosporine 4 mg/kg | Cyclosporine 2 mg/kg | RCT | 2 wk | 73 | 84.2% (4 mg/kg); 85.7% (2 mg/kg)5 | 
| Oshitani et al[47] | Japan | Prednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Retrospective cohort | 7-14 d | 71 | 82% (prednisolone); 82% (methylprednisolone)6 | 
            Table 14 Individual studies included for mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | N | Mucosal healing | 
| Prieux-Klotz et al[37] | France | AZA or 6-MP | - | Retrospective cohort | 38 mo | 80 | 43.7%1 | 
| Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 73 | 32% (tacrolimus); 28% (anti-TNF); P = 0.862 | 
| Ogata et al[39] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 2 wk | 62 | 43.8% (tacrolimus); 13.3% (placebo); P = 0.0123 | 
| Tacrolimus | Placebo | RCT | 12 wk | 21 | 85.7% (tacrolimus)3 | ||
| Oshitani et al[47] | Japan | Prednisolone | Methylprednisolone | Retrospective cohort | 6 wk | 71 | 78% (prednisolone); 82% (methylprednisolone)4 | 
            Table 15 Individual studies included for surgeries related to Crohn’s disease
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Colectomy | 
| Chun et al[46] | United States | ACTH | Hydrocortisone | RCT | 3 yr | 88 | 28% (both groups) | 
            Table 16 Individual studies included for surgeries related to ulcerative colitis
        
    | Study | Country | Intervention | Comparator | Study design | Follow-up | n | Colectomy | 
| Schmidt et al[30] | Germany | Tacrolimus | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 58 | 22% | 
| Tacrolimus with purine analogues | - | Retrospective cohort | 24 mo | 79 | 18% | ||
| Llaó et al[31] | Spain | IV corticosteroids | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 d | 110 | 15% | 
| Moskovitz et al[34] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 9.3 d | 142 | 16.9% | 
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | N/A | 37% | ||
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 4 yr | N/A | 59% | ||
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 6 yr | N/A | 84% | ||
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 yr | N/A | 88% | ||
| Campbell et al[35] | UK | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 7 yr | 58% | |
| Arts et al[36] | Belgium | Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 9 d | 86 | 16.3% | 
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 45 | 36% | ||
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 3 yr | 13 | 45% | ||
| Yamamoto et al[38] | Japan | Tacrolimus | Anti-TNF | Retrospective | 12 wk | 100 | 10% (tacrolimus); 16% (anti-TNF); P = 0.55 | 
| Cheifetz et al[40] | United States | Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 4 wk | 71 | 15% | |
| Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 1 yr | 71 | 39% | |||
| Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 2 yr | 71 | 42% | |||
| Cyclosporine | Retrospective cohort | 5 yr | 71 | 46% | |||
| Gustavsson et al[49] | Sweden | Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 3 mo | 45 (moderate) | 8.9% | |
| Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 3 mo | 61 (severe) | 45.9% | |||
| Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 20 yr | 41 (moderate) | 48.8% | |||
| Corticosteroid | Retrospective cohort | 20 yr | 33 (severe) | 33.3% | |||
| Van Assche et al[48] | Belgium | Cyclosporine 4 mg/kg | Cyclosporine 2 mg/kg | RCT | 2 wk | 73 | 13.1% (4 mg/kg); 8.6% (2 mg/kg) | 
| Hyde et al[44] | United Kingdom | Hydrocortisone | - | Retrospective cohort | 5 d | 216 | 15.7% | 
| Cyclosporine | - | Retrospective cohort | 19 mo | 50 | 16% | ||
| Kjeldsen et al[43] | Denmark | Prednisolone | - | Retrospective cohort | 8 mo | 51 | 42% (severe disease); 13% (moderate disease) | 
- Citation: Damião AOMC, Azevedo MFC, Carlos AS, Wada MY, Silva TVM, Feitosa FC. Conventional therapy for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(9): 1142-1157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i9/1142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i9.1142

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                         
                         
                        