Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2019; 25(48): 6880-6889
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6880
Published online Dec 28, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6880
Prokinetic agents | Mechanism | Comments/Limitations |
Erythromycin | Motilin receptor agonist | QT interval prolongation |
Azithromycin | Tachyphylaxis | |
Antibiotic and bacteria resistance | ||
Metoclopromide | D2 antagonist (central/peripheral) | Extrapyramidal symptoms (e.g., tardive dyskinesia, dystonia). Can not use > 12 wk |
5-HT3 antagonist | QT interval prolongation | |
5-HT4 agonist | FDA approved for adults | |
Domperidone | Peripheral D2 antagonist | QT interval prolongation |
Not approved in United States. Only available through IND | ||
Baclofen | GABAB receptor agonist that inhibits transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Increases gastric emptying | Muscle weakness, dizziness |
Very limited data, as trial was limited to a gastroesophageal reflux patients |
Therapy | Mechanism/Indication | Comments |
Botulinum Toxin | Endoscopic intra-pyloric injection of botulinum toxin to relax the pylorus | Requires frequent injections |
No improvement in long term symptoms | ||
Enteral tube feeds | Unintentional loss of 10 % or more of the body weight during a period of 3-6 mo, Refractory symptoms | Mechanical complications: Obstruction, displacement, or dislodgement of the tube. |
Gastrointestinal complications: formula intolerance, diarrhea, constipation, | ||
Hinders normal lifestyle and quality of life | ||
Gastrostomy tube | May be used for venting of secretions to decrease vomiting and fullness | Poor choice for feeding due to delayed gastric emptying |
PEG-J tube | Allows the patient to vent gastric secretions to decrease/prevent persistent emesis. Provides jejunal feedings | Migration of the J-tube extension into stomach |
Pyloric obstruction from J-tube | ||
Jejunostomy tube | Stable access for reliable jejunal nutrient | Cannot vent stomach |
Delivery Avoids gastric penetration | ||
Dual G and J tube | Two sites-one for venting and one for enteral nutrition | Increased risk of leakage, infection Cosmetic issues |
Parenteral Nutrition | Indicated due to intolerance to enteral feeds | Central venous access required. |
High risk of line infections | ||
Time consuming, expensive, and intrusive into daily routines | ||
Anesthesia complications | ||
Surgical Options | ||
Pyloroplasty | Surgical procedure used to widen the pylorus | Radical approach |
Limited success | ||
Surgical and anesthesia complications | ||
Gastrectomy | After failed medical therapy with severe symptoms | Palliative approach |
Nausea continues to be a problem | ||
High risk of surgical and anesthesia complications. | ||
Not reversible |
Ref. | Method | Sample Size | Duration | Findings |
Islam et al[28] | Prospective study on children with chronic nausea and vomiting | 9 | 8-42 mo | 7 of the 9 patients reporting sustained improvement in symptoms and improved quality of life |
Islam et al[5] | Retrospective review in children less than 18 years with diagnosis of gastroparesis | 97 | 10 yr | A significant reduction in all individual symptoms as well as the total symptom score at 1, 6, 12, and 12 mo. Recurrence of symptoms leading to device removal occurred in 7 cases. Forty-one patients had continued improvement in symptoms for over 12 mo, with a mean follow up of 3.5 years |
Lu et al[29] | Retrospective review on patients with functional dyspepsia | 24 | 6-8 mo | Significant improvements were seen in multiple areas of the PedsQL, including stomach pain/upset, food/drink limits, heartburn/reflux, gas/bloating, patient worry, medication tolerance, and constipation |
Teich et al[35] | Prospective study on children with chronic nausea and vomiting refractory to medical therapy and met ROME III criteria for functional dyspepsia | 16 | 0.5-23 mo | Significant improvement in severity and frequency of vomiting, frequency and severity of nausea. Also showed decrease in dependence on enteral/parenteral nutrition |
Elfvin et al[36] | Retrospective review on children with nausea and vomiting | 3 | 12-40 d | Favorable response to temporary percutaneous gastric electrical stimulation with greater than 50% vomiting reduction |
Hyman et al[26] | Case report on a 7 years old boy with intractable visceral pain and gastroparesis and failure to thrive | 1 | 37 mo | Reduction in pain, retching and vomiting. Successful initiation of enteral feeds and meeting caloric requirements |
- Citation: Setya A, Nair P, Cheng SX. Gastric electrical stimulation: An emerging therapy for children with intractable gastroparesis. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(48): 6880-6889
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i48/6880.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i48.6880