Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2019; 25(33): 4970-4984
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4970
Published online Sep 7, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4970
Table 1 Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic | ES group (n = 90) | BTS group (n = 38) | P-value |
Age (yr) | 61.58 ± 14.84 | 63.21 ± 13.55 | 0.561 |
Female/Male, (%) | 31 (34.40)/59 (65.60) | 15 (39.50)/23 (60.50) | 0.588 |
Size, (cm) | 5.76 ± 2.12 | 6.88 ± 2.68 | 0.015 |
BMI, (kg/m2) | 21.76 ± 2.42 | 22.20 ± 3.20 | 0.411 |
Cross score, (%) | 0.001 | ||
0 | 21 (23.60) | 21 (55.30) | |
1 | 40 (44.90) | 16 (42.10) | |
2 | 17 (19.10) | 1 (2.60) | |
3 | 10 (11.20) | 0 (0.00) | |
4 | 1 (0.80) | 0 (0.00) | |
ASH (+)/(-), (%) | 17 (18.90)/73 (81.10) | 10 (26.30)/28 (73.70) | 0.347 |
Comorbidities (+)/(-), (%) | 37 (41.10)/53 (58.90) | 21 (55.30)/17 (44.70) | 0.142 |
ASA grade, (%) | 0.299 | ||
I | 2 (2.20) | 3 (7.90) | |
II | 63 (70.00) | 28 (73.70) | |
≥ III | 25 (27.80) | 7 (18.40) | |
Location, (%) | 0.005 | ||
Right-side colon | 13 (14.40) | 1 (2.60) | |
Transverse colon | 30 (33.30) | 5 (13.20) | |
Left-side colon | 37 (41.10) | 28 (73.70) | |
Rectum | 10 (11.10) | 4 (10.50) | |
pTNM stage, (%) | 0.186 | ||
I | 4 (4.40) | 0 (0.00) | |
II | 23 (25.60) | 9 (23.70) | |
III | 44 (48.90) | 25 (65.80) | |
IV | 19 (21.10) | 4 (10.50) | |
T stage, (%) | 0.186 | ||
T1 | 4 (4.40) | 0 (0.00) | |
T2 | 23 (25.60) | 9 (23.70) | |
T3 | 44 (48.90) | 25 (65.80) | |
T4 | 19 (21.10) | 4 (10.50) | |
N stage, (%) | 0.471 | ||
N0 | 31 (34.40) | 9 (23.70) | |
N1 | 35 (38.90) | 18 (47.40) | |
N2 | 24 (26.70) | 11 (28.90) | |
M stage, (%) | 0.292 | ||
M0 | 71 (78.9) | 33 (86.8) | |
M1 | 19 (21.1) | 5 (13.2) | |
Histological features, (%) | 0.308 | ||
Well differentiated | 3 (2.30) | 0 (0.00) | |
Moderately differentiated | 61 (67.80) | 30 (78.90) | |
Poorly differentiated | 26 (28.90) | 8 (21.10) | |
LVI (+)/(-), (%) | 15 (16.70)/75 (83.30) | 14(36.80)/24(63.20) | 0.013 |
WBC, (10^9) | 8.99 ± 5.10 | 7.57 ± 2.61 | 0.042 |
NLR, (ratio) | 7.11 ± 6.72 | 4.88 ± 3.02 | 0.012 |
dNLR, (ratio) | 1.66 ± 0.41 | 1.67 ± 0.27 | 0.756 |
PLR, (ratio) | 245.61 ± 144.17 | 229.98 ± 122.38 | 0.562 |
LMR, (ratio) | 2.84 ± 2.43 | 2.34 ± 1.19 | 0.127 |
SII, (ratio) | 1969.03 ± 2316.10 | 1235.74 ± 849.53 | 0.011 |
WBC-pre, (10^9) | 9.18 ± 5.13 | 8.56 ± 3.44 | 0.434 |
NLR-pre, (ratio) | 7.62 ± 6.97 | 6.05 ± 3.03 | 0.084 |
dNLR-pre, (ratio) | 1.65 ± 0.41 | 1.68 ± 0.45 | 0.652 |
PLR-pre, (ratio) | 263.98 ± 161.96 | 270.89 ± 171.35 | 0.830 |
LMR-pre, (ratio) | 2.77 ± 2.32 | 2.38 ± 1.66 | 0.354 |
SII-pre, (ratio) | 2186.46 ± 2474.96 | 1712.60 ± 1157.32 | 0.149 |
CEA, (ng/mL) | 30.19 ± 120.54 | 17.88 ± 27.47 | 0.541 |
Chemotherapy (+)/(-), (%) | 62 (68.90)/28 (31.10) | 20 (52.60)/18 (47.40) | 0.080 |
Table 2 Comparison of short-term and long-term outcomes between emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic | ES group (n = 90) | BTS group (n = 38) | P-value |
Surgical time, (min) | 217.89 ± 60.69 | 204.64 ± 66.13 | 0.275 |
Blood loss, (mL) | 177.30 ± 134.37 | 133.68 ± 95.76 | 0.072 |
Number of LNs | 19.51 ± 9.47 | 21.45 ± 8.29 | 0.276 |
Time to flatus, (d) | 3.88 ± 1.65 | 3.61 ± 1.15 | 0.359 |
Time to semi-fluid, (d) | 8.62 ± 3.22 | 8.64 ± 3.96 | 0.738 |
Total hospital-stay, (d) | 22.17 ± 12.48 | 22.34 ± 7.78 | 0.936 |
Stoma construction, n (%) | 20 (22.20) | 8 (21.10) | 0.884 |
CD classification system, n (%) | 0.547 | ||
Grade I | 0 (0.00) | 2 (2.20) | |
Grade II | 44 (48.90) | 16 (42.10) | |
Grade III | 13 (14.40) | 5 (13.20) | |
Grade IV | 9 (10.00) | 2 (5.30) | |
Grade V | 1 (2.60) | 1 (1.10) | |
Pneumonia, n (%) | 18 (20.00) | 8 (21.10) | 0.892 |
Incision infection, n (%) | 16 (17.80) | 5 (13.20) | 0.519 |
ICU intervention, n (%) | 8 (8.90) | 1 (2.60) | 0.192 |
Leakage, n (%) | 3 (3.30) | 1 (2.60) | 0.658 |
Sepsis, n (%) | 3 (3.30) | 1 (2.60) | 0.658 |
SAE, n (%) | 23 (25.60) | 8 (21.10) | 0.587 |
30 d-mortality, n (%) | 1 (1.10) | 1 (2.60) | 0.507 |
36-OS time, (mo) | 30.10 ± 9.64 | 29.41 ± 11.33 | 0.732 |
36-DFS time, (mo) | 27.59 ± 12.19 | 27.48 ± 12.17 | 0.969 |
Table 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of long-term survival of emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Group | Characteristic | 3-year OS | 3-year DFS | ||||
Cutoff point | AUC | 95%CI | Cutoff point | AUC | 95%CI | ||
ES | NLR | 19.3 | 0.582 | 0.446-0.718 | 19.3 | 0.565 | 0.407-0.723 |
dNLR | 2.02 | 0.679 | 0.551-0.808 | 1.57 | 0.696 | 0.554-0.837 | |
PLR | 155 | 0.550 | 0.414-0.686 | 317 | 0.549 | 0.392-0.707 | |
SII | 3645 | 0.587 | 0.454-0.721 | 3645 | 0.564 | 0.403-0.726 | |
CEA | 6.7 | 0.591 | 0.458-0.724 | 11.2 | 0.604 | 0.442-0.766 | |
BTS | LMR | 1.67 | 0.611 | 0.424-0.798 | 1.67 | 0.571 | 0.366-0.776 |
CEA | 7.6 | 0.549 | 0.350-0.747 | 5.5 | 0.552 | 0.348-0.756 |
Table 4 Comparison of clinicopathological features between high-ratio and low-ratio grades in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic | ES group (n = 86) | BTS group (n = 38) | ||||
dNLR ≥ 1.57 | dNLR < 1.57 | P-value | LMR ≥ 1.67 | LMR < 1.67 | P-value | |
Cross score, (%) | 0.738 | 0.378 | ||||
0 | 11 (27.5) | 10 (21.7) | 10 (50.0) | 11 (61.1) | ||
1 | 16 (40.0) | 22 (47.8) | 10 (50.0) | 6 (33.3) | ||
2 | 8 (20.0) | 8 (17.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.6) | ||
3 | 4 (10.0) | 6 (13.0) | ||||
4 | 1 (2.5) | 0 (0.0) | ||||
ASH (+)/(-), (%) | 6 (15.0)/34 (85.0) | 10 (21.7)/36 (78.3) | 4 (20.0)/16 (80.0) | 6 (33.3)/12 (66.7) | ||
Comorbidities (+)/(-), (%) | 20 (50.0)/20 (50.0) | 17 (37.0)/29 (63.0) | 9 (45.0)/11 (55.0) | 12 (66.7/)/6 (33.3) | ||
ASA grade, (%) | 0.320 | 0.623 | ||||
I | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.6) | 1 (5.0) | 2 (11.1) | ||
II | 13 (56.5) | 47 (74.6) | 16 (80.0) | 12 (66.7) | ||
≥ III | 10 (43.5) | 15 (23.8) | 3 (15.0) | 4 (22.2) | ||
Location, (%) | 0.007 | 0.523 | ||||
Right-side colon | 2 (5.0) | 11 (23.9) | 1 (5.0) | 0 (0.00) | ||
Transverse colon | 10 (25.0) | 19 (41.3) | 3 (15.0) | 2 (11.1) | ||
Left-side colon | 21 (52.5) | 13 (28.3) | 13 (65.0) | 15 (83.3) | ||
Rectum | 7 (17.5) | 3 (6.5) | 3 (15.0) | 1 (5.6) | ||
pTNM stage, (%) | 0.141 | 0.592 | ||||
I | 0 (0.0) | 4 (8.7) | - | - | ||
II | 12 (30.0) | 10 (21.7) | 4 (20.0) | 5 (27.8) | ||
III | 17 (42.5) | 24 (52.2) | 13 (65.0) | 12 (66.7) | ||
IV | 11 (27.5) | 8 (17.4) | 3 (15.0) | 1 (5.6) | ||
T stage, (%) | 0.141 | 0.592 | ||||
T1 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (8.7) | - | - | ||
T2 | 12 (30.0) | 10 (21.7) | 4 (20.0) | 5 (27.8) | ||
T3 | 17 (42.5) | 24 (52.2) | 13 (65.0) | 12 (66.7) | ||
T4 | 11 (27.5) | 8 (17.4) | 3 (15.0) | 1 (5.6) | ||
N stage, (%) | 0.648 | 0.009 | ||||
N0 | 16 (40.0) | 14 (30.4) | 4 (20.0) | 5 (27.8) | ||
N1 | 14 (35.0) | 19 (41.3) | 6 (30.0) | 12 (66.7) | ||
N2 | 10 (25.0) | 13 (28.3) | 10 (50.0) | 1 (5.6) | ||
M stage, (%) | 0.260 | 0.552 | ||||
M0 | 29 (72.5) | 38 (82.6) | 17 (85.0) | 16 (88.9) | ||
M1 | 11 (27.5) | 8 (17.4) | 3 (15.0) | 2 (11.1) | ||
Histological features, (%) | 0.605 | 0.411 | ||||
Well differentiated | 1 (2.5) | 2 (4.3) | - | - | ||
Moderately differentiated | 30 (75.0) | 30 (65.2) | 15 (75.0) | 15 (83.3) | ||
Poorly differentiated | 9 (22.5) | 14 (30.4) | 5 (25.0) | 3 (16.7) | ||
LVI (+)/(-), (%) | 9 (22.5)/31 (77.5) | 6 (13.0)/40 (87.0) | 0.249 | 10 (50.0)/10 (50.0) | 4 (22.2)/14 (77.8) | 0.076 |
Stoma construction, (%) | 0.000 | 0.589 | ||||
Stoma | 17 (42.5) | 3 (6.5) | 4 (20.0) | 4 (22.2) | ||
None | 23(57.5) | 43 (93.5) | 16 (80.0) | 14 (77.8) | ||
Pneumonia, (+)/(-), (%) | 12 (30.0)/28 (70.0) | 6 (13.0)/40 (87.0) | 0.054 | 2 (10.0)/18(90.0) | 6 (33.3)/12 (66.7) | 0.086 |
Incision infection, (+)/(-), (%) | 8 (20.0)/32 (80.0) | 8 (17.4)/38 (82.6) | 0.486 | 2 (10.0)/18 (90.0) | 3 (16.7)/15 (83.3) | 0.448 |
ICU intervention, (+)/(-), (%) | 5 (12.5)/35 (87.5) | 3 (6.5)/43 (93.5) | 0.281 | 1 (5.0)/19 (95.0) | 0 (0.0)/18 (100.0) | 0.526 |
Leakage, (+)/(-), (%) | 1 (2.5)/39 (97.5) | 2 (4.3)/44 (95.7) | 0.553 | 0 (0.0)/20 (100.0) | 1 (5.6)/17 (94.4) | 0.474 |
Sepsis, (+)/(-), (%) | 1 (2.5)/39 (97.5) | 2 (4.3)/44 (95.7) | 0.553 | 0 (0.0)/20 (100.0) | 1 (5.6)/17 (94.4) | 0.474 |
SAE, (+)/(-), (%) | 10 (25.0)/30 (75.0) | 11 (23.9)/35 (76.1) | 0.907 | 5 (25.0)/15 (75.0) | 3 (16.7)/15 (83.3) | 0.411 |
30-day mortality, n (%) | 1 (2.5)/39 (97.5) | 0 (0.0)/46 (100.0) | 0.465 | 1 (5.0)/19 (95.0) | 0 (0.0)/18 (100.0) | 0.526 |
36-OS time, (months) | 28.05 ± 10.28 | 31.61 ± 9.16 | 0.106 | 25.26 ± 13.88 | 33.78 ± 5.35 | 0.020 |
36-DFS time, (months) | 23.10 ± 13.85 | 31.45 ± 9.35 | 0.009 | 22.67 ± 14.02 | 31.50 ± 8.89 | 0.046 |
Table 5 Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for survival outcomes in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
3-year overall survival | ES group (n = 90) | BTS group (n = 38) | ||||||
Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
Characteristic | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value |
CEA (≥ 5 ng/mL vs < 5 ng/mL) | 1.48 (0.70-3.11) | 0.303 | 2.53 (0.68-9.35) | 0.165 | ||||
ASA (Grade ≥ III vs Grade < III) | 1.50 (0.72-3.11) | 0.277 | 1.64 (0.45-5.96) | 0.454 | ||||
pT stage (pT3-4 vs pT1-2) | 1.66 (0.72-3.83) | 0.238 | 4.17 (1.09-15.95) | 0.037 | ||||
pN stage (pN+ vs pN0) | 1.05 (0.51-2.19) | 0.887 | 5.02 (0.65-38.66) | 0.122 | ||||
LVI (+) vs LVI (-) | 1.30 (0.53-3.15) | 0.568 | 3.78 (1.23-11.64) | 0.020 | 3.52 (1.03-12.02) | 0.045 | ||
NLR ≥ 19.3 vs NLR < 19.3 | 2.98 (1.27-6.97) | 0.012 | ||||||
dNLR ≥ 1.57 vs dNLR < 1.57 | 2.40 (1.12-5.13) | 0.024 | 2.34 (1.08-5.07) | 0.032 | ||||
PLR ≥ 155 vs PLR < 155 | 1.83 (0.70-4.79) | 0.217 | ||||||
SII ≥ 3645 vs SII < 3645 | 1.61 (0.71-3.61) | 0.252 | ||||||
LMR ≥ 1.67 vs LMR < 1.67 | 4.09 (1.12-14.87) | 0.033 | 4.57 (0.98-21.38) | 0.053 | ||||
Chemotherapy (+) vs (-) | 0.74 (0.36-1.51) | 0.402 | 1.43 (0.47-4.38) | 0.529 |
Table 6 Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for oncological outcomes in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
3-year disease-free survival | ES group (n = 56) | BTS group (n = 32) | ||||||
Univariate | Multivariate | Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
Characteristic | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value |
CEA (≥ 5 ng/mL vs < 5 ng/mL) | 1.71 (0.74-3.95) | 0.209 | 2.67 (0.72-9.90) | 0.141 | ||||
ASA (Grade ≥ III vs Grade < III) | 0.890 (0.36-2.23) | 0.803 | 1.49 (0.41-5.43) | 0.542 | ||||
pT stage (pT3-4 vs pT1-2) | 2.26 (0.85-6.02) | 0.104 | 2.48 (0.55-11.18) | 0.239 | ||||
pN stage (pN+ vs pN0) | 1.48 (0.64-3.43) | 0.361 | 2.48 (0.55-11.18) | 0.239 | ||||
LVI (+) vs LVI (-) | 2.92 (1.25-6.81) | 0.013 | 1.97 (0.66-5.88) | 0.224 | ||||
NLR ≥ 19.3 vs NLR < 19.3 | 2.76 (1.02-7.45) | 0.046 | ||||||
dNLR ≥ 1.57 vs dNLR < 1.57 | 2.85 (1.17-6.95) | 0.021 | 3.02(1.23-7.42) | 0.016 | ||||
PLR ≥ 317 vs PLR < 317 | 1.55 (0.66-3.67) | 0.314 | ||||||
SII ≥ 3645 vs SII < 3645 | 2.04 (0.86-4.83) | 0.104 | ||||||
LMR ≥ 1.67 vs LMR < 1.67 | 2.54 (0.83-7.80) | 0.091 | 3.11 (1.13-8.54) | 0.052 | ||||
Chemotherapy (+) vs (-) | 0.95 (0.41-2.19) | 0.896 | 1.44 (0.47-4.41) | 0.523 |
Table 7 Stratification analysis of oncological and survival outcomes between high-ratio and low-ratio grades in both emergency surgery and bridge to surgery groups
Characteristic | 3-year OS | 3-year DFS | ||
HR (95%CI) | P-value | HR (95%CI) | P-value | |
ES (dNLR < 1.57) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
BTS (dNLR < 1.57) | 0.51 (0.18-1.39) | 0.185 | 0.42 (0.13-1.34) | 0.144 |
ES (dNLR ≥ 1.57) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
BTS (dNLR ≥ 1.57) | 1.87 (0.79-4.43) | 0.155 | 1.79 (0.77-4.20) | 0.178 |
ES (LMR < 1.67) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
BTS (LMR < 1.67) | 4.34 (1.27-14.82) | 0.019 | 2.72 (0.97-7.65) | 0.058 |
ES (LMR ≥ 1.67) | Reference | - | Reference | - |
BTS (LMR ≥ 1.67) | 0.40 (0.18-0.92) | 0.031 | 0.42 (0.17-1.07) | 0.068 |
- Citation: Chen XQ, Xue CR, Hou P, Lin BQ, Zhang JR. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio effectively predicts survival outcome of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(33): 4970-4984
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v25/i33/4970.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4970